S-1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 19, 2008
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1311
|
|
20-5956993
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
8023 East 63rd Place
|
|
835 Hillcrest Drive
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133
|
|
Charleston, West Virginia 25311
|
(918) 250-8541
|
|
(304) 348-5211
|
(Address, Including Zip Code,
and Telephone Number,Including Area Code, of Registrants
Principal Executive Offices)
|
Craig Ketchum
8023 East 63rd Place
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133
(918) 250-8541
(Name, Address, Including Zip
Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
With a copy to:
|
|
|
Stuart H. Gelfond
|
|
Richard A. Drucker
|
Michael A. Levitt
|
|
Davis Polk & Wardwell
|
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
|
|
450 Lexington Avenue
|
One New York Plaza
|
|
New York, New York 10017
|
New York, New York 10004
|
|
(212) 450-4000
|
(212) 859-8000
|
|
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price (1)(2)
|
|
|
Registration Fee
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
|
$750,000,000
|
|
|
$29,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes offering price of shares of common stock which the
underwriters have the option to purchase. |
(2) |
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration
fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to Completion. Dated
August 19, 2008.
Shares
McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation
Common Stock
This is an initial public offering of shares of common stock of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation. The selling stockholder
identified in this prospectus is offering all of the shares to
be sold in the offering. We will not receive any of the proceeds
from the sale of the shares. PVF Holdings LLC intends to
distribute the net proceeds of this offering, after giving
effect to the underwriting discount, to its members, which
include certain members of our board of directors and senior
management team and various of their affiliates, and affiliates
of Goldman Sachs & Co., which is one of the
book-running managers for this offering.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
common stock. It is currently estimated that the initial public
offering price per share will be between
$ and
$ . We intend to apply to have our
common stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol MRC.
See Risk Factors beginning on
page 17 to read about factors you should consider
before buying shares of the common stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling stockholder
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
To the extent that the underwriters sell more
than shares
of common stock, the underwriters have the option to purchase up
to an
additional shares
from the selling stockholder at the initial public offering
price less the underwriting discount.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment in
New York, New York
on ,
2008.
|
|
Goldman,
Sachs & Co. |
Lehman Brothers |
|
|
JPMorgan |
Deutsche Bank Securities |
|
|
|
Robert
W. Baird & Co. |
Credit Suisse |
Stephens Inc. |
Prospectus
dated ,
2008.
[Page left intentionally blank]
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Prospectus
Through and
including ,
2008 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to a dealers obligation to
deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to an unsold allotment or subscription.
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any
information or to represent anything not contained in this
prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or
representations. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the
shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in
jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. The information
contained in this prospectus is current only as of its date.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully read the
entire prospectus, including the Risk Factors and
the consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus, before making an investment
decision. In this prospectus, all references to the
Company, McJunkin Red Man, we,
us, and our refer to McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless
the context otherwise requires or where otherwise indicated. We
use non-GAAP measures in this prospectus, including Adjusted
EBITDA. For a reconciliation of this measure to Net income, see
footnote 3 under Summary Consolidated
Financial Information.
Our
Business
We are the largest North American distributor of pipe, valves
and fittings (PVF) and related products and services
to the energy industry based on sales and the leading PVF
distributor serving this industry across each of the upstream
(exploration, production, and extraction of underground oil and
gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas
utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and
downstream (crude oil refining and petrochemical processing)
markets. We have an unmatched presence of over 250 branches that
are located in the most active oil and gas regions in North
America. We offer an extensive array of PVF and oilfield
supplies encompassing over 100,000 products, we are diversified
by geography and end market and we seek to provide best-in-class
service to our customers by satisfying the most complex,
multi-site needs of some of the largest companies in the energy
and industrials sectors as their primary supplier. As a result,
we have an average relationship of over 20 years with our
top ten customers and our pro forma sales in 2007 were over
twice as large as our nearest competitor. We believe the
critical role we play in our customers supply chain, our
unmatched scale and extensive product offering, our broad North
American geographic presence, our customer-linked scalable
information systems and our efficient distribution capabilities
serve to solidify our long-standing customer relationships and
drive our growth.
We have benefited in recent years from several growth trends
within the energy industry including high levels of expansion
and maintenance capital expenditures by our customers. This
growth in spending has been driven by several factors, including
underinvestment in North American energy infrastructure,
production and capacity constraints and anticipated strength in
the oil, natural gas, refined products and petrochemical
markets. While current prices for oil and natural gas are high
relative to historical levels, we believe that investment in the
energy sector by our customers would continue at prices well
below current levels. In addition, our products are often used
in extreme operating environments leading to the need for a
regular replacement cycle. As a result, over 50% of our pro
forma sales in 2007 were attributable to multi-year maintenance,
repair and operations (MRO) contracts where we have
demonstrated an over 99% average annual retention rate since
2000. The combination of these ongoing factors has helped
increase demand for our products and services, resulting in
record levels of orders as of August 2008. For the twelve months
ended December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, we generated
sales of $3,952.7 million, Adjusted EBITDA of
$370.4 million and net income of $150.8 million.
We have established a position as the largest North American PVF
distributor to the energy industry based on sales. We distribute
products throughout North America and the Gulf of Mexico,
including in PVF intensive, rapidly expanding oil and natural
gas production areas such as the Bakken, Barnett, Fayetteville,
Haynesville and Marcellus shales. Growth in these areas is
driven by improved production technology, favorable market
trends and robust capital expenditure budgets. Furthermore, our
Canadian subsidiary Midfield Supply ULC and its subsidiaries
(Midfield), one of the three largest Canadian PVF
distributors based on sales, provides PVF products to oil and
gas companies operating primarily in Western Canada, including
the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, Alberta Oil Sands and
heavy oil markets. These regions are still in the early stages
of infrastructure investment with numerous companies seeking to
facilitate the long-term harvesting of difficult to extract and
process crude oil.
1
McJunkin Red Man
Locations
Across our extensive North American platform we offer a broad
complement of products and services to the upstream, midstream
and downstream sectors of the energy industry, as well as other
industrial (including general manufacturing, pulp and paper,
food and beverage) and other energy (power generation, liquefied
natural gas, coal, alternative energy) end markets. During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis,
approximately 46% of our sales were attributable to upstream
activities, approximately 22% were attributable to midstream
activities and approximately 32% were attributable to downstream
and other processing activities which include the refining,
chemical and other industrial and energy end markets.
We offer more than 100,000 products including an extensive array
of PVF, oilfield supply, automation, instrumentation and other
general and specialty products to our customers across our
various end markets. Due to the demanding operating conditions
in the energy industry and high costs associated with equipment
failure, customers prefer highly reliable products and vendors
with established qualifications and experience. As our PVF
products typically represent a fraction of the total cost of the
project, our customers place a premium on service given the high
cost to them of maintenance or new project delays. Our products
are typically used in high-volume, high-stress, abrasive
applications such as the gathering and transmission of oil and
natural gas, in high-pressure, extreme temperature and
high-corrosion applications such as in heating and
desulphurization in the processing and refining industries and
in steam generation units in the power industry.
With over 250 locations servicing the energy and industrial
sectors, we are an important link between our more than 10,000
customers and approximately 10,000 suppliers. We add value to
our customers and suppliers in a number of ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Broad Product Offering and High Customer Service
Levels: The breadth and depth of our product
offering enables us to provide a high level of service to our
energy and industrial customers. Given our North American
inventory coverage and branch network, we are able to fulfill
orders more quickly, including orders for less common and
specialty items, and provide our customers with a greater array
of value added services, including multiple daily deliveries,
volume purchasing, product testing and supplier assessments,
inventory management and warehousing, technical support,
just-in-time
delivery, order consolidation, product tagging and tracking, and
system interfaces customized to customer and supplier
specifications, than if we
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
operated on a smaller scale
and/or only
at a local or regional level. Thus our clients, particularly
those operating throughout North America, can quickly and
efficiently source the most suitable products with the least
amount of downtime and at the lowest total transaction cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approved Manufacturer List (AML)
Services: Our customers rely on us to provide
a high level of quality control for their PVF products. We do
this by regularly auditing many of our suppliers for quality
assurance through our Supplier Registration Process. We use our
resulting Approved Supplier List (the MRM ASL) to
supply products across many of the markets we support,
particularly for downstream and midstream customers. This
process has enabled us to achieve a preferred vendor status with
many key end users in the industry that utilize our AML services
to help devise and maintain their own approved manufacturer
listings. In this manner, we seek to ensure that our customers
timely receive reliable and high quality products without
incurring additional administrative and procurement expenses.
Our suppliers in turn look to us as a key partner, which has
been important in establishing us as an important link in the
supply chain and a leader in the industry.
|
|
|
|
Customized and Integrated Service
Offering: We offer our customers integrated
supply services including product procurement, product quality
assurance, physical warehousing, and inventory management and
analysis using our proprietary customized information technology
platform. This is part of an overall strategy to promote a
one stop shop for PVF purchases across the
upstream-midstream-downstream spectrum and throughout North
America through integrated supply agreements and MRO contracts
that enable our customers to focus on their core operations and
increase the efficiency of their business.
|
Our
Industry
We primarily serve the North American oil and gas industry,
generating approximately 90% of our sales from supplying PVF
products and various services to customers throughout the energy
industry. Given the diverse requirements and various factors
that drive the growth of the upstream, midstream and downstream
energy markets, our sales to each sector may vary from time to
time, though the overall strength of the global energy market is
typically a good indicator of our performance. The
underinvestment in North American energy infrastructure,
together with production and capacity constraints and
anticipated strength in the oil, natural gas, refined products
and petrochemical markets, have spurred high levels of expansion
and maintenance capital expenditures in our energy end markets
by our customers. Furthermore, as participants in the energy
industry continue to focus on raising operating efficiency, they
have been increasingly looking to outsource their procurement
and related administrative functions to distributors like us.
Beyond the oil and gas industry, we also supply products and
services to other energy sectors such as coal, power generation,
liquefied natural gas and alternative energy facilities. We also
provide products such as automation and instrumentation products
and corrosion resistant piping products to more general
industrial end markets such as pulp and paper, metals
processing, fabrication, pharmaceutical, food and beverage and
manufacturing companies.
Our Competitive
Strengths
We consider the following to be our key competitive strengths:
Market Leader with Complete North American Coverage and
Significant Scale. We are the leading North
American distributor of PVF and related products to the energy
industry based on sales, with at least twice the sales of our
nearest competitor in 2007. Our North American network of over
250 locations in 38 U.S. states and in Canada gives us a
significant market presence and provides us with substantial
economies of scale that we believe make us a more effective
competitor. The benefits of our size and extensive North
American presence include: (1) the ability to act as a
3
single-source supplier to large, multi-location customers
operating across all segments of the energy industry;
(2) the ability to commit significant financial resources
to further develop our operating infrastructure, including our
information systems, and provide a strong platform for future
expansion; (3) volume purchasing benefits from our
suppliers; (4) an ability to leverage our extensive North
American inventory coverage to provide greater overall breadth
and depth of product offerings; (5) the ability to attract
and retain effective managers and salespeople; and (6) a
business model exhibiting a high degree of operating leverage.
Our presence and scale have also enabled us to establish an
efficient supply chain and logistics platform, allowing us to
better serve our customers and further differentiate us from our
competitors.
High Level of Integration and MRO Contracts with a Blue
Chip Customer Base. We have a diversified
customer base with over 10,000 active customers and serve as the
sole or primary supplier in all end markets or in specified end
markets or geographies for many of our customers. Our top ten
customers, with whom we have had relationships for more than
20 years on average, accounted for less than 25% of 2007
pro forma sales and no single customer accounted for more than
5% of 2007 pro forma sales. We enjoy fully integrated
relationships, including interconnected technology systems and
daily communication, with many of our customers and we provide
an extensive range of integrated and outsourced supply services,
allowing us to market a total transaction cost
concept as opposed to individual product prices. We provide such
services as multiple daily deliveries, zone stores management,
valve tagging, truck stocking and significant system support for
tracking and replenishing inventory, which we believe results in
deeply integrated customer relationships. We sell products to
many of our customers through multi-year MRO contracts which are
typically renegotiated every three to five years. Although there
are typically no guaranteed minimum purchase amounts under these
contracts, these MRO customers, representing over 50% of our
2007 pro forma sales, provide a relatively stable revenue stream
and help mitigate against industry downturns. We believe we have
been able to retain customers by ensuring a high level of
service and integration, as evidenced by our annual average MRO
contract retention rate of over 99% since 2000. Furthermore, we
have recently signed new MRO contracts displacing competitors
that provide opportunities for us to gain new customers and
broaden existing customer relationships.
Business and Geographic Diversification in High-Growth
Areas. We are well diversified across the
upstream, midstream and downstream operations of the energy
industry, as well as through our participation in selected
industrial end markets. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, we generated
approximately 46% of our sales in the upstream sector, 22% in
the midstream sector, and 32% in the downstream, industrial and
other energy end markets. This diversification affords us some
measure of protection in the event of a downturn in any one end
market while providing us the ability to offer one
stop shopping for most of our integrated energy customers.
In addition, our more than 250 branches are located near major
hydrocarbon and refining regions throughout North America,
including rapidly expanding oil and natural gas exploration and
production (E&P) areas in North America, such
as the Bakken, Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville and Marcellus
shales. Our geographic diversity enhances our ability to respond
to customers quickly, gives us a strong presence in these high
growth E&P areas and reduces our exposure to a downturn in
any one region.
Strategic Supplier Relationships. We
have extensive relationships with our suppliers and have key
supplier relationships dating back in certain instances over
60 years. We purchased approximately $1 billion of
products from our top ten suppliers for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, representing
approximately 33% of our purchases. We believe our customers
view us as an industry leader for the formal processes we use to
evaluate vendor performance and product quality. We employ
individuals, certified by the International Registry of
Certificated Auditors, who specialize in conducting manufacturer
assessments both domestically and internationally. Our Supplier
Registration Process (SRP), which allows us to
maintain the MRM ASL, serves as a significant strategic
advantage to us in developing, maintaining and
institutionalizing key supplier relationships. For our
suppliers, being included on the MRM ASL represents an
4
opportunity for them to increase their product sales to our
customers. The SRP also adds value to our customers, as they
collaborate with us regarding specific manufacturer performance,
our past experiences with products and the results of our
on-site
supplier assessments. Having a timely, uninterrupted supply of
those mission critical products from approved vendors is an
essential part of our customers day-to-day operations and
we work to fulfill that need through our SRP.
A Leading IT Platform Focused on Customer
Service. Our business is supported by our
integrated, scalable and customer-linked customized information
systems. These systems and our more than 3,400 employees
are linked by a wide area network. We are currently implementing
an initiative, expected to be completed in 2009, that will
combine our business operations onto one enterprise server-based
system. This will enable real-time access to our business
resources, including customer order processing, purchasing and
material requests, distribution requirements planning,
warehousing and receiving, inventory control and accounting and
financial functions. Significant elements of our systems include
firm-wide pricing controls resulting in disciplined pricing
strategies, advanced scanning and customized bar-coding
capabilities, allowing for efficient warehousing activities at
customer as well as our own locations, and significant levels of
customer-specific integrations. We believe that the customized
integration of our customers systems into our own
information systems has increased customer retention by reducing
their expenses, thus creating switching costs when comparing us
to alternative sources of supply. Typically, smaller regional
and local competitors do not have IT capabilities that are as
advanced as ours.
Highly Efficient, Flexible Operating Platform Drives
Significant Free Cash Flow Generation. We
place a particular emphasis on practicing financial discipline
as evidenced by our strong focus on return on assets, minimal
capital expenditures and high free cash flow generation. Our
disciplined cost control, coupled with our active asset
management strategies, result in a business model exhibiting a
high degree of operating leverage. As is typical with the
flexibility associated with a distribution operating model, our
variable cost base includes substantially all of our cost of
goods sold and a significant portion of our operating costs.
Furthermore, our maintenance capital expenditures are less than
0.3% of our annual sales. This cost structure allows us to
adjust to changing industry dynamics and, as a result, during
periods of decreased sales activity, we typically generate
significant free cash flow as our costs are reduced and working
capital contracts.
Experienced and Motivated Management
Team. Our senior management team has an
average of over 25 years of experience in the oilfield and
industrial supply business, the majority of which has been with
McJunkin Red Man or its predecessors. After giving effect to
this offering, senior management will
own % of our company indirectly
through their equity interests in PVF Holdings LLC. We also seek
to incentivize and align management with shareholder interests
through equity-linked compensation plans. Furthermore, executive
compensation is based on profitability and
return-on-investment
targets which we believe drives accountability and further
aligns the organization with our shareholders.
Our Business
Strategy
Our goal is to become the largest global distributor of PVF and
related products to the energy and industrials sectors. We
intend to grow our business by leveraging our existing position
as the largest North American distributor of PVF products and
services to the energy industry based on sales. Our strategy is
focused on pursuing growth by increasing organic market share
and growing our business with current customers, expanding into
new geographies and end markets, further penetrating the
Canadian Oil Sands and downstream sector, pursuing selective
strategic acquisitions and investments, increasing recurring
revenues through integrated supply, MRO and project contracts,
and continuing to increase our operational efficiency.
Increase Organic Market Share and Grow Business with
Current Customers. We are committed to
expanding upon existing deep relationships with our current
customer base while at the same time striving to secure new
customers. To accomplish this, we are focused on providing a
one
5
stop PVF procurement solution throughout North America and
across the upstream, midstream and downstream sectors of the
energy industry, cross-selling by leveraging our expanded
product offering resulting from the business combination between
McJunkin Corporation (McJunkin) and Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man) in October
2007, and increasing our penetration of existing customers
new multiyear projects.
The migration of existing customer relationships to sole or
primary sourcing arrangements is a core strategic focus. We seek
to position ourselves as the sole or primary provider of a broad
complement of PVF products and services for a particular
customer, often by end market and/or geography, or in certain
instances across all of a customers North American
upstream, midstream and downstream operations. Several of our
largest customers have recently switched to sole or primary
sourcing contracts with us. Additionally, we believe that
significant opportunities exist to expand upon heritage McJunkin
and Red Man existing deep customer and supplier relationships
and thereby increase our market share. While we believe that the
heritage McJunkin and Red Man organizations each maintained
robust product offerings, there also remain opportunities to
cross-sell certain products into the other heritage
organizations customer base and branch network. As part of
these efforts, we are working to further strengthen our service
offerings by augmenting our product portfolio, management
expertise and sales force.
We also aim to increase our penetration of our existing
customers new projects. For example, while we often
provide nearly 100% of the PVF products for certain customers
under MRO contracts, increased penetration of those
customers new downstream and midstream projects remains a
strategic priority. Initiatives are in place to deepen
relationships with engineering and construction firms and to
extend our product offering into certain niches. We recently
integrated core project groups in several locations to focus
solely on capturing new multi-year project opportunities and we
are encouraged by these initial efforts.
Expand into New Geographies and End
Markets. We intend to selectively establish
new branches in order to facilitate our expansion into new
geographies, and enter end markets where extreme operating
environments generate high PVF product replacement rates. We
continue to evaluate establishing branches and service and
supply centers, entering into joint ventures, and making
acquisitions in select domestic and international regions. While
we believe that we are one of two PVF distributors with branches
throughout North America, there is opportunity to expand via new
branch openings in certain geographic areas.
While our near term strategy is to continue to expand within
North America, we believe that attractive opportunities exist to
expand internationally. Though we currently maintain only one
branch outside North America, we continue to actively evaluate
opportunities to extend our offering to key international
markets, particularly in West Africa, the Middle East, Europe
and South America. The E&P opportunity and current
installed base of energy infrastructure internationally is
significantly larger than in North America and as a result we
believe represents an attractive long term opportunity both for
ourselves and our largest customers. While our near term focus
internationally will be centered on growing our business with
our already largely global customer base, the increased focus,
particularly by
foreign-owned
integrated oil companies, on efficiency, cost savings, process
improvements and core competencies has also generated potential
growth opportunities to add new customers that we will continue
to monitor closely.
We also believe opportunities exist for expansion into new and
under penetrated end markets where PVF products are used in
specialized, highly corrosive applications. These end markets
include pulp and paper, food and beverage and other general
industrial markets, in addition to other energy end markets such
as power generation, liquefied natural gas, coal, nuclear and
ethanol. We believe our extensive North American branch
platform, comprehensive PVF product offering, and reputation for
high customer service and technical expertise positions us to
participate in the growth in these end markets.
6
We believe there also remains an opportunity to continue to
expand into certain niche and specialty products that complement
our current extensive product offering. These products include
automated valves, instrumentation, stainless, chrome and high
nickel alloy PVF, large diameter carbon steel pipe and certain
specialty items, including steam products.
Further Penetrate the Canadian Oil Sands, Particularly the
Downstream Sector. The Canadian Oil Sands
region and its attendant downstream markets represent very
attractive growth areas for our company. Improvements in mining
and in-situ technology are driving significant investment in the
area and, according to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board,
the Canadian Oil Sands contain an ultimately recoverable crude
bitumen resource of 315 billion barrels, with established
reserves of almost 173 billion barrels at December 2007.
This represents the second largest recoverable crude oil reserve
in the world, behind Saudi Arabia. Capital and maintenance
investments in the Canadian Oil Sands are expected to experience
dramatic growth due to rising global energy demand and
advancements in recovery and upgrading technologies. According
to Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA),
between 2000 and the end of 2007 more than CDN$75 billion
was invested in Canadian Oil Sands projects. These large
facilities require significant ongoing PVF maintenance well in
excess of traditional energy infrastructure, given the extremely
harsh operating environments and highly corrosive conditions.
CERA estimates that more than CDN$160 billion in capital
expenditures will be spent on new Canadian Oil Sands projects
for the period from 2008 to 2011 which we estimate could
generate significant annual PVF expenditures over this period.
While Midfield has historically focused on the upstream and
midstream sectors in Canada, we believe that a significant
opportunity exists to penetrate the Canadian Oil Sands
downstream market which includes the upgrader and refinery
markets. We are the leading provider of PVF products to the
downstream market in the U.S. and believe this sector expertise
and existing customer relationships can be utilized by our
upstream and midstream Canadian operations to grow our
downstream sector presence in this region. We also believe there
is a significant opportunity to penetrate the Canadian Oil Sands
extraction market involving in-situ recovery methods, including
SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage) and CSS (cyclic steam
stimulation) techniques used to extract the bitumen. We have
formed a full team overseen by senior management, have made
recent inventory and facility investments in Canada, including a
new 60,000 square foot distribution center facility located near
Edmonton, and have opened additional locations in Western Canada
to address this opportunity. Finally, we also believe that an
attractive opportunity exists to more fully penetrate the MRO
market in Canada, including refineries, petrochemical
facilities, utilities and pulp and paper and other general
industrial markets.
Pursue Selective Strategic Acquisitions and
Investments. Acquisitions have been a core
focus and acquisition integration a core competency for us. We
continue to seek opportunities to strengthen our franchise
through selective acquisitions and strategic investments. In
particular, we will consider investments that enhance our
presence in the energy infrastructure market and enable us to
leverage our existing operations, either through acquiring new
branches or by acquiring companies offering complementary
products or end market breadth. Our industry remains highly
fragmented and we believe a significant number of small and
larger acquisition opportunities remain that offer favorable
synergy potential and attractive growth characteristics.
Acquisitions have been a core focus for both the heritage
McJunkin and Red Man organizations which we plan to continue. In
addition to the business combination between McJunkin and Red
Man (the Red Man Transaction), since 2000 we have
integrated 19 acquisitions which collectively represented over
$900 million in sales in the year of acquisition. Important
recent acquisitions include Midfield, one of the three largest
oilfield supply companies in Canada with 60 branches, and
Midway-Tristate Corporation (Midway), a leading
oilfield distributor primarily serving the Rockies and
Appalachia regions. Historically, our operating scale and
integration capabilities have enabled us to realize important
synergies, while minimizing execution risk, which we intend to
focus on with future acquisitions.
7
Increase Recurring Revenues through Integrated Supply, MRO
and Project Contracts. We have entered into
and continue to pursue integrated supply, MRO and project
contracts with certain of our customers. These arrangements
generally designate us as the sole or primary source provider of
the upstream, midstream,
and/or
downstream requirements of our customers. In certain instances
we are the sole or primary source provider for our customers
across all the energy sectors and/or North American geographies
within which the customer operates.
Our customers have, over time, increasingly moved toward
centralized PVF procurement management at the corporate level
rather than at individual local units. While these developments
are partly due to significant consolidation among our customer
base, sole or primary sourcing arrangements allow customers to
focus on their core operations and provide economic benefits by
generating immediate savings for the customer through
administrative cost and working capital reductions, while
providing for increased volumes, more stable revenue streams and
longer term visibility for us. We believe we are well positioned
to obtain these arrangements due to our (1) geographically
diverse and strategically located branch network,
(2) experience, technical expertise and reputation for
premier customer service operating across all segments of the
energy industry, (3) breadth of available product lines and
value added services, and (4) existing deep relationships
with customers and suppliers.
We also have exclusive and non-exclusive MRO contracts and new
project contracts in place. Our customers are increasing their
maintenance and capital spending, which is being driven by aging
infrastructure, their increased utilization of existing
facilities and the decreasing quality of energy feedstocks. Our
customers benefit from MRO agreements through lower inventory
investment and the reduction of transaction costs associated
with the elimination of the bid submission process, and our
company benefits from the recurring revenue stream that occurs
with an MRO contract in place. We believe there are additional
opportunities to utilize MRO arrangements for servicing the
requirements of our customers and we are actively pursuing such
agreements.
Continued Focus on Operational
Efficiency. We strive for continued
operational excellence. Our branch managers, regional management
and corporate leadership team continually examine branch
profitability, working capital management, and return on managed
assets and utilize this information to optimize national,
regional and local strategies, reduce operating costs and
maximize cash flow generation. As part of this effort,
management incentives are centered on meeting EBITDA and return
on assets targets.
In order to improve efficiencies and profitability, we work to
leverage operational best practices, optimize our vendor
relationships, purchasing, and inventory levels, and source
inventory internationally when appropriate. As part of this
strategy, we have integrated our heritage purchasing functions
and believe we have developed strong relationships with vendors
that value both our national footprint and volume purchasing
capabilities. Because of this, we are often considered the
preferred distribution channel. As we continue to consolidate
our vendor relationships, we plan to devote additional resources
to assist our customers in identifying products that improve
their processes, day-to-day operations and overall operating
efficiencies. We believe that offering these value added
services maximizes our value to our customers and helps
differentiate us from competitors.
8
Organizational
Structure
The following chart illustrates our organizational structure
upon the completion of this offering:
9
The
Offering
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation. |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholder |
|
shares. |
|
Option to purchase additional shares of common stock from the
selling stockholder |
|
shares. |
|
Common stock outstanding immediately after the offering |
|
shares. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
The proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in the
offering are solely for the account of PVF Holdings LLC, the
selling stockholder. We will not receive any proceeds from the
sale of our common stock by the selling stockholder. See
Use of Proceeds. PVF Holdings LLC intends to
distribute the net proceeds of this offering, after giving
effect to the underwriting discount, to its members, which
include certain members of our board of directors and senior
management team and various of their affiliates. See
Principal and Selling Stockholders and
Underwriting. Additionally, affiliates of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. own a majority interest in PVF Holdings
LLC. Accordingly, such affiliates will receive a significant
portion of the proceeds from this offering. See
Underwriting. |
|
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
MRC. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 17 of
this prospectus for a discussion of factors that you should
carefully consider before deciding to invest in shares of our
common |
stock.
The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding after the
offering:
|
|
|
|
|
gives effect to
a
for split of our common stock to
be effected prior to the pricing of this offering;
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
granted to certain of our employees and directors pursuant to
the McJ Holding Corporation 2007 Stock Option Plan; and
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of non-vested restricted stock awarded to certain of our
employees pursuant to the McJ Holding Corporation 2007
Restricted Stock Plan.
|
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation (formerly known as McJ
Holding Corporation) was incorporated in Delaware on
November 20, 2006. Our principal executive offices are
located at 8023 East 63rd Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74133 and
835 Hillcrest Drive, Charleston, West Virginia 25311. Our
telephone number is
(918) 250-8541.
Our website address is www.mcjunkinredman.com. Information
contained on our website is not a part of this prospectus.
The data included in this prospectus regarding the industrial
and oilfield pipe, valves and fittings distribution industry,
including trends in the market and our position and the position
of our competitors within this industry, are based on our
estimates, which have been derived from managements
knowledge and experience in the areas in which our business
operates, and information obtained from customers, suppliers,
trade and business organizations, internal research, publicly
available
10
information, industry publications and surveys and other
contacts in the areas in which our business operates. We have
also cited information compiled by industry publications,
governmental agencies and publicly available sources. Although
we believe that these sources are generally reliable, we have
not independently verified data from these sources or obtained
third party verification of this data.
Depending on market conditions at the time of pricing of this
offering and other considerations, the selling stockholder may
sell fewer or more shares than the number set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus.
11
Summary
Consolidated Financial Information
On January 31, 2007, McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation,
an affiliate of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., acquired a
majority of the equity of the entity now known as McJunkin Red
Man Corporation (then known as McJunkin Corporation) (the
GS Acquisition). In this prospectus, the term
Predecessor refers to McJunkin Corporation and its
subsidiaries prior to January 31, 2007 and the term
Successor refers to the entity now known as McJunkin
Red Man Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries on and after
January 31, 2007. As a result of the change in McJunkin
Corporations basis of accounting in connection with the GS
Acquisition, Predecessors financial statement data for the
one month ended January 30, 2007 and earlier periods is not
comparable to Successors financial data for the eleven
months ended December 31, 2007 and subsequent periods.
McJunkin Corporation completed a business combination
transaction with Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. (the
Red Man Transaction) on October 31, 2007. At
that time McJunkin Corporation was renamed McJunkin Red Man
Corporation. Operating results for the eleven-month period ended
December 31, 2007 include the results of McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation for the full period and the results of Red
Man Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man) for the
two months after the business combination on October 31,
2007. Accordingly, our results for the 11 months ended
December 31, 2007 are not comparable to McJunkins
results for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The summary consolidated financial information presented below
under the captions Statement of Operations Data and Other
Financial Data for the one month ended January 30, 2007
(Predecessor) and the eleven months ended December 31,
2007, and the summary consolidated financial information
presented below under the caption Balance Sheet Data as of
December 31, 2007, have been derived from the consolidated
financial statements of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation
included elsewhere in this prospectus that have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm. The summary consolidated financial information
presented below as of and for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2006 has been derived from the consolidated financial
statements of our predecessor, McJunkin Corporation, included
elsewhere in this prospectus that have been audited by Schneider
Downs & Co., Inc., independent registered public
accounting firm.
The summary unaudited interim consolidated financial information
presented below under the captions Statement of Operations Data
and Other Financial Data for the six months ended June 26,
2008 and the five months ended June 28, 2007, and the
summary unaudited consolidated financial information presented
below under the caption Balance Sheet Data as of June 26,
2008, have been derived from our unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus and have been prepared on the same basis as our
audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of
management, the interim data reflect all adjustments, consisting
of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of results for these periods. Operating results for
the six months ended June 26, 2008 include the results of
McJunkin Corporation and Red Man for the full period. Operating
results for the five-month period ending June 28, 2007 do
not reflect the operating results of Red Man, as the Red Man
Transaction did not occur until October 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the results for the six months ended June 26,
2008 are not comparable to the results for the five months ended
June 28, 2007. In addition, operating results for the
six-month period ended June 26, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
The summary unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of
operations data for the six months ended June 28, 2007 and
the year ended December 31, 2007 give pro forma effect to
(1) the GS Acquisition and the Red Man Transaction, as if
each such transaction had occurred on January 1, 2007, and
(2) our entering into our $575 million term loan
facility and our $700 million revolving credit facility, as
if we had entered into these facilities on January 1, 2007.
The pro forma statement of operations data for the six months
ended June 28, 2007 includes McJunkin Corporations
results for the one month ended January 30, 2007 (before
the GS
12
Acquisition), McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporations
results for the five months ended June 28, 2007 (before the
Red Man Transaction), and Red Mans results for the six
months ended April 30, 2007. The pro forma statement of
operations data for the year ended December 31, 2007
includes McJunkin Corporations results for the one month
ended January 30, 2007, McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporations results for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 (reflecting the results of McJunkin
Corporation for the full eleven months but excluding the results
of Red Man for the two months ended December 31, 2007), and
Red Mans results for the twelve months ended
October 31, 2007.
We calculated earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 26,
2008 on a pro forma basis, based on the number of shares
outstanding at the time of the initial public offering. All
information in this prospectus assumes that in conjunction with
the initial public offering, we will effect
a
for stock
split.
The historical data presented below has been derived from
financial statements that have been prepared using United States
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. This data
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share and share data)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
784.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,862.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,196.0
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
635.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,529.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,803.8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
|
169.2
|
|
|
|
|
200.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Amortization of intangibles(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
729.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,730.4
|
|
|
|
|
2,041.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
|
131.7
|
|
|
|
|
154.5
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
|
100.5
|
|
|
|
|
119.1
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(2)
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
70.5
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(933.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
945.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55.2
|
)
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
|
151.3
|
|
|
|
|
163.4
|
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share and share data)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
1,445.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,713.7
|
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,124.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,952.7
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,177.1
|
|
|
|
1,394.3
|
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,734.6
|
|
|
|
|
3,229.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
155.7
|
|
|
|
173.9
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
201.9
|
|
|
|
|
365.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
(1)
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,349.9
|
|
|
|
1,587.5
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,968.6
|
|
|
|
|
3,646.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
126.2
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
156.3
|
|
|
|
|
306.0
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.8
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(64.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
89.1
|
|
|
|
117.9
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
93.4
|
|
|
|
|
241.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(2)
|
|
$
|
52.5
|
|
|
$
|
69.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,788.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,687.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
115.6
|
|
|
|
139.1
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
|
344.9
|
|
|
|
|
370.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(4)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
129.0
|
|
|
|
212.3
|
|
|
|
|
663.5
|
|
|
|
686.1
|
|
|
|
686.1
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
434.0
|
|
|
|
481.0
|
|
|
|
|
2,925.0
|
|
|
|
3,294.3
|
|
|
|
3,294.3
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
868.4
|
|
|
|
1,284.7
|
|
|
|
1,384.7
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
168.8
|
|
|
|
242.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,210.0
|
|
|
|
824.4
|
|
|
|
824.4
|
|
14
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents amortization of
intangibles included as a result of the GS Acquisition, our
acquisition of Midway-Tristate Corporation, and the Red Man
Transaction, plus associated transaction fees.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The following are certain charges
and costs incurred in each of the relevant periods that are
meaningful to understanding our net income and in evaluating our
performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Successor
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
Five
|
|
Six
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
Month
|
|
Months
|
|
Year
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
June 28,
|
|
June 28,
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
LIFO expense
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
55.6
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Amortization of financing fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is used in our
senior secured term loan facility, senior secured revolving
credit facility, and junior term loan facility in the ratio of
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA, and is
also used in our senior secured term loan facility and junior
term loan facility in the ratio of consolidated adjusted EBITDA
to consolidated interest expense. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan
Facility Covenants. Adjusted EBITDA is defined
in our credit facilities as net income plus depreciation and
amortization, amortization of intangibles, interest expense,
income tax expense, stock-based compensation, LIFO expense,
certain non-recurring and transaction-related expenses
(including transaction costs associated with the GS Acquisition,
our acquisition of Midway-Tristate Corporation, and the Red Man
Transaction), minority interest, charges in connection with an
employee profit sharing plan for certain employees of our
subsidiary Midfield Supply ULC, and certain other adjustments,
including franchise taxes and pro forma adjustments relating to
acquisitions. We present Adjusted EBITDA because it is a
material component of material covenants in our senior secured
term loan facility and junior term loan facility. In addition,
we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating
performance. We believe this for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA for planning purposes,
including the preparation of our annual operating budget and
financial projections, as well as for determining a significant
portion of the compensation of our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a
companys operating performance without regard to items,
such as interest expense, income tax expense, and depreciation
and amortization, that can vary substantially from company to
company depending upon their financing and accounting methods,
the book value of their assets, their capital structures and the
method by which their assets were acquired; and
|
|
|
|
securities analysts use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental
measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of
companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Particularly, we believe that
Adjusted EBITDA is a useful indicator of our operating
performance because:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our lenders believed Adjusted EBITDA was the appropriate
performance measure for the key operational covenants in our
senior secured term loan facility and junior term loan facility
(see Description of Our Indebtedness);
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA measures our companys operating
performance without regard to LIFO expense, which is high due to
recent inflation and therefore reflects an overstatement of the
cost of goods sold over recent periods, and we believe that this
adjustment assists in comparing us to our peers, because many of
our peers do not use the LIFO method of inventory
valuation; and
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA measures our companys operating
performance without regard to non-recurring and
transaction-related expenses incurred in connection with
business combination transactions such as the Red Man
Transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA, however, does not
represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net
income, cash flow from operations, or any other measure of
financial performance calculated and presented in accordance
with GAAP. Our Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similar
measures reported by other companies because other companies may
not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as we do.
Although we use Adjusted EBITDA as a measure to assess the
operating performance of our business, Adjusted EBITDA has
significant limitations as an analytical tool because it
excludes certain material costs. For example, it does not
include interest expense, which has been a necessary element of
our costs. Because we use capital assets, depreciation expense
is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to generate
revenue. In addition, the omission of the amortization expense
associated with our intangible assets further limits the
usefulness of this measure. Adjusted EBITDA also does not
include the payment of certain taxes, which is also a necessary
element of our operations. Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA does not
account for LIFO expense, and therefore to the extent
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
that recently purchased inventory
accounts for a relatively large portion of our sales, Adjusted
EBITDA may overstate our operating performance. Because Adjusted
EBITDA does not account for certain expenses, its utility as a
measure of our operating performance has material limitations.
Because of these limitations management does not view Adjusted
EBITDA in isolation or as a primary performance measure and also
uses other measures, such as net income and sales, to measure
operating performance.
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a
reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Successor
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
Five
|
|
Six
|
|
Six
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
Month
|
|
Months
|
|
Year
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
June 28,
|
|
June 28,
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52.5
|
|
|
$
|
69.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
$
|
150.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
$
|
75.9
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Red Man pre-merger contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midway pre-acquisition contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO expense
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
Non-recurring and transaction-related expenses(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Minority interest / Midfield employee profit sharing plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Transaction cost savings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
115.6
|
|
|
$
|
139.1
|
|
|
$
|
26.0
|
|
|
$
|
344.9
|
|
|
$
|
370.4
|
|
|
$
|
151.3
|
|
|
$
|
163.4
|
|
|
$
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes transaction costs associated with the GS Acquisition,
our acquisition of Midway-Tristate Corporation, and the Red Man
Transaction.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes franchise tax expense, certain consulting fees, gains
and losses on the sale of assets and other nonrecurring items.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Adjusted to give effect for our
purchase on July 31, 2008 of the approximate 49% minority
voting interest in Midfield Supply ULC, one of our subsidiaries.
|
16
RISK
FACTORS
You should carefully consider each of the following risks and
all of the information set forth in this prospectus before
deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following
risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, our
business, results of operations and financial condition could be
materially and adversely affected. In that case, the price of
our common stock could decline and you could lose some or all of
your investment.
Risks Related to
Our Business
Decreased
capital expenditures in the energy industry, which can result
from decreased oil and natural gas prices among other things,
can materially and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
A large portion of our revenue depends upon the level of capital
expenditures in the oil and gas industry, including capital
expenditures in connection with exploration, drilling,
production, gathering, transportation, refining and processing
operations. Demand for our products and services is particularly
sensitive to the level of exploration, development and
production activity of, and the corresponding capital
expenditures by, oil and natural gas companies. A material
decline in oil or natural gas prices could depress levels of
exploration, development and production activity, and therefore
could lead to a decrease in our customers capital
expenditures. If our customers capital expenditures
decline, our business will suffer.
Prices for oil and natural gas are subject to large fluctuations
in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and
demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty, and a
variety of other factors that are beyond our control. Oil and
natural gas prices are currently at levels higher than
historical long term averages, and worldwide oil and gas
drilling and exploration activity is also at very high levels. A
decline in oil and natural gas prices could result in decreased
capital expenditures in the oil and gas industry, and could
therefore have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Many factors affect the supply of and demand for energy and
therefore influence oil and gas prices, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of domestic and worldwide oil and gas production and
inventories;
|
|
|
|
the level of drilling activity and the availability of
attractive oil and gas field prospects, which may be affected by
governmental actions, such as regulatory actions or legislation,
or other restrictions on drilling, including those related to
environmental concerns;
|
|
|
|
the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves and the expected
cost of developing new reserves;
|
|
|
|
the actual cost of finding and producing oil and gas;
|
|
|
|
depletion rates;
|
|
|
|
domestic and worldwide refinery overcapacity or undercapacity
and utilization rates;
|
|
|
|
the availability of transportation infrastructure and refining
capacity;
|
|
|
|
increases in the cost of the products that we provide to the oil
and gas industry, which may result from increases in the cost of
raw materials such as steel;
|
|
|
|
shifts in end-customer preferences toward fuel efficiency and
the use of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
the economic
and/or
political attractiveness of alternative fuels, such as coal,
hydrocarbon, wind, solar energy and biomass-based fuels;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
increases in oil and gas prices
and/or
historically high oil and gas prices, which could lower demand
for oil and gas products;
|
|
|
|
worldwide economic activity including growth in countries that
are not members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (non-OECD countries), including
China and India;
|
|
|
|
interest rates and the cost of capital;
|
|
|
|
national government policies, including government policies
which could nationalize or expropriate oil and gas exploration,
production, refining or transportation assets;
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) to set and maintain production levels and prices for oil;
|
|
|
|
the impact of armed hostilities, or the threat or perception of
armed hostilities;
|
|
|
|
pricing and other actions taken by competitors that impact the
market;
|
|
|
|
environmental regulation;
|
|
|
|
technological advances;
|
|
|
|
global weather conditions and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to
foreign currencies; and
|
|
|
|
tax policies.
|
Oil and gas prices have been and are expected to remain
volatile. This volatility has historically caused oil and gas
companies to change their strategies and expenditure levels from
year to year. We have experienced in the past, and we will
likely experience in the future, significant fluctuations in
operating results based on these changes. In particular, such
volatility in the oil and gas markets could materially adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our business,
results of operations and financial condition may be materially
and adversely affected by general economic
conditions.
Many aspects of our business, including demand for our products
and the pricing and availability of supplies, are affected by
U.S. and global general economic conditions. General
economic conditions and predictions regarding future economic
conditions also affect our forecasts, and a decrease in demand
for our products or other adverse effects resulting from an
economic downturn may cause us to fail to achieve our
anticipated financial results. General economic factors beyond
our control that affect our business and end markets include
interest rates, recession, inflation, deflation, consumer credit
availability, consumer debt levels, performance of housing
markets, energy costs, tax rates and policy, unemployment rates,
commencement or escalation of war or hostilities, the threat or
possibility of war, terrorism or other global or national
unrest, political or financial instability, and other matters
that influence spending by our customers. Increasing volatility
in financial markets may cause these factors to change with a
greater degree of frequency or increase in magnitude. An
economic downturn could adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition and could also lead to a
decrease in the market price of our common stock.
We may be
unable to compete successfully with other companies in our
industry.
We sell our products and services in very competitive markets.
In some cases, we compete with large oilfield services providers
with substantial resources and smaller regional players that may
increasingly be willing to provide similar products and services
at lower prices. Our revenues and earnings could be adversely
affected by competitive actions such as price reductions,
improved delivery and other actions by competitors. Our
business, results of operations and financial condition could be
materially and adversely affected to the extent that our
competitors are successful in
18
reducing our customers purchases of our products and
services. Competition could also cause us to lower our prices
which could reduce our margins and profitability.
Demand for our
products could decrease if manufacturers of our products were to
sell a substantial amount of goods directly to end users in the
markets we serve.
We do not manufacture any of the products that we distribute.
Historically, users of PVF and related products in the United
States, in contrast to users of PVF and related products outside
the United States, have purchased such products through
distributors and not directly from manufacturers. If customers
were to purchase the products that we sell directly from
manufacturers, or if manufacturers sought to increase their
efforts to sell directly to end users, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially and
adversely affected. These or other developments that remove us
from, or limit our role in, the distribution chain, may harm our
competitive position in the marketplace and reduce our sales and
earnings.
We may
experience unexpected supply shortages.
We distribute products from a wide variety of manufacturers and
suppliers. Nevertheless, in the future we may have difficulty
obtaining the products we need from suppliers and manufacturers
as a result of unexpected demand or production difficulties.
Also, products may not be available to us in quantities
sufficient to meet our customer demand. Our inability to obtain
sufficient products from suppliers and manufacturers, in
sufficient quantities, could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may
experience cost increases by suppliers, which we may be unable
to pass on to our customers.
In the future, we may face supply cost increases due to, among
other things, unexpected increases in demand for supplies,
decreases in production of supplies or increases in the cost of
raw materials or transportation. Our inability to pass supply
price increases on to our customers could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. For example, we may be unable to pass
increased supply costs on to our customers because significant
amounts of our sales are derived from stocking program
arrangements, contracts and maintenance, repair and operations
(MRO) arrangements which provide our customers time
limited price protection, which may obligate us to sell products
at a set price for a specific period. In addition, if supply
costs increase, our customers may elect to purchase smaller
amounts of products or may purchase products from other
distributors. While we may be able to work with our customers to
reduce the effects of unforeseen price increases because of our
relationships with them, we may not be able to reduce the
effects of such cost increases. In addition, to the extent that
competition leads to reduced purchases of our products or
services or reduction of our prices, and such reductions occur
concurrently with increases in the prices for selected
commodities which we use in our operations, including steel,
nickel and molybdenum, the adverse effects described above would
likely be exacerbated and could result in a prolonged downturn
in profitability.
We do not have
contracts with most of our suppliers. The loss of a significant
supplier would require us to rely more heavily on our other
existing suppliers or to develop relationships with new
suppliers, and such a loss may have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Given the nature of our business, and consistent with industry
practice, we do not have contracts with most of our suppliers.
Purchases are generally made through purchase orders. Therefore,
most of our suppliers have the ability to terminate their
relationships with us at any time. Approximately 33% of our
total purchases during 2007 on a pro forma basis were from our
ten largest suppliers. Although we believe there are numerous
manufacturers with the capacity to supply our products, the loss
of one or more of our major suppliers could have a material
adverse effect on our business,
19
results of operations and financial condition. Such a loss would
require us to rely more heavily on our other existing suppliers
or develop relationships with new suppliers, which may cause us
to pay higher prices for products due to, among other things, a
loss of volume discount benefits currently obtained from our
major suppliers.
Price
reductions by suppliers of products sold by us could cause the
value of our inventory to decline. Also, such price reductions
could cause our customers to demand lower sales prices for these
products, possibly decreasing our margins and profitability on
sales to the extent that our inventory of such products was
purchased at the higher prices prior to supplier price
reductions and we are required to sell such products to our
customers at the lower market prices.
The value of our inventory could decline as a result of price
reductions by manufacturers of products sold by us. We believe
the risk of a material reduction in the value of our inventory
is mitigated due to the fact that we do not carry a significant
amount of speculative inventory, our significant supply
commitments are generally for relatively short-term periods, and
we have been selling the same types of products to our customers
for many years (and therefore do not expect that our inventory
will become obsolete). However, there is no assurance that a
substantial decline in product prices would not result in a
write-down of our inventory value. Such a write-down could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Also, decreases in the market prices of products sold by us
could cause customers to demand lower sale prices from us. These
price reductions could reduce our margins and profitability on
sales with respect to such lower-priced products to the extent
that we purchase such products at the higher prices prior to
supplier price reductions and we are required to sell such
products to our customers at the lower market prices. Reductions
in our margins and profitability on sales could have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and
financial condition.
A substantial
decrease in the price of steel could significantly lower our
gross profit.
We distribute many products manufactured from steel and, as a
result, our business is significantly affected by the price and
supply of steel. When steel prices are lower, the prices that we
charge customers for products may decline, which affects our
gross profit. The steel industry as a whole is cyclical and at
times pricing and availability of steel can be volatile due to
numerous factors beyond our control, including general domestic
and international economic conditions, labor costs, sales
levels, competition, consolidation of steel producers,
fluctuations in the costs of raw materials necessary to produce
steel, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates.
This volatility can significantly affect the availability and
cost of steel for our suppliers. When steel prices decline,
customer demands for lower prices and our competitors
responses to those demands could result in lower sale prices
and, consequently, lower gross profit.
If steel
prices rise, we may be unable to pass along the cost increases
to our customers.
We maintain inventories of steel products to accommodate the
lead time requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we
purchase steel products in an effort to maintain our inventory
at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the
anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying
practices, contracts with customers and market conditions. Our
commitments to purchase steel products are generally at
prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our
orders. If steel prices increase between the time we order steel
products and the time of delivery of such products to us, our
suppliers may impose surcharges that require us to pay for
increases in steel prices during such period. Demand for our
products, the actions of our competitors, and other factors will
influence whether we will be able to pass such steel cost
increases and surcharges on to our customers, and we may be
unsuccessful in doing so.
20
We do not have
long-term contracts with many of our customers and our contracts
generally do not commit our customers to any minimum purchase
volume. The loss of a significant customer may have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Given the nature of our business, and consistent with industry
practice, we do not have long-term contracts with many of our
customers and our contracts, including our maintenance, repair
and operations contracts, generally do not commit our customers
to any minimum purchase volume. Therefore, a significant number
of our customers may terminate their relationships with us or
reduce their purchasing volume at any time. Furthermore, the
long-term customer contracts that we do have are generally
terminable without cause on short notice. Our 10 largest
customers represented 24% of our total pro forma sales for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The products that we
may sell to any particular customer depend in large part on the
size of that customers capital expenditure budget in a
particular year and on the results of competitive bids for major
projects. Consequently, a customer that accounts for a
significant portion of our sales in one fiscal year may
represent an immaterial portion of our sales in subsequent
fiscal years. The loss of a significant customer, or a
substantial decrease in a significant customers orders,
may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Changes in our
customer and product mix could cause our gross margin percentage
to fluctuate.
From time to time, we may experience changes in our customer mix
and in our product mix. Changes in our customer mix may result
from geographic expansion, daily selling activities within
current geographic markets, and targeted selling activities to
new customer segments. Changes in our product mix may result
from marketing activities to existing customers and needs
communicated to us from existing and prospective customers. If
customers begin to require more lower-margin products from us
and fewer higher-margin products, our business, results of
operations and financial condition may suffer.
We face risks
associated with our business combination with Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. in October 2007, and this business
combination may not yield all of its intended
benefits.
We are currently continuing the process of integrating the
McJunkin and Red Man businesses, which were previously operated
independently and sometimes competed with one another. If we
cannot successfully integrate these two businesses, there may be
a material adverse effect on our combined business, results of
operations and financial condition. The difficulty of combining
the companies presents challenges to our management, including:
|
|
|
|
|
operating a significantly larger combined company with
operations in more geographic areas and with more business lines;
|
|
|
|
integrating personnel with diverse backgrounds and
organizational cultures;
|
|
|
|
coordinating sales and marketing functions;
|
|
|
|
retaining key employees, customers or suppliers;
|
|
|
|
integrating the information systems;
|
|
|
|
preserving the collaboration, distribution, marketing, promotion
and other important relationships; and
|
|
|
|
consolidating other corporate and administrative functions.
|
If the risks associated with the Red Man Transaction materialize
and we are unable to sufficiently address them, there is a
possibility that the results of operations of our combined
company could be
21
less successful than the separate results of operations of
McJunkin and Red Man, taken together, if the Red Man Transaction
had never occurred.
We may be
unable to successfully execute or effectively integrate
acquisitions.
One of our key operating strategies is to selectively pursue
acquisitions, including large scale acquisitions, in order to
continue to grow and increase profitability. However,
acquisitions, particularly of a significant scale, involve
numerous risks and uncertainties, including intense competition
for suitable acquisition targets; the potential unavailability
of financial resources necessary to consummate acquisitions in
the future; increased leverage due to additional debt financing
that may be required to complete an acquisition; dilution of our
stockholders net current book value per share if we issue
additional equity securities to finance an acquisition;
difficulties in identifying suitable acquisition targets or in
completing any transactions identified on sufficiently favorable
terms; and the need to obtain regulatory or other governmental
approvals that may be necessary to complete acquisitions. In
addition, any future acquisitions may entail significant
transaction costs and risks associated with entry into new
markets.
In addition, even when acquisitions are completed, integration
of acquired entities can involve significant difficulties, such
as:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to achieve cost savings or other financial or operating
objectives with respect to an acquisition;
|
|
|
|
strain on the operational and managerial controls and procedures
of our business, and the need to modify systems or to add
management resources;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the integration and retention of customers or
personnel and the integration and effective deployment of
operations or technologies;
|
|
|
|
amortization of acquired assets, which would reduce future
reported earnings;
|
|
|
|
possible adverse short-term effects on our cash flows or
operating results;
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from the ongoing
operations of our business;
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain and retain key personnel of an acquired
business; and
|
|
|
|
assumption of known or unknown material liabilities or
regulatory non-compliance issues.
|
Failure to manage these acquisition growth risks could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Our
significant indebtedness may affect our ability to operate our
business, and may have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We have now and will likely continue to have a significant
amount of indebtedness. As of June 26, 2008, we had total
debt outstanding of $1,284.7 million and we had borrowing
availability of $542.5 million under our credit facilities.
We and our subsidiaries may incur significant additional
indebtedness in the future. If new indebtedness is added to our
current indebtedness, the risks described below could increase.
Our significant level of indebtedness could have important
consequences, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our
working capital, acquisitions, expenditures, debt service
requirements or other general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to use operating cash flow in other areas
of our business because we must dedicate a substantial portion
of these funds to service debt;
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to compete with other companies who are not
as highly leveraged;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
subjecting us to restrictive financial and operating covenants
in the agreements governing our and our subsidiaries
long-term indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
exposing us to potential events of default (if not cured or
waived) under financial and operating covenants contained in our
or our subsidiaries debt instruments that could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition;
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to a downturn in general economic
conditions or in pricing of our products; and
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions in
our industry and in our customers industries.
|
In addition, borrowings under our credit facilities bear
interest at variable rates. If market interest rates increase,
such variable-rate debt will create higher debt service
requirements, which could adversely affect our cash flow. Our
pro forma interest expense for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 was $60.8 million.
Our ability to make scheduled debt payments, to refinance our
obligations with respect to our indebtedness and to fund capital
and non-capital expenditures necessary to maintain the condition
of our operating assets, properties and systems software, as
well as to provide capacity for the growth of our business,
depends on our financial and operating performance, which, in
turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, competitive, legal and other factors. Our
business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations,
and future borrowings may not be available to us under our
credit facilities in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay
our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may
seek to sell assets to fund our liquidity needs but may not be
able to do so. We may also need to refinance all or a portion of
our indebtedness on or before maturity. We may not be able to
refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable
terms or at all.
In addition, we are and will be subject to covenants contained
in agreements governing our present and future indebtedness.
These covenants include and will likely include restrictions on
certain payments and investments, the redemption and repurchase
of capital stock, the issuance of stock of subsidiaries, the
granting of liens, the incurrence of additional indebtedness,
dividend restrictions affecting us and our subsidiaries, asset
sales, transactions with affiliates and mergers and
acquisitions. They also include financial maintenance covenants
which contain financial ratios we must satisfy each quarter. Any
failure to comply with these covenants could result in a default
under our credit facilities. Upon a default, unless waived, the
lenders under our secured credit facilities would have all
remedies available to a secured lender, and could elect to
terminate their commitments, cease making further loans,
institute foreclosure proceedings against our or our
subsidiaries assets, and force us and our subsidiaries
into bankruptcy or liquidation.
In addition, any defaults under our credit facilities or our
other debt could trigger cross defaults under other or future
credit agreements and may permit acceleration of our other
indebtedness. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we cannot be
certain that we will have sufficient funds available to pay the
accelerated indebtedness or that we will have the ability to
refinance the accelerated indebtedness on terms favorable to us
or at all. For a description of our credit facilities, please
see Description of Our Indebtedness.
We are a
holding company and depend upon our subsidiaries for our cash
flow.
We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries conduct all of our
operations and own substantially all of our assets.
Consequently, our cash flow and our ability to meet our
obligations or to pay dividends or make other distributions in
the future will depend upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries
and the payment of funds by our subsidiaries to us in the form
of dividends, tax sharing payments or otherwise. In addition,
McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our direct subsidiary and the
primary obligor
23
under our $1,275 million senior secured credit facilities,
is also dependent to a significant extent on the cash flow of
its subsidiaries in order to meet its debt service obligations.
The ability of our subsidiaries to make any payments to us will
depend on their earnings, the terms of their current and future
indebtedness, tax considerations and legal and contractual
restrictions on the ability to make distributions. In
particular, our subsidiaries credit facilities currently
impose significant limitations on the ability of our
subsidiaries to make distributions to us and consequently our
ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. Subject to
limitations in our credit facilities, our subsidiaries may also
enter into additional agreements that contain covenants
prohibiting them from distributing or advancing funds or
transferring assets to us under certain circumstances, including
to pay dividends.
Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities. Any
right that we have to receive any assets of or distributions
from any of our subsidiaries upon the bankruptcy, dissolution,
liquidation or reorganization of any such subsidiary, or to
realize proceeds from the sale of their assets, will be junior
to the claims of that subsidiarys creditors, including
trade creditors and holders of debt issued by that subsidiary.
Changes in our
credit profile may affect our relationship with our suppliers,
which could have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity.
Changes in our credit profile may affect the way our suppliers
view our ability to make payments and may induce them to shorten
the payment terms of their invoices, particularly given our high
level of outstanding indebtedness. Given the large dollar
amounts and volume of our purchases from suppliers, a change in
payment terms may have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity and our ability to make payments to our suppliers, and
consequently may have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be
materially and adversely affected if restrictions on imports of
line pipe, oil country tubular goods, or certain of the other
products that we sell are lifted.
U.S. law currently imposes tariffs and duties on imports
from certain foreign countries of line pipe and oil country
tubular goods, and, to a lesser extent, on imports of certain
other products that we sell. If these restrictions are lifted,
if the tariffs are reduced or if the level of such imported
products otherwise increases, and these imported products are
accepted by our customer base, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially and
adversely affected to the extent that we would then have
higher-cost products in our inventory or if prices and margins
are driven down by increased supplies of such products. If
prices of these products were to decrease significantly, we
might not be able to profitably sell these products and the
value of our inventory would decline. In addition, significant
price decreases could result in a significantly longer holding
period for some of our inventory, which could also have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
We are subject
to strict environmental, health and safety laws and regulations
that may lead to significant liabilities.
We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local, foreign
and provincial environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations, including those governing the discharge of
pollutants into the air or water, the management, storage and
disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the responsibility
to investigate and cleanup contamination and occupational health
and safety. Fines and penalties may be imposed for
non-compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety
requirements and the failure to have or to comply with the terms
and conditions of required permits. Historically, the costs to
comply with environmental and health and safety requirements
have not been material. However, the
24
failure by us to comply with applicable environmental, health
and safety requirements could result in fines, penalties,
enforcement actions, third party claims for property damage and
personal injury, requirements to clean up property or to pay for
the costs of cleanup, or regulatory or judicial orders requiring
corrective measures, including the installation of pollution
control equipment or remedial actions.
Under certain laws and regulations, such as the federal
Superfund law, the obligation to investigate and remediate
contamination at a facility may be imposed on current and former
owners or operators or on persons who may have sent waste to
that facility for disposal. Liability under these laws and
regulations may be without regard to fault or to the legality of
the activities giving rise to the contamination. Contamination
has been identified at several of our current and former
facilities, and we have incurred and will continue to incur
costs to investigate and remediate these conditions.
Moreover, we may incur liabilities in connection with
environmental conditions currently unknown to us relating to our
existing, prior, or future sites or operations or those of
predecessor companies whose liabilities we may have assumed or
acquired. We believe that indemnities contained in certain of
our acquisition agreements may cover certain environmental
conditions existing at the time of the acquisition, subject to
certain terms, limitations and conditions. However, if these
indemnification provisions terminate or if the indemnifying
parties do not fulfill their indemnification obligations, we may
be subject to liability with respect to the environmental
matters that may be covered by such indemnification obligations.
In addition, environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations applicable to our business and the business of our
customers, including laws regulating the energy industry, and
the interpretation or enforcement of these laws and regulations,
are constantly evolving and it is impossible to predict
accurately the effect that changes in these laws and
regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, may have
upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In particular, legislation and regulations limiting emissions of
greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide associated with the
burning of fossil fuels, are at various stages of consideration
and implementation, and if fully implemented, could negatively
impact the market for our products and, consequently, our
business. Should environmental laws and regulations, or their
interpretation or enforcement, become more stringent, our costs
could increase, which may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not
have adequate insurance for potential liabilities, including
liabilities arising from litigation.
In the ordinary course of business, we have and in the future
may become the subject of various claims, lawsuits and
administrative proceedings seeking damages or other remedies
concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and
other matters, including potential claims by individuals
alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of our
products or operations. Some of these claims may relate to the
activities of businesses that we have acquired, even though
these activities may have occurred prior to our acquisition of
such businesses. Our products are sold primarily for use in the
energy industry, which is subject to inherent risks that could
result in death, personal injury, property damage, pollution or
loss of production. In addition, defects in our products could
result in death, personal injury, property damage, pollution or
damage to equipment and facilities. Actual or claimed defects in
the products we distribute may give rise to claims against us
for losses and expose us to claims for damages.
We maintain insurance to cover certain of our potential losses,
and we are subject to various self-retentions, deductibles and
caps under our insurance. It is possible, however, that
judgments could be rendered against us in cases in which we
would be uninsured and beyond the amounts that we currently have
reserved or anticipate incurring for such matters. Even a
partially uninsured claim, if successful and of significant
size, could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, we
may not be able to continue to obtain insurance
25
on commercially reasonable terms in the future, and we may incur
losses from interruption of our business that exceed our
insurance coverage. Finally, even in cases where we maintain
insurance coverage, our insurers may raise various objections
and exceptions to coverage which could make uncertain the timing
and amount of any possible insurance recovery.
Due to our
position as a distributor, we are subject to personal injury,
product liability and environmental claims involving allegedly
defective products.
Certain of our products are used in potentially hazardous
applications that can result in personal injury, product
liability and environmental claims. A catastrophic occurrence at
a location where our products are used may result in us being
named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting potentially large
claims, even though we did not manufacture the products, and
applicable law may render us liable for damages without regard
to negligence or fault. Particularly, certain environmental laws
provide for joint and several and strict liability for
remediation of spills and releases of hazardous substances.
Certain of these risks are reduced by the fact that we are a
distributor of products produced by third-party manufacturers,
and thus in certain circumstances we may have third-party
warranty or other claims against the manufacturer of products
alleged to have been defective. However, there is no assurance
that such claims could fully protect us or that the manufacturer
would be able financially to provide such protection. There is
no assurance that our insurance coverage will be adequate to
cover the underlying claims and our insurance does not provide
coverage for all liabilities (including liability for certain
events involving pollution).
We are a
defendant in asbestos-related lawsuits, and exposure to these
and any future lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We are a defendant in lawsuits involving approximately 826
plaintiffs as of June 2008 alleging, among other things,
personal injury, including mesothelioma and other cancers,
arising from exposure to asbestos-containing materials included
in products distributed by us in the past. The complaints in
these lawsuits typically name many other defendants. In the
majority of these lawsuits, little or no information is known
regarding the nature of the plaintiffs alleged injuries or
their connection with the products we distributed. Based on our
experience with asbestos litigation to date, as well as the
existence of certain insurance coverage, we do not believe that
the outcome of these cases will have a material impact on us.
However, the potential liability associated with asbestos
lawsuits is subject to many uncertainties, including negative
developments in the cases pending against us, the current or
future insolvency of co-defendants, adverse changes in relevant
laws or the interpretation thereof, and the extent to which
insurance will be available to pay for defense costs, judgments
or settlements. Further, we expect that additional claims will
be filed against us in the future, but we are unable to predict
the number, timing and magnitude of such future claims with any
certainty. Therefore, we cannot assure you that pending or
future asbestos litigation will not ultimately have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. See Risk Factors We may
not have adequate insurance for potential liabilities, including
liabilities arising from litigation,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Contingencies and Business Legal
Proceedings for more information.
If we lose any
of our key personnel, we may be unable to effectively manage our
business or continue our growth.
Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the
continued contributions of our management team and our ability
to attract, hire, train and retain qualified managerial, sales
and marketing personnel. Particularly, we rely on our sales and
marketing teams to create innovative ways to generate demand for
our products. The loss or unavailability to us of any member of
our management team or a key sales or marketing employee could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition to the extent we are unable
to timely find
26
adequate replacements. We face competition for these
professionals from our competitors, our customers and other
companies operating in our industry. We may be unsuccessful in
attracting, hiring, training and retaining qualified personnel,
and our business, results of operations and financial condition
could be materially and adversely effected under such
circumstances.
Interruptions
in the proper functioning of our information systems or failure
to timely and properly complete our current information systems
integration project could disrupt operations and cause increases
in costs and/or decreases in revenues.
The proper functioning of our information systems is critical to
the successful operation of our business. We depend on our
information technology systems to process orders, track credit
risk, manage inventory and monitor accounts receivable
collections. Our information systems also allow us to
efficiently purchase products from our vendors and ship products
to our customers on a timely basis, maintain
cost-effective
operations and provide superior service to our customers.
Although our information systems are protected through physical
and software safeguards and remote processing capabilities
exist, information systems are still vulnerable to natural
disasters, power losses, telecommunication failures and other
problems. If critical information systems fail or are otherwise
unavailable, our ability to procure products to sell, process
and ship customer orders, identify business opportunities,
maintain proper levels of inventories, collect accounts
receivable and pay accounts payable and expenses could be
adversely affected. Our ability to integrate our systems with
our customers systems would also be significantly
affected. We maintain information systems controls designed to
protect against, among other things, unauthorized program
changes and unauthorized access to data on our information
systems. If our information systems controls do not function
properly, we face increased risks of unexpected errors and
unreliable financial data.
In addition, we are currently integrating the information
systems of our predecessor companies McJunkin Corporation and
Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. and our Canadian subsidiary,
Midfield Supply ULC. Our failure to timely and properly complete
this project and train our staff in the use of the integrated
system could cause similar negative effects.
The loss of
third-party
transportation providers upon whom we depend, or conditions
negatively affecting the transportation industry, could increase
our costs or cause a disruption in our operations.
We depend upon
third-party
transportation providers for delivery of products to our
customers. Strikes, slowdowns, transportation disruptions or
other conditions in the transportation industry, including, but
not limited to, shortages of truck drivers, disruptions in rail
service, increases in fuel prices and adverse weather
conditions, could increase our costs and disrupt our operations
and our ability to service our customers on a timely basis. We
cannot predict whether or to what extent recent increases or
anticipated increases in fuel prices may impact our costs or
cause a disruption in our operations going forward.
We may need
additional capital in the future and it may not be available on
acceptable terms.
We may require more capital in the future to:
|
|
|
|
|
fund our operations;
|
|
|
|
finance investments in equipment and infrastructure needed to
maintain and expand our distribution capabilities;
|
|
|
|
enhance and expand the range of products we offer; and
|
|
|
|
respond to potential strategic opportunities, such as
investments, acquisitions and international expansion.
|
27
We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available
on terms favorable to us, or at all. The terms of available
financing may place limits on our financial and operating
flexibility. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable
terms, we may be forced to reduce our operations or delay, limit
or abandon expansion opportunities. Moreover, even if we are
able to continue our operations, the failure to obtain
additional financing could reduce our competitiveness.
Hurricanes or
other adverse weather events could negatively affect our local
economies or disrupt our operations, which could have an adverse
effect on our business or results of operations.
Certain areas in which we operate in the United States,
including areas in the southeastern United States, are
susceptible to hurricanes and other adverse weather conditions.
Such weather events can disrupt our operations, result in damage
to our properties and negatively affect the local economies in
which we operate. Additionally, we may experience communication
disruptions with our customers, vendors and employees. In late
August 2005 and September 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
struck the Gulf Coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and
Texas and caused extensive and catastrophic physical damage to
those market areas. Hurricanes can cause physical damage to our
branches and require us to close branches in order to secure our
employees. Additionally, our sales order backlog and shipments
can experience a temporary decline immediately following
hurricanes.
We cannot predict whether or to what extent damage caused by
future hurricanes and tropical storms will affect our operations
or the economies in regions where we operate. Such adverse
weather events could result in disruption of our purchasing
and/or distribution capabilities, interruption of our business
that exceeds our insurance coverage, our inability to collect
from customers and increased operating costs. Our business or
results of operations may be adversely affected by these and
other negative effects of hurricanes or other adverse weather
events.
The failure of
Red Man Distributors LLC to continue to be certified as a
minority business enterprise could result in the loss of
customers or volume which may have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, McJunkin Red Man Corporation owns
49% of the outstanding equity interests in Red Man Distributors
LLC (RMD), an Oklahoma limited liability company
formed on November 1, 2007 for the purposes of distributing
oil country tubular goods in North America as a certified
minority supplier. RMD is currently certified by each of the
Oklahoma Minority Supplier Development Council and the North
Central Texas Regional Certification Agency as a minority
business enterprise. If for any reason RMD ceases to be
certified as a minority business enterprise, then customers who
may derive advantages from purchasing products from RMD as a
result of its status as a certified minority business enterprise
could terminate their relationships with RMD or reduce their
purchasing volume. The loss of a significant customer of RMD, or
a significant decrease in a customers orders, may have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
We have a
substantial amount of goodwill and other intangibles recorded on
our balance sheet, partly because of our recent acquisitions and
business combination transactions. The amortization of acquired
assets will reduce our future reported earnings and,
furthermore, if our goodwill or other intangible assets become
impaired, we may be required to recognize charges that would
reduce our income.
As of June 26, 2008, we had $1.8 billion of goodwill
and other intangibles recorded on our balance sheet. A
substantial portion of these intangible assets result from our
use of purchase accounting in connection with the GS
Acquisition, our acquisition of Midway-Tristate Corporation, and
the Red Man Transaction. In accordance with the purchase
accounting method, the excess of the cost of purchased assets
over the fair value of such assets is assigned to intangible
assets and is
28
amortized over a period of time. The amortization expense
associated with our intangible assets will have a negative
effect on our future reported earnings. Many other companies,
including many of our competitors, will not have the significant
acquired intangible assets that we have because they have not
participated in recent acquisitions and business combination
transactions similar to ours. Thus, their reported earnings will
not be as negatively affected by the amortization of intangible
assets as our reported earnings will be.
Additionally, under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, goodwill and certain other intangible assets are not
amortized but must be reviewed for possible impairment annually,
or more often in certain circumstances if events indicate that
the asset values are not recoverable. Such reviews could result
in an earnings charge for the impairment of goodwill, which
would reduce our income and negatively affect our stock price
even though there would be no impact on our underlying cash flow.
We face risks
associated with conducting business in markets outside of North
America.
Nigeria is currently the only country outside of North America
in which we conduct business, though we are aware that our
customers use our products outside of North America as well. In
addition, we are evaluating the possibility of establishing
distribution networks in certain other foreign countries,
particularly in West Africa, the Middle East, Europe and South
America. Though our revenue from business in developing
countries is currently not significant, our business, results of
operations and financial condition could be materially and
adversely affected by changes in the developing countries in
which we do business in the future or in which we expand our
business, particularly those countries which have historically
experienced a high degree of political
and/or
economic instability. Examples of risks inherent in such
non-North
American activities include changes in the political and
economic conditions in the countries in which we operate,
including civil uprisings and terrorist acts, unexpected changes
in regulatory requirements, changes in tariffs, the adoption of
foreign or domestic laws limiting exports to certain foreign
countries, fluctuations in currency exchange rates and the value
of the U.S. dollar, restrictions on repatriation of
earnings, expropriation of property without fair compensation,
governmental actions that result in the deprivation of contract
or proprietary rights, the acceptance of business practices
which are not consistent with or antithetical to prevailing
business practices we are accustomed to in North America, and
governmental sanctions. If we begin doing business in a foreign
country in which we do not presently operate, we may also face
difficulties in operations and diversion of management time in
connection with establishing our business there.
The
requirements of being a public company, including compliance
with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, may strain our
resources, increase our costs and distract management, and we
may be unable to comply with these requirements in a timely or
cost-effective manner.
As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the
Exchange Act, and the corporate governance standards of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the
New York Stock Exchange. These requirements may place a strain
on our management, systems and resources. The Exchange Act will
require that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with
respect to our business and financial condition within specified
time periods. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act will require that we
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting. Due to our limited
operating history, our disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls may not meet all of the standards applicable
to public companies subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In order
to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting, significant resources and management oversight will
be required. This may divert managements attention from
other business concerns, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and the price of our common stock.
29
We also expect that it could be difficult and will be
significantly more expensive to obtain directors and
officers liability insurance, and we may be required to
accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially
higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a
result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain
qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as
executive officers. Advocacy efforts by shareholders and third
parties may also prompt even more changes in governance and
reporting requirements. We cannot predict or estimate the amount
of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
We will be
exposed to risks relating to evaluations of controls required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
We are in the process of evaluating our internal controls
systems to allow management to report on, and our independent
auditors to audit, our internal control over financial
reporting. We will be performing the system and process
evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required
to comply with the management certification and auditor
attestation requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and will be required to comply with
Section 404 in our annual report for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (subject to any change in applicable SEC
rules). Furthermore, upon completion of this process, we may
identify control deficiencies of varying degrees of severity
under applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
or SEC, and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB,
rules and regulations that remain unremediated. As a public
company, we will be required to report, among other things,
control deficiencies that constitute a material
weakness or changes in internal controls that, or that are
reasonably likely to, materially affect internal control over
financial reporting. A material weakness is a
significant deficiency or combination of significant
deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that
results in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis.
If we fail to implement the requirements of Section 404 in
a timely manner, we might be subject to sanctions or
investigation by regulatory authorities such as the SEC or the
PCAOB. If we do not implement improvements to our disclosure
controls and procedures or to our internal controls in a timely
manner, our independent registered public accounting firm may
not be able to certify as to the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting pursuant to an audit of our
internal control over financial reporting. This may subject us
to adverse regulatory consequences or a loss of confidence in
the reliability of our financial statements. We could also
suffer a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial
statements if our independent registered public accounting firm
reports a material weakness in our internal controls, if we do
not develop and maintain effective controls and procedures or if
we are otherwise unable to deliver timely and reliable financial
information. Any loss of confidence in the reliability of our
financial statements or other negative reaction to our failure
to develop timely or adequate disclosure controls and procedures
or internal controls could result in a decline in the price of
our common stock. In addition, if we fail to remedy any material
weakness, our financial statements may be inaccurate, we may
face restricted access to the capital markets and our stock
price may be adversely affected.
We are a
controlled company within the meaning of the New
York Stock Exchange rules and, as a result, will qualify for,
and may rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance
requirements.
A company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by
an individual, a group or another company is a controlled
company within the meaning of the New York Stock Exchange
rules and may elect not to comply with certain corporate
governance requirements of the New York Stock Exchange,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement that a majority of our board of directors
consist of independent directors;
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement that we have a nominating/corporate governance
committee that is composed entirely of independent directors
with a written charter addressing the committees purpose
and responsibilities; and
|
|
|
|
the requirement that we have a compensation committee that is
composed entirely of independent directors with a written
charter addressing the committees purpose and
responsibilities.
|
Following this offering, we will rely on some or all of these
exemptions as a controlled company. Accordingly, you will not
have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies
that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements
of the New York Stock Exchange.
We are a newly
combined company with a limited combined operating history, and
the financial statements presented in this prospectus may
therefore not give you an accurate indication of what our future
results of operations are likely to be.
The Red Man Transaction closed on October 31, 2007 and we
have operated as a combined company only since that time. Our
limited combined operating history may make it difficult to
forecast our future operating results and financial condition.
Because of the significance of the Red Man Transaction, the
financial statements for periods prior to the transaction are
not comparable with those after the transaction, and the lack of
comparable data may make it difficult to evaluate our results of
operations and future prospects. The only historical financial
statements of our combined company included in this prospectus
are audited financial statements for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 (which includes McJunkins results
for the full eleven month period and Red Mans results for
only the two months following October 31, 2007) and
unaudited financial statements for the six months ended
June 26, 2008. Pro forma financial information that assumes
that the Red Man Transaction closed on January 1, 2007 as
opposed to the actual closing date of October 31, 2007 is
presented with respect to the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 28,
2007. However, due to our limited combined operating history,
these historical financial statements and the related pro forma
information may not give you an accurate indication of what our
actual results would have been if the combination had been
completed at the beginning of the periods presented or of what
our future results of operations and financial condition are
likely to be. In addition, we acquired Midway-Tristate
Corporation in April 2007, and we acquired the remaining
approximate 49% minority voting interest in Midfield in July
2008, but our pro forma financial statements do not (and are not
required to) give effect to either of these transactions.
Additionally, other historical financial statements reflecting
the separate historical results of operations, financial
position and cash flows of McJunkin and Red Man prior to the Red
Man Transaction are also included in this prospectus. These
financial statements reflect the results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows of McJunkin and Red Man as
stand-alone companies and thus they may not give you an accurate
indication of what our combined results would have been if the
Red Man Transaction had been completed at an earlier time or of
what our future results of operations and financial condition
are likely to be.
Risks Related to
this Offering and our Common Stock
There is no
existing market for our common stock, and we do not know if one
will develop to provide you with adequate liquidity. If our
stock price fluctuates after this offering, you could lose a
significant part of your investment.
Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for
our common stock. If an active trading market does not develop,
you may have difficulty selling any of our common stock that you
buy. The initial public offering price for the shares will be
determined by negotiations among the Company, the selling
stockholder and the underwriters and may not be indicative of
prices that will prevail in the open market following this
offering. Consequently, you may not be able to sell shares of
31
our common stock at prices equal to or greater than the price
you paid in this offering. The market price of our common stock
may be influenced by many factors including:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices;
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts
or acquisitions or other business developments;
|
|
|
|
variations in quarterly results of operations;
|
|
|
|
loss of a large customer or supplier;
|
|
|
|
U.S. and international general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
increased competition;
|
|
|
|
terrorist acts;
|
|
|
|
future sales of our common stock or the perception that such
sales may occur; and
|
|
|
|
investor perceptions of us and the industries in which our
products are used.
|
As a result of these factors, investors in our common stock may
not be able to resell their shares at or above the initial
offering price. In addition, the stock market in general has
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of companies like us. These broad market and
industry factors may significantly reduce the market price of
our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.
Following the
completion of this offering, certain affiliates of The Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. will continue to control us and may have
conflicts of interest with other stockholders. Conflicts of
interest may arise because affiliates of our principal
stockholder have continuing agreements and business
relationships with us.
Upon completion of this offering, certain affiliates of The
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (the Goldman Sachs Funds)
will control % of our outstanding
common stock, or % if the
underwriters exercise their option in full. As a result, the
Goldman Sachs Funds will continue to be able to control the
election of our directors, determine our corporate and
management policies and determine, without the consent of our
other stockholders, the outcome of any corporate transaction or
other matter submitted to our stockholders for approval,
including potential mergers or acquisitions, asset sales and
other significant corporate transactions. The Goldman Sachs
Funds will also have sufficient voting power to amend our
organizational documents.
Conflicts of interest may arise between our principal
stockholder and us. Affiliates of our principal stockholder
engage in transactions with our company. One affiliate of our
principal stockholder, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners, L.P., is
the joint lead arranger for our $1,275 million senior
secured credit facilities and our $450 million term loan
facility. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions. Further, the Goldman Sachs Funds are in the
business of making investments in companies and may, from time
to time, acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete
directly or indirectly with us and they may either directly, or
through affiliates, also maintain business relationships with
companies that may directly compete with us. In general, the
Goldman Sachs Funds or their affiliates could pursue business
interests or exercise their voting power as stockholders in ways
that are detrimental to us but beneficial to themselves or to
other companies in which they invest or with whom they have a
material relationship. Conflicts of interest could also arise
with respect to business opportunities that could be
advantageous to the Goldman Sachs Funds and they may pursue
acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our
business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may
not be available to us. Under the terms of our amended and
restated
32
certificate of incorporation, the Goldman Sachs Funds will have
no obligation to offer us corporate opportunities. See
Description of Our Capital Stock Corporate
Opportunities.
As a result of these relationships, the interests of the Goldman
Sachs Funds may not coincide with the interests of our company
or other holders of our common stock. So long as the Goldman
Sachs Funds continue to control a significant amount of the
outstanding shares of our common stock, the Goldman Sachs Funds
will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively
control our decisions, including potential mergers or
acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate
transactions. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions.
We do not
currently intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future.
It is uncertain when, if ever, we will declare dividends to our
stockholders. We do not currently intend to pay dividends in the
foreseeable future. Our ability to pay dividends is constrained
by our holding company structure under which we are dependent on
payments by our subsidiaries. Additionally, we and our
subsidiaries are parties to credit agreements which restrict our
ability and their ability to pay dividends. See Dividend
Policy and Description of our Indebtedness.
You should not rely on an investment in us if you require
dividend income. In the foreseeable future, the only possible
return on an investment in us would come from an appreciation of
our common stock and there can be no assurance that our common
stock will appreciate after this offering.
Shares
eligible for future sale may cause the price of our common stock
to decline.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market, or the perception that these sales may occur, could
cause the market price of our common stock to decline. This
could also impair our ability to raise additional capital
through the sale of our equity securities. Under our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation, we are authorized to
issue up
to shares
of common stock, of
which shares
of common stock are currently outstanding. Of these shares,
the shares
of common stock sold in this offering will be freely
transferable without restriction or further registration under
the Securities Act by persons other than affiliates,
as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities
Act. Our principal stockholder, directors and executive
officers, who collectively beneficially
own shares,
will enter into
lock-up
agreements, pursuant to which they will agree, subject to
certain exceptions, not to sell or transfer, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock for a period of
180 days from the date of this prospectus, subject to
extension in certain circumstances. Upon the expiration of these
lock-up
agreements, all of these shares of common stock will be tradable
subject to limitations imposed by Rule 144 under the
Securities Act. See Shares Eligible for Future Sale.
33
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. Statements
that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to
future events or conditions or that include the words
believe, expect, anticipate,
intend, estimate and other expressions
that are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and
that do not relate to historical matters identify
forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements
include, among others, statements about our business strategy,
our industry, our future profitability, and the costs of
operating as a public company. These statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including
the factors described under Risk Factors, that may
cause our actual results and performance to be materially
different from any future results or performance expressed or
implied by these forward-looking statements. Such risks and
uncertainties include, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
decreases in oil and gas prices;
|
|
|
|
decreases in oil and gas industry expenditure levels, which may
result from decreased oil and natural gas prices or other
factors;
|
|
|
|
increased usage of alternative fuels, which may negatively
affect oil and gas industry expenditure levels;
|
|
|
|
U.S. and international general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to compete successfully with other companies in our
industry;
|
|
|
|
the risk that manufacturers of our products will sell a
substantial amount of goods directly to end users in the markets
that we serve;
|
|
|
|
unexpected supply shortages;
|
|
|
|
cost increases by our suppliers;
|
|
|
|
our lack of long-term contracts with most of our suppliers;
|
|
|
|
increases in customer, manufacturer and distributor inventory
levels;
|
|
|
|
price reductions by suppliers of products sold by us, which
could cause the value of our inventory to decline;
|
|
|
|
decreases in steel prices, which could significantly lower our
profit;
|
|
|
|
increases in steel prices, which we may be unable to pass along
to our customers, which could significantly lower our profit;
|
|
|
|
our lack of long-term contracts with many of our customers and
our lack of contracts with customers that require minimum
purchase volumes;
|
|
|
|
changes in our customer and product mix;
|
|
|
|
the potential adverse effects associated with integrating Red
Man into our business and whether the Red Man Transaction will
yield its intended benefits;
|
|
|
|
ability to integrate acquired companies into our business;
|
|
|
|
the success of our acquisition strategies;
|
|
|
|
our significant indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
the dependence on our subsidiaries for cash to meet our debt
obligations;
|
|
|
|
changes in our credit profile;
|
|
|
|
a decline in demand for certain of our products if import
restrictions on these products are lifted;
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
the sufficiency of our insurance policies to cover losses,
including liabilities arising from litigation;
|
|
|
|
product liability claims against us;
|
|
|
|
pending or future asbestos-related claims against us;
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
interruption in the proper functioning of our information
systems or failure to timely and properly complete our current
information systems integration project;
|
|
|
|
loss of third-party transportation providers;
|
|
|
|
potential inability to obtain necessary capital;
|
|
|
|
risks related to hurricanes and other adverse weather events;
|
|
|
|
the failure of Red Man Distributors LLC to continue to be
certified as a minority business enterprise;
|
|
|
|
impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in political or economic conditions in the
countries in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
potential increases in costs and distraction of management
resulting from the requirements of being a public company;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to evaluations of internal controls required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
|
|
|
|
the operation of our company as a controlled
company; and
|
|
|
|
our limited operating history as a combined company.
|
You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements. Although forward-looking statements reflect our good
faith beliefs, reliance should not be placed on forward-looking
statements because they involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to differ materially from
anticipated future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.
35
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares
of our common stock by PVF Holdings LLC, the selling
stockholder. PVF Holdings LLC intends to distribute the net
proceeds of this offering, after giving effect to the
underwriting discount, to its members, which include certain
members of our board of directors and senior management team and
various of their affiliates. See Principal and Selling
Stockholders.
Additionally, affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. own a
majority interest in PVF Holdings LLC. Accordingly, such
affiliates will receive a significant portion of the proceeds
from this offering. See Underwriting.
36
DIVIDEND
POLICY
Following the completion of this offering, we do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We
currently intend to retain future earnings from our business, if
any, to finance operations and the expansion of our business.
Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon
our financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements and other factors that the board deems relevant. In
addition, the covenants contained in our subsidiaries
credit facilities limit the ability of our subsidiaries to pay
dividends to us, which limits our ability to pay dividends to
our stockholders. Our ability to pay dividends is also limited
by the covenants contained in our $450 million term loan
facility, and our ability to pay dividends may be further
limited by covenants contained in the instruments governing
future indebtedness that we or our subsidiaries may incur in the
future. See Description of Our Indebtedness.
On May 21, 2008, our board of directors approved a dividend
of $475 million to our stockholders, of which $474,096,204
was distributed to PVF Holdings LLC and $903,796 was held by us
in accordance with the terms of our restricted stock award
agreements with holders of our restricted stock. PVF Holdings
LLC distributed its share of the proceeds of the dividend to its
members, including certain members of our board of directors and
management team, in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Limited Liability Company Agreement of PVF Holdings LLC. See
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Transactions with the Goldman Sachs
Funds May 2008 Dividend. This dividend is not
indicative of future dividends we may pay to our stockholders.
37
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our consolidated cash and cash
equivalents and capitalization as of June 26, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to
(1) a
for split
of our common stock to be effected prior to the pricing of this
offering and (2) transactions in connection with our
purchase of the minority interest in Midfield Supply ULC, one of
our subsidiaries, on July 31, 2008.
|
You should read this table in conjunction with Unaudited
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements,
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt (including current portion):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured revolving credit facility(1)
|
|
|
204.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured term loan facility
|
|
|
567.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior term loan facility
|
|
|
450.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield revolving credit facility(2)
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield term loan facility
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield notes payable(3)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt before Midfield shareholder loans
|
|
|
1,284.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield shareholder loans(3)
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,313.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share;
1,000,000 shares authorized, 311,364.7277 shares
issued and outstanding,
actual; shares
authorized, shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; no shares
authorized, issued or outstanding,
actual; shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
825.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 26, 2008, we had outstanding $204.4 million
of borrowings and availability of $490.9 million under our
senior secured revolving credit facility. |
|
(2) |
|
As of June 26, 2008, we had outstanding $51.7 million
of borrowings and availability of $51.6 million under the
Midfield revolving credit facility. |
|
(3) |
|
The as adjusted column gives effect to total payments made in
connection with our purchase on July 31, 2008 of all of the
minority interest in Midfield Supply ULC, one of our
subsidiaries. Total payments consisted of CDN$86.5 million
paid to shareholders of and lenders to Midfield Holdings
(Alberta) Ltd., the holder of the minority interest, and
approximately US$47.7 million paid to former |
38
|
|
|
|
|
shareholders of Red Man pursuant to the stock purchase agreement
entered into in connection with the Red Man Transaction. In
connection with the purchase of the minority interest, the
Midfield shareholder loans were paid in full. |
|
(4) |
|
The number of shares of common stock outstanding on an actual
and as adjusted basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
granted to certain of our employees pursuant to the McJ Holding
Corporation 2007 Stock Option Plan; and
|
|
|
|
excludes shares
of non-vested restricted stock awarded to certain of our
employees and directors pursuant to the McJ Holding Corporation
2007 Restricted Stock Plan.
|
39
DILUTION
Our pro forma net tangible book value per share as of
June 26, 2008, both before and after giving effect to this
offering, was approximately
$ million. Pro forma net
tangible book value per share represents the amount of tangible
assets less total liabilities divided by the pro forma number of
shares of common stock outstanding (giving effect to
the
for split of our
common stock which will occur prior to the pricing of this
offering). There will be no increase in our pro forma net
tangible book value per share on account of this offering
because we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares
in this offering. Purchasers of shares in this offering will not
incur immediate dilution because our pro forma net tangible book
value per share will not be affected by this offering.
The following table sets forth as of June 26, 2008 the
number of shares of common stock purchased from us or to be
purchased from the selling stockholder, total consideration paid
or to be paid and the average price per share paid by our
existing stockholders and by new investors, on a pro forma basis
to give effect to
the
for
split of our common stock which will occur prior to the pricing
of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
New investors(2)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total consideration and average price per share paid by the
existing stockholders give effect to the $475 million
distribution made to the existing stockholders in May 2008 using
proceeds from our senior secured revolving credit facility and
junior term loan facility. If the table were adjusted to not
give effect to these payments, existing stockholders total
consideration for their shares would be
$ with an average share price of
$ . |
|
(2) |
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public
offering price of $ per share,
which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) total
consideration paid by new investors and total consideration paid
by all stockholders by
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by the selling stockholder, as set
forth on the cover page of the prospectus, remains the same. |
|
(3) |
|
If the underwriters exercise their option to
purchase shares
from the selling stockholder in full, then new investors would
purchase shares,
or approximately % of shares
outstanding, and the total consideration paid by new investors
would increase to $ ,
or % of the total consideration
paid (based on the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus). |
As of June 26, 2008, there were options outstanding to
purchase shares of our common stock, with exercise prices
ranging from $ to
$ per share and a weighted average
exercise price of $ per share
(after taking into account
the
for
split of our common stock which will occur prior to the pricing
of this offering). Also, as of June 26, 2008, there
were shares
of unvested restricted stock outstanding (after giving effect to
the stock split). The tables and calculations above assume that
those options have not been exercised and the restricted stock
has not vested. If these options were exercised at the weighted
average exercise price and the restricted stock was fully
vested, the additional dilution per share to new investors would
be $ .
40
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
On January 31, 2007, McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation,
an affiliate of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., acquired a
majority of the equity of the entity now known as McJunkin Red
Man Corporation (then known as McJunkin Corporation) (the
GS Acquisition). In this prospectus, the term
Predecessor refers to McJunkin Corporation and its
subsidiaries prior to January 31, 2007 and the term
Successor refers to the entity now known as McJunkin
Red Man Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries on and after
January 31, 2007. As a result of the change in McJunkin
Corporations basis of accounting in connection with the GS
Acquisition, Predecessors financial statement data for the
one month ended January 30, 2007 and earlier periods is not
comparable to Successors financial data for the eleven
months ended December 31, 2007 and subsequent periods.
McJunkin Corporation completed a business combination
transaction with Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. (the
Red Man Transaction) on October 31, 2007. At
that time McJunkin Corporation was renamed McJunkin Red Man
Corporation. Operating results for the eleven-month period ended
December 31, 2007 include the results of McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation for the full period and the results of Red
Man Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man) for the
two months after the business combination on October 31,
2007. Accordingly, our results for the 11 months ended
December 31, 2007 are not comparable to McJunkins
results for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
The selected consolidated financial information presented below
under the captions Statement of Operations Data and Other
Financial Data for the one month ended January 30, 2007
(Predecessor) and the eleven months ended December 31,
2007, and the selected consolidated financial information
presented below under the caption Balance Sheet Data as of
December 31, 2007, have been derived from the consolidated
financial statements of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation
included elsewhere in this prospectus that have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm. The selected consolidated financial information
presented below as of and for the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2006 has been derived from the consolidated financial
statements of our Predecessor, McJunkin Corporation, included
elsewhere in this prospectus that have been audited by Schneider
Downs & Co., Inc., independent registered public
accounting firm. The selected consolidated financial information
presented below as of and for the years ended December 31,
2003 and 2004 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of our predecessor, McJunkin Corporation,
that are not included in this prospectus.
The selected unaudited interim consolidated financial
information presented below under the captions Statement of
Operations Data and Other Financial Data for the six months
ended June 26, 2008 and the five months ended June 28,
2007, and the selected unaudited consolidated financial
information presented below under the caption Balance Sheet Data
as of June 26, 2008, have been derived from our unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus and have been prepared on the same
basis as our audited consolidated financial statements. In the
opinion of management, the interim data reflect all adjustments,
consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of results for these periods. Operating
results for the six months ended June 26, 2008 include the
results of McJunkin Corporation and Red Man for the full period.
Operating results for the five-month period ending June 28,
2007 do not reflect the operating results of Red Man, as the Red
Man Transaction did not occur until October 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the results for the six months ended June 26,
2008 are not comparable to the results for the five months ended
June 28, 2007. In addition, operating results for the
six-month period ended June 26, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
We calculated earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and the six months ended June 26,
2008 on a pro forma basis, based on the actual number of shares
outstanding at the time of the initial public offering.
41
The selected historical consolidated financial data presented
below has been derived from financial statements that have been
prepared using United States generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP. This data should be read in conjunction
with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
June 28, 2007
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share and share data)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
784.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,196.0
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
635.9
|
|
|
|
1,803.8
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
200.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
729.8
|
|
|
|
2,041.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
154.5
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.2
|
)
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
119.1
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
324.0
|
|
|
|
686.1
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
474.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,551.7
|
|
|
|
3,294.3
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
747.4
|
|
|
|
1,284.7
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
|
392.9
|
|
|
|
824.4
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
70.5
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(933.3
|
)
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
945.9
|
|
|
|
(55.2
|
)
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
11 Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except as otherwise indicated)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
798.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,081.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,445.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,713.7
|
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,124.9
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
644.5
|
|
|
|
867.6
|
|
|
|
1,177.1
|
|
|
|
1,394.3
|
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,734.6
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
118.7
|
|
|
|
140.5
|
|
|
|
155.7
|
|
|
|
173.9
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
201.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
773.1
|
|
|
|
1,024.0
|
|
|
|
1,349.9
|
|
|
|
1,587.5
|
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,968.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
126.2
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
156.4
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.7
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
|
|
89.1
|
|
|
|
117.9
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
93.5
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
31.4
|
|
|
$
|
52.5
|
|
|
$
|
69.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares, basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares, diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
112.3
|
|
|
|
115.6
|
|
|
|
129.0
|
|
|
|
212.3
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
663.5
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
265.3
|
|
|
|
323.9
|
|
|
|
434.0
|
|
|
|
481.0
|
|
|
|
474.2
|
|
|
|
|
2,925.0
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
868.4
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
120.9
|
|
|
|
132.3
|
|
|
|
168.8
|
|
|
|
242.6
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,210.0
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.2
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,788.9
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,687.2
|
|
43
PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On January 31, 2007, McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation,
an affiliate of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., acquired a
majority of the equity of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (then
known as McJunkin Corporation) (the GS Acquisition).
In connection with the GS Acquisition, McJunkin Corporation
entered into a $575 million term loan facility on
January 31, 2007. On October 31, 2007, McJunkin
Corporation completed a business combination transaction with
Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. (the Red Man
Transaction). At that time McJunkin Corporation was
renamed McJunkin Red Man Corporation. McJunkin Red Man
Corporation entered into a $650 million revolving credit
facility on October 31, 2007 in connection with the Red Man
Transaction. This revolving credit facility was upsized to
$700 million on June 10, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 has been derived from (1) the
audited consolidated statement of income of McJunkin Corporation
for the one month ended January 30, 2007 (before the GS
Acquisition), (2) the audited consolidated statement of
income of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation for the eleven
months ended December 31, 2007 (which includes the results
of McJunkin for 11 months and the results of Red Man for
the two months ended December 31, 2007), and (3) the
audited statement of operations of Red Man Pipe &
Supply Co. for the twelve months ended October 31, 2007.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 has been adjusted to exclude the results
of Red Man for the two months ended December 31, 2007 and
to give pro forma effect to (1) the GS Acquisition and the
Red Man Transaction as if each such transaction had occurred on
January 1, 2007, and (2) our entering into our
$575 million term loan facility and our $700 million
revolving credit facility, as if we had entered into these
facilities on January 1, 2007.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated income statement of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation for the six months ended
June 28, 2007 has been derived from (1) the audited
consolidated statement of income of McJunkin Corporation for the
one month ended January 30, 2007 (before the GS
Acquisition), (2) the unaudited consolidated statement of
income of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation for the five
months ended June 28, 2007 (before the Red Man
Transaction), and (3) the unaudited consolidated statement
of operations of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. for the six
months ended April 30, 2007. The unaudited pro forma
consolidated income statement of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation for the six months ended June 28, 2007 has been
adjusted to give pro forma effect to (1) the GS Acquisition
and the Red Man Transaction as if each such transaction had
occurred on January 1, 2007, and (2) our entering into
our $575 million term loan facility and our
$700 million revolving credit facility, as if we had
entered into these facilities on January 1, 2007.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements also
do not give effect to our acquisition of Midway-Tristate
Corporation (Midway) on April 30, 2007 and
therefore do not include Midways results for the four
months ended April 30, 2007 nor do they give pro forma
effect to Midway as if the acquisition had occurred on
January 1, 2007. Midway was not a significant
acquisition within the meaning of
Rule 3-05
of
Regulation S-X.
The unaudited pro forma income statements also do not give
effect to our purchase of the approximate 49% minority voting
interest in Midfield, one of our subsidiaries, on July 31,
2008. Red Man originally acquired 51% of Midfield in 2005 and
the purchase of the remaining 49% in July 2008 was not a
significant acquisition within the meaning of Rule
3-05 of
Regulation
S-K. The
assets and liabilities of Midfield are included in the audited
consolidated financial statements of MRM at December 31,
2007.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements are
provided for informational purposes only and do not purport to
represent or be indicative of the results that actually would
have been obtained had the transactions described above occurred
on January 1, 2007 and are not intended to project our
consolidated financial position or results of operations for any
future period. The pro forma adjustments are based on available
information and certain assumptions that we believe are
reasonable. The pro forma adjustments and certain assumptions
are described in the accompanying notes. Other information
included under this heading has been presented to provide
additional analysis.
44
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements below
should be read in conjunction with the historical financial
statements, the related notes and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included elsewhere in this prospectus.
PRO FORMA INCOME
STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McJunkin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McJunkin
|
|
|
|
Red Man
|
|
|
|
Red Man
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Six
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
April 30,
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
784.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
934.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,862.1
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
635.9
|
|
|
|
|
779.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,529.9
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
729.8
|
|
|
|
|
863.1
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,730.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
|
71.6
|
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
131.7
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
100.5
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Reflects the increase in
depreciation and amortization resulting from the revaluation of
our assets in connection with the GS Acquisition and the Red Man
Transaction, as if these transactions had each occurred on
January 1, 2007. All significant assets that were acquired
in each of these transactions were revalued to their estimated
fair value. The pro forma adjustment includes a $544,000
increase in depreciation and amortization in connection with the
revaluation of assets acquired in the GS Acquisition, and a
$80,000 increase in depreciation and amortization in connection
with the revaluation of assets acquired in the Red Man
Transaction.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Reflects the increase in
amortization of intangibles in connection with the GS
Acquisition and the Red Man Transaction, as if these
transactions had each occurred on January 1, 2007. In
accordance with the purchase accounting method, the fair value
of certain identifiable intangible assets is amortized over the
assets estimated life. The pro forma adjustment includes a
$707,500 increase in amortization of intangibles in connection
with the assets acquired in the GS Acquisition, and a $5,371,000
increase in amortization of intangibles in connection with the
assets acquired in the Red Man Transaction.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Reflects the interest expense for
(1) interest resulting from our entering into our
$575 million term loan facility and the $700 million
revolving credit facility, as if we entered into these
facilities on January 1, 2007 (an assumed average interest
rate of 7.11% based on LIBOR was used to calculate interest
expense on an average annual balance of $802 million of
debt) and (2) amortization of the related deferred
financing costs of $1,896,000 amortized over the life of the
related debt instruments. Actual interest expense may be higher
or lower depending upon fluctuations in interest rates. A 1/8%
change in interest rates would have resulted in a $501,000
change in interest expense for the six month period. No pro
forma adjustment has been made to reflect an increase in
interest expense that would have resulted had we entered into
our $450 million junior term loan facility at any time
during the six month period because our entry into this facility
was not related to funding the Red Man Transaction or the GS
Acquisition.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Reflects our elimination of
minority interest expense related to McJunkin Appalachian
Oilfield Supply Company in connection with the GS Acquisition on
January 31, 2007 as if we acquired the minority interest on
January 1, 2007.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Reflects the reduction in income
tax expense as a result of (1) the pro forma adjustments
described above, which resulted in a lower amount of pre-tax
income, and (2) the lower effective income tax rate
applicable to our combined company, which is lower than the
historical income tax rates applicable to McJunkin and Red Man
separately, as if our combined companys current income tax
rate was in effect from January 1, 2007 onward.
|
45
PRO FORMA INCOME
STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McJunkin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Man
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McJunkin
|
|
|
|
Red Man
|
|
|
|
Red Man
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Two Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
142.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,124.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,982.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(296.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,952.7
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
114.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,734.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,632.3
|
|
|
|
|
(252.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,229.2
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
201.9
|
|
|
|
|
176.9
|
|
|
|
|
(27.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
130.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,968.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,818.9
|
|
|
|
|
(282.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
3,646.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
156.4
|
|
|
|
|
163.1
|
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
306.0
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(60.8
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(62.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
64.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
93.5
|
|
|
|
|
139.8
|
|
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
241.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
82.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Reflects the increase in
depreciation and amortization resulting from the revaluation of
our assets in connection with the GS Acquisition and the Red Man
Transaction, as if these transactions had each occurred on
January 1, 2007. All significant assets that were acquired
in each of these transactions were revalued to their estimated
fair value. The pro forma adjustment includes a $420,000
increase in depreciation and amortization in connection with the
revaluation of assets acquired in the GS Acquisition and a
$374,000 decrease in depreciation and amortization in connection
with the revaluation of assets acquired in the Red Man
Transaction.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Reflects the increase in
amortization of intangibles in connection with the GS
Acquisition and the Red Man Transaction, as if these
transactions had each occurred on January 1, 2007. In
accordance with the purchase accounting method, the fair value
of certain identifiable intangible assets is amortized over the
assets estimated life. The pro forma adjustment includes a
$190,000 increase in amortization of intangibles in connection
with the assets acquired in the GS Acquisition and a $10,250,000
increase in amortization of intangibles in connection with the
assets acquired in the Red Man Transaction.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Reflects the interest expense for
(1) interest resulting from our entering into our
$575 million term loan facility and the $700 million
revolving credit facility, as if we entered into these
facilities on January 1, 2007 (an assumed average interest
rate of 7.11% based on LIBOR was used to calculate interest
expense on an average annual balance of $801 million of
debt) and (2) amortization of the related deferred
financing costs of $3,792,000 amortized over the life of the
related debt instruments. Actual interest expense may be higher
or lower depending upon fluctuations in interest rates. A 1/8%
change in interest rates would have resulted in a $1,002,000
change in interest expense for the twelve month period. No pro
forma adjustment has been made to reflect an increase in
interest expense that would have resulted had we entered into
our $450 million junior term loan facility at any time
during the twelve month period because our entry into this
facility was not related to funding the Red Man Transaction or
the GS Acquisition.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Reflects our elimination of
minority interest expense related to McJunkin Appalachian
Oilfield Supply Company in connection with the GS Acquisition on
January 31, 2007 as if we acquired the minority interest on
January 1, 2007.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Reflects the reduction in income
tax expense as a result of (1) the pro forma adjustments
described above, which resulted in a lower amount of pre-tax
income, and (2) the lower effective income tax rate
applicable to our combined company, which is lower than the
historical income tax rates applicable to McJunkin and Red Man
separately, as if our combined companys current income tax
rate was in effect from January 1, 2007 onward.
|
46
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with our financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion and analysis
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of a number of factors, including, but
not limited to, those set forth under Risk Factors,
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are the largest North American distributor of pipe, valves
and fittings (PVF) and related products and services
to the energy industry based on sales and the leading PVF
distributor serving this industry across each of the upstream
(exploration, production, and extraction of underground oil and
gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas
utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and
downstream (crude oil refining and petrochemical processing)
markets. We have an unmatched presence of over 250 branches that
are located in the most active oil and gas regions in North
America. We offer an extensive array of PVF and oilfield
supplies encompassing over 100,000 products, we are diversified
by geography and end market and we seek to provide best-in-class
service to our customers by satisfying the most complex,
multi-site needs of some of the largest companies in the energy
and industrial sectors as their primary supplier. As a result,
we have an average relationship of over 20 years with our
top ten customers and our pro forma sales in 2007 were over
twice as large as our nearest competitor. We believe the
critical role we play in our customers supply chain, our
unmatched scale and extensive product offering, our broad North
American geographic presence, our customer-linked scalable
information systems and our efficient distribution capabilities
serve to solidify our long-standing customer relationships and
drive our growth.
We have benefited in recent years from several growth trends
within the energy industry including high levels of expansion
and maintenance capital expenditures by our customers. This
growth in spending has been driven by several factors, including
underinvestment in North American energy infrastructure,
production and capacity constraints and anticipated strength in
the oil, natural gas, refined products and petrochemical
markets. While current prices for oil and natural gas are high
relative to historical levels, we believe that investment in the
energy sector by our customers would continue at prices well
below current levels. In addition, our products are often used
in extreme operating environments leading to the need for a
regular replacement cycle. As a result, over 50% of our pro
forma sales in 2007 were attributable to multi-year maintenance,
repair and operations (MRO) contracts where we have
demonstrated an over 99% average annual retention rate since
2000. The combination of these ongoing factors has helped
increase demand for our products and services, resulting in
record levels of orders as of August 2008. For the twelve months
ended December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, we generated
sales of $3,952.7 million, Adjusted EBITDA of
$370.4 million and net income of $150.8 million.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 on a pro
forma basis, approximately 46% of our sales were attributable to
upstream activities, approximately 22% were attributable to
midstream activities, and approximately 32% were attributable to
downstream activities.
Key Factors
Affecting Our Business
Our revenues are predominantly derived from the sale of PVF and
other oilfield service supplies to the energy industry in North
America. Our business is therefore dependent upon conditions in
the energy sector and, in particular, maintenance and
expansionary capital expenditures by our customers in the
upstream, midstream and downstream sectors of the energy
industry. Growth in spending has been, and we believe will
continue to be, driven by several factors, including
underinvestment in North
47
American energy infrastructure, production and capacity
constraints, and anticipated strength in the oil, natural gas,
refined products and petrochemical markets. The outlook for
future oil, natural gas, refined products and petrochemical
prices are influenced by numerous factors, including but not
limited to the factors listed in Risk Factors
beginning on page 17 as well as the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas price volatility. Proceeds
from the sale of PVF and related products to the oil and gas
industry constitute a significant portion of our sales. As a
result, we depend upon the oil and gas industry and its ability
and willingness to make capital expenditures to explore for,
develop and produce oil and gas and refined products. If these
expenditures decline due to declining prices or otherwise, our
business will suffer.
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in steel
prices. Fluctuations in steel prices can lead
to volatility in the pricing of our products, which can
influence the buying patterns of our customers and have a
negative impact on our results of operations.
|
|
|
|
Economic downturns. The demand for our
products is dependent on the general economy, the energy and
industrials sectors and other factors. Downturns in the general
economy or in the energy and industrials sectors (domestically
or internationally) could cause demand for our products to
materially decrease.
|
|
|
|
Increases in customer, manufacturer and distributor
inventory levels of PVF and related
products. Customer, manufacturer and
distributor inventory levels of PVF and related products can
change significantly from period to period. Increases in our
customers inventory levels can have a direct adverse
affect on the demand for our products when customers draw from
inventory rather than purchase new products. Reduced demand, in
turn, would likely result in reduced sales volume and overall
profitability. Increased inventory levels by manufacturers or
other distributors can cause an oversupply of PVF and related
products in our markets and reduce the prices that we are able
to charge for our products. Reduced prices, in turn, would
likely reduce our profitability.
|
History
McJunkin Corporation (McJunkin) and Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man), two leading
national PVF distributors, completed a business combination
transaction in October 2007 to create our combined company
(McJunkin Red Man). The combination created the
largest North American PVF distributor to the energy industry
based on sales, with pro forma sales of more than twice those of
our nearest competitor.
McJunkin
Corporation
McJunkin Corporation (formerly known as McJunkin Supply Company)
was founded in 1921 in Charleston, West Virginia by
brothers-in-law
Jerry McJunkin and H. Bernard Wehrle and initially primarily
served the local oil and gas industry. Following post-war
economic expansion, by the end of the 1960s McJunkin had 29
branches in 18 states with sales of approximately
$60 million, focusing primarily on the downstream sector.
In 1989 McJunkin broadened its upstream presence by merging its
oil and gas division with Appalachian Pipe & Supply
Co. to form McJunkin Appalachian Oilfield Supply Company
(McJunkin Appalachian), which focused primarily on
upstream oil and gas customers. Since 2001, McJunkin Corporation
has integrated eight acquisitions, with pro forma revenues in
the respective years of acquisition totaling approximately
$300 million, and became a leading supplier of PVF products
to customers in the Appalachian region and California.
In January 2007, affiliates of Goldman Sachs Capital Partners
(the Goldman Sachs Funds) acquired a controlling
interest in McJunkin Corporation. The Goldman Sachs Funds are
part of Goldman Sachs Principal Investment Area, a leading
private equity and mezzanine investor.
48
Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co.
Red Man was founded in 1977 in Tulsa, Oklahoma by the late Lewis
B. Ketchum, a member and former Chief of the Delaware Indian
Tribe headquartered in Oklahoma. The heritage and tradition of
the Delaware Indian was very important to Mr. Ketchum and
was the basis upon which he gave the company the name Red
Man. Red Man began as a distributor to the upstream energy
sector and subsequently expanded into the midstream and
downstream energy sectors. Since then, Red Man has grown
organically and through a number of acquisitions in the United
States. In 2005, Red Man acquired an approximate 51% voting
interest in Canadian oilfield distributor Midfield, giving Red
Man a significant presence in the Western Canadian Sedimentary
Basin. We acquired the remaining voting interest and equity
interest in Midfield on July 31, 2008.
In October 2007, McJunkin and Red Man completed a business
combination transaction (the Red Man Transaction) to
form the combined company, McJunkin Red Man.
Results of
Operations
Our results of operations for the year ended December 31,
2007 consist of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporations
results of operations for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 and McJunkin Corporations results
of operations for the one month ended January 30, 2007. Our
financial statements for 2007 include two reporting periods
because on January 31, 2007, the entity now known as
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation, an affiliate of the
Goldman Sachs Funds, acquired a majority of the equity of the
entity now known as McJunkin Red Man Corporation (then known as
McJunkin Corporation, or McJunkin), and McJunkins basis of
accounting was deemed to have changed on that date. As a result,
we have compared below (1) our results of operations for
the six months ended June 26, 2008 with our results of
operations for the five months ended June 28, 2007 and
McJunkins results of operations for the one month ended
January 30, 2007, (2) our results of operations for
the eleven months ended December 31, 2007 and
McJunkins results of operations for the one month ended
January 30, 2007 with McJunkins results of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and
(3) McJunkins results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2006 with McJunkins results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2005. McJunkin
Red Man Holding Corporations results of operations for
periods subsequent to January 30, 2007 (before the GS
Acquisition occurred) may not be comparable to McJunkins
results of operations prior to that date.
Operating results for the eleven-month period ended
December 31, 2007 include the results of McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation for the full period and the results of Red
Man for the two months after the business combination on
October 31, 2007. Accordingly, results for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (which do not reflect the operating
results of Red Man) are not comparable to the results for the
eleven months ended December 31, 2007 (which include the
operating results of Red Man for two months). Operating results
for the five-month period ending June 28, 2007 do not
reflect the operating results of Red Man, as the Red Man
Transaction did not occur until October 31, 2007.
Accordingly, the results for the six months ended June 26,
2008 (which include the operating results of Red Man for the
full period) are not comparable to the results for the five
months ended June 28, 2007.
Given the materiality of Red Mans financial results to our
business, we have also compared (1) the results of
operations of Red Man for the year ended October 31, 2007
with Red Mans results of operations for the year ended
October 31, 2006 and (2) the results of operations of
Red Man for the year ended October 31, 2006 with Red
Mans results of operations for the year ended
October 31, 2005. Red Mans results of operations are
included in our results of operations beginning after
October 31, 2007.
49
Six Months
Ended June 26, 2008 (Successor) Compared to the Five Months
Ended June 28, 2007 (Successor) and the One Month Ended
January 30, 2007 (Predecessor)
Sales. Sales include the revenue
recognized from the sales of our products and services to
customers and freight billings to customers, less cash discounts
taken by customers in return for their early payment of our
invoices to them. Our sales were $2,196 million for the six
months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to $785 million
for the five months ended June 28, 2007 and McJunkins
sales of $143 million for the one month ended
January 30, 2007. The increase of $1,268 million for
the six months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to the
combined six month period ended June 28, 2007 was due to
the inclusion of $1,047 million of Red Man sales in the six
months ended June 26, 2008, as well as the inclusion of
Midway Tri-States sales for the full six months of 2008
compared with only May and June of 2007 of approximately
$48 million and significant increases in our exploration
and production and petroleum refining business.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales consists
of the cost of our products at their weighted average actual
cost, in-bound and out-bound freight expense, LIFO expense,
manufacturers rebates, physical inventory gains/losses,
and inventory obsolescence charges, less cash discounts that we
earn by early payment of vendor invoices. Our cost of sales was
$1,804 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to $636 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and McJunkins cost of sales of
$115 million for the one month ended January 30, 2007.
As a percentage of sales, cost of sales was 82.1% for the six
months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to 81.0% for the
five months ended June 28, 2007 and 80.4% for the one month
period ended January 30, 2007. The increase of
$1.053 billion for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to the combined six month period ended June 28,
2007 was due to the inclusion of $882 million of Red Man
cost of sales, the inclusion of Midways cost of sales for
the full six months of 2008 compared with only May and June of
2007 of approximately $40 million, increases in our
exploration and production and petroleum refining business, and
additional LIFO expense resulting from greater rates of
inflation in the cost of our products in 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Costs such as salaries, wages,
employee benefits, rent, utilities, communications, insurance,
fuel, and taxes (other than state and federal income taxes) that
are necessary to operate our branch and corporate operations are
included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Also
contained in this category are certain items that are
non-operational in nature, including certain costs of acquiring
and integrating other businesses. Our selling, general and
administrative expenses were $200.1 million for the six
months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to
$80.7 million for the five months ended June 28, 2007
and McJunkins selling, general and administrative expenses
of $14.6 million for the one month ended January 30,
2007. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and
administrative expenses were 9.1% for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to 10.3% for the combined six
month period ended June 28, 2007. The increase of
$104.8 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to the combined six month period ended June 28,
2007 was due to the inclusion of Red Mans
$98.7 million of selling, general and administrative
expenses; the absence of $8.6 million of expenses incurred
in the 2007 periods related to the GS Acquisition (including
payments of $6.2 million to former McJunkin Appalachian
shareholders); an increase in wages and benefits of
$8.7 million; Red Man integration expenses of
$2.3 million; and an increase in fuel expense of
$0.8 million.
Depreciation and Amortization. Our
depreciation and amortization was $5.2 million for the six
months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to $1.7 million
for the five months ended June 28, 2007 and McJunkins
depreciation and amortization of $0.3 million for the one
month ended January 30, 2007. The increase of
$3.2 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008 as
compared to the combined six month period ended June 28,
2007 was due to the inclusion of depreciation on the Midway
Supply and Red Man assets from the date of each transaction as
well as the write up of assets to fair value in purchase
accounting for the GS Acquisition and the Midway and Red Man
transactions.
50
Amortization of Intangibles. In
connection with the January 2007 acquisition of a controlling
interest in McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds, the April 2007
acquisition of Midway Tristate by McJunkin, and the October 2007
business combination between Red Man and McJunkin, the fair
values of intangible assets were determined based upon
assumptions related to future cash flows, discounts rates and
asset lives. These amortizable intangible assets consist of
sales order backlog at the date of the transactions, the
customer base of each entity, and non-compete agreements which
are amortized over a weighted average amortization period of
30.3 years. Our amortization of intangibles was
$15.6 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to $4.6 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and McJunkins amortization of
intangibles of $0.02 million for the one month ended
January 30, 2007. The increase of $11.0 million for
the six months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to the
combined six month period ended June 28, 2007 was the
result of the timing of each of the three transactions described
above. In particular, the six months ended June 26, 2008
included $10.5 million of amortization expense associated
with the Red Man Transaction for which there were no
corresponding amounts for the five months ended June 28,
2007 and one month ended January 30, 2007. This
$10.5 million of amortization expense includes
$2.6 million of amortization which was estimated in 2007
because the business combination occurred late in the year and
the purchase price allocation was preliminary pending receipt of
appraisals and valuations at year-end.
Profit Sharing. We have a qualified,
defined-contribution plan for employees who meet eligibility
requirements, generally six months of service. This plan
provides for annual discretionary contributions generally based
upon company operating results. Our profit sharing expense was
$13.5 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to $5.6 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and McJunkins profit sharing of
$1.3 million for the one month ended January 30, 2007.
The increase of $6.6 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to the combined six month period
ended June 28, 2007 was due to an increase in the number of
our employees primarily as a result of the Midway and Red Man
transactions.
Stock-Based Compensation. Our
equity-based compensation consists of restricted common units in
PVF Holdings LLC, profit units in PVF Holdings LLC, restricted
stock and non-qualified stock options. In conjunction with the
acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds, certain key
employees received restricted common units in PVF Holdings LLC,
and in conjunction with the acquisition of McJunkin by the
Goldman Sachs Funds and the Red Man Transaction, certain key
employees received profits units in PVF Holdings LLC. In
addition, effective March 27, 2007, our board of directors
approved the formation of the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan and the
2007 Stock Option Plan. The purpose of these plans is to aid us
in recruiting and retaining key employees, directors and
consultants of outstanding ability and to motivate such key
employees, directors and consultants to exert their best efforts
on our behalf by providing them incentives in the form of
restricted stock and stock options. It is expected that the
Company will benefit from the added interest which such key
employees, directors and consultants will have in the welfare of
the Company as a result of their proprietary interest in the
Companys success. Our stock- based compensation was
$3.3 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008 as
compared to $1.3 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and no stock-based compensation for the one
month ended January 30, 2007. The increase of
$2.0 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008 as
compared to the combined six month period ended June 28,
2007 was due to the adoption of our equity plans in January and
March 2007 and the addition of incremental participants as a
result of the Red Man Transaction in October 2007.
Operating Income. As a result of the
aforementioned items, our operating income was
$154.5 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to $55.1 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and McJunkins operating income of
$11.7 million for the one month ended January 30,
2007, an increase of $87.7 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to the combined six month period
ended June 28, 2007.
51
Interest Expense. Our interest expense
was $35.0 million for the six months ended June 26,
2008 as compared to $24.3 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and McJunkins interest expense of
$0.1 million for the one month ended January 30, 2007.
The increase of $10.6 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to the combined six month period
ended June 28, 2007 was due to the increased amounts of
debt incurred
and/or
assumed in conjunction with the GS Acquisition and the Midway
and Red Man transactions, including Midfields Canadian
debt. Interest expense for the six months ended June 26,
2008 also reflects approximately $2.6 million of expense
associated with the Junior Term Loan Facility which was entered
into on May 22, 2008, the proceeds of which were used to
fund a dividend to our shareholders.
Minority Interests. Our minority
interests were $0.1 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 (all related to Midfield) as compared to none
for the five months ended June 28, 2007 and McJunkins
minority interests of $0.4 million for the one month ended
January 30, 2007 (which was due to McJunkin Appalachian).
The decrease of $0.3 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to the combined six month period
ended June 28, 2007 was due to the repurchase of the
minority interest held by McJunkin Appalachians management
in January 2007. In connection with our 1989 transaction with
Appalachian Pipe and Supply which formed our McJunkin
Appalachian subsidiary, certain members of Appalachians
management group retained a minority ownership in the combined
company. As part of the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman
Sachs Funds in January 2007, these minority shareholders were
bought out and McJunkin Appalachian became a wholly owned
subsidiary of McJunkin. On December 31, 2007, McJunkin
Appalachian was merged into McJunkin Red Man Corporation. In
addition, in 2005 Red Man acquired an approximate 51% interest
in Midfield.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Our other
expense, net was $0.3 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to other expense, net of
$0.9 million for the five months ended June 28, 2007
and McJunkins other expense, net of $15,000 for the one
month ended January 30, 2007. The decrease of
$0.6 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008 as
compared to the combined six month period ended June 28,
2007 was due in part to $0.4 million derivatives expense,
$0.1 million increase in bank charges, and
$0.1 million increase in directors fees.
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax
expense was $43.2 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to $12.3 million for the
five months ended June 28, 2007 and McJunkins income
tax expense of $4.6 million for the one month ended
January 30, 2007. The increase of $26.3 million for
the six months ended June 26, 2008 as compared to the
combined six month period ended June 28, 2007 was due to
the inclusion of Red Mans results, which added
$10.3 million to our income tax expense, and higher pre-tax
income, partially offset by certain tax savings in the six
months ended June 26, 2008. Our effective tax rates were
36.26% for the six months ended June 26, 2008, 41.18% for
the five months ended June 28, 2007 and 41.08% for the one
month ended January 30, 2007. These rates differ from the
federal statutory rate of 35% principally as a result of state
income taxes. The rate for the six months ended June 26,
2008 is lower than the rates for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and the one month ended January 30, 2007
primarily due to lower state taxes.
Net Income. Our net income was
$75.9 million for the six months ended June 26, 2008
as compared to $17.6 million for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and McJunkins net income of
$6.6 million for the one month ended January 30, 2007.
Net income increased $51.7 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 as compared to the combined six month period
ended June 28, 2007.
Eleven Months
Ended December 31, 2007 (Successor) and One Month Ended
January 30, 2007 (Predecessor) Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006 (Predecessor)
Sales. Our sales were $2.1 billion
for the eleven months ended December 31, 2007 and
McJunkins sales were $142.5 million for the one month
ended January 30, 2007, as compared to McJunkins
sales of $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31,
2006. The increase of $554 million
52
for the combined twelve month period ended December 31,
2007 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 was
due to the inclusion of Red Mans sales of
$297 million and Midways sales of approximately
$98 million during the 2007 periods, and increases in our
exploration and production and petroleum refining business.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of sales was
$1.7 billion for the eleven months ended December 31,
2007 and McJunkins cost of sales was $115 million for
the one month ended January 30, 2007, as compared to
McJunkins cost of sales of $1.4 billion for the year
ended December 31, 2006. As a percentage of sales, cost of
sales was 81.6% for the combined twelve month period ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to 81.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase in cost of sales of
$455 million for the combined twelve month period ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2006 was due to the inclusion of Red
Mans cost of sales of $252 million and Midways
cost of sales of approximately $83 million, and increases
in our exploration and production and petroleum refining
business, partially offset by a decrease in LIFO expense of
$6.5 million due to decreased inflation rates in the cost
of our products in 2007.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Our selling, general and
administrative expenses were $201.9 million for the eleven
months ended December 31, 2007 and McJunkins selling,
general and administrative expenses were $14.6 million for
the one month ended January 30, 2007, as compared to
McJunkins selling, general and administrative expenses of
$173.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative
expenses were 9.5% for the combined twelve month period ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to 10.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase of $42.6 million for
the combined twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 was due to the
inclusion of two months of Red Mans selling, general and
administrative expenses totaling $28.0 million in the
twelve months ended December 31, 2007; payments of
$6.2 million to the former McJunkin Appalachian
shareholders in 2007; eight months of expenses of approximately
$4.4 million from the Midway operations acquired at the end
of April 2007; $4.2 million of expenses related to the GS
Acquisition in 2007; an increase in franchise taxes of
$1.3 million due to the increase in shareholders equity
resulting from the GS Acquisition; $0.8 million in
acquisition and integration expenses related to Red Man; a
$0.6 million increase in fuel costs; and $0.3 million
in acquisition and integration expenses related to Midway.
Depreciation and Amortization. Our
depreciation and amortization was $5.4 million for the
eleven months ended December 31, 2007 and McJunkins
depreciation and amortization was $0.3 million for the one
month ended January 30, 2007, as compared to
McJunkins depreciation and amortization of
$3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
increase of $1.8 million for the combined twelve month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006 was primarily due to the recording
of depreciation expense with respect to the Red Man and Midway
transactions in 2007, and the write up of McJunkins assets
to fair value in conjunction with the GS Acquisition in January
2007.
Amortization of Intangibles. Our
amortization of intangibles was $10.5 million for the
eleven months ended December 31, 2007 and McJunkins
amortization of intangibles was $16,000 for the one month ended
January 30, 2007, as compared to McJunkins
amortization of intangibles of $0.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The increase of $10.2 million
for the combined twelve month period ended December 31,
2007 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 was
due to the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds in
January 2007 ($9.8 million) and the Midway acquisition in
April 2007 ($0.7 million). Intangibles amortization
totaling $2.6 million with respect to the Red Man
Transaction was recorded in the six months ended June 26,
2008.
Profit Sharing. Our profit sharing was
$13.2 million for the eleven months ended December 31,
2007 and McJunkins profit sharing was $1.3 million
for the one month ended January 30, 2007, as compared to
McJunkins profit sharing of $15.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease of
$0.6 million for the combined twelve month period ended
December 31, 2007 as
53
compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 was due to
lower non-qualified plan contributions as a result of the
departure of several members of management who left the company
in connection with the GS Acquisition, offset in part by an
increase of approximately 100 employees added with the
Midway acquisition on April 30, 2007.
Stock-Based Compensation. Our
stock-based compensation was $3.0 million for the eleven
months ended December 31, 2007. McJunkin had no stock based
compensation for the one month ended January 30, 2007 or
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our equity-based
compensation consists of restricted common units in PVF Holdings
LLC, profit units in PVF Holdings LLC, restricted stock and
non-qualified stock options. In conjunction with the acquisition
of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds, certain key employees
received restricted common units in PVF Holdings LLC, and in
conjunction with the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman
Sachs Funds and the Red Man Transaction, certain key employees
received profits units in PVF Holdings LLC. In addition,
effective March 27, 2007 our board of directors approved
the formation of the 2007 Restricted Stock Plan and the 2007
Stock Option Plan.
Operating Income. Our operating income
was $156.3 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 and McJunkins operating income was
$11.7 million for the one month ended January 30,
2007, as compared to McJunkins operating income of
$126.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Operating income increased by $41.9 million for the
combined twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of
the items mentioned above.
Interest Expense. Our interest expense
was $61.7 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 and McJunkins interest expense was
$0.1 million for the one month ended January 30, 2007,
as compared to McJunkins interest expense of
$2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
increase of $59.0 million for the combined twelve month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006 was primarily due to our entering
into and borrowing under two new credit facilities to finance
the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds on
January 31, 2007.
Minority Interests. Our minority
interests were $0.1 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 and McJunkins minority interests
were $0.4 million for the one month ended January 30,
2007, as compared to McJunkins minority interests of
$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
decrease of $3.6 million for the combined twelve month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006 was primarily due to the minority
shareholders in McJunkin Appalachian selling their interests as
part of the January 2007 acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman
Sachs Funds whereby McJunkin Appalachian became a wholly owned
subsidiary.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Our other
expense, net was $1.1 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 and McJunkins other expense, net
was $15,000 for the one month ended January 30, 2007, as
compared to McJunkins other expense, net of
$1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
decrease of $0.2 million expense for the combined twelve
month period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2006 was due to a change in our
corporate charitable contributions policy in 2007 which reduced
contribution expense in 2007 by $0.4 million and a decrease
in board of directors fees of $0.2 million, offset in
part by the absence of gains from the sales of various parcels
of real estate ($0.5 million) and life insurance proceeds
received by McJunkin upon the deaths of certain stockholders not
actively involved in management of the company, which were lower
in 2007 as compared to 2006 by $0.3 million.
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax
expense was $36.5 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 and McJunkins income tax expense
was $4.6 million for the one month ended January 30,
2007, as compared to McJunkins income tax expense of
$48.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The decrease of $7.2 million for the combined twelve month
period ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2006 was due to (1) a decrease in
54
pretax income of $13.2 million, permanent items decreased
by $3.5 million due to one month of minority interest
compared to 12 months in 2006, (2) a decrease in state
taxable income of $14.6 million which resulted in a
decrease in state income tax expense, and (3) a foreign tax
credit of $.8 million in 2007 which we did not have in
2006, offset in part by an increase of $2.4 million
relating to the inclusion of Red Mans results for the last
two months of 2007.
The total provision for income taxes varied from the
U.S. federal statutory rate due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Period
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
One Month
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Federal tax expense at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
32,721
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,918
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
41,270
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
State taxes net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
3,971
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
36,559
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,340
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income. Our net income was
$56.9 million for the eleven months ended December 31,
2007 and McJunkins net income was $6.6 million for
the one month ended January 30, 2007, as compared to
McJunkins net income of $69.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The decrease of $6.1 million
for the combined twelve month period ended December 31,
2007 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 was
due to the factors described above.
Year Ended
December 31, 2006 (Predecessor) Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2005 (Predecessor)
Sales. McJunkins sales were
$1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to $1.4 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The increase of $268 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2005 was due to increases in our sales
to the exploration and production, gas transmission and
distribution, and petroleum refining end markets.
Cost of Sales. McJunkins cost of
sales was $1.4 billion for the year ended December 31,
2006 as compared to $1.2 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2005. As a percentage of sales,
McJunkins cost of sales was 81.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to 81.4% for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The increase of $217 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2005 was due to increases in our sales
to the exploration and production, gas transmission and
distribution, and petroleum refining end markets, partially
offset by a decrease in LIFO expense of $7.9 million
resulting from a decrease in the inflation rate experienced in
the cost of our products.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. McJunkins selling, general
and administrative expenses were $173.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to
$155.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
As a percentage of sales, McJunkins selling, general and
administrative expenses were 10.2% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to 10.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The increase of $18.2 million for
the year ended December 31,
55
2006 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 was
due to an $8.4 million increase in incentive compensation
expense due to higher levels of sales and profitability; a
$4.6 million increase in employee salaries, wages,
overtime, benefits, and temporary labor due to increased sales
activity; $3.0 million of consulting fees for strategic
planning services; an increase in fuel costs of
$0.6 million; and $0.4 million of expenses related to
the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds.
Additionally, in 2005 we recorded losses of $0.7 million
related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on which insurance
recoveries were higher than anticipated. As a result of these
insurance recoveries, 2006 expenses were reduced by
$0.3 million.
Depreciation and
Amortization. McJunkins depreciation
and amortization was $3.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $3.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The increase of
$0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 was due to the
depreciation recorded in 2006 regarding certain distribution
center expansions that were made in 2005.
Amortization of
Intangibles. McJunkins amortization of
intangibles was $0.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and $0.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Profit Sharing
Expenses. McJunkins profit sharing
expenses were $15.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $13.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The increase of
$2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 was due to
increased compensation, primarily management incentive
compensation, increased profitability and an increase in the
number of employees from year to year.
Operating Income. As a result of the
items mentioned above, McJunkins operating income was
$126.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to $95.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, an increase of $30.3 million.
Interest Expense. McJunkins
interest expense was $2.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $2.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, an increase of
$0.1 million attributable to marginally higher levels of
debt.
Minority Interests. McJunkins
minority interests were $4.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $2.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The increase of
$1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 was due to a
$9.5 million increase in net income at McJunkin Appalachian
to $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $19.2 million for the year ended December 31,
2005.
Other Expenses, Net. McJunkins
other expenses, net were $1.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $1.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The increase of
$0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 was partly due
to a $0.3 million increase in allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable, offset by a decrease in charitable
contributions expense in 2006 of $0.6 million due to the
absence in 2006 of certain special contributions made in 2005,
including $0.1 million in contributions made to Hurricane
Katrina relief efforts. Additionally, we realized a gain of
$0.7 million on the sale of real estate in 2006, realized a
gain of $0.9 million on the sale of stock in PrimeEnergy in
2005, and received income of $0.5 million from swap
valuation in 2005 (the swap instrument expired in 2005).
Income Tax Expense. McJunkins
income tax expense was $48.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as compared to $36.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. The increase of
$11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 was due to
pre-tax income increased $28.8 million and permanent items
increased $1.0 million primarily due to increased minority
interest income related to McJunkin Appalachian.
56
The total provision for income taxes varied from the
U.S. federal statutory rate due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Federal tax expense at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
41,270
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
$
|
31,193
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
State taxes net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4,254
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
48,340
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income. McJunkins net income
was $69.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
as compared to $52.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The increase of $17.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2005 was due to the factors described
above.
Red Man: Year
Ended October 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
October 31, 2006.
Sales. Red Mans sales were
$2.0 billion for the year ended October 31, 2007 as
compared to $1.8 billion for the year ended
October 31, 2006. The increase of $166.7 million for
the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended October 31, 2006 was due primarily to an increase of
$179.5 million in Red Man US sales to $1,499.2 million
for the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to
$1,319.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2006,
partially offset by a $12.8 million decrease in Midfield
sales to $482.8 million for the year ended October 31,
2007 as compared to $495.6 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006. The increase in Red Man US sales was
primarily attributable to growth in upstream and midstream
oil & gas operations reflecting higher spending by
exploration, production and field services companies associated
with increased drilling and completion activities. The decrease
in Midfield sales was attributable to a slowing of spending by
exploration, production and field services companies associated
with decreased drilling and completion activities in Canada.
Cost of Products Sold. Red Mans
cost of products sold was $1.6 billion for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to $1.6 billion for the
year ended October 31, 2006. As a percentage of sales, Red
Mans cost of products sold was 82.4% for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to 85.4% for the year ended
October 31, 2006. The increase of $81.2 million for
the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended October 31, 2006 was due primarily to an increase in
sales of $166.7 million to $1,982.0 million in the
year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to
$1,815.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2006
due primarily to growth in upstream and midstream
oil & gas operations reflecting higher spending by
exploration, production and field services companies associated
with increased drilling and completion activities. The decrease
in the percentage of cost of product sold of 82.4% in 2007 as
compared with 85.4% in 2006 was due to lower cost of product
sold percentages for both the Midfield business and the Red Man
US business in 2007 as compared to 2006, due to lower cost of
product sold percentages of other pipe, valve and fittings
partially offset by an overall increase in tubulars cost of
product sold percentages in 2007 as compared to 2006. Also, Red
Man had an $8.0 million decrease in the LIFO reserve in
2007 as compared to a $35.9 million increase in the LIFO
reserve in 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Red Mans selling, general and
administrative expenses were $186.6 million for the year
ended October 31, 2007 as compared to $172.2 million
57
for the year ended October 31, 2006. As a percentage of
sales, Red Mans selling, general and administrative
expenses were 9.4% for the year ended October 31, 2007 as
compared to 9.5% for the year ended October 31, 2006. The
increase of $14.4 million, or 8.4%, for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended
October 31, 2006 was due to an increase in sales of
$166.7 million in 2007 compared with 2006, which represents
a 9.2% increase in sales, which resulted in increased selling,
general and administrative expenses commensurate with the sales
activity increase.
Operating Income. Red Mans
operating income was $163.1 million for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to $92.0 million for the
year ended October 31, 2006. The increase of
$71.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2007 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2006 was due to the
factors described above.
Interest Expense. Red Mans
interest expense was $20.6 million for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to $15.0 million for the
year ended October 31, 2006. The increase of
$5.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2007 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2006 was due to
higher average borrowings during 2007 as compared to 2006.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Red
Mans other income (expense), net was $(2.7) million
for the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to
$3.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2006. The
decrease of $6.0 million for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended
October 31, 2006 was primarily due to a goodwill impairment
loss on Midfield of $5.1 million recorded in the year ended
October 31, 2007. Red Man performed an impairment analysis
for its goodwill and intangible assets and engaged an
independent valuation specialist to determine the fair values of
Red Mans business units. The valuation analysis determined
that the fair value of the Nusco pipe divisions goodwill
and intangible assets was lower than their carrying value as of
July 31, 2007.
Income Tax Expense. Red Mans
income tax expense was $57.6 million for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to $26.5 million for the
year ended October 31, 2006. The increase of
$31.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2007 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2006 was primarily
due to an increase in earnings before income taxes of
$59.5 million to $139.8 million for the year ended
October 31, 2007 as compared to $80.3 million for the
year ended October 31, 2006 as well as an increase in the
effective income tax rate in 2007 as compared to 2006.
Non-Controlling Interest. Red
Mans non-controlling interest was $0.1 million for
the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to
$0.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2006.
Earnings From Discontinued
Operations. Red Man earnings from
discontinued operations were $(2.2) million for the year
ended October 31, 2006. These earnings are associated with
Nusco Mfg., a division of Midfield Supply ULC, which was
disposed of in June 2006.
Gain on Sale of Discontinued
Operations. Red Man recorded a gain on sale
of discontinued operations of $8.2 million for the year
ended October 31, 2006 in connection with the disposition
in June 2006 of Nusco Mfg., a division of Midfield Supply ULC.
Net Income. Red Mans net income
was $82.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2007
as compared to $59.6 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006. The increase of $22.6 million for
the year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the year
ended October 31, 2006 was due to the factors described
above.
Red Man: Year
Ended October 31, 2006 Compared to the Year Ended
October 31, 2005.
Sales. Red Mans sales were
$1.8 billion for the year ended October 31, 2006 as
compared to $1.2 billion for the year ended
October 31, 2005. The increase of $591.2 million for
the year ended October 31, 2006 as compared to the year
ended October 31, 2005 was primarily due to the acquisition
of a controlling interest in Midfield in June 2005. Sales of
Midfield were $495.6 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared with $158.7 million for
the year ended October 31,
58
2005, an increase of $336.9 million due to a full year of
sales in 2006. In addition, Red Man US sales were
$1,319.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2006
as compared with $1,065.4 million for the year ended
October 31, 2005, an increase of $254.3 million due
primarily to growth in upstream and midstream oil &
gas operations reflecting higher spending by exploration,
production & field services companies associated with
increased drilling and completion activities.
Cost of Products Sold. Red Mans
cost of products sold was $1.6 billion for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to $1.0 billion for the
year ended October 31, 2005. As a percentage of sales, Red
Mans cost of products sold was 85.4% for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to 83.6% for the year ended
October 31, 2005. The increase of $528.1 million for
the year ended October 31, 2006 as compared to the year
ended October 31, 2005 was primarily due to the acquisition
of Midfield in June 2005 and growth in upstream and midstream
oil and gas operations in the United States. In addition, Red
Man US cost of products sold was $1,132.5 million for the
year ended October 31, 2006 as compared with
$886.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2005, an
increase of $245.8 million, primarily due to growth in
upstream and midstream oil and gas operations reflecting higher
spending by exploration, production and field services companies
associated with increased drilling and completion activities.
The increase in cost of product sold as a percentage of sales of
85.4% in 2006 as compared with 83.6% in 2005 was due to higher
cost of product sold percentages for the Midfield business which
was a larger percentage of the overall Red Man business in 2006
as compared to 2005 and an overall increase in tubulars cost of
product sold percentages in the United States in 2006 as
compared to 2005, partially offset by lower cost of product sold
percentages of other pipe, valve and fittings business in the
United States. Also, Red Man had a $35.9 million increase
in the LIFO reserve in 2006, which increased its cost of
products sold as a percentage of sales as compared with a
$0.7 million reduction in 2005, which decreased its cost of
products sold as a percentage of sales.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Red Mans selling, general and
administrative expenses were $172.2 million for the year
ended October 31, 2006 as compared to $100.2 million
for the year ended October 31, 2005. As a percentage of
sales, Red Mans selling, general and administrative
expenses were 9.5% for the year ended October 31, 2006 as
compared to 8.2% for the year ended October 31, 2005. The
increase of $72.0 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended
October 31, 2005 was due primarily to an additional
$47.7 million in expenses for Midfield due to including
them for a full year in 2006. In addition, there was an
additional $18.2 million in employee related expenses in
the United States due primarily to a 12.3% increase in the
overall average headcount in 2006 as compared with 2005 due to
increased business activities. The increase in selling, general
and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales of 9.5% in
2006 as compared with 8.2% in 2005 was primarily due to higher
Midfield expenses as a percentage of overall expenses in 2006 as
compared with 2005.
Operating Income. Red Mans
operating income was $92.0 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to $100.9 million for the
year ended October 31, 2005. The decrease of
$8.9 million for the year ended October 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2005 was due to an
increase in the LIFO reserve of $35.9 million in 2006 as
compared to a $0.7 million reduction in 2005, and an
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses to
$172.2 million in 2006 as compared to $100.2 million
in 2005, partially offset by an increase in pre-LIFO gross
margin of $300.1 million in 2006 as compared to
$200.4 million in 2005.
Interest Expense. Red Mans
interest expense was $15.0 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to $8.4 million for the
year ended October 31, 2005. The increase of
$6.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2005 was due
primarily to $7.3 million of interest on debt of Midfield
for the year ended October 31, 2006 as compared to
$2.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2005. This
increase was primarily due to a full year of interest in 2006 as
compared to four and one-half months in 2005 due to the
acquisition of Midfield in June 2005. In addition, Red Man U.S.
interest expense for the year ended October 31,
59
2006 was $7.7 million as compared to $6.2 million for
the year ended October 31, 2005 due primarily to increased
borrowings in 2006 versus 2005.
Other Income (Expense), Net. Red
Mans other income (expense), net was $3.3 million for
the year ended October 31, 2006 as compared to
$1.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2005. The
increase of $2.3 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended
October 31, 2005 was primarily due to an insurance
settlement related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2006.
Income Tax Expense. Red Mans
income tax expense was $26.5 million for the year ended
October 31, 2006 as compared to $34.2 million for the
year ended October 31, 2005. The decrease of
$7.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2006 as
compared to the year ended October 31, 2005 was due
primarily to a decrease in earnings before income taxes of
$13.2 million in 2006 as compared to 2005 as well as a
lower effective income tax rate in 2006 as compared to 2005.
Non-Controlling Interest. Red
Mans non-controlling interest was $0.2 million for
the year ended October 31, 2006 as compared to none for the
year ended October 31, 2005.
Earnings From Discontinued
Operations. Red Mans earnings from
discontinued operations were $(2.2) million for the year
ended October 31, 2006 as compared to $0.5 million for
the year ended October 31, 2005. These earnings are
associated with Nusco Mfg., a division of Midfield Supply ULC,
which was disposed of in June 2006.
Gain on Sale of Discontinued
Operations. Red Man recorded a gain on sale
of discontinued operations of $8.2 million for the year
ended October 31, 2006 in connection with the disposition
by Midfield of Nusco Mfg. in June 2006.
Net Income. Red Mans net income
was $59.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2006
as compared to $59.8 million for the year ended
October 31, 2005, a decrease of $0.2 million.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity consist of cash generated from
our operating activities, existing cash balances and borrowings
under our existing revolving credit facilities. Our ability to
generate sufficient cash flows from our operating activities
will continue to be primarily dependent on our sales of pipe,
valves, fittings and other products and services to our
customers at margins sufficient to cover fixed and variable
expenses. As of June 26, 2008 we had cash and cash
equivalents of $8.8 million and up to $542.5 million
available under our revolving credit facilities.
We believe our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to
satisfy the anticipated cash requirements associated with our
existing operations for at least the next twelve months.
However, our future cash requirements could be higher than we
currently expect as a result of various factors. Additionally,
our ability to generate sufficient cash from our operating
activities depends on our future performance, which is subject
to general economic, political, financial, competitive and other
factors beyond our control.
Our credit facilities consist of a $575 million term loan
facility, a $700 million revolving credit facility, a
$450 million junior term loan facility, and the two credit
facilities of our subsidiary Midfield. The $575 million
term loan facility was entered into for purposes of financing
the GS Acquisition in January 2007, and was subsequently amended
in connection with the Red Man Transaction in October 2007. The
$700 million revolving credit facility was entered into for
purposes of financing the Red Man Transaction in October 2007.
The $450 million junior term loan facility was entered into
in connection with our May 2008 recapitalization and the
proceeds of the facility were distributed by way of a dividend
to stockholders of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation.
60
Revolving
Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility
Our subsidiary McJunkin Red Man Corporation is the borrower
under a $700 million revolving credit facility (the
Revolving Credit Facility) and a $575 million
term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility and,
together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the Senior
Secured Facilities). $204.4 million of borrowings
were outstanding and $490.9 million were available under the
Revolving Credit Facility as of June 26, 2008. Goldman
Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. are co-lead
arrangers and joint bookrunners for each of these facilities.
McJunkin Red Man Corporation entered into the Term Loan
Facility, as well as a $300 million asset-backed revolving
credit facility with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc., and
the other financial institutions party thereto, in January 2007
for purposes of financing the acquisition of McJunkin
Corporation by affiliates of Goldman Sachs. The Term Loan
Facility was amended, and the Revolving Credit Facility was
entered into, for purposes of financing the Red Man Transaction
in October 2007 and refinancing the $300 million
asset-backed revolving credit facility. The Revolving Credit
Facility was upsized on June 10, 2008 from
$650 million to $700 million.
Letter of Credit and Swingline
Sublimits. The Revolving Credit Facility
provides for the extension of both revolving loans and swingline
loans and the issuance of letters of credit. The aggregate
principal amount of revolving loans outstanding at any time
under the Revolving Credit Facility may not exceed
$700 million, subject to adjustments based on changes in
the borrowing base and less the sum of aggregate letters of
credit outstanding and the aggregate principal amount of
swingline loans outstanding, provided that the borrower may
elect to increase the limit on the revolving loans or term loans
outstanding as described in Incremental
Facilities below. There is a $60 million sub-limit on
swingline loans and the total letters of credit outstanding at
any time may not exceed $60 million.
Maturity. The revolving loans have a
maturity date of October 31, 2013 and the swingline loans
have a maturity date of October 24, 2013. Any letters of
credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility will
expire on October 24, 2013. The maturity date of the term
loans under the Term Loan Facility is January 31, 2014.
Interest Rate and Fees. The term loans
bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at the
borrowers option, either (i) the greater of the prime
rate and the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, plus in
either case 2.25%; or (ii) LIBOR plus 3.25%. On
June 26, 2008, $567.8 million was outstanding under
the Term Loan Facility and the interest rate on these loans was
6.13%.
The revolving loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to,
at the borrowers option, either (i) the greater of
the prime rate and the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%,
plus in either case (a) 0.50% if the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio is
greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00, (b) 0.25% if such
ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 but less than
2.75 to 1.00, or (c) 0.00% if such ratio is less than 2.00
to 1.00; or (ii) LIBOR plus (a) 1.50% if the
borrowers consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted
EBITDA ratio is greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00,
(b) 1.25% if such ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to
1.00 but less than 2.75 to 1.00, or (c) 1.00% if such ratio
is less than 2.00 to 1.00. Interest on swingline loans is
calculated on the basis of the rate described in clause (i)
of the preceding sentence. The weighted average interest rate on
the revolving loans as of June 26, 2008 was 4.14% and the
interest rate on the swingline loans was 5.25%.
Additionally, the borrower is required to pay a commitment fee
with respect to unutilized revolving credit commitments at a
rate per annum equal to (i) 0.375% if the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio is
greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00 and (ii) 0.25% if
such ratio is less than 2.75 to 1.00. The borrower is also
required to pay fees on the stated amounts of outstanding
letters of credit for the account of all revolving lenders at a
per annum rate equal to (i) 1.375% if the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio is
greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00, (ii) 1.125% if such
ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 but less
61
than 2.75 to 1.00, or (iii) 0.875% if such ratio is less
than 2.00 to 1.00. The borrower is required to pay a fronting
fee for the account of the letter of credit issuer in respect of
each letter of credit issued by it at a rate for each day equal
to 0.125% per annum on the average daily stated amount of such
letter of credit. The borrower is also obligated to pay directly
to the letter of credit issuer upon each issuance of, drawing
under,
and/or
amendment of, a letter of credit issued by it such amount as the
borrower and the letter of credit issuer agree upon for
issuances of, drawings under or amendments of, letters of credit
issued by the letter of credit issuer.
Prepayments. The borrower may
voluntarily prepay revolving loans, swingline loans and term
loans in whole or in part at the borrowers option, in each
case without premium or penalty. If the borrower refinances the
term loans on certain terms prior to October 31, 2008, the
borrower will be subject to a prepayment penalty of 1.00% of the
aggregate principal amount of such payment. The borrower is
required to prepay outstanding term loans with 100% of the net
cash proceeds of:
|
|
|
|
|
a disposition of any business units, assets or other property of
the borrower or any of the borrowers restricted
subsidiaries not in the ordinary course of business, subject to
certain exceptions for permitted asset sales;
|
|
|
|
a casualty event with respect to collateral for which the
borrower or any of its restricted subsidiaries receives
insurance proceeds, or proceeds of a condemnation award or other
compensation;
|
|
|
|
the issuance or incurrence by the borrower or any of its
restricted subsidiaries of indebtedness, subject to certain
exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
any sale-leaseback transaction permitted under the Term Loan
Facility.
|
Not later than the date that is 90 days after the last day
of any fiscal year, the borrower under the Term Loan Facility
will be required to prepay the outstanding term loans under the
Term Loan Facility with an amount equal to (i) 50% of
excess cash flow for such fiscal year, provided that
(a) the percentage will be reduced to 25% if the
borrowers ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated
EBITDA for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters is
no greater than 2.50 to 1.00 but greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and
(b) no prepayment of term loans with excess cash flow is
required if the borrowers ratio of consolidated total debt
to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent four consecutive
fiscal quarters is no greater than 2.00 to 1.00, minus
(ii) the principal amount of term loans under the Term Loan
Facility voluntarily prepaid during such fiscal year.
In addition, if at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding
loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn
letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility exceeds
the total revolving credit commitments and (ii) the
borrowing base, the borrower will be required to repay
outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an
aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the
commitment amount. If the amount available under the Revolving
Credit Facility is less than 7% of total revolving credit
commitments for any period of five consecutive business days, or
an event of default pursuant to certain provisions of the
Revolving Credit Facility has occurred, the borrower would be
required to transfer funds from certain blocked accounts daily
into a collection account under the exclusive control of the
agent under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Amortization. The term loans are
repayable in quarterly installments in an amount equal to the
principal amount of the term loans outstanding on the quarterly
installment date multiplied by 0.25%, with the balance of the
principal amount due on the term loan maturity date of
January 31, 2014.
Incremental Facilities. Subject to
certain terms and conditions, the borrower may request an
increase in revolving loan commitments and term loan
commitments. The increase in revolving loan commitments may not
exceed the sum of (i) $150 million, plus
(ii) only after the entire amount in the preceding
clause (i) is drawn, an amount such that on a pro forma
basis after giving effect to the new revolving credit
commitments and certain other specified transactions, the
secured leverage ratio will
62
be no greater than 4.75 to 1.00. The borrowers ability to
borrow under such incremental facilities, however, would still
be limited by the borrowing base. The incremental term loan
commitments may not exceed the difference between (i) up to
$100 million, and (ii) the sum of all incremental
revolving commitments and incremental term loan commitments
taken together. Any lender that is offered to provide all or
part of the new revolving loan commitments or new term loan
commitments may elect or decline, in its sole discretion, to
provide such new commitments. No lender is required to fund any
of such amounts.
Collateral and Guarantors. The
obligations under the Senior Secured Facilities are guaranteed
by the borrowers wholly owned domestic subsidiaries. The
obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured,
subject to certain significant exceptions, by substantially all
of the assets of the borrower and the subsidiary guarantors,
including (i) a first-priority security interest in
personal property consisting and arising from inventory and
accounts receivable; (ii) a second-priority pledge of
certain of the capital stock held by the borrower or any
subsidiary guarantor; and (iii) a second-priority security
interest in, and mortgages on, substantially all other tangible
and intangible assets of the borrower and each subsidiary
guarantor. The obligations under the Term Loan Facility are
secured, subject to exceptions, by substantially all of the
assets of the borrower and the subsidiary guarantors, including
(i) a second-priority security interest in personal
property consisting of and arising from inventory and accounts
receivable; (ii) a first-priority pledge of certain of the
capital stock held by the borrower or any subsidiary guarantor;
and (iii) a first-priority security interest in, and
mortgages on, substantially all other tangible and intangible
assets of the borrower and each subsidiary guarantor.
Covenants. The Senior Secured
Facilities contain customary covenants. These agreements, among
other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the
ability of the borrower and its subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, create liens on assets, engage in mergers,
consolidations or sales of assets, dispose of subsidiary
interests, make investments, loans or advances, pay dividends,
make payments with respect to subordinated indebtedness, enter
into sale and leaseback transactions, change the business
conducted by the borrower and its subsidiaries taken as a whole,
and enter into agreements that restrict subsidiary dividends or
limit the ability of the borrower or any subsidiary guarantor to
create or keep liens for the benefit of the lenders with respect
to the obligations under the Senior Secured Facilities. The
Senior Secured Facilities require the borrower to enter into
interest rate swap, cap and hedge agreements for purposes of
ensuring that no less than 50% of the aggregate principal amount
of the total indebtedness of the borrower and its subsidiaries
then outstanding is either subject to such interest rate
agreements or bears interest at a fixed rate.
The Term Loan Facility requires the borrower to maintain a
maximum ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated
adjusted EBITDA and a minimum ratio of consolidated adjusted
EBITDA to consolidated interest expense. Each of these ratios is
calculated for the period that is four consecutive
63
fiscal quarters prior to the date of calculation. These
financial covenants are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total Debt to
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA to
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Four Consecutive Fiscal
Quarters Ending on:
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
4.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
If the borrower fails to comply with the consolidated total debt
to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio, then within ten days
after the date on which financial statements for the applicable
period are due under the Term Loan Facility, the Goldman Sachs
Funds and other investors in the borrower (or any direct or
indirect parent of the borrower) have a cure right which allows
any of them to make a direct or indirect equity investment in
the borrower or any restricted subsidiary of the borrower in
cash. If such cure right is exercised, the consolidated total
debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio of the borrower will
be recalculated to give pro forma effect to the net cash
proceeds received from the exercise of the cure right. The cure
right is subject to certain limitations. For the four prior
consecutive fiscal quarters, there must be at least one fiscal
quarter in which the cure right is not exercised. Additionally,
the equity investment contributed under the cure right may not
exceed the amount necessary to bring the borrower back into
compliance with the restrictions regarding the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio.
The computation of the consolidated total debt to consolidated
adjusted EBITDA ratio and the consolidated adjusted EBITDA to
consolidated interest expense ratio are governed by the specific
terms of the Term Loan Facility. The computation of these ratios
requires a calculation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA. In
general, under the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, Term
Loan Facility and our Junior Term Loan Facility (as described
below), adjusted EBITDA is defined as consolidated net income,
plus (without duplication and to the extent already deducted in
arriving at consolidated net income):
|
|
|
|
|
total interest expense and to the extent not reflected in such
total interest expense, any losses on hedging obligations or
other derivative instruments entered into for the purpose of
hedging interest rate risk, net of interest income and gains on
such hedging obligations and costs of surety bonds in connection
with financing activities;
|
|
|
|
provisions for taxes based on income, profits or capital,
including state, franchise and similar taxes and foreign
withholding taxes paid or accrued;
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization;
|
|
|
|
other non-cash charges;
|
|
|
|
extraordinary losses and unusual or non-recurring charges,
severance, relocation costs and curtailments or modifications to
pension and post-retirement employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
restructuring charges or reserves;
|
|
|
|
any deductions attributable to minority interests;
|
|
|
|
management, monitoring, consulting and advisory fees and related
expenses paid to the Goldman Sachs Funds and their affiliates;
|
|
|
|
any costs or expenses incurred pursuant to any management equity
plan or stock option plan or any other management or employee
benefit plan or agreement or any stock subscription or
shareholder agreement, to the extent that such costs or expenses
are funded with cash proceeds contributed to the capital of
McJunkin Red Man Corporation or net cash proceeds of an issuance
of stock or stock equivalents of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
(i) for any period that includes a fiscal quarter occurring
prior to the fifth fiscal quarter occurring after
January 31, 2007, certain specified cost savings and
(ii) for any period that includes a fiscal quarter
occurring thereafter, the amount of net cost savings that we
project in good faith to be realized as a result of specified
actions taken by us in connection with certain specified
transactions, including the Red Man Transaction (calculated on a
pro forma basis as though such cost savings had been realized on
the first day of such period), net of the amount of actual
benefits realized during such period from such actions, subject
to certain limitations and exceptions with respect to
clause (ii) above;
|
less, without duplication and to the extent included in arriving
at consolidated net income, the sum of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
extraordinary gains and unusual or non-recurring gains;
|
|
|
|
non-cash gains (excluding any non-cash gain to the extent it
represents the reversal of an accrual or reserve for a potential
cash item that reduced consolidated net income in any prior
period);
|
|
|
|
gains on asset sales (other than asset sales in the ordinary
course of business);
|
|
|
|
any net after-tax income from the early extinguishment of
indebtedness or hedging obligations or other derivative
instruments; and
|
|
|
|
all gains from investments recorded using the equity method;
|
provided that certain adjustments, such as certain currency
translation gains and losses and adjustments resulting from the
application of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, shall be excluded from the calculation of
consolidated adjusted EBITDA to the extent they are included in
consolidated net income. Additionally, to the extent included in
consolidated net income, the adjusted EBITDA of properties,
businesses or assets acquired during the applicable period shall
be included in the calculation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA
to the extent not subsequently disposed of, and the adjusted
EBITDA of properties, businesses and assets sold during the
applicable period shall be excluded from the calculation of
adjusted EBITDA.
Also, the calculation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA with
respect to any period includes, to the extent included in
consolidated net income, for the four consecutive fiscal
quarters last ended to the extent such four-quarter period
includes all or any part of a fiscal quarter included in a
post-acquisition period (a period beginning on the
date that a permitted acquisition is consummated and ending on
the last day of the fourth full fiscal quarter immediately
following the date that the permitted acquisition is
consummated), a pro forma adjustment equal to the increase or
decrease in
65
consolidated adjusted EBITDA projected by us in good faith as a
result of (i) actions taken during such post-acquisition
period for the purposes of realizing reasonably identifiable and
factually supportable cost savings or (ii) any additional
costs incurred during such post-acquisition period, in each case
in connection with the combination of the operations of such
acquired entity or business with our operations. For purposes of
this calculation, it may be assumed that such cost savings will
be realizable during the entirety of the four consecutive fiscal
quarters last ended, and that any such pro forma increase or
decrease to consolidated adjusted EBITDA shall be without
duplication for cost savings or additional costs already
included in consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the four
consecutive fiscal quarters last ended.
We present consolidated adjusted EBITDA, or Adjusted EBITDA,
because it is a material component of material covenants within
our Term Loan Facility and Junior Term Loan Facility and also
affects the interest rate charged on revolving loans under our
Revolving Credit Facility. As such, it has a material impact on
our liquidity and financial position. However, Adjusted EBITDA
is not a defined term under GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to net income as a measure of operating results
or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity.
Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
52.5
|
|
|
$
|
69.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
56.9
|
|
|
$
|
150.8
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
62.8
|
|
|
$
|
75.9
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
61.7
|
|
|
|
60.8
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Red Man pre-merger contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midway pre-acquisition contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO expense
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
Non-recurring and transaction-related expenses(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Minority interest / Midfield employee profit sharing plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Transaction cost savings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
115.6
|
|
|
$
|
139.1
|
|
|
$
|
26.0
|
|
|
$
|
344.9
|
|
|
$
|
370.4
|
|
|
$
|
151.3
|
|
|
$
|
163.4
|
|
|
$
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes transaction costs
associated with the GS Acquisition, our acquisition of
Midway-Tristate Corporation, and the Red Man Transaction.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Includes franchise tax expense,
certain consulting fees, gains and losses on the sale of assets
and other nonrecurring items.
|
Although the Revolving Credit Facility does not require the
borrower to comply with any financial ratio maintenance
covenants, if less than 7% of the then-outstanding credit
commitments are available to be borrowed under the Revolving
Credit Facility at any time, the borrower will not be permitted
to borrow additional amounts unless its pro forma ratio of
consolidated adjusted EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges is at
least 1.00 to 1.00.
66
The Term Loan Facility provides that the borrower and its
restricted subsidiaries may not make, or commit to make, capital
expenditures in excess of $25 million in any year. If the
actual amount of capital expenditures made in any fiscal year is
less than the amount permitted to be made in such fiscal year,
the amount of such difference may be carried forward and used to
make capital expenditures in the succeeding fiscal year, though
the carried forward amount may not be used beyond the
immediately succeeding fiscal year.
Events of Default. The Senior Secured
Facilities contain customary events of default. The events of
default include the failure to pay interest and principal when
due, failure to pay fees and any other amounts owed under the
Senior Secured Facilities when due, a breach of certain
covenants in the Senior Secured Facilities, a breach of any
representation or warranty contained in the Senior Secured
Facilities in any material respect, defaults in payments with
respect to any other indebtedness in excess of $15 million
(under the Term Loan Facility) or in excess of $30 million
(under the Revolving Credit Facility), defaults with respect to
other indebtedness in excess of $15 million (under the Term
Loan Facility) or in excess of $30 million (under the
Revolving Credit Facility) that has the effect of accelerating
such indebtedness, bankruptcy, certain events relating to
employee benefits plans, failure of a material subsidiarys
guarantee to remain in full force and effect, failure of the
security agreement, pledge agreements pursuant to which the
stock of any material subsidiary is pledged, or any mortgage for
the benefit of the lenders under the Term Loan Facility to
remain in full force and effect, entry of one or more judgments
or decrees against the borrower or its restricted subsidiaries
involving a liability of $15 million or more in the
aggregate (under the Term Loan Facility) or $30 million or
more in the aggregate (under the Revolving Credit Facility), and
the invalidation of subordination provisions of any document
evidencing permitted additional debt having a principal amount
in excess of $15 million.
The Senior Secured Facilities also contain an event of default
upon the occurrence of a change of control. Under the Senior
Secured Facilities, a change of control shall have
occurred if (i) the Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of
their affiliates shall cease to beneficially own at least 35% of
the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of the borrower
(other than as a result of one or more widely distributed
offerings of the common stock of the borrower or any direct or
indirect parent of the borrower); or (ii) any person,
entity or group (within the meaning of
Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended) shall have acquired beneficial ownership of a
percentage of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock
of the borrower that exceeds the percentage of the voting power
of such voting stock then beneficially owned, in the aggregate,
by the Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of their affiliates,
unless, in the case of either clause (i) or
(ii) above, the Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of their
affiliates have, at such time, the right or the ability by
voting power, contract or otherwise to elect or designate for
election at least a majority of the board of directors of the
borrower; or (iii) a majority of the board of directors of
the borrower ceases to consist of continuing
directors, defined as individuals who (a) were
members of the board of directors of the borrower on
October 31, 2007 (or January 31, 2007 for purposes of
determining whether an event of default has occurred under the
Term Loan Facility), (b) who have been a member of the
board of directors for at least 12 preceding months,
(c) who have been nominated to be a member of the board of
directors, directly or indirectly, by the Goldman Sachs Funds
and certain of their affiliates or persons nominated by the
Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of their affiliates or
(d) who have been nominated to be a member of the board of
directors by a majority of the other continuing directors then
in office.
Junior Term
Loan Facility
On May 22, 2008, McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation, as
the borrower, entered into a $450 Million Term Loan Credit
Agreement (the Junior Term Loan Facility). Goldman
Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. were the
co-lead arrangers and joint bookrunners under this facility. The
proceeds from the Junior Term Loan Facility, along with
$25 million in proceeds from revolving loans drawn under
the Revolving Credit Facility, were used to fund a dividend to
McJunkin Red Man
67
Holding Corporations stockholders, including PVF Holdings
LLC. PVF Holdings LLC distributed the proceeds it received from
the dividend to its members, including the Goldman Sachs Funds
and certain of our directors and members of our management. See
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Transactions with the Goldman Sachs
Funds May 2008 Dividend. The term loans under
the Junior Term Loan Facility are not subject to amortization
and the principal of such loans must be repaid on
January 31, 2014.
Interest Rate and Fees. The term loans
under the Junior Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate per
annum equal to, at the borrowers option, either
(i) the greater of the prime rate and the federal funds
effective rate plus 0.50%, plus in either case 2.25%, or
(ii) LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate plus
3.25%.
Prepayments. We may voluntarily prepay
term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility in whole or in
part at our option, without premium or penalty. After the
payment in full of the term loans under the Term Loan Facility,
we will be required to prepay outstanding term loans under the
Junior Term Loan Facility with 100% of the net cash proceeds of:
|
|
|
|
|
a disposition of any of our or our restricted subsidiaries
business units, assets or other property not in the ordinary
course of business, subject to certain exceptions for permitted
asset sales;
|
|
|
|
a casualty event with respect to collateral for which we or any
of our restricted subsidiaries receives insurance proceeds, or
proceeds of a condemnation award or other compensation;
|
|
|
|
the issuance or incurrence by us or any of our restricted
subsidiaries of indebtedness, subject to certain
exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
any sale-leaseback transaction permitted under the Junior Term
Loan Facility.
|
Also, after the payment in full of the term loans under the Term
Loan Facility, not later than the date that is 90 days
after the last day of any fiscal year, we will be required to
prepay the outstanding term loans under the Junior Term Loan
Facility with an amount equal to (i) 50% of excess
cash flow for such fiscal year, provided that (a) the
percentage will be reduced to 25% if the borrowers ratio
of consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA for
the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters is no greater
than 2.50 to 1.00 but greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and (b) no
prepayment of term loans with excess cash flow is required if
the borrowers ratio of consolidated total debt to
consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the most recent four
consecutive fiscal quarters is no greater than 2.00 to 1.00,
minus (ii) the principal amount of term loans under the
Junior Term Loan Facility voluntarily prepaid during such fiscal
year.
We must also prepay the principal amount of the term loans under
the Junior Term Loan Facility with 50% of the cash proceeds
received by us from a Qualified IPO, net of
underwriting discounts and commissions and other related
reasonable costs and expenses. A Qualified IPO is
defined as a bona fide underwritten sale to the public of our
common stock or the common stock of any of our direct or
indirect subsidiaries or our direct or indirect parent companies
pursuant to a registration statement that is declared effective
by the SEC or the equivalent offering on a private exchange or
platform. Prepayment is only required if we or one of our
subsidiaries receives cash proceeds from the Qualified IPO.
Collateral. The term loans under the
Junior Term Loan Facility are secured by perfected security
interests in and liens on substantially all of the personal
property and certain real property of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation, including the common stock we hold of McJunkin Red
Man Corporation. The term loans are not guaranteed by any of our
subsidiaries or by PVF Holdings LLC.
Certain Covenants and Events of
Default. The Junior Term Loan Facility
contains customary covenants for a holding company facility.
These agreements, among other things, restrict, subject to
certain exceptions, the ability of the borrower to incur
additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, and engage in
activities or own assets other than certain specified activities
and assets. Also, the
68
Junior Term Loan Facility requires the borrower to maintain a
maximum ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated
adjusted EBITDA and a minimum ratio of consolidated adjusted
EBITDA to consolidated interest expense. Each of these ratios is
calculated for the period that is four consecutive fiscal
quarters prior to the date of calculation. These financial
covenants are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total Debt to
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA to
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Four Consecutive Fiscal
Quarters Ending on:
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
4.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA is calculated under the Junior Term
Loan Facility in a similar manner as under the Senior Secured
Facilities. See Description of Our
Indebtedness Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan
Facility Covenants.
The Junior Term Loan Facility provides that the borrower and its
restricted subsidiaries may not make, or commit to make, capital
expenditures in excess of $30 million in any year. If the
actual amount of capital expenditures made in any fiscal year is
less than the amount permitted to be made in such fiscal year,
the amount of such difference may be carried forward and used to
make capital expenditures in the succeeding fiscal year, though
the carried forward amount may not be used beyond the
immediately succeeding fiscal year.
If the borrower fails to comply with the consolidated total debt
to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio, then the Goldman Sachs
Funds and other investors in the borrower have a cure right that
is similar to the cure right provided with respect to the Term
Loan Facility. See Description of Our
Indebtedness Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan
Facility Covenants.
The Junior Term Loan Facility also contains customary events of
default that are similar to the events of default under the
Senior Secured Credit Facilities, including an event of default
upon a change of control. See Description of Our
Indebtedness Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan
Facility Events of Default.
Purchases of Outstanding Loans. Subject
to certain terms and conditions, the Goldman Sachs Funds and
their affiliates may from time to time seek to purchase term
loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility from the lenders under
the facility pursuant to open market purchases in an aggregate
amount not to exceed 30% of the aggregate principal amount of
the loans outstanding under the Junior Term Loan Facility. The
Goldman Sachs Funds and their affiliates may contribute such
purchased loans to PVF Holdings LLC as an equity contribution in
return for equity interests in
69
PVF Holdings LLC and PVF Holdings LLC will then contribute such
loans to the borrower under the Junior Term Loan Facility as an
equity contribution in return for additional stock of the
borrower. In the case of such purchases of term loans by the
Goldman Sachs Funds and their affiliates followed by
contributions of the purchased loans to PVF Holdings LLC and
then to the borrower, the loans subject to such purchases and
contributions shall be cancelled.
In addition, the borrower under the Junior Term Loan Facility
may from time to time seek to purchase, subject to certain terms
and conditions, term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility
from the lenders under the facility pursuant to open market
purchases. In the case of such purchases by the borrower, the
loans subject to such purchases shall be cancelled.
Midfield
CDN$150 Million Revolving Credit Facility
One of our subsidiaries, Midfield Supply ULC, is the borrower
under a CDN$150 million revolving credit facility (the
Midfield Revolving Credit Facility) with Bank of
America, N.A. and certain other lenders from time to time
parties thereto. Proceeds from this facility may be used by
Midfield for working capital and other general corporate
purposes. As of June 26, 2008, US$51.7 million of
borrowings were outstanding and US$51.6 million were
available under the Midfield Revolving Credit Facility. The
facility provides for the extension of up to
CDN$150 million in revolving loans, subject to adjustments
based on the borrowing base and less the aggregate letters of
credit outstanding under the facility. Letters of credit may be
issued under the facility subject to certain conditions,
including a CDN$10 million sub-limit. The revolving loans
have a maturity date of November 2, 2010. All letters of
credit issued under the facility must expire at least 20
business days prior to November 2, 2010.
Interest Rate and Fees. The revolving
loans bear interest at a rate equal to either (i) the
Canadian prime rate, plus (a) 0.25% if the average
daily availability (as defined in the loan and security
agreement for the facility) for the previous fiscal quarter was
less than CDN$30 million or (b) 0.00% if the average
daily availability for the previous fiscal quarter was greater
than or equal to CDN$30 million, or, at the borrowers
option, (ii) the rate of interest per annum equal to the
rates applicable to Canadian Dollar Bankers Acceptances
having a comparable term as the proposed loan displayed on the
CDOR Page of Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service,
plus (a) 1.75% if the average daily availability for the
previous fiscal quarter was less than CDN$30 million,
(b) 1.50% if the average daily availability for the
previous fiscal quarter was greater than or equal to
CDN$30 million but less than CDN$60 million, or
(c) 1.25% if the if the average daily availability for the
previous fiscal quarter was greater than or equal to
CDN$60 million.
The borrower must pay a monthly unused line fee with respect to
unutilized revolving loan commitments equal to (i) 0.25% if
the outstanding amount of borrowings under the facility for the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter are greater than 50% of the
revolving loan commitments, or (ii) 0.375% if otherwise.
The borrower must pay a monthly fronting fee equal to 0.125% per
annum of the stated amount of letters of credit issued and must
also pay a monthly fee to the agent on the average daily stated
amount of letters of credit issued equal to (i) 1.75% if
the average daily availability for the previous fiscal quarter
was less than CDN$30 million, (ii) 1.50% if the
average daily availability for the previous fiscal quarter was
greater than or equal to CDN$30 million but less than
CDN$60 million, or (iii) 1.25% if the average daily
availability for the previous fiscal quarter was greater than or
equal to CDN$60 million.
Prepayments. The borrower may prepay
the revolving loans from time to time without premium or penalty.
Collateral and Guarantors. The Midfield
Revolving Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the
personal property of Midfield Supply ULC and its subsidiary
guarantors, Mega Production Testing Inc. and Hagan Oilfield
Supply Ltd.
Certain Covenants and Events of
Default. The Midfield Revolving Credit
Facility contains customary covenants. These agreements, among
other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions,
70
the ability of the borrower and its subsidiaries to incur
additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, make
distributions, make investments, sell, lease or transfer assets,
make loans or advances, pay certain debt, amalgamate, merge,
combine or consolidate with another entity, enter into certain
types of restrictive agreements, engage in any business other
than the business conducted by the borrower and its subsidiaries
on the closing date of the Midfield Revolving Credit Facility,
enter into transactions with affiliates, become a party to
certain employee benefit plans, enter into certain amendments
with respect to subordinated debt, make acquisitions, enter into
transactions which would reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect or cause a default, enter into sale and
leaseback transactions, and terminate certain agreements.
Additionally, the Midfield Revolving Credit Facility requires
the borrower to maintain a leverage ratio of no greater than
3.50 to 1.00 (measured on a monthly basis) and to maintain a
fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.15 to 1.00 (measured
on a monthly basis). The facility also prohibits the borrower
and its subsidiaries from making capital expenditures in excess
of $5 million in the aggregate during any fiscal year,
subject to exceptions for certain expenditures and provided that
if the actual amount of capital expenditures made in any fiscal
year is less than the amount permitted to be made in such fiscal
year, up to $250,000 of such excess may be carried forward and
used to make capital expenditures in the succeeding fiscal year.
The Midfield Revolving Credit Facility contains customary events
of default. The events of default include, among others, the
failure to pay interest, principal and other obligations under
the facilitys loan documents when due, a breach of any
representation or warranty contained in the loan documents,
breaches of certain covenants, the failure of any loan document
to remain in full force and effect, a default with respect to
other indebtedness in excess of $250,000 if the other
indebtedness may be accelerated due to such default, judgments
against the borrower and its subsidiaries in excess of $250,000
in the aggregate, the occurrence of any loss or damage with
respect to the collateral if the amount not covered by insurance
exceeds $100,000, cessation or governmental restraint of a
material part of the borrowers or a subsidiarys
business, insolvency, certain events related to benefits plans,
the criminal indictment of a senior officer of the borrower or a
guarantor or the conviction of a senior officer of the borrower
or a guarantor of certain crimes, an amendment to the
shareholders agreement among Midfield Supply ULC, the entity now
known as McJunkin Red Man Canada Ltd. and Midfield Holdings
(Alberta) Ltd. without the prior written consent of Bank of
America, N.A., and any event or condition that has a material
adverse effect on the borrower or a guarantor.
A change of control is also an event of default. A
change of control occurs if (i) McJunkin Red
Man Canada Ltd. ceases to own and control, directly or
indirectly, 51% or more of the voting equity interests of
Midfield Supply ULC, (ii) a change in the majority of
directors of Midfield Supply ULC occurs, unless approved by the
then-majority of directors, or (iii) all or substantially
all of Midfield Supply ULCs assets are sold or transferred.
Midfield
CDN$15 Million Facility
One of our subsidiaries, Midfield Supply ULC, is also the
borrower under a CDN$15 million credit facility with
Alberta Treasury Branches. The facility is secured by
substantially all of the real property and equipment of Midfield
Supply ULC and its subsidiary guarantors. The facility contains
customary covenants and events of default. The borrowers
leverage ratio must not exceed 3.50 to 1.00, its fixed charge
coverage ratio must be at least 1.15 to 1.00, and its ratio of
tangible asset value to borrowings outstanding must be at least
2.00 to 1.00.
The Midfield CDN$15 million facility and the Midfield
CDN$150 million facility are subject to an intercreditor
agreement which relates to, among other things, priority of
liens and proceeds of sale of collateral.
71
Cash
Flows
The following table sets forth our cash flows for the periods
indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Red Man Standalone
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
Five
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(11,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(56,459
|
)
|
|
$
|
102,284
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,385
|
|
|
$
|
18,352
|
|
|
$
|
6,617
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,226
|
|
|
$
|
1,895
|
|
|
$
|
70,497
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
(12,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6,701
|
)
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,788,920
|
)
|
|
|
(933,256
|
)
|
|
|
(16,437
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
60,904
|
|
|
|
52,663
|
|
|
|
(78,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21,084
|
)
|
|
|
(17,207
|
)
|
|
|
(8,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,687,188
|
|
|
|
945,860
|
|
|
|
(55,233
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(908
|
)
|
|
$
|
(460
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,409
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,600
|
|
|
$
|
(2,117
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
8,122
|
|
|
$
|
14,499
|
|
|
$
|
(1,314
|
)
|
Cash Flows
Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
McJunkin Red
Man
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the six months
ended June 26, 2008 was $70.5 million. Cash provided
by operations was primarily attributable to net income of
$75.9 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation, of
$25.6 million. These increases were partially offset by
increases in operating assets of $200.9 million (primarily
accounts receivable and inventory) and increases in accounts
payable and other current liabilities of $169.9 million.
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the five
months ended June 28, 2007 was $1.9 million. Cash
provided by operations was primarily attributable to net income
of $17.6 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and stock-option based compensation,
of $7.4 million. These increases were partially offset by
increases in operating assets of $33.2 million (primarily
accounts receivable) and increases in accounts payable and other
current liabilities of $10.0 million.
Net cash provided by Red Mans operations is included in
our net cash provided by operating activities for the six months
ended June 26, 2008, but not in our net cash provided by
operating activities for the five months ended June 28,
2007. As a result, our cash flows for the two periods are not
necessarily comparable.
Our net cash provided by operating activities for the eleven
months ended December 31, 2007 was $110.2 million.
Cash provided by operations was primarily attributable to net
income of $56.9 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation, of
$26.9 million. In addition, we had decreases in operating
assets of $78.7 million (primarily accounts
72
receivable and inventory), partially offset by decreases in
accounts payable and other current liabilities of
$52.3 million.
McJunkin
McJunkins net cash provided by operating activities for
the one month ended January 31, 2007 was $6.6 million.
Cash provided by operations was primarily attributable to net
income of $6.6 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and stock based compensation, of
$0.6 million. The companys decrease in operating
assets of $10.1 million was offset by a decrease in
accounts payable and other current liabilities of
$10.7 million.
McJunkins net cash provided by operating activities for
the year ended December 31, 2006 was $18.4 million.
Cash provided by operations was attributable to net income of
$69.6 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and deferred income taxes, of
$11.9 million, including $4.1 million relating to our
minority interest in McJunkin Appalachian. These increases were
partially offset by increases in operating assets of
$47.9 million (primarily inventory) and decreases in
accounts payable and other current liabilities of
$15.0 million.
McJunkins net cash provided by operating activities for
the year ended December 31, 2005 was $30.4 million.
Cash provided by operations was attributable to net income of
$52.5 million plus non-cash charges of $1.6 million
(primarily depreciation of $3.7 million, deferred taxes of
($4.9) million, and $2.8 million relating to our
minority interest in McJunkin Appalachian. In addition, McJunkin
had increases in operating assets of $83.1 million
(primarily accounts receivable and inventory) and increases in
accounts payable and other current liabilities of
$60.6 million.
Red Man
Red Mans net cash provided by operating activities for the
year ended October 31, 2007 was $102.3 million. Cash
provided by operations was attributable to net income of
$82.2 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and write-off of obsolete inventories
and deferred income taxes, of $20.0 million, plus a
non-cash charge for impairment loss on goodwill and intangible
assets of $5.1 million, plus a decrease in operating
assets, including accounts receivable and inventories, of
$10.1 million, offset by a decrease in accounts payable and
other net liabilities of $15.1 million.
Red Mans net cash used in operating activities for the
year ended October 31, 2006 was $56.5 million. Cash
used by operations was attributable to net income of
$59.7 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and write-off of obsolete
inventories, of $9.4 million, plus an increase in accounts
payable and other net liabilities of $52.5 million, offset
by increases in operating assets, including accounts receivable
and inventories of $161.5 million and reduced by a gain on
discontinued operations of $16.6 million which was included
in net income.
Red Mans net cash used in operating activities for the
year ended October 31, 2005 was $11.4 million. Cash
used by operations was attributable to net income of
$59.8 million plus non-cash charges, primarily
depreciation, amortization and deferred income taxes, of
$20.5 million, plus an increase in accounts payable and
other net liabilities of $32.6 million, offset by increases
in operating assets, including accounts receivable and
inventories of $124.3 million.
Cash Flows
Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
McJunkin Red
Man
Our net cash used in investing activities for the six months
ended June 26, 2008 was $16.4 million. We used
$11.4 million in conjunction with the acquisition of Red
Man Pipe & Supply and $7.6 million for purchases
of property, plant and equipment.
73
Our net cash used in investing activities for the five months
ended June 28, 2007 was $933.3 million. This was
attributable to the GS Acquisition of McJunkin Corporation in
January 2007 ($849.1 million) and our acquisition of
Midway-Tristate Corporation in April 2007 ($83.3 million).
We also used $2.2 million to purchase property, plant and
equipment and had investment income of $1.3 million.
Our net cash used in investing activities for the eleven months
ended December 31, 2007 was $1.8 billion. This was
attributable to the GS Acquisition of McJunkin Corporation in
January 2007 ($849.1 million), our acquisition of
Midway-Tristate Corporation in April 2007 ($83.3 million),
and the business combination with Red Man ($852.4 million).
We also used $5.5 million to purchase property, plant and
equipment.
McJunkin
McJunkins net cash used in investing activities for the
one month ended January 31, 2007 was $0.2 million. The
company used $0.4 million to purchase property, plant and
equipment and received proceeds of $0.2 million from the
sale of certain investments.
McJunkins net cash used in investing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was $3.3 million. The
company used $5.3 million to purchase property, plant and
equipment and received $1.6 million in life insurance
proceeds related to a shareholder who was not active in the
business.
McJunkins net cash used in investing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2005 was $6.7 million.
Primarily, the company used $8.7 million to purchase
property, plant and equipment and had net proceeds of
$1.0 million from the disposal of certain property, plant
and equipment. The company also received proceeds of
$1.0 million from the sale of certain investments.
Red Man
Red Mans net cash used in investing activities for the
year ended October 31, 2007 was $12.5 million. The
company used $12.2 million to purchase property, plant and
equipment. In April and May, 2007, Red Man purchased 100%
interests in two separate companies in Canada for an aggregate
of $3.7 million. Red Man also had net proceeds of
$3.4 million from the disposal of certain property, plant
and equipment assets.
Red Mans net cash provided by investing activities for the
year ended October 31, 2006 was $3.5 million. Red Man
sold the Nusco Manufacturing division of Midfield Supply ULC in
June 2006 for cash proceeds of $35.2 million. Red Man used
$14.4 million of cash to purchase property, plant and
equipment. In June 2006 Red Man purchased certain assets from
Bear Tubular, Inc. for $4.6 million in cash. In 2006
through a series of transactions, Red Man acquired 100%
interests in four separate companies in Canada for an aggregate
of $8.2 million in cash. Red Man also made cash advances to
a related party of $4.9 million. Red Man also had net
proceeds from other investing activities of $0.4 million.
Red Mans net cash used in investing activities for the
year ended October 31, 2005 was $50.4 million. Red Man
purchased a 51% controlling interest in Midfield Supply ULC in
June 2005 for $45.9 million. In addition, $5.8 million
was used to purchase property, plant and equipment. These uses
were partially offset by proceeds from other investing
activities of $1.3 million.
Cash Flows
Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
McJunkin Red
Man
Our net cash used in financing activities for the six months
ended June 26, 2008 was $55.2 million. We used
$31.4 million for payments on long-term obligations, as
well as $9.3 million for debt issuance costs. We received
cash equity contributions of $5.0 million and proceeds from
long-
74
term obligations of $454.5 million, which was used to fund
$475 million of dividends to our shareholders.
Our net cash provided by financing activities for the five
months ended June 28, 2007 was $945.9 million. This
was attributable to financings for the acquisitions noted above
($747.4 million proceeds from long-term borrowings and cash
equity contributions of $226.2 million). We also made
payments of $4.9 million on other long-term obligations and
$22.8 million for debt issuance costs.
Our net cash used in financing activities for the eleven months
ended December 31, 2007 was $1.7 billion. This was
attributable to financings for the acquisitions noted above
($897.5 million proceeds from long-term borrowings and cash
equity contributions of $899.2 million). We also made
payments of $78.8 million on other long-term obligations
and $30.6 million for debt issuance costs.
McJunkin
McJunkins net cash used in financing activities for the
one month ended January 31, 2007 was $8.3 million,
which consisted of payments on long-term obligations.
McJunkins net cash used in financing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was $17.2 million. We
paid dividends of $26.9 million to our shareholders which
were partially funded with $10.1 million of long-term debt.
McJunkins net cash used in financing activities for the
year ended December 31, 2005 was $21.1 million. The
company used $11.2 million to reduce long-term obligations
and paid $9.8 million in dividends to shareholders.
Red Man
Red Mans net cash used in financing activities for the
year ended October 31, 2007 was $78.2 million. Red Man
used cash to pay down net borrowings of $45.3 million. In
addition, Red Man paid off its existing line of credit of
$120.0 million in connection with the merger transaction
with McJunkin. Also, Red Man paid $27.6 million on its
operating line of credit, $7.1 million on repayments of
notes payable and $6.2 million in payments to minority
shareholders. These amounts were partially offset by
$120.0 million in advances from McJunkin in connection with
the merger transaction and $6.2 million in capital
contributions associated with the merger. There was an
additional $1.8 million of cash provided by other net
financing activities.
Red Mans net cash provided by financing activities for the
year ended October 31, 2006 was $52.7 million. Red Man
had cash provided by net borrowings on its line of credit of
$64.0 million. Additionally, Red Man had $13.1 million
provided in advances from minority shareholders. These amounts
of cash provided were partially offset by $20.4 million
used in payments of notes payable and net payments were
$4.0 million on other debt items.
Red Mans net cash provided by financing activities for the
year ended October 31, 2005 was $60.9 million. Red Man
had cash provided by net borrowings on its line of credit of
$49.2 million. Additionally, Red Man had $20.4 million
provided by additional notes payable. These amounts of cash
provided were partially offset by $8.0 million in payments
to minority shareholders and net payments on $0.7 million
on other debt items.
Working
Capital
Our working capital at June 26, 2008 was
$686.1 million, consisting of $1,355.2 million in
current assets and $669.1 million in current liabilities.
Working capital at December 31, 2007 was $663.5 million,
consisting of $1,159.7 million in current assets and
$496.2 million in current liabilities. In addition, we had
available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit
facilities of $542.5 million at June 26, 2008 and
$384.0 million at December 31, 2007.
75
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our minimum payment obligations
as of December 31, 2007 relating to long-term debt, capital
leases, operating leases, purchase obligations and other
long-term liabilities for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
868.4
|
|
|
$
|
19.8
|
|
|
$
|
62.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
$
|
774.6
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
46.9
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
846.7
|
|
|
|
846.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities reflected on our balance sheet under
GAAP
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,821.2
|
|
|
$
|
910.7
|
|
|
$
|
107.4
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
782.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term debt amortization is based on the contractual terms of
our credit facilities. As of December 31, 2007,
$868.4 million was outstanding under these facilities. On
May 22, 2008, we entered into a $450 million junior
term loan facility. As of June 26, 2008, giving effect to
this new facility, a total of $1,284.8 million was
outstanding under our credit facilities. See Description
of Our Indebtedness. As of June 26, 2008, our total
minimum amortization payments with respect to long-term debt
were $1,284.8 million, with payments of $16.6 million due
within less than one year from June 26, 2008,
$63.2 million due within one to three years of that date,
$11.5 million due within three to five years of that date,
and $1,193.5 million due more than five years from that
date. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations reflect our commitments to purchase PVF
products in the ordinary course of business. Information
presented with respect to purchase obligations is presented
(1) with respect to U.S. purchase obligations, as of
June 26, 2008 and (2) with respect to Canadian
purchase obligations, as of August 2008. |
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our
indebtedness, to fund planned capital expenditures and to
satisfy our other capital and commercial commitments will depend
on our ability to generate cash flow in the future. This, to a
certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial,
competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are
beyond our control. However, our business may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may
not be available to us under our credit facilities in an amount
sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our
other liquidity needs. We may seek to sell assets to fund our
liquidity needs but may not be able to do so. We may also need
to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before
maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our
indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Standby
Letters of Credit
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors and
others, we are contingently liable for performance under standby
letters of credit and bid, performance and surety bonds. We were
contingently liable for approximately $8.2 million of
standby letters of credit and bid, performance and
76
surety bonds at December 31, 2007. Management does not
expect any material amounts to be drawn on these instruments.
Legal
Proceedings
We are a defendant in various legal proceedings, including
numerous asbestos claims. Although we believe that we have
currently established sufficient reserves with respect to these
claims, we cannot assure you that the assumptions on which our
reserves are based will not need to be revised in the future.
Accordingly, if our actual liability for current and future
asbestos claims is higher than the amounts reserved for these
claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. See
Business Legal Proceedings for more
information.
Seasonality
Our business experiences mild seasonal effects as demand for our
products is generally higher during the months of August,
September and October. Demand for our products during the months
of November and December and early in the year generally tends
to be lower due to a lower level of activity in our end markets
near the end of the calendar year. As a result, our results of
operations for the third quarter are generally stronger than
those for our fourth quarter. In addition, certain
E & P activities typically experience a
springtime reduction due to seasonal thaws and regulatory
restrictions, limiting the ability of drilling rigs to operate
effectively during these periods.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as
such term is defined within the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with GAAP. In order to apply these principles, management must
make judgments and assumptions and develop estimates based on
the best available information at the time. Actual results may
differ based on the accuracy of the information utilized and
subsequent events. Our accounting policies are described in the
notes to our audited financial statements included elsewhere in
this prospectus. These critical accounting policies could
materially affect the amounts recorded in our financial
statements. We believe the following describes significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements:
Investments: Investments are carried at
fair value based on quoted market prices. Prior to the
acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds on
January 31, 2007, these available for sale investments were
recorded at fair value and reflected as investments on the
balance sheets. Changes to the fair value of the assets were
recorded in other comprehensive income, net of related deferred
taxes. On January 31, 2007, these investments were
reclassified as assets held for sale as more fully described in
Assets Held for Sale below.
Assets Held for Sale: Certain of the
Companys assets, consisting principally of certain
available for sale securities and certain real estate holdings,
were designated as non-core assets under the terms of the
acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds. The Company
has classified these as assets held for sale in the balance
sheet. A corresponding liability to predecessor shareholders,
net of related deferred income taxes, has been recognized to
reflect the obligation to the shareholders of record at the date
of the acquisition. Upon the sale of these assets, 95% of the
proceeds net of associated taxes will be distributed to the
predecessor shareholders. No gain or loss will be recognized as
the result of the sale of these assets.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: A
portion of our accounts receivable will not be collected due to
non-payment, bankruptcies and sales returns. Our accounting
policy for the provision for
77
doubtful accounts requires providing an amount based on the
evaluation of the aging of accounts receivable, trend analysis,
detailed analysis of potential high-risk customers
accounts, and the overall market and economic conditions of our
customers. Because this process is subjective and based on
estimates, ultimate losses may differ significantly from those
estimates. Receivable balances are written off when we determine
that the balance is uncollectible.
Derivatives and Hedging: The Company
uses derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate
swaps to reduce its exposure to potential interest rate
increases. The Company records all derivatives on the balance
sheet at fair value, which is determined by independent market
quotes. The Companys swap is designated as a cash flow
hedge and it measures the effectiveness of the hedge, or the
degree that the gain (loss) for the hedging instrument offsets
the loss (gain) on the hedged item, at each reporting period.
The effective portion of the gain (loss) on the derivative
instrument is recognized in other comprehensive income as a
component of equity and, subsequently, reclassified into
earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The
ineffective portion of a derivatives change in fair value
is recognized in earnings immediately. Derivatives that do not
qualify for hedge treatment are recorded at fair value with
gains (losses) recognized in earnings in the period of change.
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets: Goodwill represents the excess of
cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Recorded
goodwill balances are not amortized but, instead, are evaluated
for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances
indicate that an impairment may exist.
Intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value at the
date of acquisition. The determination of fair value involves
key assumptions regarding discount rates and cash flow
estimates. Amortization is provided using the straight-line
method over their estimated useful lives. The carrying value of
intangible assets is subject to an impairment test on an annual
basis, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate a
possible impairment. The measure of impairment is based on the
estimated fair values.
Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial
and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the tax rate
expected to be in effect when tax benefits and costs will be
realized.
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, which provides specific guidance on the financial
statement recognition, measurement, reporting and disclosure of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. We recognize the impact of our tax positions in our
financial statements if those positions will more likely than
not be sustained on audit, based on the technical merit of the
position.
Inventories: The Companys
inventories are generally valued at the lower of cost
(principally
last-in,
first-out method) or market. The Company believes the LIFO
method more fairly presents the results of operations by more
closely matching current costs with current revenues. Certain
inventories held in Canada totaling $78.6 million, at
December 31, 2007, are valued at the lower of weighted
average cost or market. Periodically, the Company evaluates
inventory for estimated net realizable value at the lower of
cost or market based upon excess slow moving or obsolete
inventory.
Revenue Recognition: The Company
recognizes revenue as products are shipped, title has
transferred to the customer, and the customer assumes the risk
and rewards of ownership. Out-bound shipping and handling costs
are reflected in cost of goods sold, and freight charges billed
to customers are reflected in revenues. Unusual arrangements are
subject to management approval.
Equity-Based Compensation: The
Companys equity-based compensation consists of restricted
common units, profit units, restricted stock and non-qualified
stock options. The cost of employee services received in
exchange for an award of an equity instrument is measured based
on the grant-date fair value of the award. The Companys
policy is to expense stock-based compensation
78
using the fair-value of awards granted, modified or settled.
Restricted common units, profit units, and restricted stock are
credited to equity as they are expensed over their vesting
periods based on the current market value of the shares to be
granted.
The fair value of non-qualified stock options is measured on the
grant date of the related equity instrument using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized as
compensation expense over the applicable vesting period.
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which establishes a framework for reporting
fair values and expands disclosures about fair value
measurement. Certain provisions of SFAS 157 became
effective beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of this
standard had no material impact on our financial position or
results of operations. At June 26, 2008, the only financial
assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis are our derivative instruments.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
157-2 which
defers the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entitys
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
We will be required to adopt SFAS 157 for these
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities as of
January 1, 2009. Management has not determined the impact
that the adoption of SFAS 157 deferral provisions will have
on our financial position or earnings.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159), which allows entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The provisions of SFAS 159 were effective as of
January 1, 2008. We did not elect the fair value option for
any asset or liability. Therefore, the adoption of SFAS 159
did not impact our consolidated financial statements as of the
six months ended June 26, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations. This statement defines the
acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more
businesses in the business combination, establishes the
acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control
and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest at their
fair values as of the acquisition date. This statement also
requires that acquisition-related costs of the acquirer be
recognized separately from the business combination and such
costs will generally be expensed as incurred. We will be
required to adopt this statement as of January 1, 2009. The
impact of adopting SFAS 141(R) has not been determined.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards
for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership
interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as
equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160
requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure
requirements for existing minority interests. All other
requirements of SFAS 160 must be applied prospectively.
SFAS 160 is effective for us beginning January 1,
2009. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of the
adoption of SFAS 160 on our consolidated financial
statements
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133. This statement will change the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about how
and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an
entitys financial
79
position, net earnings, and cash flows. We will be required to
adopt this statement as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 161 is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The risk inherent in our market risk sensitive instruments and
positions is the potential loss from adverse changes in interest
rates.
As of June 26, 2008, all of our $1,284.7 million of
outstanding term debt was at floating rates. An increase of 1.0%
in the LIBOR rate would result in an increase in our interest
expense of approximately $10.2 million per year.
As of June 26, 2008, all of our $256.1 million of
outstanding revolving debt was at floating rates. If this amount
remained outstanding for an entire year, an increase of 1.0% in
the LIBOR rate would result in an increase in our interest
expense of approximately $2.6 million per year.
We use derivative financial instruments to help manage our
interest rate risk. On December 3, 2007, we entered into a
floating to fixed interest rate swap agreement, effective
December 31, 2007, for a notional amount of
$700.0 million to limit our exposure to interest rate
increases relating to a portion of our floating rate
indebtedness. The interest rate swap agreement terminates after
three years. At June 26, 2008, the fair value of our
interest rate swap agreement was a loss of approximately
$3.2 million, which amount is included in accrued
liabilities. As of the effective date of the interest rate swap
agreement, we designated the interest rate swap as a cash flow
hedge. As a result, the effective portion of changes in the fair
value of our swap was recorded as a component of other
comprehensive income. At June 26, 2008, $1.6 million
of unrecognized losses, net of tax, on the interest rate swap
agreement was included in other comprehensive income.
As a result of the interest rate swap agreement, our effective
interest rates as to the $700.0 million floating rate
indebtedness will be 4.868% for associated indebtedness on our
Revolving Credit Facility and 7.118% for associated indebtedness
on the Term Loan Facility per quarter through 2010 and result in
an average fixed rate of 6.672%.
80
BUSINESS
General
We are the largest North American distributor of pipe, valves
and fittings (PVF) and related products and services
to the energy industry based on sales and the leading PVF
distributor serving this industry across each of the upstream
(exploration, production, and extraction of underground oil and
gas), midstream (gathering and transmission of oil and gas, gas
utilities, and the storage and distribution of oil and gas) and
downstream (crude oil refining and petrochemical processing)
markets. We have an unmatched presence of over 250 branches that
are located in the most active oil and gas regions in North
America. We offer an extensive array of PVF and oilfield
supplies encompassing over 100,000 products, we are
diversified by geography and end market and we seek to provide
best-in-class service to our customers by satisfying the most
complex, multi-site needs of some of the largest companies in
the energy and industrials sectors as their primary supplier. As
a result, we have an average relationship of over 20 years
with our top ten customers and our pro forma sales in 2007 were
over twice as large as our nearest competitor. We believe the
critical role we play in our customers supply chain, our
unmatched scale and extensive product offering, our broad North
American geographic presence, our customer-linked scalable
information systems and our efficient distribution capabilities
serve to solidify our long-standing customer relationships and
drive our growth.
We have benefited in recent years from several growth trends
within the energy industry including high levels of expansion
and maintenance capital expenditures by our customers. This
growth in spending has been driven by several factors, including
underinvestment in North American energy infrastructure,
production and capacity constraints and anticipated strength in
the oil, natural gas, refined products and petrochemical
markets. While current prices for oil and natural gas are high
relative to historical levels, we believe that investment in the
energy sector by our customers would continue at prices well
below current levels. In addition, our products are often used
in extreme operating environments leading to the need for a
regular replacement cycle. As a result, over 50% of our pro
forma sales in 2007 were attributable to multi-year maintenance,
repair and operations (MRO) contracts where we have
demonstrated an over 99% annual average retention rate since
2000. The combination of these ongoing factors has helped
increase demand for our products and services, resulting in
record levels of orders as of August 2008. For the twelve months
ended December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, we generated
sales of $3,952.7 million, Adjusted EBITDA of
$370.4 million and net income of $150.8 million.
We have established a position as the largest North American PVF
distributor to the energy industry based on sales. We distribute
products throughout North America and the Gulf of Mexico,
including in PVF intensive, rapidly expanding oil and natural
gas production areas such as the Bakken, Barnett, Fayetteville,
Haynesville and Marcellus shales. Growth in these areas is
driven by improved production technology, favorable market
trends and robust capital expenditure budgets. Furthermore,
Midfield, one of the three largest Canadian PVF distributors
based on sales, provides PVF products to oil and gas companies
operating primarily in Western Canada, including the Western
Canadian Sedimentary Basin, Alberta Oil Sands and heavy oil
markets. These regions are still in the early stages of
infrastructure investment with numerous companies seeking to
facilitate the long-term harvesting of difficult to extract and
process crude oil.
81
McJunkin Red Man
Locations
Across our extensive North American platform we offer a broad
complement of products and services to the upstream, midstream
and downstream sectors of the energy industry, as well as other
industrial (including general manufacturing, pulp and paper,
food and beverage) and other energy (power generation, liquefied
natural gas, coal, alternative energy) end markets. During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis,
approximately 46% of our sales were attributable to upstream
activities, approximately 22% were attributable to midstream
activities and approximately 32% were attributable to downstream
and other processing activities which include the refining,
chemical and other industrial and energy end markets.
We offer more than 100,000 products including an extensive array
of PVF, oilfield supply, automation, instrumentation and other
general and specialty products to our customers across our
various end markets. Due to the demanding operating conditions
in the energy industry and high costs associated with equipment
failure, customers prefer highly reliable products and vendors
with established qualifications and experience. As our PVF
products typically represent a fraction of the total cost of the
project, our customers place a premium on service given the high
cost to them of maintenance or new project delays. Our products
are typically used in high-volume, high-stress, abrasive
applications such as the gathering and transmission of oil and
natural gas, in high-pressure, extreme temperature and
high-corrosion applications such as in heating and
desulphurization in the processing and refining industries and
in steam generation units in the power industry.
With over 250 locations servicing the energy and industrial
sectors, we are an important link between our more than 10,000
customers and approximately 10,000 suppliers. We add value to
our customers and suppliers in a number of ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Broad Product Offering and High Customer Service
Levels: The breadth and depth of our product
offering enables us to provide a high level of service to our
energy and industrial customers. Given our North American
inventory coverage and branch network, we are able to fulfill
orders more quickly, including orders for less common and
specialty items, and provide our customers with a greater array
of value added services, including multiple daily deliveries,
volume purchasing, product testing and supplier assessments,
inventory management and warehousing, technical support,
just-in-time
delivery, order consolidation, product tagging and tracking, and
system interfaces customized to customer and supplier
specifications, than if we
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
operated on a smaller scale
and/or only
at a local or regional level. Thus our clients, particularly
those operating throughout North America, can quickly and
efficiently source the most suitable products with the least
amount of downtime and at the lowest total transaction cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approved Manufacturer List (AML)
Services: Our customers rely on us to provide
a high level of quality control for their PVF products. We do
this by regularly auditing many of our suppliers for quality
assurance through our Supplier Registration Process. We use the
resulting MRM ASL to supply products across many of the markets
we support, particularly for downstream and midstream customers.
This process has enabled us to achieve a preferred vendor status
with many key end users in the industry that utilize our AML
services to help devise and maintain their own approved
manufacturer listings. In this manner, we seek to ensure that
our customers timely receive reliable and high quality products
without incurring additional administrative and procurement
expenses. Our suppliers in turn look to us as a key partner,
which has been important in establishing us as an important link
in the supply chain and a leader in the industry.
|
|
|
|
Customized and Integrated Service
Offering: We offer our customers integrated
supply services including product procurement, product quality
assurance, physical warehousing, and inventory management and
analysis using our proprietary customized information technology
platform. This is part of an overall strategy to promote a
one stop shop for PVF purchases across the
upstream-midstream-downstream spectrum and throughout North
America through integrated supply agreements and MRO contracts
that enable our customers to focus on their core operations and
increase the efficiency of their business.
|
Industry Overview
and Trends
We primarily serve the North American oil and gas industry,
generating approximately 90% of our revenues from supplying PVF
products and various services to customers throughout the energy
industry. Given the diverse requirements and various factors
that drive the growth of the upstream, midstream and downstream
energy sectors, our sales to each sector may vary from time to
time, though the overall strength of the energy market is
typically a good indicator of our performance. Globally, the
energy industry is experiencing a number of favorable supply and
demand dynamics that have led companies to make substantial
investments to expand their physical infrastructure and
processing capacities. On the demand side, world energy markets
are benefiting from the increased consumption of energy, caused
in part by the industrialization of China, India, and other
non-OECD countries, as well as continued global energy
infrastructure expansion. At the same time, energy supply has
been constrained due to increasing scarcity of natural
resources, declining excess capacity of existing energy assets,
geopolitical instability, natural and other unforeseen
disasters, and more stringent regulatory, safety and
environmental standards. These demand and supply dynamics
underscore the need for investment in energy infrastructure and
the next level of global exploration, extraction, production,
transportation, refining and processing of energy inputs.
Upstream: Oil and Gas. Exploration and
production (E&P) companies, commonly referred
to as upstream companies, search for gas and oil underground and
extract it to the surface. Representative companies include BP
p.l.c., Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chevron Corporation,
ConocoPhillips Company, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., EnCana
Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Husky Energy Inc., Royal
Dutch Shell plc, and Suncor Corporation. Exploration and
production companies typically purchase oilfield supplies
including tools, sucker rods, pumps, storage tanks and meters
while producers primarily purchase high density polyethylene
pipe, valves and general oilfield supplies.
The capital spending budgets of North American oil and gas
companies have grown in recent years as tight supply conditions
and strong global demand have spurred companies to expand their
operations. According to the June 2008 Drilling and Production
Outlook prepared by Spears &
83
Associates Inc., North American drilling and completion spending
has grown by a 30.5% compound annual growth rate from 2002 to
2007 and is projected to grow by 10.2% from 2008 to 2013. Much
of this growth is expected to come from a need to compensate for
accelerating depletion rates in existing domestic oil and
natural gas reservoirs, improved E&P technologies,
increased demand for natural gas, especially from power
generation, and an anticipated rebound in Canadian upstream
activity.
North American
Oil and Gas Drilling and Completion Spending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Over Year % Increase
|
|
2003A
|
|
2004A
|
|
2005A
|
|
2006A
|
|
2007A
|
|
2008E
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
2011E
|
|
2012E
|
|
2013E
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
North America
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Source: Spears & Associates
Due to this unprecedented level of exploration expenditures,
U.S. and Canadian rig counts are expected to increase at a
4.8% and a 5.7% compound annual growth rate, respectively,
between 2007 and 2012, according to the June 2008 Drilling and
Production Outlook prepared by Spears and Associates, Inc.
Furthermore, more technically sophisticated drilling methods,
such as deep and horizontal drilling, which tend to have higher
PVF requirements, coupled with higher oil and natural gas prices
relative to long term averages, are making E&P in
previously underdeveloped areas like Appalachia and the Rockies
more economically feasible. As part of this trend, there has
been growing commercial interest by our customers in several
shale deposit areas in the U.S., including the Bakken, Barnett,
Fayetteville, Haynesville and Marcellus shales, where we have a
strong local presence.
In Canada, improvements in mining and in-situ technology are
driving increased investment in the Canadian Oil Sands which,
according to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, contain
established reserves of almost 174 billion barrels. This
represents the second largest recoverable crude oil reserve in
the world, behind Saudi Arabia. As a result, according to the
Canadian Energy Research Institute, projected annual capital
expenditures in the Canadian Oil Sands will increase from
CDN$24.9 billion in 2008 to CDN$53.1 billion by 2011,
a 28.7% compound annual growth rate. As a result of these
factors, we believe that the North American upstream market
presents strong growth prospects on which we are well positioned
to capitalize.
84
Canadian Oil
Sands Production
Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Midstream: Energy. The midstream sector
of the oil and gas industry is comprised of companies that
provide gathering, storage, transmission, distribution, and
other services related to the movement of oil, natural gas, and
refined petroleum products from sources of production to demand
centers. Representative midstream companies include Atmos Energy
Corporation, AGL Resources Inc., Buckeye Partners, L.P.,
Consolidated Edison, Inc., DCP Midstream Partners, LP,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Kinder Morgan Energy
Partners, L.P., Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., NiSource,
Inc., Vectren Energy, and Williams Partners L.P. Core products
supplied for midstream infrastructure include carbon steel line
pipe for gathering and transporting oil and gas, actuation
systems for the remote opening and closing of valves, plastic
pipe for last mile transmission to end user
locations, and metering equipment for the measurement of oil and
gas delivery.
Midstream: Gas Utilities. The gas
utilities portion of the midstream sector has been one of
McJunkin Red Mans fastest growing markets since regulatory
changes enacted in the late 1990s permitted utilities to
outsource their PVF purchasing and procurement needs.
Outsourcing provides significant labor and working capital
savings to customers through the consolidation of product
procurement spending and the delegation of warehousing
operations to us. We estimate that while approximately one third
of gas utilities currently outsource, many of the remaining gas
utilities that operate their supply operations in-house will
most likely switch from the direct sourcing model to a
distributor model. Furthermore, gas utilities will increasingly
seek operating efficiencies as large natural gas pipelines and
related distribution networks continue to be built, and will
increasingly rely on companies such as ours to optimize their
supply chains.
Midstream: Oil and Gas
Transmission. The pipeline and transmission
sector is anticipated to exhibit significant growth over the
next three years due to the new discoveries of gas reserves in
various oil and natural gas shale gas fields and the need for
additional pipelines to carry heavy sour crude from Canada to
refineries in the United States. Recent heightened activity in
oil and gas fields such as the Bakken, Barnett, Fayetteville,
Haynesville and Marcellus shales remain largely unsupported by
transmission facilities of the appropriate scale necessary to
bring the oil and natural gas to market. This need for large
pipelines to transport energy feedstocks to markets is creating
significant growth for PVF and other products we sell. According
to the EIA, 200 planned or approved projects (as of May 2008),
call for 10,100 miles of new pipeline between 2008 and 2010,
more than twice the level from the prior three year period, and
are estimated to cost over $28 billion. Drivers of this pipeline
development and growth include the development of natural gas
production in new
85
geographies, the need for increased pipeline interconnection to
lower price differences within regions, and the need to link
facilities, liquefied natural gas and otherwise, that may be
developed over the next decade.
The need for increased safety and governmental demands for
pipeline integrity has also accelerated the MRO cycle for PVF
products in this segment. After 2000, the U.S. Department
of Transportation mandated programs that hasten, based on
population densities and other considerations, the testing of
existing lines to ensure that the integrity of the pipe remains
consistent with its original design criteria. All pipe falling
outside the necessary performance criteria as it relates to
safety and overall integrity must be replaced. These new
regulations for pipeline integrity management will continue to
stimulate MRO demand for products as older pipelines are
inspected and eventually replaced.
Additions to
Natural Gas Pipeline Mileage
1998-2010
Source: EIA
Downstream and Other Processing Industries: Oil and
Gas. Typical downstream activities include
the refining of crude oil and the selling and distribution of
products derived from crude oil, as well as the production of
petrochemicals. Representative downstream companies include BP
plc, Chevron, ConocoPhillips Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation,
Marathon Oil Corporation, Shell Oil, and Valero Energy
Corporation. Refinery infrastructure products include carbon
steel line pipe and gate valves, fittings to construct piping
infrastructure and chrome or high alloy pipe and fittings for
high heat and pressure applications. Chemical/petrochemical
products include corrosive-resistant stainless steel or high
alloy pipes, multi-turn valves and quarter-turn valves.
Total U.S. refinery capacity utilization remains high,
averaging approximately 90% over the last twenty-three years
according to data provided by the Energy Information
Administration. No new refineries have been built in the
U.S. since 1976, and the number of refineries has declined
from 216 in 1985 to 149 in 2006 where it has since remained
constant. This continued high level of refinery utilization has
stressed the existing refinery infrastructure and accelerated
PVF product replacement rates. Furthermore, we expect that
additional increases in production to meet growing demand for
refined products will result in a greater number of expansion
projects at existing refineries. According to the EIA,
cumulative capacity additions are expected to increase nearly
threefold, or from approximately 0.5 Mmbl/day in 2007 to
approximately 1.4 Mmbl/day by 2010. We believe that this
trend of increased new project and MRO activities, coupled with
continued high capacity utilization and the
86
need to reinvest in existing plants, will generate significant
new project and MRO contract opportunities for us.
U.S. Petroleum
Products Consumption vs. U.S. Refining Capacity
Source: EIA
As refineries look for ways to improve margins and value-added
capabilities, they are also increasingly investing in broadening
the crudes that they process to include heavier, sourer crude.
Increasingly heavy and sour crude is harsher and more corrosive
than light sweet crude and requires high-grade alloys in many
parts of the refining process. As a result of these corrosive
characteristics, processing heavier and sourer crudes shortens
product replacement cycles and, as a result, creates additional
MRO contract opportunities for us following project completion.
Thus, we believe that our specialty products will be in high
demand to meet this need. Our specialty products include, among
others, corrosion resistant components and steam products used
in various process applications in refineries.
Petrochemical plants generally use crude oil, natural gas, or
coal as a basis to produce a variety of primary petrochemicals
(e.g. ethylene and propylene) that are the building blocks for
most of the manufactured goods produced in the world today. The
burgeoning economies in China, India and other non-OECD
countries have generated increasing demand for petrochemicals
and we expect that future increases in demand will require
additional capital expenditures to increase capacity. Industry
participants include integrated oil and gas companies with
significant petrochemical operations and large industrial
chemical companies, such as BP Chemicals, Celanese Chemicals,
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Eastman Chemicals Company,
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Lyondell Chemical Company.
Other Industries Served. Beyond the oil
and gas industry, we also supply products to other energy
sectors such as coal, power generation, liquefied natural gas
and alternative energy facilities. We also serve more general
industrial end markets such as pulp and paper, metals
processing, fabrication, pharmaceutical, food and beverage and
manufacturing companies, which together make use of products
such as corrosion resistant piping products as well as
automation and instrumentation products. Some of the customers
we serve in these markets include Alcoa, Inc., Arcelor Mittal,
Eli Lilly and Company, Georgia Pacific Corporation,
International Paper Company and U.S. Steel Corporation.
87
These other markets are typically characterized by large
physical plants requiring significant ongoing maintenance and
capital programs to ensure efficient and reliable operations.
Overview of Our
Business
Competitive
Strengths
We consider the following to be our key competitive strengths:
Market Leader with Complete North American Coverage and
Significant Scale. We are the leading North
American distributor of PVF and related products to the energy
industry based on sales, with at least twice the sales of our
nearest competitor in 2007. Our North American network of over
250 locations in 38 U.S. states and in Canada gives us a
significant market presence and provides us with substantial
economies of scale that we believe make us a more effective
competitor. The benefits of our size and extensive North
American presence include: (1) the ability to act as a
single-source supplier to large, multi-location customers
operating across all segments of the energy industry;
(2) the ability to commit significant financial resources
to further develop our operating infrastructure, including our
information systems, and provide a strong platform for future
expansion; (3) volume purchasing benefits from our
suppliers; (4) an ability to leverage our extensive North
American inventory coverage to provide greater overall breadth
and depth of product offerings; (5) the ability to attract
and retain effective managers and salespeople; and (6) a
business model exhibiting a high degree of operating leverage.
Our presence and scale have also enabled us to establish an
efficient supply chain and logistics platform, allowing us to
better serve our customers and further differentiate us from our
competitors.
High Level of Integration and MRO Contracts with a Blue
Chip Customer Base. We have a diversified
customer base with over 10,000 active customers and serve as the
sole or primary supplier in all end markets or in specified end
markets or geographies for many of our customers. Our top ten
customers, with whom we have had relationships for more than
20 years on average, accounted for less than 25% of 2007
pro forma sales and no single customer accounted for more than
5% of 2007 pro forma sales. We enjoy fully integrated
relationships, including interconnected technology systems and
daily communication, with many of our customers and we provide
an extensive range of integrated and outsourced supply services,
allowing us to market a total transaction cost
concept as opposed to individual product prices. We provide such
services as multiple daily deliveries, zone stores management,
valve tagging, truck stocking and significant system support for
tracking and replenishing inventory, which we believe results in
deeply integrated customer relationships. We sell products to
many of our customers through multi-year MRO contracts which are
typically renegotiated every three to five years. Although there
are typically no guaranteed minimum purchase amounts under these
contracts, these MRO customers, representing over 50% of our
2007 pro forma sales, provide a relatively stable revenue stream
and help mitigate against industry downturns. We believe we have
been able to retain customers by ensuring a high level of
service and integration, as evidenced by our annual average MRO
contract retention rate of over 99% since 2000. Furthermore, we
have recently signed new MRO contracts displacing competitors
that provide opportunities for us to gain new customers and
broaden existing customer relationships.
Business and Geographic Diversification in the High-Growth
Areas. We are well diversified across the
upstream, midstream and downstream operations of the energy
industry, as well as through our participation in selected
industrial end markets. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, we generated
approximately 46% of our sales in the upstream sector, 22% in
the midstream sector, and 32% in the downstream, industrial and
other energy end markets. This diversification affords us some
measure of protection in the event of a downturn in any one end
market while providing us the ability to offer one
stop shopping for most of our integrated energy customers.
In addition, our more than 250 branches are located near major
hydrocarbon and
88
refining regions throughout North America, including rapidly
expanding oil and natural gas E&P areas in North America,
such as the Bakken, Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville and
Marcellus shales. Our geographic diversity enhances our ability
to respond to customers quickly, gives us a strong presence in
these high growth E&P areas and reduces our exposure to a
downturn in any one region.
Strategic Supplier Relationships. We
have extensive relationships with our suppliers and have key
supplier relationships dating back in certain instances over
60 years. We purchased approximately $1 billion of
products from our top ten suppliers for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis, representing
approximately 33% of our purchases. We believe our customers
view us as an industry leader for the formal processes we use to
evaluate vendor performance and product quality. We employ
individuals, certified by the International Registry of
Certificated Auditors, who specialize in conducting manufacturer
assessments both domestically and internationally. Our Supplier
Registration Process (SRP), which allows us to
maintain the MRM ASL, serves as a significant strategic
advantage to us in developing, maintaining and
institutionalizing key supplier relationships. For our
suppliers, being included on the MRM ASL represents an
opportunity for them to increase their product sales to our
customers. The SRP also adds value to our customers, as they
collaborate with us regarding specific manufacturer performance,
our past experiences with products and the results of our
on-site
supplier assessments. Having a timely, uninterrupted supply of
those mission critical products from approved vendors is an
essential part of our customers day-to-day operations and
we work to fulfill that need through our SRP.
A Leading IT Platform Focused on Customer
Service. Our business is supported by our
integrated, scalable and customer-linked customized information
systems. These systems and our more than 3,400 employees
are linked by a wide area network. We are currently implementing
an initiative, expected to be completed in 2009, that will
combine our business operations onto one enterprise server-based
system. This will enable real-time access to our business
resources, including customer order processing, purchasing and
material requests, distribution requirements planning,
warehousing and receiving, inventory control and all accounting
and financial functions. Significant elements of our systems
include firm-wide pricing controls resulting in disciplined
pricing strategies, advanced scanning and customized bar-coding
capabilities, allowing for efficient warehousing activities at
customer as well as our own locations, and significant levels of
customer-specific integrations. We believe that the customized
integration of our customers systems into our own
information systems has increased customer retention by reducing
their expenses, thus creating switching costs when comparing us
to alternative sources of supply. Typically, smaller regional
and local competitors do not have IT capabilities that are as
advanced as ours.
Highly Efficient, Flexible Operating Platform Drives
Significant Free Cash Flow Generation. We
place a particular emphasis on practicing financial discipline
as evidenced by our strong focus on return on assets, minimal
capital expenditures and high free cash flow generation. Our
disciplined cost control, coupled with our active asset
management strategies, result in a business model exhibiting a
high degree of operating leverage. As is typical with the
flexibility associated with a distribution operating model, our
variable cost base includes substantially all our cost of goods
sold and a significant portion of our operating costs.
Furthermore, our maintenance capital expenditures are less than
0.3% of our annual sales. This cost structure allows us to
adjust to changing industry dynamics and, as a result, during
periods of decreased sales activity, we typically generate
significant free cash flow as our costs are reduced and working
capital contracts.
Experienced and Motivated Management
Team. Our senior management team has an
average of over 25 years of experience in the oilfield and
industrial supply business, the majority of which has been with
McJunkin Red Man or its predecessors. After giving effect to
this offering, senior management will
own % of our company indirectly
through their equity interests in PVF Holdings LLC. We also seek
to incentivize and align management with shareholder interests
through equity-linked compensation plans. Furthermore, executive
compensation is based on profitability and
89
return-on-investment
targets which we believe drives accountability and further
aligns the organization with our shareholders.
Business
Strategy
Our goal is to become the largest global distributor of PVF and
related products to the energy and industrials sectors. We
intend to grow our business by leveraging our existing position
as the largest North American distributor of PVF products and
services to the energy industry based on sales. Our strategy is
focused on pursuing growth by increasing organic market share
and growing our business with current customers, expanding into
new geographies and end markets, further penetrating the
Canadian Oil Sands and downstream sector, pursuing selective
strategic acquisitions and investments, increasing recurring
revenues through integrated supply, MRO and project contracts,
and continuing to increase our operational efficiency.
Increase Organic Market Share and Grow Business with
Current Customers. We are committed to
expanding upon existing deep relationships with our current
customer base while at the same time striving to secure new
customers. To accomplish this, we are focused on providing a
one stop PVF procurement solution throughout North
America and across the upstream, midstream and downstream
sectors of the energy industry, cross-selling by leveraging our
expanded product offering resulting from the business
combination between McJunkin and Red Man in October 2007,
and increasing our penetration of existing customers new
multiyear projects.
The migration of existing customer relationships to sole or
primary sourcing arrangements is a core strategic focus. We seek
to position ourselves as the sole or primary provider of a broad
complement of PVF products and services for a particular
customer, often by end market
and/or
geography, or in certain instances across all of a
customers North American upstream, midstream and
downstream operations. Several of our largest customers have
recently switched to sole or primary sourcing contracts with us.
Additionally, we believe that significant opportunities exist to
expand upon heritage McJunkin and Red Man existing deep customer
and supplier relationships and thereby increase our market
share. While we believe that both heritage McJunkin and Red Man
organizations each maintained robust product offerings, there
also remain opportunities to cross-sell certain products into
the other heritage organizations customer base and branch
network. As part of these efforts, we are working to further
strengthen our service offerings by augmenting our product
portfolio, management expertise and sales force.
We also aim to increase our penetration of our existing
customers new projects. For example, while we often
provide nearly 100% of the PVF products for certain customers
under MRO contracts, increased penetration of those
customers new downstream and midstream projects remains a
strategic priority. Initiatives are in place to deepen
relationships with engineering and construction firms and to
extend our product offering into certain niches. We recently
integrated core project groups in several locations to focus
solely on capturing new multi-year project opportunities and we
are encouraged by these initial efforts.
Expand into New Geographies and End
Markets. We intend to selectively establish
new branches in order to facilitate our expansion into new
geographies, and enter end markets where extreme operating
environments generate high PVF product replacement rates. We
continue to evaluate establishing branches and service and
supply centers, entering into joint ventures, and making
acquisitions in select domestic and international regions. While
we believe that we are one of two PVF distributors with branches
throughout North America, there is opportunity to expand via new
branch openings in certain geographies and end markets.
While our near term strategy is to continue to expand within
North America, we believe that attractive opportunities exist to
expand internationally. Though we currently maintain only one
branch outside of North America, we continue to actively
evaluate opportunities to extend our offering to key
international markets, particularly in West Africa, the Middle
East, Europe and South America. The
90
E&P opportunity and current installed base of energy
infrastructure internationally is significantly larger than in
North America and as a result we believe represents an
attractive long term opportunity both for ourselves and our
largest customers. While our near term focus internationally
will be centered on growing our business with our already
largely global customer base, the increased focus, particularly
by foreign-owned integrated oil companies, on efficiency, cost
savings, process improvements and core competencies has also
generated potential growth opportunities to add new customers
that we will continue to monitor closely.
We also believe opportunities exist for expansion into new and
under penetrated end markets where PVF products are used in
specialized, highly corrosive applications. These end markets
include pulp and paper, food and beverage and other general
industrial markets, in addition to other energy end markets such
as power generation, liquefied natural gas, coal, nuclear and
ethanol. We believe our extensive North American branch
platform, comprehensive PVF product offering, and reputation for
high customer service and technical expertise positions us to
participate in the growth in these end markets.
We believe there also remains an opportunity to continue to
expand into certain niche and specialty products that complement
our current extensive product offering. These products include
automated valves, instrumentation, stainless, chrome and high
nickel alloy PVF, large diameter carbon steel pipe and certain
specialty items, including steam products.
Further Penetrate the Canadian Oil Sands, Particularly the
Downstream Sector. The Canadian Oil Sands
region and its attendant downstream markets represent very
attractive growth areas for our company. Improvements in mining
and in-situ technology are driving significant investment in the
area and, according to the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board,
the Canadian Oil Sands contain an ultimately recoverable crude
bitumen resource of 315 billion barrels, with established
reserves of almost 173 billion barrels at December 2007.
This represents the second largest recoverable crude oil reserve
in the world, behind Saudi Arabia. Capital and maintenance
investments in the Canadian Oil Sands are expected to experience
dramatic growth due to rising global energy demand and
advancements in recovery and upgrading technologies. According
to Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA),
between 2000 and the end of 2007 more than CDN$75 billion
was invested in Canadian Oil Sands projects. These large
facilities require significant ongoing PVF maintenance well in
excess of traditional energy infrastructure, given the extremely
harsh operating environments and highly corrosive conditions.
CERA estimates that more than CDN$160 billion in capital
expenditures will be spent on new Canadian Oil Sands projects
for the period from 2008 to 2011 which we estimate could
generate significant annual PVF expenditures over this period.
While Midfield has historically focused on the upstream and
midstream sectors in Canada, we believe that a significant
opportunity exists to penetrate the Canadian Oil Sands
downstream market which includes the upgrader and refinery
markets. We are the leading provider of PVF products to the
downstream market in the U.S. and believe this sector expertise
and existing customer relationships can be utilized by our
upstream and midstream Canadian operations to grow our
downstream sector presence in this region. We also believe there
is a significant opportunity to penetrate the Canadian Oil Sands
extraction market involving in-situ recovery methods, including
SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage) and CSS (cyclic steam
stimulation) techniques used to extract the bitumen. We have
formed a full team overseen by senior management, have made
recent inventory and facility investments in Canada, including a
new 60,000 square foot distribution center facility located near
Edmonton, and have opened additional locations in Western Canada
to address this opportunity. Finally, we also believe that an
attractive opportunity exists to more fully penetrate the MRO
market in Canada, including refineries, petrochemical
facilities, utilities and pulp and paper and other general
industrial markets.
Pursue Selective Strategic Acquisitions and
Investments. Acquisitions have been a core
focus and acquisition integration a core competency for us. We
seek opportunities to strengthen our franchise through selective
acquisitions and strategic investments. In particular, we will
consider
91
investments that enhance our presence in the energy
infrastructure market and enable us to leverage our existing
operations, either through acquiring new branches or by
acquiring companies offering complementary products or end
market breadth. Our industry remains highly fragmented and we
believe a significant number of small and larger acquisition
opportunities remain that offer favorable synergy potential and
attractive growth characteristics. Acquisitions have been a core
focus for both the heritage McJunkin and Red Man organizations
which we plan to continue. In addition to the business
combination between McJunkin and Red Man, since 2000 we have
integrated 19 acquisitions which collectively represented over
$900 million in sales in the year of acquisition. Important
recent acquisitions include Midfield, one of the three largest
oilfield supply companies in Canada with 60 branches, and
Midway-Tristate Corporation (Midway), a leading
oilfield distributor primarily serving the Rockies and
Appalachia regions. Historically, our operating scale and
integration capabilities have enabled us to realize important
synergies, while minimizing execution risk, which we intend to
focus on with future acquisitions.
Increase Recurring Revenues through Integrated Supply, MRO
and Project Contracts. We have entered into
and continue to pursue integrated supply, MRO and project
contracts with certain of our customers. These arrangements
generally designate us as the sole source or primary provider of
the upstream, midstream,
and/or
downstream requirements of our customers. In certain instances
we are the sole or primary source provider for our customers
across all the energy sectors and/or North American geographies
within which the customer operates.
Our customers have, over time, increasingly moved toward
centralized PVF procurement management at the corporate level
rather than at individual local units. While these developments
are partly due to significant consolidation among our customer
base, sole or primary sourcing arrangements allow customers to
focus on their core operations and provide economic benefits by
generating immediate savings for the customer through
administrative cost and working capital reductions while
providing for increased volumes, more stable revenue streams and
longer term visibility for us. We believe we are well positioned
to obtain these arrangements due to our (1) geographically
diverse and strategically located branch network,
(2) experience, technical expertise and reputation for
premier customer service operating across all segments of the
energy industry, (3) breadth of available product lines and
value added services, and (4) existing deep relationships
with customers and suppliers.
We also have exclusive and non-exclusive MRO contracts and new
project contracts in place. Our customers are increasing their
maintenance and capital spending, which is being driven by aging
infrastructure, their increased utilization of existing
facilities and the decreasing quality of energy feedstocks. Our
customers benefit from MRO agreements through lower inventory
investment and the reduction of transaction costs associated
with the elimination of the bid submission process, and our
company benefits from the recurring revenue stream that occurs
with an MRO contract in place. We believe there are additional
opportunities to utilize MRO arrangements for servicing the
requirements of our customers and we are actively pursuing such
agreements.
Continued Focus on Operational
Efficiency. We strive for continued
operational excellence. Our branch managers, regional management
corporate leadership team continually examine branch
profitability, working capital management, and return on managed
assets and utilize this information to optimize national,
regional and local strategies, reduce operating costs and
maximize cash flow generation. As part of this effort,
management incentives are centered on meeting EBITDA and return
on assets targets.
In order to improve efficiencies and profitability, we work to
leverage operational best practices, optimize our vendor
relationships, purchasing, and inventory levels and source
inventory internationally when appropriate. As part of this
strategy, we have integrated our heritage purchasing functions
and believe we have developed strong relationships with vendors
that value both our national footprint and volume purchasing
capabilities. Because of this, we are often considered the
preferred distribution channel. As we continue to consolidate
our vendor relationships, we plan to devote additional resources
to assist our customers in identifying products that improve
their processes, day-to-day
92
operations and overall operating efficiencies. We believe that
offering these value added services maximizes our value to our
customers and helps differentiate us from competitors.
Products
Through our over 250 strategic locations in North America, we
distribute over 100,000 products from over 10,000 suppliers
primarily used in specialized applications in the energy
infrastructure market. Our products are used in the
construction, maintenance, repair and overhaul of equipment used
in extreme operating conditions such as high pressure, high/low
temperature, high corrosive and high abrasive environments.
The breadth and depth of our product offerings and our extensive
North American presence allow us to provide high levels of
service to our customers. Due to our national inventory
coverage, we are able to fulfill more orders more quickly,
including those with lower volume and specialty items, than we
would be able to if we operated on a smaller scale
and/or only
at a local or regional level. Approximately two-thirds of our
pro forma sales for the twelve months ended December 31,
2007 consisted of sales of carbon, stainless and alloy pipe,
valves and specialty products. Sales of oilfield and industrial
supplies, fittings, gas products and other products comprised
the remainder. Key product groups are described below:
Carbon and Alloy Pipe. Carbon pipes are
typically used in high-yield, high-stress, abrasive applications
such as gathering and transmission of oil, natural gas and
phosphates. Steel alloy pipes are composed of iron, carbon, and
one or more other elements such as chromium, cobalt or nickel.
Alloy products are principally used in high-pressure, extreme
temperature and high-corrosion applications such as in heating
and desulphurization in the processing and refining industries
and in steam generation units in the power industry.
Valves and Specialty Products. Products
offered include ball, butterfly, gate, globe, check, needle and
plug valves which are manufactured from cast steel,
stainless/alloy steel, forged steel, carbon steel or cast and
ductile iron. Valves are generally used in oilfield and
industrial applications to control direction, velocity and
pressure of fluids and gases within transmission networks.
Specialty products include corrosion resistant components and
steam products used in various process applications in
refineries and petrochemical plants.
Oilfield and Industrial
Supplies. Products include high density
polyethylene pipe, valves, well heads, pumping units, rods and
other related oilfield and production equipment.
Carbon Fittings. Products include
carbon weld fittings, flanges and accessory items used primarily
to connect piping and valve systems for the transmission of
various liquids and gases.
Gas Products. Products include risers,
meters, polyethylene pipe and fittings and various other gas
carrying materials that are used primarily in the distribution
of natural gas to residential and commercial customers.
Stainless Pipe and Fittings. Products
include stainless, alloy and corrosion resistant pipe, tubing,
fittings and flanges that are used primarily in chemical process
applications.
Services
We provide our customers with a comprehensive array of services
including multiple daily deliveries, zone stores management,
valve tagging, truck stocking and significant system interfaces
that directly tie the customer into our proprietary information
systems. Our proprietary information systems allow us to
interface with our customers IT systems, thereby providing
a seamless and integrated supply service. Such services
strengthen our position with our customers as we become
93
more integrated into the customers business and supply
chain and are able to market a total transaction
cost concept rather than individual product prices.
Our comprehensive information systems platform, which provides
for customer and supplier electronic integrations, information
sharing, and
e-commerce
applications, further strengthens our ability to provide high
levels of service to our customers. Our highly specialized
implementation group focuses on the integration of our
information systems and implementation of improved business
processes with those of a new customer during the initiation
phase. By maintaining a specialized team, we are able to utilize
best practices to implement our systems and processes, thereby
providing solutions to customers in a more organized, efficient
and effective manner. This approach is valuable to large,
multi-location customers who have demanding service requirements.
As major integrated and large independent energy companies have
implemented efficiency initiatives to focus on their core
business, many of these companies have begun outsourcing their
procurement and inventory management requirements. In response
to these initiatives and to satisfy customer service
requirements, we offer integrated supply services to customers
who wish to outsource all or a part of the administrative burden
associated with sourcing PVF and other related products, and we
also have employees
on-site at
many customer locations. Our integrated supply group offers
procurement-related services, physical warehousing services,
product quality assurance and inventory ownership and analysis
services.
Customers
Our principal customers are companies active in the upstream,
midstream and downstream sectors of the energy industry as well
as in other industrial and energy sectors. Due to the demanding
operating conditions in the energy industry and high costs
associated with equipment failure, customers prefer highly
reliable products and vendors with established qualifications
and experience. As our PVF products typically represent a
fraction of the total cost of the project, our customers place a
premium on service given the high cost to them of maintenance or
new project delays. We strive to build long-term relationships
with our customers by maintaining our reputation as a supplier
of high-quality, efficient and reliable products and value-added
services and solutions.
We have a diverse customer base with over 10,000 active
customers. We are not dependent on any one customer or group of
customers. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007,
our top ten customers represented less than 25% of our pro forma
sales. For many of our largest customers, we are often their
sole or primary provider by end market or geography, their
largest or second largest supplier in aggregate, or in certain
instances the sole provider for their upstream, midstream and
downstream procurement needs. We believe that many customers for
which we are not the end market exclusive or comprehensive North
American sole source PVF provider will continue to reduce their
number of suppliers in an effort to reduce costs and
administrative burdens and focus on their core operations. As
such, we believe these customers will seek to select PVF
distributors with the most extensive product offering and
broadest geographic presence. Furthermore, we believe our
business will strengthen as companies in the energy industry
continue to consolidate and the larger, resulting companies look
to larger distributors such as ourselves as their sole or
primary source PVF provider.
Suppliers
We source our products from approximately 10,000 suppliers. Our
suppliers benefit from access to our diversified customer base
and, by consolidating customer orders, we benefit from stronger
purchasing power and preferred vendor programs. During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2007 on a pro forma basis,
we purchased approximately $1 billion of products from our
top 10 suppliers, representing approximately 33% of our
total purchases. Our largest supplier accounted for
approximately 9% of our total purchases in 2007.
94
We believe our customers and suppliers recognize us as an
industry leader for the formal processes we use to evaluate the
performance of our vendors as well as the products they furnish
to our company. This assessment process is referred to as the
MRM Supplier Registration Process, which involves employing
individuals, certified by the International Registry of
Certificated Auditors, who specialize in conducting
on-site
assessments of our manufacturers as well as monitoring and
evaluating the quality of goods produced. The result of this
process is the MRM ASL. Products from the manufacturers on this
list are supplied across many of the end markets we support.
Given that many of our largest customers, especially those in
the refinery and chemical industries, maintain their own formal
AML listing, we are recognized as an important source of
information sharing with our key customers regarding the results
of our
on-site
assessment. For this reason, together with managements
commitment to promote high quality products that bring the best
overall value to our customers, we often become the preferred
provider of AML products to these customers. Many of our
customers regularly collaborate with us regarding specific
manufacturer performance, our own experience with vendors
products and the results of our
on-site
supplier assessments. The emphasis placed on the MRM ASL by both
our customers and suppliers helps secure our central and
critical position in the global PVF supply chain.
Sales and
Marketing
We distribute our products to a wide variety of end-users. Our
broad distribution network and customer base allow us to
capitalize on our extensive inventory base. Local relationships,
depth of inventory, service and timely delivery are critical to
the sales process in the PVF distribution industry. Our
marketing efforts are customer and product driven, and provide a
system that is more responsive to changing customer and product
needs than a traditional, fully centralized structure.
Our sales model applies a two-pronged approach to address both
the regional and national markets. Regional sales teams, led by
eight senior vice presidents with an average tenure of
32 years at McJunkin Red Man or its predecessors, are based
in our core geographic regions and the national accounts sales
team is focused on specific customer types, including large
national customers and gas utility customers, supported by
groups with specific expertise, including integrated supply and
implementation. Our overall sales force is internally divided
into outside and inside sales forces.
Our 342 (as of December 31, 2007) outside sales
representatives develop relationships with prospective and
existing customers in an effort to better understand their needs
and to increase the number of our products specified or approved
by a given customer. Outside sales representatives may be branch
outside sales representatives, focused on customer relationships
in specific geographies, or technical outside sales
representatives, who focus on specific products and provide
detailed technical support to customers.
In order to address the needs of our customer base, our inside
sales force of 762 individuals (as of December 31,
2007) is responsible for processing orders generated by new
and existing customers as well as by our outside sales force.
The inside sales force prepares packages based on specific
customer needs, interfaces with manufacturers to determine
product availability, ensures on-time delivery and establishes
pricing of materials and services based on guidelines and
predetermined metrics set by management.
Information
Systems
Our technology approach allows for extensive integration and
customization with our clients. We believe that this is
accretive to the customers value proposition and increases
customer loyalty. Thus, our customized information systems
enable on-line real-time access to appropriate resources and are
an integral part of our competitive advantage, particularly
among larger customers whose own information systems we
integrate with seamlessly.
95
Third party and web-based applications are incorporated in our
platform to further enhance the IT offering. Customer and
supplier electronic integrations, information sharing, and
e-commerce
applications help support and secure long-standing relationships
and foster additional business with our customers. Scanning and
customized bar-coding systems increase efficiency. Our corporate
Intranet also includes web-based applications such as its Sales
History Analysis Reporting Program (SHARP), a Wizard
Document and Report Library and a Document Imaging application
that includes more than 5 million documents and reports. As
of December 31, 2007, we had a staff of more than 50 IT
professionals.
We currently operate two primary information systems inherited
from the combination of McJunkin and Red Man. Management has
thoroughly evaluated both systems for functionality, degree of
customer and internal integration, controls, accounting and
reporting capability, acquisition implementation, scalability,
reliability, speed and Sarbanes-Oxley upgradeability.
Information systems have been a critical focus and a three-step
integration plan has been put in place with the final transition
to an enhanced hybrid information system platform combining
certain elements of the heritage McJunkin and Red Man systems
expected to be fully completed in 2009. This plan enables the
company to leverage the benefits of both systems while reducing
the risk associated with any major system change.
Upon completion of our information systems integration
initiative, our branches will be linked by our wide area
networks into an existing integrated, scalable, enterprise
server-based system allowing online, real-time access to all
business resources including customer order processing,
purchasing and material request, distributing requirements
planning, warehousing and receiving, inventory control and all
accounting and financial functions. Prior to project completion,
we are merging geographically overlapping locations and
migrating these and certain other locations to the chosen
information systems platform. We have already successfully
transitioned 10 locations in this manner. This serves as both a
validation of our approach and a confirmation of our conversion
process, a key to minimizing information systems risk and any
disruption to the business and customer base.
Employees
As of June 26, 2008, we had approximately
3,484 employees worldwide. 29 employees belong to the
International Brotherhood of Teamsters and are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. We believe we have good
relationships with our employees and have not had any major
issues such as strikes or business interruptions during the past
several years.
Properties
We operate a modified hub and spoke model that is centered
around our 6 distribution centers in North America with more
than 250 locations which have inventory and local employees.
Additionally, in order to maintain strong customer
relationships, we hold inventory at approximately 700
on-site
customer locations.
The company maintains two corporate headquarters, the precedent
McJunkin headquarters in Charleston, WV, which focuses on
downstream, gas utilities (midstream), and Appalachian upstream
activities, and the precedent Red Man headquarters in Tulsa, OK,
which focuses on upstream and pipeline (midstream) activities.
We also maintain a main corporate office for our Canadian
operations in Calgary, Alberta.
Competition
We are the largest PVF distributor to the energy industry in
North America based on sales. The broad PVF distribution
industry is fragmented and includes large, nationally recognized
distributors, major regional distributors and many smaller local
distributors, with the potential for further
96
consolidation. The principal methods of competition include
offering prompt local service, fulfilment capability, breadth of
product and service offerings, price and total costs to the
customer. Our competitors include national recognized
distributors, such as Wilson Industries, Inc. (a subsidiary of
Smith International, Inc.) and National Oilwell Varco, Inc.,
several large regional or product-specific competitors, and many
local, family-owned PVF distributors.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local, foreign
and provincial environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations, including those governing the discharge of
pollutants into the air or water, the management, storage and
disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the responsibility
to investigate and cleanup contamination and occupational health
and safety. Fines and penalties may be imposed for
non-compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety
requirements and the failure to have or to comply with the terms
and conditions of required permits. Historically, the costs to
comply with environmental and health and safety requirements
have not been material. We are not aware of any pending
environmental compliance or remediation matters that, in the
opinion of management, are reasonably likely to have a material
effect on our business, financial position or results of
operations. However, the failure by us to comply with applicable
environmental, health and safety requirements could result in
fines, penalties, enforcement actions, third party claims for
property damage and personal injury, requirements to clean up
property or to pay for the costs of cleanup, or regulatory or
judicial orders requiring corrective measures, including the
installation of pollution control equipment or remedial actions.
Under certain laws and regulations, such as the federal
Superfund law, the obligation to investigate and remediate
contamination at a facility may be imposed on current and former
owners or operators or on persons who may have sent waste to
that facility for disposal. Liability under these laws and
regulations may be without regard to fault or to the legality of
the activities giving rise to the contamination. Contamination
has been identified at several of our current and former
facilities, and we have incurred and will continue to incur
costs to investigate and remediate these conditions. Moreover,
we may incur liabilities in connection with environmental
conditions currently unknown to us relating to our prior,
existing or future sites or operations or those of predecessor
companies whose liabilities we may have assumed or acquired.
In addition, environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations applicable to our business and the business of our
customers, including laws regulating the energy industry, and
the interpretation or enforcement of these laws and regulations,
are constantly evolving and it is impossible to predict
accurately the effect that changes in these laws and
regulations, or their interpretation or enforcement, may have
upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In particular, legislation and regulations limiting emissions of
greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide associated with the
burning of fossil fuels, are at various stages of consideration
and implementation, and if fully implemented, could negatively
impact the market for our products and, consequently, our
business. Should environmental laws and regulations, or their
interpretation or enforcement, become more stringent, our costs
could increase, which may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we have been subject to various claims and
involved in legal proceedings incidental to the nature of our
businesses. We maintain insurance coverage to reduce financial
risk associated with certain of these claims and proceedings. It
is not possible to predict the outcome of these claims and
proceedings. However, in our opinion, there are no material
pending legal proceedings that are likely to have a material
effect on our business, financial condition or results of
operations, although it is possible that the resolution of
certain actual or threatened claims or proceedings could
97
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operation in the period of resolution.
We are a defendant in lawsuits involving approximately 826
plaintiffs as of June 2008 alleging, among other things,
personal injury, including mesothelioma and other cancers,
arising from exposure to
asbestos-containing
materials included in products distributed by us in the past.
The complaints in these lawsuits typically name many other
defendants. In the majority of these lawsuits, little or no
information is known regarding the nature of the
plaintiffs alleged injuries or their connection with the
products we distributed. As of June 2008, lawsuits involving
approximately 11,240 claims have been brought against us. Of
these claims, approximately 10,414 have been resolved (7,140
have been dismissed, 33 have been settled and 3,241 were
resolved prior to 1995 as part of two mass settlements with
payments not allocated to individual claims). No asbestos
lawsuit has resulted in a judgment against us to date. In 2008,
we reviewed our potential exposure to pending and foreseeable
future asbestos claims. Among other things, with the assistance
of accounting and financial experts, we reviewed our pending
claims, analyzed historic claims filing and resolution rates and
estimated the value of future asbestos claims expected to be
asserted against us over the next fifteen years. Based on our
review, the existence of certain insurance coverage and our
experience to date, we do not believe that the outcome of our
pending and foreseeable future cases will have a material impact
on us. The potential liability associated with asbestos
lawsuits, however, is subject to many uncertainties, including
negative developments in the cases pending against us, the
current or future insolvency of co-defendants, adverse changes
in relevant laws or the interpretation thereof, and the extent
to which insurance will be available to pay for defense costs,
judgments or settlements. Further, we anticipate that additional
claims will be filed against us in the future, but are unable to
predict the number, timing and magnitude of such future claims
with any certainty. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the
pending or future asbestos litigation will not ultimately have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
98
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth the names, ages (as of
June 26, 2008) and positions of each person who is an
executive officer or director of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation and who will be an executive officer or director of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation upon completion of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Craig Ketchum
|
|
51
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
53
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Dee Paige
|
|
55
|
|
Executive Vice President of Canadian Operations and Business
Development
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
55
|
|
Executive Vice President Branch Sales and Operations
|
Jeffrey Lang
|
|
52
|
|
Executive Vice President Branch Sales and Operations
|
Randy K. Adams
|
|
51
|
|
Senior Corporate Vice President Sales & Marketing
(Upstream)
|
Rory M. Isaac
|
|
58
|
|
Senior Corporate Vice President Sales & Marketing
(Downstream/Gas Utilities)
|
Gary A. Ittner
|
|
56
|
|
Senior Corporate Vice President of Supply Chain Management
(based in Charleston)
|
Dennis Niver
|
|
60
|
|
Senior Corporate Vice President of Supply Chain Management
(based in Tulsa)
|
Ken Hayes
|
|
52
|
|
Senior Corporate Vice President of Standard and Line Pipe
|
Stephen W. Lake
|
|
44
|
|
Senior Corporate Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary
|
David Fox, III
|
|
59
|
|
Senior Regional Vice President of the Appalachian Region
|
Rhys J. Best
|
|
61
|
|
Director
|
Henry Cornell
|
|
52
|
|
Director
|
Christopher A.S. Crampton
|
|
30
|
|
Director
|
John F. Daly
|
|
42
|
|
Director
|
Harry K. Hornish, Jr.
|
|
63
|
|
Director
|
Sam B. Rovit
|
|
50
|
|
Director
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
56
|
|
Director
|
Craig Ketchum has served as the president and
chief executive officer of our company and of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation, our subsidiary, since May 2008. Prior to that, he
served as co-president and co-chief executive officer of
McJunkin Red Man Corporation since the business combination
between McJunkin and Red Man in October 31, 2007. He has
also been a member of our board of directors since
October 31, 2007. He has served at Red Man in various
capacities since 1979, including store operations and sales,
working at Red Man locations in Ardmore, Oklahoma, Tulsa,
Oklahoma, Denver, Colorado, and Dallas, Texas. He was named vice
president sales at Red Man in 1991, executive vice
president of Red Man in 1994 and president and chief executive
officer in 1995. He also served on Red Mans board of
directors. During his tenure as Red Mans leader, Red Man
sales increased significantly and he led Red Mans
acquisition of a majority voting interest in Midfield Supply
ULC, a successful Canadian oilfield distributor, as well as
other strategic acquisitions that provided opportunities for Red
Man to expand its product offering and geographic presence. In
2007 he led the key team players in the successful business
combination between McJunkin and Red Man. As president and chief
executive officer of our company, his expanded leadership
responsibilities
99
in 2007 and 2008 have included serving on our board of
directors, planning and formulating strategies for our combined
company, leading our combined senior management team,
communicating corporate strategy and vision to all employees,
and blending cultures and organizational structures.
Mr. Ketchum graduated from the University of Central
Oklahoma with a business degree and joined Red Man in 1979. He
has served as chairman of the Petroleum Equipment Suppliers
Association. He currently serves on the board of the
Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce and is active in the
Young Presidents Organization.
James F. Underhill has served as executive vice
president and chief financial officer of our company and of
McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary, since November
2007. At McJunkin, he served as chief financial officer from May
2006 through October 2007, as senior vice president of
accounting and information services from 1994 to May 2006, and
vice president and controller from 1987 to 1994. Prior to 1987,
Mr. Underhill served as controller, assistant controller,
and corporate accounting manager. Mr. Underhill joined
McJunkin in 1980 and has since overseen McJunkins
accounting, information systems, and mergers and acquisitions
areas. He has been involved in numerous implementations of
electronic customer solutions and has had primary responsibility
for the acquisition and integration of more than 30 businesses.
Mr. Underhill was also project manager for the design,
development, and implementation of McJunkins FOCUS
operating system. He received a B.A. in accounting and economics
from Lehigh University in 1977 and is a certified public
accountant. Prior to joining McJunkin, Mr. Underhill worked
in the New York City office of the accounting firm of Main
Hurdman.
Dee Paige has served as executive vice president
with responsibilities for Canadian operations and business
development at our company and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation,
our subsidiary, since November 2007. Mr. Paige joined Red
Man in 1982 and worked as controller until 1986, when he was
named vice-president finance. He was named chief
financial officer/treasurer of Red Man in 1995. He also served
on Red Mans board of directors. Mr. Paige received
his undergraduate degree and masters degree in accounting
from Oklahoma State University. Mr. Paige is a certified
public accountant.
Stephen D. Wehrle has served as executive vice
president branch sales and operations at our company
and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary, since
November 2007. Mr. Wehrle began working at McJunkin in
1974 as an inside sales representative. He became senior vice
president of sales at McJunkin in 1987 and became executive vice
president of sales at McJunkin in 2004. Mr. Wehrle
graduated from the University of Colorado with a bachelor of
arts degree. He currently serves on the advisory board for the
University of Charleston Graduate School of Business and is a
director of the Chemical Alliance Zone in Charleston, West
Virginia, the Clay Center for the Arts and Sciences, the Library
Foundation of Kanawha Valley, Thomas Memorial Hospital, and the
West Virginia Hospital Association. He is also director emeritus
of Childrens Home Society of West Virginia. Stephen D.
Wehrle is the brother of H.B. Wehrle, III, one of our
directors.
Jeff Lang has served as executive vice
president branch sales and operations at our company
since August 2008 and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our
subsidiary, since November 2007. Mr. Lang has over
25 years experience in distribution, operations and sales.
He served as senior vice president of branch sales and
operations at Red Man from March 2006 through October 2007.
Prior to joining Red Man in March 2006, he served as director of
Ingersoll Rands North American Sales and Service business
from January 2002 to March 2006. Mr. Lang worked at
Ingersoll Rands headquarters in various leadership and
management capacities. He also led Ingersoll Rands North
American Independent Distributor business from May 1999 to
December 2002. Mr. Lang received his undergraduate degree
from Ohio University and received an MBA from Averett College.
Randy Adams has served as senior corporate vice
president sales & marketing (focusing on
upstream and midstream markets) at our company since August 2008
and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary, since
November 2007. Mr. Adams career in the PVF
distribution industry began in 1980 with Vinson Supply Co.,
which was acquired by Red Man in 1995. He has served in
100
many roles at Red Man, including as branch manager from 1995 to
1997, manager alliances and marketing from 1997 to
2000, director
e-commerce &
alliances from 2000 to 2002, and vice-president
sales and marketing from 2002 to 2007. His current roles and
responsibilities include retention and growth of existing MRO
contracts and proactive growth in domestic and international oil
and gas markets. In addition to sales responsibilities, he also
manages the pricing strategy and marketing programs.
Mr. Adams received his business administration degree in
marketing from the University of North Texas.
Rory M. Isaac has served as senior corporate vice
president sales & marketing (focusing on
downstream, industrials and gas utilities operations) at our
company since August 2008 and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation,
our subsidiary, since November 2007. He served as senior
corporate vice president national accounts at
McJunkin from 1995 to 2000 and as senior corporate vice
president national accounts, utilities and marketing
at McJunkin from 2000 to 2007. Mr. Isaac joined McJunkin in
1981. He has extensive experience in sales, customer relations
and management and has served at McJunkin as a branch manager,
regional manager and regional vice president. In 1995 he began
working in the corporate office of McJunkin in Charleston, West
Virginia as senior vice president for national accounts, where
he was responsible for managing and growing McJunkins
national accounts customer base and directing business
development efforts into integrated supply markets. In 1999 he
took on the additional responsibility of growing McJunkins
market share in key initiative areas including gas products and
marketing McJunkins capabilities. Prior to joining
McJunkin, Mr. Isaac worked at Consolidated Services, Inc.
and Charleston Supply Company. Mr. Isaac attended the
Citadel.
Gary A. Ittner has served as senior corporate vice
president of supply chain management at our company since August
2008 and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary, since
November 2007. He has specific responsibility for the
procurement of all industrial valves, automation, fittings and
alloy tubular products. Prior to November 2007, he served as
senior corporate vice president of supply management at McJunkin
(which became McJunkin Red Man Corporation after the Red Man
Transaction in October 2007) since March 2001. Before
joining the Supply Management Group, Mr. Ittner worked in
various field positions including branch manager, regional
manager, and senior regional vice president. He is a past
chairman of the executive committee of the American Supply
Associations Industrial Piping Division. Mr. Ittner
began working at McJunkin in 1971 following his freshman year at
the University of Cincinnati and joined the company full-time
following his graduation in 1974.
Dennis Niver has served as senior corporate vice
president of supply chain management at our company since August
2008 and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary, since
November 2007. He joined Red Man in 1977 with founder Lew
Ketchum, helping to grow the company as it emerged as a major
player in its industry. He served as purchasing manager at Red
Man before he was named vice-president purchasing in
1989. He served as vice-president purchasing and
alliances at Red Man from 1993 through October 2007.
Mr. Niver received his education from the University of
Tulsa. He currently serves as chairman of the IPD executive
committee for the American Supply Association, as well as the
supply chain management committee for the Petroleum Equipment
Suppliers Association.
Ken Hayes has served as senior corporate vice
president of standard and line pipe at our company since August
2008 and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary, since
November 2007. He leads and directs all activities associated
with the performance of the standard and line pipe product line.
Mr. Hayes has had 29 years of experience in the
industrial, oilfield and tubular distribution business. His
primary focus for the past 19 years has been on the carbon
steel standard and line pipe product line. He previously served
as director of standard and line pipe at Red Man from April 1999
through October 2007. He initially joined Red Man in 1979 as
division manager and served in sales in various locations.
Mr. Hayes received his bachelor of science degree in
business management from New Mexico State University.
101
Stephen W. Lake has served as senior corporate
vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary of our
company and of McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary,
since June 2008. Prior to that date he was senior vice
president general counsel of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation since joining McJunkin Red Man Corporation in
January 2008. Previously, Mr. Lake was a shareholder at the
law firm Gable & Gotwals in Tulsa, Oklahoma from
January 1, 1998 through January 6, 2008, where he
practiced in the areas of mergers and acquisitions and
securities law. He was a member of the board of directors of
Gable & Gotwals from January 1, 2005 through
January 6, 2008 and an associate of that firm from
September 1991 until becoming a shareholder in January 1998.
Mr. Lake graduated from Vanderbilt University in 1987 with
honors in economics and graduated first in his class from the
University of Oklahoma law school in 1991. He was
editor-in-chief
of the Oklahoma Law Review from
1990-1991.
David Fox, III has served as senior regional
vice president of the Appalachian region at our company since
August 2008 and at McJunkin Red Man Corporation, our subsidiary,
since February 2007. He served as executive vice president of
McJunkin Appalachian from 1989 to June 2008. Mr. Fox joined
McJunkin in 1989 when Appalachian Pipe merged with
McJunkins oil and gas division to form McJunkin
Appalachian. Mr. Fox founded Appalachian Pipe in 1984,
together with his brother Stephen G. Fox and Steven G. Park, as
a successor corporation to Branchland Pipe & Supply.
Branchland Pipe & Supply was started by
Mr. Foxs grandfather, David Fox, in 1919.
Mr. Fox has spent his entire career in the oil and gas
distribution industry in the Appalachian area. Mr. Fox
graduated from Marshall University with a bachelors degree
in business administration.
Rhys J. Best has been a member of our board of
directors since December 1, 2007. From 1999 until June
2004, Mr. Best was chairman, president and chief executive
officer of Lone Star Technologies, Inc., a company engaged in
producing and marketing casing, tubing, line pipe and couplings
for the oil and gas, industrial, automotive, and power
generation industries. From June 2004 until Lone Star was
acquired by the United States Steel Corporation in June 2007,
Mr. Best was chairman and chief executive officer of Lone
Star. Before joining Lone Star in 1989, Mr. Best held
several leadership positions in the banking industry. In 1985 he
was named president of First City Bank Dallas, which, at that
time, was the second largest bank in the First City system.
Earlier, he had worked at Manufacturers Hanover Corporation of
New York and Interfirst Bank of Dallas. Mr. Best graduated
from the University of North Texas with a Bachelor of Business
Administration Degree and earned an M.B.A. from Southern
Methodist University. He is a member of the board of directors
of Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation, an independent natural
gas producer, Trinity Industries, which owns a group of
businesses providing products and services to the industrial,
energy, transportation, and construction sectors, and Austin
Industries, Inc., a Dallas-based general construction company.
He is also a member of the board of directors of Crosstex Energy
GP, LLC, the general partner of the general partner of Crosstex
Energy, L.P., an independent midstream energy services company.
He is also involved in a number of industry-related and civic
organizations, including the Petroleum Equipment Suppliers
Association (for which he has previously served as chairman) and
the Maguire Energy Institute of Southern Methodist University.
He serves on the board of advisors of the College of Business
Administration at the University of North Texas.
Henry Cornell has been a member of our board of
directors since November 29, 2006. Mr. Cornell is a
managing director in the Principal Investment Area of Goldman,
Sachs & Co., which he joined in 1984. He is a member
of the Investment Committee of the Principal Investment Area of
Goldman, Sachs & Co. Mr. Cornell also serves on
the board of directors of The First Marblehead Corporation and
Knight Inc. Mr. Cornell received a B.A. from Grinnell College
and a J.D. from New York Law School.
Christopher A.S. Crampton has been a member of our
board of directors since January 31, 2007. He is currently
a vice president in the Principal Investment Area of Goldman,
Sachs & Co., which he joined in 2003. From 2000 to
2003, he worked in the investment banking division of Deutsche
Banc Alex. Brown. He is a graduate of Princeton University.
102
John F. Daly has been a member of our board of
directors since January 31, 2007. Mr. Daly is a
managing director in the Principal Investment Area of Goldman
Sachs, where he has worked since 2000. In 1998 and from 1999 to
2000, he was a member of the Investment Banking Division of
Goldman Sachs. From 1991 to 1997, Mr. Daly was a Senior
Instructor of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering at
Case Western Reserve University. He earned a B.S. and M.S. in
Engineering from Case Western Reserve University and an M.B.A.
from the Wharton School of Business. Mr. Daly currently
serves as a director of Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. and
Hawker Beechcraft, Inc.
Harry K. Hornish, Jr. has been a member of
our board of directors since October 31, 2007. From October
2002 to November 2005, he was the president and chief executive
officer of National Waterworks, Inc., a distributor of products
used to build, repair and maintain water and wastewater
transmission systems. Prior to joining National Waterworks,
Mr. Hornish was the president and chief operating officer
of U.S. Filter Distribution Group, Inc. since February 1998
and also served as the executive vice president of
U.S. Filter Distribution from its inception in 1996 until
February 1998. Prior to serving at U.S. Filter Distribution
Group, Mr. Hornish was the president and chief executive
officer of The Utility Supply Group, Inc., which was acquired by
U.S. Filter Distribution Group in 1996 after it was spun
off from CertainTeed Corporation in 1994. Mr. Hornish was
employed at CertainTeed Corporation from 1987 to 1994, where he
held executive positions in both the Building Materials and the
Utility Supply divisions. His early career included several
sales, marketing, and senior management positions with the
distribution division of Owens Corning Fiberglas. He is
currently a member of the board of directors of Underground
Solutions, Inc., a provider of infrastructure technologies for
water and sewer applications, and Generac Corp., a manufacturer
of standby and prime power generators. Mr. Hornish received
a B.A. in political science from Marshall University.
Sam B. Rovit has been a member of our board of
directors since June 2008. Mr. Rovit was also a member of
the board of directors of McJunkin Corporation from 2001 until
January 2007. Mr. Rovit is a partner at Bain Corporate
Renewal Group, a unit of Bain & Company which provides
turnaround services. Mr. Rovit joined the Bain Corporate
Renewal Group in January 2008 and was a partner at
Bain & Company from 1989 to June 2005. From July 2005
to June 2007, he was the president and CEO of Swift &
Co., a meat processing company. Mr. Rovit earned an M.B.A.
from Harvard Business School and a Master of Arts in law and
diplomacy from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts
University where he studied military strategy and international
business. He received a bachelors degree in Public Policy
from Duke University.
H.B. Wehrle, III has been a member of our
board of directors since January 31, 2007. He served as our
president and chief executive officer from January 31, 2007
to October 30, 2007. From October 31, 2007 to May
2008, he served as co-president and co-chief executive officer
of McJunkin Red Man Corporation. Mr. Wehrle began his
career with McJunkin Corporation in 1973 in sales. He
subsequently served as treasurer and was later promoted to
executive vice president. He was elected president of McJunkin
Corporation in 1987. Mr. Wehrle graduated from Princeton
University and received an M.B.A. from Georgia State University.
He is affiliated with the American Supply Association and the
Young Presidents Organization. He serves on the boards of
the Central WV Regional Airport Authority, the Mid-Atlantic
Technology, Research and Innovation Center and the National
Institute for Chemical Studies in Charleston, West Virginia. He
also serves on the board of the Mountain Company in Parkersburg,
West Virginia. H.B. Wehrle, III is the brother of Stephen
D. Wehrle, our executive vice president branch sales
and operations.
Each of our directors is also a director of PVF Holdings LLC,
our majority stockholder.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors consists of eight members. The current
directors are included above. Our directors are elected annually
to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until
their successors are duly elected and qualified.
103
Prior to the completion of this offering, our board will
establish an audit committee and a compensation committee. Our
board of directors has determined that we are a controlled
company under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange
and, as a result, will qualify for, and may rely on, exemptions
from certain corporate governance requirements of the New York
Stock Exchange. Pursuant to the controlled company
exception to the board of directors and committee composition
requirements, we will be exempt from the rules that require that
(a) our board of directors be comprised of a majority of
independent directors, (b) our compensation
committee be comprised solely of independent
directors and (c) we establish a nominating and
corporate governance committee comprised solely of
independent directors as defined under the rules of
the New York Stock Exchange. The controlled company
exception does not modify the independence requirements for the
audit committee, and we intend to comply with the audit
committee requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the New
York Stock Exchange, which require that our audit committee be
composed of at least one independent director at the closing of
this offering, a majority of independent directors within
90 days of this offering and all independent directors
within a year of this offering.
Audit Committee. Our audit committee
will be comprised
of , ,
and . will
be chairman of the audit committee. Our board of directors has
determined
that
qualifies as an audit committee financial expert.
The audit committees responsibilities will be to assist
the board of directors in monitoring our financial reporting
process, accounting functions and internal controls; to oversee
the qualifications, independence, appointment, retention,
compensation and performance of our independent registered
public accounting firm; to recommend to the board of directors
the engagement of our independent accountants; to review with
the independent accountants the plans and results of the
auditing engagement; and to oversee whistle-blowing
procedures and certain other compliance matters.
Compensation Committee. Our
compensation committee will be comprised
of , ,
and . will
be chairman of the compensation committee. The principal
responsibilities of the compensation committee will be to
establish policies and periodically determine matters involving
executive compensation, recommend changes in employee benefit
programs, grant or recommend the grant of stock options and
stock awards and provide counsel regarding key personnel
selection. See Executive
Compensation Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
Prior to this offering, the company has been privately owned. On
January 31, 2007, the Goldman Sachs Funds acquired a
controlling interest in McJunkin. In October 2007, McJunkin and
Red Man entered into a business combination transaction to form
the combined company, McJunkin Red Man Corporation. The Goldman
Sachs Funds are part of Goldman Sachs Principal Investment
Area, one of the worlds largest private equity and
mezzanine investors. The overriding objective of our owners and
management prior to this offering has been to increase the
economic value and size of the company during the period of
ownership. Our compensation philosophy has been primarily
designed to support achieving that objective. In addition,
compensation decisions during 2007 and 2008 have been made with
an eye toward successfully integrating the compensation programs
of McJunkin and Red Man.
To date, the compensation committee of the board of directors of
PVF Holdings LLC (our controlling stockholder, with over 98% of
our common stock prior to this offering) has overseen
companywide compensation practices, reviewed, developed and
administered executive compensation programs and made
recommendations to the board of directors of PVF Holdings LLC on
compensation matters. Harry K. Hornish, Peter C.
Boylan, III and John F. Daly serve as members of this
committee. In addition, the compensation committee of the board
of directors of the company, which,
104
during fiscal year 2007 was also composed of
Messrs. Boylan, Hornish and Daly, has overseen and made
recommendations to the board of directors of the company on
compensation matters specific to the company. With respect to
compensation matters, in general, each compensation committee
makes recommendations to its corresponding full board of
directors, and each board of directors has final decision-making
authority. However, with respect to certain compensation
policies or plans, the boards of directors of PVF Holdings LLC
and the company may delegate to their respective compensation
committees the authority to make decisions. In August 2008, the
board of directors of the company delegated the authority to its
compensation committee to administer the companys stock
option and restricted stock plans.
The compensation committee of PVF Holdings LLC has historically:
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed both performance and compensation to ensure that the
company maintains its ability to attract and retain superior
executives in key positions and that the compensation provided
to those employees is competitive with the compensation paid to
similarly situated executives at our peer companies;
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and authorized the company to enter into employment,
severance and other compensation agreements with senior
executives;
|
|
|
|
Administered the McJunkin Red Man Corporation Variable
Compensation Plan (a general bonus plan), the Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. Retirement Savings Plan, the
McJunkin Corporation Profit-Sharing and Savings Plan and Trust
and the McJunkin Red Man Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan;
|
|
|
|
Performed such duties and responsibilities as may be assigned by
our board of directors under the terms of any other executive
compensation plan
and/or with
respect to the issuance and management of profits units and
common units in PVF Holdings LLC; and
|
|
|
|
Reviewed and established perquisites and employee benefits
policies.
|
Following this offering, the compensation committee of the
company will generally take over the duties of the compensation
committee of PVF Holdings LLC. For purposes of this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, board of directors and
compensation committee refer to the board of
directors and the compensation committee of PVF Holdings LLC
unless otherwise specified. We do not expect our overall
compensation philosophy to materially change as a result of the
compensation committee of the company taking over these
compensation-related duties.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our compensation committee believes that our executive
compensation program should be structured to reward the
achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic
performance goals of the company. The executive compensation
philosophy of the compensation committee is threefold:
|
|
|
|
|
To align the interests of executive officers with those of our
shareholders, thereby providing long-term economic benefit to
the companys shareholders;
|
|
|
|
To provide competitive financial incentives in the form of
salary, bonus and benefits, with the goal of attracting and
retaining talented executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
To maintain a compensation program whereby executive officers
who demonstrate exceptional performance will have the
opportunity to realize appropriate economic rewards.
|
Following this offering, our executive compensation program will
continue to be structured to ensure an appropriate balance
between compensation and the companys financial
performance and shareholder returns, as well as between
short-term and long-term performance.
105
Setting
Executive Compensation
Role of the
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee has established annual and long-term
cash and equity programs to motivate our executive officers to
achieve the business goals established by the company. In
addition to considering our philosophy and objectives, the
compensation committee considered the pre-acquisition
compensation packages of executive officers of McJunkin and Red
Man and their interests in PVF Holdings LLC through equity
rollovers and co-investments in establishing our compensation
program. Based on these factors, the compensation committee
devised a compensation program designed to keep our executive
officers highly incentivized.
Role of Executive
Officers
As a member of the compensation committee advisory group, our
chief executive officer meets with the compensation committee on
a regular basis and assists in determining compensation for
executive officers. In 2007 both H.B. Wehrle, III and Craig
Ketchum served as chief executive officer, and, as a result,
both consulted with the compensation committee.
Role of
Compensation Consultant
Due to the nature of our ownership, the compensation committee
did not engage compensation consultants in connection with the
determination of executive compensation in 2007. However, the
company recently engaged Hewitt Associates, an outside global
human resources consulting firm, to review our compensation
program, including executive compensation. Hewitt Associates is
expected to produce a report late this year in which the
companys compensation program is compared to the
compensation programs of a group of peer companies. To ensure
that our compensation program remains competitive with those of
our peers, we plan to continue to evaluate our program in
connection with our review of the Hewitt Associates report and
other relevant considerations.
Components of
Executive Compensation
The individuals who served as our chief executive officer or
chief financial officer in fiscal year 2007 and our next three
most highly compensated executive officers serving as of
December 31, 2007 were H.B. Wehrle, III, Craig Ketchum,
James F. Underhill, David Fox, III, Dee Paige and Stephen D.
Wehrle. In this prospectus, we refer to these individuals as our
named executive officers. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, the principal components of compensation
for our named executive officers were:
|
|
|
|
|
Base salary
|
|
|
|
Short-term incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
Long-term equity incentive compensation
|
|
|
|
Retirement and other benefits
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and other personal benefits
|
Base
Salary
The company provides named executive officers and other
employees with base salary to compensate them for services
rendered during the fiscal year. Base salary for each named
executive officer is determined based on his position and
responsibility and on available market data. During its annual
review of base salaries for executives, the compensation
committee primarily considers each executive officers
individual performance and an internal review of the
executives compensation, both individually and as compared
to that of other executive officers.
106
Short-term
Incentive Compensation
McJunkin Red Man Corporation maintains an annual cash bonus
plan, the Variable Compensation Plan. Messrs. H.B. Wehrle,
Underhill, Fox and S. Wehrle participated in this plan in fiscal
year 2007 starting on February 1, 2007 following the GS
Acquisition. Messrs. Ketchum and Paige began participating
in this plan in fiscal year 2008. Each of the named executive
officers has a target annual incentive bonus equal to 100% of
annual base salary. The determination of awards pursuant to the
plan depends on the achievement of two corporate performance
objectives, one with respect to adjusted earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (Adjusted
EBITDA) and the other with respect to return on net assets
(RONA), the achievement of which constitutes 80% and
20% of annual awards, respectively. For fiscal year 2007, the
Adjusted EBITDA and RONA goals for the heritage McJunkin
Corporation under the Variable Compensation Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
Percent of Target
|
Performance Level
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
RONA
|
|
Award Payout
|
|
Threshold
|
|
$
|
146,639,160
|
|
|
|
34.87
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Target
|
|
$
|
181,036,000
|
|
|
|
43.05
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Maximum
|
|
$
|
181,036,000
|
|
|
|
43.05
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
These annual performance goals were determined by a budgeting
process that involved an examination of the companys
markets, customers and general outlook and the setting of growth
targets based on these factors. The fiscal year 2007 performance
goals related solely to the performance of McJunkin, and
excluded the performance of Red Man. Starting in fiscal year
2008, the performance goals will relate to the performance of
the entire organization, not solely to that of McJunkin. No
awards are payable under the plan unless at least 81% of the
annual goal has been achieved. At 81% achievement, there is a
payout of 5% of each participants target annual incentive
bonus; this payout increases in 5% increments for each
additional percent of achievement up to full achievement of the
annual goal. Upon full achievement of the annual goal, 100% of
the target annual incentive bonus is paid, which is the maximum
award possible under the plan. Performance measures are
evaluated on an annual basis in connection with awards to the
named executive officers.
As a result of McJunkin meeting its fiscal year 2007 performance
goals, the named executive officers who participated in the plan
during 2007 were paid 100% of their target annual incentive
bonuses (with the exception of Mr. Fox, who earned 97.4% of
his target Variable Compensation Plan award for this period),
pro-rated to reflect participation for eleven months of the
year. The amounts paid under this plan for performance in fiscal
year 2007 are as follows: $632,500 for Mr. H.B. Wehrle,
$412,500 for Mr. Underhill, $513,643 for Mr. Fox and
$531,667 for Mr. S. Wehrle.
As part of an agreement reached with Messrs. Ketchum and
Paige in connection with the Red Man Transaction, they will be
eligible to receive awards under the Variable Compensation Plan
starting in 2008. During Red Mans 2007 fiscal year, which
ended on October 31, 2007, Messrs. Ketchum and Paige
participated in Red Mans bonus plan, in which a bonus pool
is funded based on profitability and then allocated to employees
on a discretionary basis. Following the Red Man Transaction,
executive vice presidents and senior vice presidents of Red Man
were integrated into the Variable Compensation Plan starting in
fiscal year 2008. Please refer to the bonus column in the
Summary Compensation Table below for the amounts earned by
Messrs. Ketchum and Paige under the Red Man bonus plan
during Red Mans 2007 fiscal year.
Long-term Equity
Incentive Compensation
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Underhill, Paige and S.
Wehrle have been awarded profits units, and Mr. Fox has
been awarded restricted common units, each in respect of PVF
Holdings LLC, the terms of which are described in
Articles III and VII of the Limited Liability Company
Agreement of McJ Holdings LLC (currently known as PVF Holdings
LLC) (the PVF LLC Agreement). Prior to this
offering, PVF Holdings LLC owned over 98% of our common stock.
107
The named executive officers were not required to make any
capital contribution in exchange for their profits units and
restricted common units, which were awarded as compensation.
Profits units have no voting rights, whereas restricted common
units have voting rights with respect to that class of
interests. PVF Holdings LLC may from time to time distribute its
available cash to holders of common units and profits units.
Distributions are made, first, to holders of common units
(including restricted common units), pro rata in proportion to
the number of such units outstanding at the time of
distribution, until each holder has received an amount equal to
such holders aggregate capital contributions and, second,
to holders of all units (including profits units) pro rata in
proportion to the number of units outstanding at the time of
such distribution. Distributions in respect of restricted common
units, however, are held by the company until such restricted
common units become vested and are no longer subject to
forfeiture. Please see the table titled Outstanding Equity
Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year-End below for the number of
profits units and restricted common units held by the named
executive officers as of December 31, 2007.
Pursuant to the PVF LLC Agreement, profits units and restricted
common units generally become vested in one-third increments on
each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of
grant. In the event of a termination of employment other than
for Cause (as defined in the PVF LLC Agreement), the
named executive officers will forfeit all unvested profits units
and restricted common units. All profits units and restricted
common units, whether vested or unvested, will be forfeited upon
a termination of the named executive officers employment
for Cause. In the event of a termination by reason of death or
Disability (as defined in the PVF LLC Agreement), all unvested
profits units and restricted common units will become vested.
The PVF LLC Agreement also specifies that profits units and
restricted common units may be subject to a different vesting
schedule if such schedule is set forth in an employment
agreement.
The employment agreements of Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum
and S. Wehrle provide for alternative vesting schedules for
their profits units, with such profits units vesting in equal
installments on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date
of grant, which, for Messrs. H.B. Wehrle and S. Wehrle, was
January 31, 2007, and, for Mr. Ketchum, was
October 31, 2007. Profits units held by Messrs. H.B.
Wehrle, Ketchum and S. Wehrle remain subject to the forfeiture
provisions set forth in the PVF LLC Agreement with respect to a
termination of employment other than for cause or by reason of
death or Disability (as described in the previous paragraph).
The vesting schedules of profits units held by
Messrs. Underhill and Paige and restricted common units
held by Mr. Fox are governed by the PVF LLC Agreement with
respect to a termination due to death or Disability, but each of
their employment agreements provides that in the event of the
termination of Mr. Underhills, Mr. Paiges
or Mr. Foxs employment by McJunkin Red Man
Corporation without Cause (as defined in the
employment agreement) or by Mr. Underhill, Mr. Paige
or Mr. Fox with Good Reason (as defined in the
employment agreement), all of the profits units held by
Messrs. Underhill and Paige and the restricted common units
held by Mr. Fox will vest and no longer be subject to
forfeiture. Messrs. Underhill and Paige will forfeit all
vested and unvested profits units held by them in the event of a
termination for Cause by McJunkin Red Man Corporation. With
respect to restricted common units held by Mr. Fox, in the
event that Mr. Fox is terminated for Cause (as
defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Fox will not
forfeit his restricted common units that are vested at the time
of termination, but PVF Holdings LLC will have the opportunity
to purchase vested restricted common units held by Mr. Fox
at Fair Market Value (as defined in the PVF LLC
Agreement). In the event of a termination by reason of death or
Disability, profits units and restricted common units held by
Messrs. Underhill, Paige and Fox become vested in
accordance with the PVF LLC Agreement.
Each of the named executive officers also holds common units in
PVF Holdings LLC. On January 31, 2007, Messrs. H.B.
Wehrle and S. Wehrle contributed shares of McJunkin and McJunkin
Appalachian to PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for common units in
PVF Holdings LLC and Mr. Fox contributed shares of
McJunkin Appalachian to PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for common
units in PVF Holdings LLC, which common units were subsequently
transferred to a trust established by Mr. Fox. Also on
January 31, 2007, Mr. Underhill purchased common units in PVF
Holdings LLC. On
108
October 31, 2007, Mr. Ketchum (through an LLC)
contributed shares of Red Man to PVF Holdings LLC in exchange
for common units in PVF Holdings LLC. In addition,
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Underhill and S. Wehrle purchased
common units in PVF Holdings LLC on October 31, 2007.
Mr. Paige purchased common units in PVF Holdings LLC on
November 29, 2007. Common units held by the named executive
officers were not awarded as part of their compensation. Please
see the section titled Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Transactions with Executive
Officers and Directors Investments in PVF Holdings
LLC below for a more detailed description of the common
units and the number of common units held by each named
executive officer.
The company also maintains a restricted stock plan and two stock
option plans (one each for participants in the United States and
Canada). Pursuant to these plans, awards of restricted stock and
stock options may be granted to key employees, directors and
consultants of the company. Generally, shares of restricted
stock become vested in four installments on the second, third,
fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant and stock
options become vested in three installments on the third, fourth
and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant, each conditioned
on continued employment and subject to accelerated vesting under
certain circumstances. The named executive officers have not
been granted any restricted stock or stock option awards due to
their receipt of profits units and restricted common units in
PVF Holdings LLC as part of their compensation packages and
their participation in equity rollovers and co-investments.
Retirement and
Other Benefits
On December 31, 2007, the company adopted the McJunkin Red
Man Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan. Under the terms of
the plan, select members of management and highly compensated
employees may defer receipt of a specified amount or percentage
of cash compensation, including annual bonuses. The plan was
adopted in part to compensate certain participants for benefits
forgone in connection with the GS Acquisition. Each of the named
executive officers currently participates in the plan with the
exception of Mr. Paige. McJunkin Red Man Corporation makes
predetermined annual contributions to each participants
account, less any discretionary matching contributions made on
behalf of the participant by the company to a defined
contribution plan for such calendar year.
If a participants account balance as of the beginning of a
calendar year is less than $100,000, such balance will be
credited quarterly with interest at the Prime Rate
(as defined in the plan) plus 1%. If a participants
account balance at the beginning of a calendar year is $100,000
or greater, the participant may choose between being credited
quarterly with interest at the Prime Rate plus 1% or having his
or her account deemed converted into a number of phantom common
units of PVF Holdings LLC. If no investment election is made, a
participants account will be credited quarterly with
interest at the Prime Rate plus 1%. Mr. H.B. Wehrle, the
only named executive officer with a balance in excess of
$100,000 as of December 31, 2007, did not make this
election. As of December 31, 2007, all existing
participants were fully vested in their entire accounts,
including contributions by McJunkin Red Man Corporation. People
who become participants after December 31, 2007 will be
fully vested in their elective deferral amounts and shall become
vested in contributions by McJunkin Red Man Corporation as
determined by the administrator of the plan. For additional
information, please see the table titled Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation for 2007 below.
Participants receive the vested balance of their accounts, in
cash, upon a Separation from Service (as defined in
Section 409A (Section 409A) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code)). Such amount is
paid in three annual installments (with interest) commencing on
January 1 of the second calendar year following the calendar
year in which the Separation from Service occurs. In the event
of a participants death or Permanent
Disability (as defined in the plan), or upon a
Change in Control (as defined in the plan) of
McJunkin Red Man Corporation, the full amount of a
participants account, vested and unvested, shall be paid
within 30 days following such event, to the
participants beneficiary in the case of death, or to the
participant, in the case of Permanent Disability or a Change in
Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing regarding the timing of
payments, distributions to specified
109
employees (as defined in Section 409A of the Code)
may be required to be delayed in accordance with
Section 409A of the Code.
Perquisites and
Other Forms of Compensation
The company provides named executive officers with perquisites
and other personal benefits that the company and the
compensation committee believe are reasonable and consistent
with its overall compensation program. The compensation
committee reviews the perquisites and personal benefits provided
to named executive officers to ensure the reasonableness of such
programs. In addition to participation in the plans and programs
described above, the named executive officers are provided use
of company automobiles, club memberships and, in some cases,
reimbursement of reasonable relocation expenses.
Each of the named executive officers has entered into an
employment agreement with McJ Holding LLC (currently known as
PVF Holdings LLC) and McJunkin Corporation (currently known
as McJunkin Red Man Corporation) that contain provisions
regarding severance payments and benefits. These agreements are
designed to promote stability and continuity of senior
management at the company. Additional information regarding
payment under these severance provisions is provided below, in
the section titled Potential Payments Made Upon
Termination or a Change in Control.
Tax and
Accounting Implications
Deductibility of
Executive Compensation
Upon completion of the initial public offering,
Section 162(m) of the Code will limit the deductibility of
compensation in excess of $1 million paid out to any of our
executive officers unless specific and detailed criteria are
satisfied. We believe that it is in the companys best
interest to deduct compensation paid to our executive officers.
We will consider the anticipated tax treatment to the company
and our executive officers in the review and determination of
compensation payments and incentives. We believe that the
compensation that historically has been paid and that will be
paid will meet the criteria and will be deductible. It will be
the intent of the company to preserve the deductibility of
compensation payments. No assurance, however, can be given that
compensation will be fully deductible under Section 162(m)
of the Code.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
All deferred compensation arrangements have been structured in a
manner intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code.
Compensation
Committee Report
The compensation committee reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of
Regulation S-K
with management and, based on such review and discussions, the
compensation committee recommended to the companys board
of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be
included in this Registration Statement.
The Compensation Committee
Harry K. Hornish
John F. Daly
Summary
Compensation Table for 2007
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to compensation earned during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007 for all individuals who served as our
chief executive officer and our chief financial officer during
fiscal year 2007, and our next three most highly compensated
110
executive officers serving as of December 31, 2007. In this
prospectus, we refer to these individuals as our named executive
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
650,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
213,500
|
|
|
$
|
819,500
|
|
|
$
|
242,862
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
1,925,963
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Ketchum,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
347,823
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
4,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,686
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
1,495,976
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Underhill,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
445,933
|
|
|
$
|
687,500
|
(9)
|
|
$
|
334,483
|
|
|
$
|
486,400
|
|
|
$
|
127,230
|
(10)
|
|
$
|
2,081,546
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Fox, III,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
559,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
373,027
|
|
|
$
|
640,907
|
|
|
$
|
2,638,930
|
(11)
|
|
$
|
4,211,868
|
|
Senior Regional Vice President
of the Appalachian Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dee Paige,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
239,763
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
(12)
|
|
$
|
6,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
449,507
|
(13)
|
|
$
|
1,895,970
|
|
Executive Vice President of Canadian Operations and Business
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
548,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
106,750
|
|
|
$
|
709,317
|
|
|
$
|
208,349
|
(14)
|
|
$
|
1,572,803
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Branch Sales and Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For Messrs. H.B. Wehrle,
Underhill, Fox and S. Wehrle, these amounts represent the base
salary paid to them by McJunkin for service during 2007, both
prior to and following the GS Acquisition. Messrs. Ketchum
and Paige became employed by McJunkin Red Man Corporation on
October 31, 2007 in connection with the Red Man
Transaction. For Messrs. Ketchum and Paige, these amounts
represent the base salary paid to them for service during 2007,
by Red Man prior to the Red Man Transaction and by McJunkin Red
Man Corporation thereafter.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These numbers reflect the amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes in
accordance with FAS 123R for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007 with respect to profits units in PVF
Holdings LLC held by Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum,
Underhill, Paige and S. Wehrle and restricted common units in
PVF Holdings LLC held by Mr. Fox. A discussion of the
assumptions underlying the valuation of these profits units is
provided in Note 9 to our audited financial statements for
the eleven months ending December 31, 2007, included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
(3)
|
|
These amounts represent cash awards
earned pursuant to the Variable Compensation Plan in respect of
performance during the 2007 fiscal year. As a result of McJunkin
meeting its fiscal year 2007 performance goals, the named
executive officers who participated in the plan in 2007 were
paid 100% of their target annual incentive bonuses (with the
exception of Mr. Fox, who earned 97.4% of his target
Variable Compensation Plan award for this period), pro-rated to
reflect participation during eleven months of the year. Amounts
paid under the Variable Compensation Plan for 2007 performance
are as follows: $632,500 for Mr. H.B. Wehrle, $412,500 for
Mr. Underhill, $513,643 for Mr. Fox and $531,667 for
Mr. S. Wehrle. Messrs. Ketchum and Paige will be
eligible to earn awards under the Variable Compensation Plan
starting in fiscal year 2008. Please refer to the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis and the narrative following the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2007
table for a discussion of the 2007 performance goals.
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in this column also include
amounts earned under the pre-GS-Acquisition McJunkin bonus plan
for performance during the month of January 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Mr. H.B. Wehrle was sole
president and chief executive officer of McJunkin during 2007
until October 30, 2007 and co-president and co-chief
executive officer with Mr. Ketchum from October 31,
2007 until May 6, 2008. On May 7, 2008,
Mr. Ketchum became sole president and chief executive
officer.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This amount includes (i) a
contribution by McJunkin Red Man Corporation of $110,000 to
Mr. H.B. Wehrles nonqualified deferred compensation
plan account; (ii) a $49,293 contribution made by McJunkin
Red Man Corporation with respect to January 2007 contributions
due under the McJunkin Supplemental Executive Savings Plan and
Trust, which was terminated in connection with the GS
Acquisition; (iii) a $21,224 contribution made by McJunkin
Red Man Corporation with respect to January 2007 contributions
due under a pre-GS Acquisition McJunkin deferred compensation
arrangement, which was terminated in connection with the GS
Acquisition; (iv) with respect to the McJunkin Corporation
Profit-Sharing and Savings Plan, $35,000 representing profit
sharing and salary deferral matching contributions made by
McJunkin Red Man Corporation; (v) $19,620 attributable to a
company-provided automobile; and (vi) $7,725 with respect
to country club dues paid by McJunkin Red Man Corporation on
behalf of Mr. H.B. Wehrle.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Mr. Ketchum became
co-president and co-chief executive officer of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation on October 31, 2007 in connection with the Red
Man Transaction. On May 7, 2008, Mr. Ketchum become
sole president and chief executive officer.
|
|
(7)
|
|
This amount represents the annual
bonus paid to Mr. Ketchum pursuant to the Red Man bonus
plan for performance during the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2007.
|
|
(8)
|
|
This amount includes (i) a
contribution by McJunkin Red Man Corporation of $20,000 to
Mr. Ketchums nonqualified deferred compensation plan
account; (ii) with respect to the Red Man Pipe &
Supply Co. Retirement Savings Plan, $10,338 representing a
salary deferral match contribution; (iii) $5,600
attributable to a company-provided automobile, a portion of
which was paid by Red Man prior to the Red Man Transaction and a
portion of which was paid by McJunkin Red Man Corporation
following the Red Man Transaction; and (iv) $7,748 with
respect to country club dues paid on behalf of Mr. Ketchum,
a portion of which was paid by Red Man prior to the Red Man
Transaction and a portion of which was paid by McJunkin Red Man
Corporation following the Red Man Transaction.
|
|
(9)
|
|
In connection with the consummation
of the GS Acquisition, Mr. Underhill received a $750,000
transaction bonus, to be paid in installments, and conditioned
on Mr. Underhills continued service through each
respective payment date. This amount represents the portion of
Mr. Underhills transaction bonus earned in 2007.
|
|
(10)
|
|
This amount includes (i) a
contribution by McJunkin Red Man Corporation of $64,167 to
Mr. Underhills nonqualified deferred compensation
plan account; (ii) a $10,861 contribution made by McJunkin
Red Man Corporation with respect to January 2007 contributions
due under the McJunkin Supplemental Executive Savings Plan and
Trust, which was terminated in connection with the GS
Acquisition; (iii) with respect to the McJunkin Corporation
Profit-Sharing and Savings Plan, $35,000 representing profit
sharing and salary deferral matching contributions made by
McJunkin Red Man Corporation; (iv) $12,948 attributable to
a company-provided automobile; and (v) $4,254 with respect
to country club dues paid by McJunkin Red Man Corporation on
behalf of Mr. Underhill.
|
|
(11)
|
|
This amount includes (i) a
payment of $2,480,000 to Mr. Fox in connection with the GS
Acquisition as a
gross-up for
taxes in respect of restricted common units in PVF Holdings LLC
granted to Mr. Fox; (ii) a contribution by McJunkin
Red Man Corporation of $91,666 to Mr. Foxs
nonqualified deferred compensation plan account; (iii) a
$15,705 contribution made by McJunkin Red Man Corporation with
respect to January 2007 contributions due under the McJunkin
Supplemental Executive Savings Plan and Trust, which was
terminated in connection with the GS Acquisition; (iv) with
respect to the McJunkin Corporation Profit-Sharing and Savings
Plan, $35,000 representing profit sharing and salary deferral
matching contributions made by McJunkin Red Man Corporation;
(v) $12,948 attributable to a company-provided automobile;
and (vi) $3,611 with respect to country club dues paid by
McJunkin Red Man Corporation on behalf of Mr. Fox.
|
|
(12)
|
|
This amount represents (i) a
$500,000 payment to Mr. Paige pursuant to the Red Man bonus
plan for performance during the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2007 and (ii) a $700,000 transaction bonus
paid to Mr. Paige by Red Man in connection with the Red Man
Transaction.
|
112
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
This amount includes (i) a
payment of $436,867 by PVF Holdings LLC to Mr. Paige on
January 12, 2008 in partial settlement of phantom shares in
Red Man surrendered by Mr. Paige plus interest, to which
Mr. Paige became entitled as a result of services performed
in 2007; (ii) with respect to the Red Man Pipe &
Supply Co. Retirement Savings Plan, $7,831 representing a salary
deferral match contribution; and (iii) $4,809 with respect
to country club dues paid on behalf of Mr. Paige, a portion
of which was paid by Red Man prior to the Red Man Transaction
and a portion of which was paid by McJunkin Red Man Corporation
following the Red Man Transaction.
|
|
(14)
|
|
This amount includes (i) a
contribution by McJunkin Red Man Corporation of $82,500 to
Mr. S. Wehrles nonqualified deferred compensation
plan account; (ii) a $46,433 contribution made by McJunkin
Red Man Corporation with respect to January 2007 contributions
due under the McJunkin Supplemental Executive Savings Plan and
Trust, which was terminated in connection with the GS
Acquisition; (iii) a $17,459 contribution made by McJunkin
Red Man Corporation with respect to January 2007 contributions
due under a pre-GS Acquisition McJunkin deferred compensation
arrangement, which was terminated in connection with the GS
Acquisition; (iv) with respect to the McJunkin Corporation
Profit-Sharing and Savings Plan, $35,000 representing profit
sharing and salary deferral matching contributions, made by
McJunkin Red Man Corporation; (v) $22,736 attributable to a
company-provided automobile; and (vi) $4,221 with respect
to country club dues paid by McJunkin Red Man Corporation on
behalf of Mr. S. Wehrle.
|
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
|
|
Shares of
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Stocks or
|
|
and Option
|
Name
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
Threshold(2)
|
|
Target(3)
|
|
Maximum(3)
|
|
Units (#)(4)
|
|
Awards(5)
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
|
1/31/07
|
|
|
$
|
31,625
|
|
|
$
|
632,500
|
|
|
$
|
632,500
|
|
|
|
381.3098
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Craig Ketchum(6)
|
|
|
10/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381.3098
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
|
1/31/07
|
|
|
$
|
20,625
|
|
|
$
|
412,500
|
|
|
$
|
412,500
|
|
|
|
597.3853
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
David Fox, III
|
|
|
1/31/07
|
|
|
$
|
26,354
|
|
|
$
|
527,083
|
|
|
$
|
527,083
|
|
|
|
640.6004
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Dee Paige(6)
|
|
|
10/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571.9647
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
|
1/31/07
|
|
|
$
|
26,583
|
|
|
$
|
531,667
|
|
|
$
|
531,667
|
|
|
|
190.6549
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These are the grant dates for the
awards set forth in the sixth column of this table.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Under the Variable Compensation
Plan, no awards are payable unless there is at least 81%
achievement of the annual performance goals, which are comprised
of Adjusted EBITDA and RONA, during the relevant fiscal year. At
81% achievement, there is a payout of 5% of participants
target annual incentive bonus. The named executive officers,
except for Messrs. Ketchum and Paige, began participating
in the Variable Compensation Plan on February 1, 2007. As a
result, the amounts in this column reflect 5% of each named
executive officers target annual incentive bonus that
would have been paid upon 81% achievement of the performance
goals, pro-rated to reflect participation during eleven months
of the year. If the named executive officers had participated in
the Variable Compensation Plan during the entire 2007 year,
threshold payouts would have been as follows: $34,500 for
Mr. H.B. Wehrle, $22,500 for Mr. Underhill, $28,750
for Mr. Fox and $29,000 for Mr. S. Wehrle.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Payout under the Variable
Compensation Plan increases in 5% increments for each additional
percent of achievement beyond 81% up to full achievement of the
annual goal. Upon full achievement of the annual goal, 100% of
the target annual incentive bonus is paid, which is the maximum
award possible under the plan. In 2007, 100% of the performance
goals were attained (for all named executive officers other than
Mr. Fox). The amounts in these columns reflect 100% of the
named executive officers target annual incentive bonuses
for 2007, pro-rated to reflect participation for eleven months
of the year. These amounts are also the maximum payouts possible
under the Variable Compensation Plan for 2007. If the named
executive officers had participated in the Variable Compensation
Plan during the entire 2007 year, target and maximum
payouts would have been as follows: $690,000 for Mr. H.B.
Wehrle, $450,000 for Mr. Underhill, $575,000 for
Mr. Fox and $580,000 for Mr. S. Wehrle. Please refer
to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the narrative
following the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year
2007 for a discussion of the specific 2007 performance
goals.
|
113
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
For Messrs. H.B. Wehrle,
Ketchum, Underhill, Paige and S. Wehrle, these amounts reflect
the number of profits units in PVF Holdings LLC granted under
the PVF LLC Agreement during 2007. For Mr. Fox, this amount
reflects the number of restricted common units in PVF Holdings
LLC granted under the PVF LLC Agreement during 2007. Pursuant to
the PVF LLC Agreement, profits units and restricted common units
generally become vested in equal increments on each of the
third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant
subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances, but
may be subject to different treatment if provided for in an
employment agreement. The employment agreements for
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum and S. Wehrle each provide
that their profits units become vested in equal increments on
each of the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant.
Profits units held by Messrs. Underhill and Paige and
restricted common units held by Mr. Fox become vested in
accordance with the terms of the PVF LLC Agreement, but each of
their employment agreements provides that if, at any time,
Mr. Underhill, Mr. Paige or Mr. Fox terminates
his employment with Good Reason (as defined in the employment
agreement) or McJunkin Red Man Corporation terminates
Mr. Underhills, Mr. Paiges or
Mr. Foxs employment without Cause (as defined in the
employment agreement), all profits units and restricted common
units held by them shall become vested. With respect to
restricted common units held by Mr. Fox, in the event that
Mr. Fox is terminated for Cause (as defined in
the employment agreement), Mr. Fox will not forfeit his
restricted common units that are vested at the time of
termination, but PVF Holdings LLC will have the opportunity to
purchase vested restricted common units held by Mr. Fox at
Fair Market Value (as defined in the PVF LLC
Agreement).
|
|
(5)
|
|
These amounts represent the grant
date fair value, computed in accordance with FAS 123R, of
profits units (for Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Underhill,
Paige and S. Wehrle) and restricted common units (for
Mr. Fox) in PVF Holdings LLC granted to the named executive
officers in 2007. A discussion of the assumptions underlying the
valuation is provided in Note 9 to our audited financial
statements for the eleven months ending December 31, 2007,
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Messrs. Ketchum and Paige will
be eligible to receive awards under the Variable Compensation
Plan beginning in fiscal year 2008.
|
Employment
Agreements
Each of the named executive officers is party to an employment
agreement with McJ Holding LLC (currently known as PVF Holdings
LLC) and McJunkin Corporation (currently known as McJunkin
Red Man Corporation). The employment agreements with
Mr. H.B. Wehrle as president and chief executive officer of
McJunkin Corporation, Mr. Underhill as executive vice
president and chief financial officer of McJunkin Corporation,
Mr. Fox as executive vice president of McJunkin Appalachian
and Mr. S. Wehrle as executive vice president of sales of
McJunkin Corporation were entered into on December 4, 2006
with an effective date of January 31, 2007. The employment
agreement with Mr. Ketchum as co-president and co-chief
executive officer of McJunkin Corporation was entered into on
July 6, 2007 with an effective date of October 31,
2007 and the employment agreement with Mr. Paige as
executive vice president of international and corporate
development was entered into on October 31, 2007, which is
also its effective date.
Each of the employment agreements has a term of three years and
provides for an initial annual base salary to be reviewed
annually and which may be adjusted upward at the discretion of
the board of directors of McJunkin Red Man Corporation (or a
committee thereof). Messrs. H.B. Wehrles and
Ketchums initial base salaries are each $690,000,
Mr. Underhills is $450,000, Mr. Foxs is
$575,000, Mr. Paiges is $338,750 and Mr. S.
Wehrles is $580,000. The employment agreements also
provide for an annual cash bonus to be based upon such
individual
and/or
company performance criteria to be established for each
respective fiscal year by the board of directors of McJunkin Red
Man Corporation in consultation with the chief executive
officer. The target annual cash bonus for each named executive
officer is equal to 100% of their respective base salaries in
effect at the beginning of the relevant fiscal year.
Participation in the Variable Compensation Plan began on
February 1, 2007 for Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Underhill,
Fox and S. Wehrle and will begin in fiscal year 2008 for
Messrs. Ketchum and Paige.
The employment agreements provide for certain severance payments
and benefits following a termination of employment under certain
circumstances. These benefits are described below in the section
titled Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control.
114
Profits Units and
Restricted Common Units
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Underhill, Paige and S.
Wehrle have been awarded profits units and Mr. Fox has been
awarded restricted common units, each in respect of PVF Holdings
LLC, the terms of which are described in Articles III and
VII of the PVF LLC Agreement. Profits units have no voting
rights, whereas restricted common units have voting rights with
respect to that class of interests. PVF Holdings LLC may from
time to time distribute its available cash to holders of common
units and profits units. Distributions are made, first, to
holders of common units (including restricted common units), pro
rata in proportion to the number of such units outstanding at
the time of distribution, until each holder has received an
amount equal to such holders aggregate capital
contributions and, second, to holders of all units (including
profits units) pro rata in proportion to the number of units
outstanding at the time of such distribution. Distributions in
respect of restricted common units, however, are held by the
company until such time as such restricted common units become
vested and are no longer subject to forfeiture.
Pursuant to the PVF LLC Agreement, profits units and restricted
common units generally become vested in equal increments on each
of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of
grant. In the event of a termination of employment other than
for Cause (as defined in the PVF LLC Agreement), the
named executive officers will forfeit all unvested profits units
and restricted common units. All profits units and restricted
common units, whether vested or unvested, will be forfeited upon
a termination of the named executive officers employment
for Cause. In the event of a termination by reason of death or
Disability, all unvested profits units and restricted common
units would become vested. The PVF LLC Agreement also specifies
that profits units and restricted common units may be subject to
a different vesting schedule if such schedule is set forth in an
employment agreement.
The employment agreements of Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum
and S. Wehrle provide for alternative vesting schedules for
their profits units, which will become vested in equal
installments on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date
of grant, which, for Messrs. H.B. Wehrle and S. Wehrle, was
January 31, 2007, and, for Mr. Ketchum, was
October 31, 2007. Profits units held by Messrs. H.B.
Wehrle, Ketchum and S. Wehrle remain subject to the forfeiture
provisions set forth in the PVF LLC Agreement with respect to a
termination of employment other than for cause or by reason of
death or Disability (as described in the previous paragraph).
The vesting schedules of profits units held by
Messrs. Underhill and Paige and restricted common units
held by Mr. Fox are governed by the PVF LLC Agreement, but
each of their employment agreements provides that in the event
of a termination of Mr. Underhills,
Mr. Paiges or Mr. Foxs employment by
McJunkin Red Man Corporation without Cause (as
defined in the employment agreement) or by Mr. Underhill,
Mr. Paige or Mr. Fox with Good Reason (as
defined in the employment agreement), all of the profits units
and restricted common units held by them will vest and no longer
be subject to forfeiture. Messrs. Underhill and Paige will
forfeit all vested and unvested profits units held by them in
the event of a termination for Cause by McJunkin Red Man
Corporation. With respect to restricted common units held by
Mr. Fox, in the event that Mr. Fox is terminated for
Cause (as defined in the employment agreement),
Mr. Fox will not forfeit his restricted common units that
are vested at the time of termination, but PVF Holdings LLC will
have the opportunity to purchase vested restricted common units
held by Mr. Fox at Fair Market Value (as
defined in the PVF LLC Agreement). In the event of a termination
by reason of death or Disability, profits units and restricted
common units held by Messrs. Underhill, Paige and Fox become
vested in accordance with the PVF LLC Agreement.
Variable
Compensation Plan
McJunkin Red Man Corporation maintains an annual cash bonus
plan, the Variable Compensation Plan. Each of the named
executive officers participates in this plan and has a target
annual incentive bonus equal to 100% of his annual base salary.
The determination of awards pursuant to the plan depends upon
the achievement of two corporate performance measures, Adjusted
EBITDA and RONA, the achievement of which constitutes 80% and
20% of annual awards, respectively. These performance measures
are evaluated on an annual basis in connection with awards to
the named
115
executive officers. No awards are payable under the plan unless
at least 81% of the annual goal has been achieved. At 81%
achievement, there is a payout of 5% of each participants
target annual incentive bonus; this payout increases in 5%
increments for each additional percent of achievement up to full
achievement of the annual goal. Upon full achievement of the
annual goal, 100% of the target annual incentive bonus is paid,
which is the maximum award possible under the plan.
Starting on February 1, 2007, following the GS Acquisition,
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Underhill, Fox and S. Wehrle
participated in this plan. Messrs. Ketchum and Paige, who
joined the company on October 31, 2007, will be eligible to
receive awards under the plan starting in fiscal year 2008.
During the 2007 fiscal year, the performance goals were Adjusted
EBITDA of $181,036,000 and RONA of 43.05%. These 2007
performance goals related solely to the performance of McJunkin
Red Man Corporation, and excludes the performance of Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. As a result of McJunkin meeting its
performance goals, the named executive officers who participated
in the plan during 2007 were paid 100% of their target annual
incentive bonus (with the exception of Mr. Fox, who earned
97.4% of his target Variable Compensation Plan award for this
period), pro-rated to reflect participation for eleven months of
the year. Amounts earned by the named executive officers under
this plan in 2007 were as follows: $632,500 for Mr. H.B.
Wehrle, $412,5000 for Mr. Underhill, $513,643 for
Mr. Fox and $531,667 for Mr. S. Wehrle.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Market Value of Shares
|
|
|
or Units of Stock That
|
|
or Units of Stock That
|
Name
|
|
Have Not Vested
(#)(1)
|
|
Have Not Vested(2)
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
|
381.3098
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Craig Ketchum
|
|
|
381.3098
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
|
597.3853
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
David Fox, III
|
|
|
640.6004
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Dee Paige
|
|
|
571.9647
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
|
190.6549
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects profits units granted to Messrs. H.B. Wehrle,
Ketchum, Underhill, Paige and S. Wehrle in 2007 and restricted
common units granted to Mr. Fox in 2007, each in respect of
PVF Holdings LLC pursuant to the PVF LLC Agreement. Pursuant to
the PVF LLC Agreement, profits units and restricted common units
generally become vested in equal increments on each of the
third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant, but
may be subject to different treatment if provided for in an
employment agreement. The employment agreements for
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum and S. Wehrle provide that
their profits units become vested in equal increments on each of
the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of grant subject
to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances. Profits
units held by Messrs. Underhill and Paige and restricted
common units held by Mr. Fox become vested in accordance
with the PVF LLC Agreement, but each of their employment
agreements provides that if, at any time, Mr. Underhill,
Mr. Paige or Mr. Fox terminate their employment with
Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreement)
or McJunkin Red Man Corporation terminates
Mr. Underhills, Mr. Paiges or
Mr. Foxs employment without Cause (as
defined in the employment agreement), all profits units and
restricted common units held by them shall become vested. With
respect to restricted common units held by Mr. Fox, in the
event that Mr. Fox is terminated for Cause (as
defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Fox will not
forfeit his restricted common units that are vested at the time
of termination, but PVF Holdings LLC would have the opportunity
to purchase vested restricted common units held by Mr. Fox
at Fair Market Value (as defined in the PVF LLC
Agreement). The date of grant for Messrs. H.B. |
116
|
|
|
|
|
Wehrle, Underhill, Fox and S. Wehrle was January 31, 2007
and for Messrs. Ketchum and Paige was October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The market value of unvested profits units and restricted common
units in PVF Holdings LLC on December 31, 2007 was $0. |
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
Balance
|
Name
|
|
Last FY(1)
|
|
at Last FYE
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
Craig Ketchum
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
David Fox, III
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
Dee Paige
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts are included in the All Other Compensation column
of the Summary Compensation Table. |
McJunkin Red Man Corporation maintains the McJunkin Red Man
Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, in which all named
executive officers participate with the exception of
Mr. Paige. Under the terms of the plan, select members of
management and highly compensated employees may defer receipt of
a specified amount or percentage of their cash compensation,
including annual bonuses. In addition, McJunkin Red Man
Corporation makes annual contributions to participants
accounts. This plan was adopted by McJunkin Red Man Corporation
on December 31, 2007, on which date company contributions
to accounts held by the named executive officers set forth above
were made by McJunkin Red Man Corporation. There were no
executive officer contributions, earnings, withdrawals or
distributions with respect to these accounts during 2007.
If a participants account balance as of the beginning of a
calendar year is less than $100,000, such balance will be
credited quarterly with interest at the Prime Rate
(as defined in the plan) plus 1%. If a participants
account balance at the beginning of a calendar year is $100,000
or greater, the participant may elect between being credited
quarterly with interest at the Prime Rate plus 1% or having his
or her account deemed converted into a number of phantom common
units of PVF Holding LLC. If no investment election is made, a
participants account will credited quarterly with interest
at the Prime Rate plus 1%. Mr. H.B. Wehrle, the only named
executive officer with a balance in excess of $100,000 as of
December 31, 2007, did not make this election.
The named executive officers are currently fully vested in their
accounts, including company contributions. Participants receive
the vested balance of their accounts, in cash, upon a
Separation from Service (as defined in
Section 409A). Such amount is paid in three annual
installments (with interest) commencing on January 1 of the
second calendar year following the calendar year in which the
Separation from Service occurs. In the event of a
participants death or Permanent Disability (as
defined in the plan), or upon a Change in Control
(as defined in the plan) of McJunkin Red Man Corporation, the
full amount of a participants account, vested and
unvested, shall be paid within 30 days following such
event, to the participants beneficiary, in the case of
death, or to the participant, in the case of Permanent
Disability or a Change in Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing
regarding the timing of payments, distributions to
specified employees (as defined in Section 409A
of the Code) may be required to be delayed in accordance with
Section 409A of the Code.
117
Director
Compensation for 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
Option
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
Harry K. Hornish
|
|
$
|
112,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,901
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
117,401
|
|
Peter C. Boylan, III
|
|
$
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
3,257
|
(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,924
|
|
Rhys Best
|
|
$
|
8,333
|
|
|
$
|
1,584
|
(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,917
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Ketchum(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Cornell(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher A.S. Crampton(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Daly(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Fox, III(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Ketchum(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Gaines Wehrle(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate number of shares of our common stock subject to
option awards outstanding on December 31, 2007
was for
each of Messrs. Boylan and Best (taking into account the
stock split). |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Hornish participates in the company medical and dental
plans that are offered to employees. The company pays all costs
of this coverage for Mr. Hornish. This amount represents
the annual cost to the company of providing such coverage,
pro-rated to reflect Mr. Hornishs coverage for two
months of the 2007 year. Starting in 2008, Mr. Hornish will
receive an annual fee of $100,000 for his service on our board
of directors. In addition, starting in 2008, Mr. Hornish will no
longer be eligible to participate in the company health and
dental plans available to employees. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Boylan was awarded stock options in respect
of shares
on December 24, 2007 (taking into account the stock split).
The amount in the table reflects the dollar amount recognized
for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with
FAS 123R for the eleven months ended December 31,
2007. A discussion of the assumptions underlying the valuation
is provided in Note 9 to our audited financial statements
for the eleven months ending December 31, 2007, included
elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(4) |
|
The grant date fair value of Mr. Boylans option
award, computed in accordance with FAS 123R, was $1,281
using the Black Scholes method. A discussion of the assumptions
underlying the valuation is provided in Note 9 to our
audited financial statements for the eleven months ending
December 31, 2007, included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Best was awarded stock options in respect
of shares
on December 24, 2007 (taking into account the stock split).
The amount in the table reflects the dollar amount recognized
for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with
FAS 123R for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
A discussion of the assumptions underlying the valuation is
provided in Note 9 to our audited financial statements for
the eleven months ending December 31, 2007, included
elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(6) |
|
The grant date fair value of Mr. Bests option award,
computed in accordance with FAS 123R, was $1,226 using the
Black Scholes method. A discussion of the assumptions underlying
the valuation is provided in Note 9 to our audited
financial statements for the eleven months ending
December 31, 2007, included elsewhere in this prospectus. |
|
(7) |
|
Each of these directors served on our board of directors during
2007, but did not receive any compensation for such service.
Mr. Cornell has served on our board of directors since
November 29, 2006. Messrs. Crampton and Daly have
served on our board of directors since January 31, 2007.
Craig Ketchum has served on our board of directors since
October 31, 2007. Kent Ketchum |
118
|
|
|
|
|
served on our board of directors from October 31, 2007
until August 2008. Mr. Fox and Mr. Wehrle served
on our board from January 31, 2007 until August 2008. |
Mr. Hornish was appointed to the board of directors of McJunkin
Red Man Corporation on March 20, 2007 and to our board of
directors on October 31, 2007. The amounts for Mr. Hornish
in the above table were earned by him for his service on the
board of directors of McJunkin Red Man Corporation and on the
board of directors of the company during 2007 following each
respective appointment date. Mr. Boylan was appointed to our
board of directors as of October 31, 2007 and Mr. Best
was appointed to our board of directors as of December 1,
2007. As a result, the cash fees received by Messrs. Boylan
& Best during fiscal year 2007 are also for a partial year
of service. For their service as directors in 2007,
Mr. Hornish was entitled to receive an annual fee of
$150,000 and Messrs. Boylan and Best were entitled to
receive an annual fee of $100,000. Starting in 2008,
Mr. Hornish will receive an annual fee of $100,000 for his
service on our board of directors. In addition, starting in
2008, Mr. Hornish will no longer be eligible to participate
in the company health and dental plans available to our
employees. On December 24, 2007, each of Messrs. Best
and Boylan was granted an option to
purchase
of our common shares, with an original exercise price of
$ (taking into account the stock
split). The exercise price was subsequently reduced to
$ (taking into account the stock
split) in connection with our recapitalization in May 2008.
Messrs. Hornish, Boylan and Best were the only directors to
receive compensation for services performed in 2007. All
directors are also reimbursed for travel expenses and other
out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with their attendance
at meetings.
On June 16, 2008, Sam Rovit was appointed to serve on our
board of directors, for which he will be paid an annual cash fee
of $100,000 in respect of his services. Also in connection with
Mr. Rovits appointment, he was granted an option to
purchase
of our common shares at an exercise price of
$ (taking into account the stock
split).
All option grants made to directors were made pursuant to the
McJ Holding Stock Option Plan and generally vest in equal
increments on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries
of the date of grant, conditioned on continued service and
subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances.
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Each of the named executive officers would be entitled to
severance payments and benefits following the termination of
employment under certain circumstances. These benefits are
summarized below. The amounts of potential post-employment
payments and benefits assume that termination of employment took
place on December 31, 2007.
Voluntary
Separation
In the event of the voluntary separation of a named executive
officer, all unvested profits units and restricted common units
in PVF Holdings LLC held by such officer (which, as of
December 31, 2007, included all profits units and
restricted common units held by each named executive officer)
would be forfeited pursuant to the PVF LLC Agreement, and the
fully vested accounts in the McJunkin Red Man Corporation
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan held by such named
executive officer would become payable (subject to the
requirements of Section 409A of the Code). Such named
executive officer would also be paid the value of any accrued
but unused vacation time as of December 31, 2007.
Termination
Not for Cause and Termination for Good Reason
Each of the named executive officers has entered into an
employment agreement with PVF Holdings LLC (then known as McJ
Holding LLC) and McJunkin Red Man Corporation (then known
as McJunkin Corporation). Each of these agreements provides that
if McJunkin Red Man Corporation terminates the named executive
officers employment other than for Cause or
Disability (as such terms are defined in
119
the employment agreement) or if the named executive officer
terminates his employment for Good Reason (as such
term is defined in the employment agreement), then the named
executive officer would be entitled to (i) all accrued, but
unpaid, obligations (including, but not limited to, salary,
bonus, expense reimbursement or vacation pay),
(ii) continuation of base salary for a period of
12 months at the rate in effect immediately prior to
termination, (iii) continuation of medical benefits for
12 months or until such earlier time as he becomes eligible
for medical benefits from a subsequent employer on the same
terms as active senior executives of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation and (iv) a pro-rata annual bonus for the fiscal
year in which termination occurs, based on actual performance
through the end of the fiscal year. However, because
Messrs. Ketchum and Paige did not participate in the
Variable Compensation Plan during fiscal year 2007, they would
not be entitled to a pro-rata annual bonus assuming a
termination date of December 31, 2007. The termination
payments and the provision of benefits described in this
paragraph are subject to the execution of a release and
compliance with restrictive covenants prohibiting competition,
solicitation of employees and interference with business
relationships during the restriction period applicable to each
named executive officer. The restriction period for each of
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Fox and S. Wehrle is the
greater of (i) five years following the effective date of
the employment agreement and (ii) the duration of
employment and 24 months following termination of
employment, and the restriction period for
Messrs. Underhill and Paige is the duration of employment
and 12 months following termination of employment.
In addition, Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Underhill, Paige
and S. Wehrle hold profits units and Mr. Fox holds
restricted common units, each in respect of PVF Holdings LLC.
The vesting schedules of these profits units and restricted
common units are described in the narrative following the
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2007
table. As of December 31, 2007, all profits units and
restricted common units held by the named executive officers
were unvested. In the event of the termination of a named
executive officers employment by the company other than
for Cause or by a named executive officer for Good Reason, all
unvested profits units held by the named executive officers
would be forfeited, with the exception of the profits units held
by Messrs. Underhill and Paige, which would become fully
vested and nonforfeitable. Under these circumstances
Mr. Foxs restricted common units would also become
fully vested and nonforfeitable.
The fully vested account in the McJunkin Red Man Corporation
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan held by each named
executive officer would become payable (subject to the
requirements of Section 409A) upon a termination by the
company of such named executive officers employment other
than for Cause or a termination of employment by such named
executive officer for Good Reason.
The named executive officers would also be paid the value of any
accrued but unused vacation time as of December 31, 2007.
Termination by
the Company for Cause
Pursuant to the PVF LLC Agreement, upon a termination of
employment by the company for Cause, profits units held by
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Underhill, Paige and S.
Wehrle, whether or not vested, would be forfeited immediately
for no consideration. Unvested restricted common units held by
Mr. Fox would also be forfeited immediately for no
consideration in the event of Mr. Foxs termination by
the company for Cause. However, restricted common units held by
Mr. Fox that are vested at the date of his termination
(none of Mr. Foxs restricted common units were vested
as of December 31, 2007) would not be forfeited, but
would be subject to a right of repurchase by McJunkin Red Man
Corporation. As described in the narrative following the
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table, the fully
vested accounts in the McJunkin Red Man Corporation Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan held by the named executive officers
would become payable (subject to the requirements of
Section 409A). The named executive officers would also be
paid the value of any accrued but unused vacation time as of
December 31, 2007.
120
Termination
due to Death or Disability
Pursuant to the named executive officers employment
agreements, upon a termination of employment due to the death or
disability, the named executive officers (or their
beneficiaries) would be entitled to receive a pro-rata portion
of the annual bonus for the fiscal year in which termination
occurs, based on actual performance through the end of the
fiscal year. However, because Messrs. Ketchum and Paige did
not participate in the Variable Compensation Plan during fiscal
year 2007, they would not be entitled to a pro-rata annual bonus
assuming a termination date of December 31, 2007. Pursuant
to the PVF LLC Agreement, all unvested profits units held by
Messrs. H.B. Wehrle, Ketchum, Underhill, Paige and S.
Wehrle (which, as of December 31, 2007, included all of
their profits units) would become fully vested in the event of a
termination due to death or Disability (as defined
in the PVF LLC Agreement). Mr. Foxs restricted common
units would also become fully vested. In the event of a named
executive officers death or Permanent
Disability (as such term is defined in the McJunkin Red
Man Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan), the full amount of
such named executive officers account, whether or not
vested, would be payable. The named executive officers (or their
beneficiaries) would also be paid the value of any accrued but
unused vacation time as of December 31, 2007.
Change in
Control
The PVF LLC Agreement provides that in the event of a
Transaction (as defined in the PVF LLC Agreement), profits units
and restricted common units would become fully vested. The PVF
LLC Agreement defines Transaction as (i) any
event which results in the GSCP Members (as defined in the PVF
LLC Agreement) and its or their Affiliates (as defined in the
PVF LLC Agreement) ceasing to directly or indirectly
beneficially own, in the aggregate, at least 35% of the equity
interests of McJunkin Red Man Corporation that they beneficially
owned directly or indirectly as of January 31, 2007; or
(ii) in a single transaction or a series of related
transactions, the occurrence of the following event: a majority
of the outstanding voting power of PVF Holdings LLC, McJunkin
Red Man Holding Corporation or McJunkin Red Man Corporation, or
substantially all of the assets of McJunkin Red Man Corporation,
shall have been acquired or otherwise become beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, by any Person (as defined in the PVF LLC
Agreement) (other than any Member (as defined in the PVF LLC
Agreement) on the effective date of the PVF LLC Agreement or any
of its or their Affiliates, or PVF Holdings LLC or any of its
Affiliates) or any two or more Persons (other than any Member on
the date of the PVF LLC Agreement or any of its or their
Affiliates, or the McJunkin Red Man Corporation or any of its
Affiliates) acting as a partnership, limited partnership,
syndicate or other group, entity or association acting in
concert for the purpose of voting, acquiring, holding or
disposing of the voting power of PVF Holdings LLC, McJunkin Red
Man Holding Corporation or McJunkin Red Man Corporation; it
being understood that, for this purpose, the acquisition or
beneficial ownership of voting securities by the public shall
not be an acquisition or constitute beneficial ownership by any
Person or Persons acting in concert. The table below assumes
that a Transaction as so defined has occurred.
Pursuant to the McJunkin Red Man Corporation Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan, the full amount of a
participants account becomes vested upon a Change in
Control and shall be paid within thirty days of such Change in
Control. The plan defines Change in Control as, in a
single transaction or a series of related transactions, the
occurrence of the following event: a majority of the outstanding
voting power of PVF Holdings LLC, McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation or McJunkin Red Man Corporation, or substantially
all of the assets of McJunkin Red Man Corporation, shall have
been acquired or otherwise become beneficially owned, directly
or indirectly, by any Person (as defined in the plan) (other
than any Member (as defined in the PVF LLC Agreement) or any of
its or their affiliates, or PVF Holdings LLC or any of its
affiliates) or any two or more Persons (other than any Member or
any of its or their affiliates, or PVF Holdings LLC or any of
its affiliates) acting as a partnership, limited partnership,
syndicate or other group, entity or association acting in
concert for the purpose of voting, acquiring, holding or
disposing of the voting power of PVF Holdings LLC, McJunkin
121
Red Man Holding Corporation or McJunkin Red Man Corporation; it
being understood that, for this purpose, the acquisition or
beneficial ownership of voting securities by the public shall
not be an acquisition or constitute beneficial ownership by any
Person or Persons acting in concert. The table below assumes
that a Change in Control as so defined has occurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
Salary
|
|
Pro Rata
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Profits
|
|
Account
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Obligations(1)
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Units(3)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Total
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Separation
|
|
$
|
79,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
189,617
|
|
Not for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
79,617
|
|
|
$
|
690,000
|
|
|
$
|
632,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,519,477
|
|
Termination for Good Reason
|
|
$
|
79,617
|
|
|
$
|
690,000
|
|
|
$
|
632,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,519,477
|
|
Involuntary for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
79,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
189,617
|
|
Death
|
|
$
|
79,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
632,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
822,117
|
|
Disability
|
|
$
|
79,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
632,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
822,117
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
Craig Ketchum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Separation
|
|
$
|
66,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
86,346
|
|
Not for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
66,346
|
|
|
$
|
690,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
783,706
|
|
Termination for Good Reason
|
|
$
|
66,346
|
|
|
$
|
690,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
783,706
|
|
Involuntary for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
66,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
86,346
|
|
Death
|
|
$
|
66,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
86,346
|
|
Disability
|
|
$
|
66,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
86,346
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Separation
|
|
$
|
43,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
107,437
|
|
Not for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
43,270
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
412,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
977,297
|
|
Termination for Good Reason
|
|
$
|
43,270
|
|
|
$
|
450,000
|
|
|
$
|
412,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
977,297
|
|
Involuntary for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
43,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
107,437
|
|
Death
|
|
$
|
43,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
519,937
|
|
Disability
|
|
$
|
43,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
519,937
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
$
|
64,167
|
|
|
|
David Fox, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Separation
|
|
$
|
66,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
158,013
|
|
Not for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
66,347
|
|
|
$
|
575,000
|
|
|
$
|
513,643
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
1,254,016
|
|
Termination for Good Reason
|
|
$
|
66,347
|
|
|
$
|
575,000
|
|
|
$
|
513,643
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
1,254,016
|
|
Involuntary for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
66,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
158,013
|
|
Death
|
|
$
|
66,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
513,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
671,656
|
|
Disability
|
|
$
|
66,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
513,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
671,656
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
|
$
|
91,666
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
|
Medical
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
Salary
|
|
Pro Rata
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Profits
|
|
Account
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Obligations(1)
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Units(3)
|
|
Balance
|
|
Total
|
|
Dee Paige
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Separation
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
Not for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
$
|
338,750
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
378,682
|
|
Termination for Good Reason
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
$
|
338,750
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
378,682
|
|
Involuntary for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
Death
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
Disability
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
32,572
|
|
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Separation
|
|
$
|
66,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
149,424
|
|
Not for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
66,924
|
|
|
$
|
580,000
|
|
|
$
|
531,667
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,268,451
|
|
Termination for Good Reason
|
|
$
|
66,924
|
|
|
$
|
580,000
|
|
|
$
|
531,667
|
|
|
$
|
7,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,268,451
|
|
Involuntary for Cause Termination
|
|
$
|
66,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
149,424
|
|
Death
|
|
$
|
66,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
531,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
681,091
|
|
Disability
|
|
$
|
66,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
531,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
681,091
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
$
|
82,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These amounts represent accrued but
unused vacation time as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Each of the named executive
officers has an annual target bonus of 100% of annual base
salary at the beginning of the relevant fiscal year. Except for
Messrs. Ketchum and Paige, who will be eligible to earn
awards starting in fiscal year 2008, the named executive
officers participated in the Variable Compensation Plan starting
on February 1, 2007. The Adjusted EBITDA and RONA
performance goals for the Variable Compensation Plan were
satisfied in fiscal year 2007. As a result, assuming a
termination as of December 31, 2007, pursuant to the terms
of their employment agreements, Messrs. H.B. Wehrle,
Underhill, Fox and S. Wehrle would be entitled to receive their
target annual incentive bonus, pro-rated to reflect
participation during eleven months of the year.
|
|
(3)
|
|
In the event of a Transaction (as
defined in the PVF LLC Agreement) or a termination by reason of
death or Disability, the profits units and restricted common
units in PVF Holdings LLC held by the named executive officers
would become fully vested.
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, our
compensation committee was comprised of Peter C.
Boylan, III, John F. Daly, and Harry K. Hornish Jr.
In connection with the Red Man Transaction, Red Man paid a fee
of $4 million to Boylan Partners LLC. On December 17,
2007, Mr. Boylan made an investment of $1 million in
PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for 254.2065 common units in PVF
Holdings LLC. Mr. Boylan made his investment in PVF
Holdings LLC through a limited liability company which he
controls. In May 2008, Mr. Boylans limited liability
company holding common units in PVF Holdings LLC received a
dividend of $389,653.01 in connection with our May 2008
recapitalization. See Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Transactions with Executive
Officers and Directors May 2008 Dividend.
Mr. Daly is a managing director in the Principal Investment
Area of Goldman, Sachs & Co. For a description of the
companys transactions with Goldman, Sachs & Co.
and certain of its affiliates, see
123
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Transactions with the Goldman Sachs
Funds.
On April 13, 2007, Harry K. Hornish, Jr. made an
investment of $1.5 million in PVF Holdings LLC in exchange
for 381.3098 common units in PVF Holdings LLC. The investment
consisted of $500,000 in cash and a $1 million promissory
note issued to PVF Holdings LLC. The $500,000 in cash and
$1 million promissory note were subsequently contributed to
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation by PVF Holdings LLC. In
connection with our May 2008 dividend, the amount of the note
was reduced to $498,467.01. Mr. Hornish repaid the note in
full on August 7, 2008. See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Transactions with
Executive Officers and Directors.
124
PRINCIPAL AND
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table presents information regarding beneficial
ownership of our common stock by:
|
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
each stockholder known by us to beneficially hold five percent
or more of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
each selling stockholder; and
|
|
|
|
all of our executive officers and directors as a group.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC
and generally includes voting or investment power with respect
to securities. Unless indicated below, to our knowledge, the
persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and
sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially
owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.
Shares of common stock subject to options that are currently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the date of
this prospectus are deemed to be outstanding and to be
beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but
are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise
indicated, the business address for each of our beneficial
owners is
c/o McJunkin
Red Man Holding Corporation, 8023 East 63rd Place, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 74133.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
Owned Prior to the Offering
|
|
Number of
|
|
Owned After the Offering
|
Name and Address
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
Shares Offered
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
|
|
PVF Holdings LLC(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Ketchum(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Underhill(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Fox, III(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dee Paige(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhys J. Best(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Cornell(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher A.S. Crampton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Daly(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry K. Hornish, Jr.(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam B. Rovit(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers, as a group
(19 persons)(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PVF Holdings LLC has granted the
underwriters the option to purchase from it an aggregate
of
additional shares. If the option to purchase additional shares
were exercised in full, after the offering PVF Holdings LLC and
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. would
own shares,
or %, of our common stock, and all
of our directors and executive officers, as a group, would
own shares,
or %, of our common stock.
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1%.
|
|
(1)
|
|
PVF Holdings LLC directly
owns shares
of common stock. GS Capital Partners V Fund, L.P., GS Capital
Partners V Offshore Fund, L.P., GS Capital Partners V
GmbH & Co. KG, GS Capital Partners V Institutional,
L.P., GS Capital Partners VI Fund, L.P., GS Capital Partners VI
Offshore Fund, L.P., GS Capital Partners VI Parallel, L.P., and
GS Capital Partners VI GmbH & Co. KG (collectively,
the Goldman Sachs Funds) are members of PVF Holdings
LLC and own common units of PVF Holdings LLC. The Goldman
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
Sachs Funds common units in
PVF Holdings LLC correspond
to shares
of common stock. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and Goldman,
Sachs & Co. may be deemed to beneficially own
indirectly, in the aggregate, all of the common stock owned by
PVF Holdings LLC because (i) affiliates of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. are the
general partner, managing general partner, managing partner,
managing member or member of the Goldman Sachs Funds and
(ii) the Goldman Sachs Funds control PVF Holdings LLC and
have the power to vote or dispose of all of the common stock of
the Company owned by PVF Holdings LLC. Goldman,
Sachs & Co. is a direct and indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Goldman,
Sachs & Co. is the investment manager of certain of
the Goldman Sachs Funds. Shares of common stock that may be
deemed to be beneficially owned by the Goldman Sachs Funds that
correspond to the Goldman Sachs Funds common units of PVF
Holdings LLC consist of:
(1)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners V Fund, L.P. and its general partner, GSCP V
Advisors, L.L.C.,
(2)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners V Offshore Fund, L.P. and its general partner,
GSCP V Offshore Advisors, L.L.C.,
(3)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners V Institutional, L.P. and its general partner,
GSCP V Advisors, L.L.C.,
(4)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners V GmbH & Co. KG and its general
partner, Goldman, Sachs Management GP GmbH,
(5)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners VI Fund, L.P. and its general partner, GSCP VI
Advisors, L.L.C.,
(6)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners VI Offshore Fund, L.P. and its general partner,
GSCP VI Offshore Advisors, L.L.C.,
(7)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners VI Parallel, L.P. and its general partner, GS
Advisors VI, L.L.C., and
(8)
shares of common stock deemed to be beneficially owned by GS
Capital Partners VI GmbH & Co. KG and its managing
limited partner, GS Advisors VI, L.L.C. Henry Cornell and John
F. Daly are managing directors of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Mr. Cornell, Mr. Daly, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
and Goldman, Sachs & Co. each disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares of common stock owned directly or
indirectly by PVF Holdings LLC and the Goldman Sachs Funds,
except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein, if any.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Ketchum owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Ketchum owns common units in PVF
Holdings LLC both directly and through a limited liability
company which correspond
to shares
of common stock owned by PVF Holdings LLC. Mr. Ketchum does
not have the power to vote or dispose of shares of common stock
that correspond to his ownership or his limited liability
companys ownership of common units in PVF Holdings LLC and
thus does not have beneficial ownership of such shares.
Mr. Ketchum also owns profits units in PVF Holdings LLC.
These profits units do not give Mr. Ketchum beneficial
ownership of any shares of our common stock because they do not
give Mr. Ketchum the power to vote or dispose of any such
shares.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Mr. Underhill owns no shares
of common stock directly. Mr. Underhill
owns shares
indirectly through his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC. Mr. Underhill does not have the power to vote or
dispose of shares of common stock that correspond to his
ownership of common units in PVF Holdings LLC and thus does not
have beneficial ownership of such shares. Mr. Underhill
also owns profits units in PVF Holdings LLC. These profits units
do not give Mr. Underhill beneficial ownership of any
shares of our common stock because they do not give
Mr. Underhill the power to vote or dispose of any such
shares.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Mr. Fox owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Fox has transferred all of his
common units (including his restricted common units) in PVF
Holdings LLC, corresponding
to shares
of our common stock, to a trust for the benefit of members of
his family. Neither Mr. Fox nor the trust has the power to
vote or dispose of the common units of PVF Holdings LLC held by
the trust, which correspond
to shares
of our common stock, and therefore neither Mr. Fox nor the
trust has beneficial ownership of these shares of our common
stock.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Mr. Paige owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Paige
owns shares
indirectly through his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC. Mr. Paige does not have the power to vote or dispose
of shares of common stock that correspond to his ownership of
common units in PVF Holdings LLC and thus does not have
beneficial ownership of such shares. Mr. Paige also owns
profits units in PVF Holdings LLC. These profits units do not
give Mr. Paige beneficial ownership of any shares of our
common stock because they do not give Mr. Paige the power
to vote or dispose of any such shares.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Mr. Wehrle owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Wehrle
owns shares
indirectly through his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC. Mr. Wehrle does not have the power to vote or
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
dispose of shares of common stock
that correspond to his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC and thus does not have beneficial ownership of such shares.
Mr. Wehrle also owns profits units in PVF Holdings LLC.
These profits units do not give Mr. Wehrle beneficial
ownership of any shares of our common stock because they do not
give Mr. Wehrle the power to vote or dispose of any such
shares.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Best owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Best
owns shares
indirectly due to his limited liability companys ownership
of common units in PVF Holdings LLC. Mr. Best does not have
the power to vote or dispose of shares of common stock that
correspond to such limited liability companys ownership of
common units in PVF Holdings LLC and thus does not have
beneficial ownership of such shares. Mr. Best also owns
options to
purchase shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of
$ .
The date of grant for these options was December 24, 2007.
These options will generally vest in one-third annual increments
on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of
grant.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Mr. Hornish owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Hornish
owns shares
indirectly through his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC. Mr. Hornish does not have the power to vote or dispose
of shares of common stock that correspond to his ownership of
common units in PVF Holdings LLC and thus does not have
beneficial ownership of such shares.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Mr. Rovit owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Rovit
owns shares
indirectly through his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC. Mr. Rovit does not have the power to vote or dispose
of shares of common stock that correspond to his ownership of
common units in PVF Holdings LLC and thus does not have
beneficial ownership of such shares. Mr. Rovit also owns
options to
purchase shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of
$ .
The date of grant for these options was June 27, 2008.
These options will generally vest in one-third annual increments
on the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of
grant.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Mr. Wehrle owns no shares of
common stock directly. Mr. Wehrle
owns shares
indirectly through his ownership of common units in PVF Holdings
LLC. Mr. Wehrle does not have the power to vote or dispose
of shares of common stock that correspond to his ownership of
common units in PVF Holdings LLC and thus does not have
beneficial ownership of such shares. Mr. Wehrle also owns
profits units in PVF Holdings LLC. These profits units do not
give Mr. Wehrle beneficial ownership of any shares of our
common stock because they do not give Mr. Wehrle the power
to vote or dispose of any such shares.
|
|
(11)
|
|
The number of shares of common
stock owned by all directors and executive officers, as a group,
reflects all shares of common stock directly owned by PVF
Holdings LLC, with respect to which Henry Cornell and John F.
Daly may be deemed to share beneficial ownership.
|
The following table sets forth, as of June 26, 2008, the
number of common units and profits units of PVF Holdings LLC
held by each of our directors, executive officers and beneficial
owners of more than five percent of our common stock. The table
also sets forth the amount of proceeds that each of these unit
holders will receive from this offering upon PVF Holdings
LLCs distribution of the net proceeds of this offering to
its unit holders and the percentage of proceeds to be received
in proportion to all unit holders. Pursuant to the amended and
restated limited liability company agreement of PVF Holdings
LLC, distributions of the net proceeds of this offering will be
allocated as follows: first, to the holders of common units pro
rata in proportion to the number of common units outstanding at
the time of such distribution, until each common unit holder has
received an amount equal to such holders aggregate capital
contributions made to PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for
127
common units; and second, to the holders of all units (including
profits units), pro rata in proportion to the number of units
(including profits units) outstanding at the time of such
distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Profits
|
|
Proceeds from
|
|
Proceeds from this
|
|
|
Units Owned
|
|
Units Owned
|
|
this Offering to
|
|
Offering Received
|
Name of
|
|
Directly or
|
|
Directly or
|
|
be Distributed to
|
|
in Proportion to
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Indirectly
|
|
Indirectly
|
|
the Unit Holder
|
|
All Unit Holders
|
|
The Goldman Sachs Funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Ketchum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Fox, III(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dee Paige
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Lang
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy K. Adams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rory M. Isaac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Ittner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis Niver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ken Hayes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen W. Lake
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhys J. Best
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Cornell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christopher A.S. Crampton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Daly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harry K. Hornish, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam B. Rovit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Goldman Sachs Funds and all of our directors and executive
officers, as a group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other holders of common units of PVF Holdings LLC, as a group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Of the proceeds received on account of common units issued to
Mr. Fox,
$
will be received on account of restricted common units. No
proceeds will be distributed by PVF Holdings LLC on account of
these restricted common units until they vest. |
128
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
This section describes related party transactions between
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and its directors,
executive officers and 5% stockholders and their immediate
family members.
Transactions with
the Goldman Sachs Funds
Prior to this offering, certain affiliates of The Goldman Sachs
Group, Inc., including GS Capital Partners V Fund, L.P., GS
Capital Partners VI Fund, L.P. and related entities, or the
Goldman Sachs Funds, were the majority owners of PVF Holdings
LLC, our direct parent company. Following the consummation of
this offering, PVF Holdings LLC will remain the majority owner
of our company and the Goldman Sachs Funds will continue to be
the majority owners of PVF Holdings LLC.
McJunkin
Acquisition
On December 4, 2006, the entity now known as McJunkin Red
Man Corporation entered into a definitive agreement to be
acquired by the entity now known as McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of the Goldman Sachs Funds
(the GS Acquisition). Shareholders of McJunkin Red
Man Corporation received consideration in the form of cash or a
combination of cash and common units in PVF Holdings LLC (as
described in further detail below). On January 31, 2007,
the GS Acquisition closed and a direct wholly owned subsidiary
of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation merged with and into
McJunkin Red Man Corporation, with McJunkin Red Man Corporation
surviving the merger and becoming a direct subsidiary of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation. Immediately prior to the
closing of the merger, certain shareholders of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation and McJunkin Appalachian Oilfield Supply Company
(McJunkin Appalachian, which entity was a subsidiary
of McJunkin Red Man Corporation, but has since been merged out
of existence) contributed their shares of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation and McJunkin Appalachian, as applicable, to the
entity now known as PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for common
units in PVF Holdings LLC. We refer to these common unit holders
as the McJunkin Rollover Equity Holders.
The acquisition of McJunkin Red Man Corporation was financed by
a $225.6 million capital contribution by certain Goldman
Sachs Funds in PVF Holdings LLC, investments in PVF Holdings LLC
by the McJunkin Rollover Equity Holders valued at
$166.5 million (including restricted common units valued at
$7 million), $575.0 million in term loans and
$75.0 million in revolver borrowings.
In connection with the GS Acquisition, McJunkin Red Man
Corporation paid (i) a $10 million sponsor fee to an
affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds, (ii) a
$2.5 million investment banking advisory fee to an
affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds, and (iii) an
$8.5 million debt financing fee to an affiliate of the
Goldman Sachs Funds.
Red Man
Transaction
West Oklahoma PVF Company, our indirect subsidiary, entered into
a Stock Purchase Agreement on July 6, 2007 with Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man), PVF Holdings
LLC, Craig Ketchum, and the holders of 100% of the outstanding
common stock of Red Man, pursuant to which West Oklahoma PVF
Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Red Man
in a business combination transaction (the Red Man
Transaction). Shareholders of Red Man received
consideration in the form of cash or a combination of cash and
common units in PVF Holdings LLC (as described in further detail
below). The Red Man Transaction was consummated on
October 31, 2007.
The Goldman Sachs Funds made a capital contribution of
$574.3 million in PVF Holdings LLC for purposes of
financing the Red Man Transaction. Additionally, prior to making
such capital contribution, the Goldman Sachs Funds offered to
each of the McJunkin Rollover Equity Holders the option of
making an additional equity investment in PVF Holdings LLC in an
amount required to preserve such holders pro rata interest
in PVF Holdings LLC relative to the other equity holders in PVF
Holdings LLC prior to the Red Man Transaction. The McJunkin
Rollover Equity Holders were also
129
given the option to redeem their interests in PVF Holdings LLC
at a fixed price per unit, or to continue to hold their
interests without any additional subscriptions or redemptions.
Certain McJunkin Rollover Equity Holders chose to exercise their
option to make an additional equity investment in PVF Holdings
LLC and consequently contributed $83.9 million to PVF
Holdings LLC in exchange for common units of PVF Holdings LLC
for purposes of financing the Red Man Transaction.
Immediately prior to the closing of the Red Man Transaction,
certain shareholders of Red Man (the Red Man Rollover
Equity Holders) contributed their shares of Red Man to PVF
Holdings LLC in exchange for common units in PVF Holdings LLC.
The Red Man Transaction was also financed by $322.5 million
in revolving loans under McJunkin Red Man Corporations
revolving credit facility. Immediately following the closing of
the Red Man Transaction, an immediate family member of Craig
Ketchum remitted to McJunkin Red Man Corporation the amount of
$517,366.12 to fund McJunkin Red Man Corporations
payment of withholding taxes on such immediate family
members account, relating to the transfer to such
immediate family member of certain assets that were excluded
from the Red Man Transaction.
In connection with the Red Man Transaction, McJunkin Red Man
Corporation paid certain affiliates of the Goldman Sachs Funds a
$10 million merger and acquisition advisory fee and a
$2 million investment banking advisory fee. McJunkin Red
Man Corporation also paid a fee of $4 million to Boylan
Partners LLC.
May 2008
Dividend
On May 22, 2008, McJunkin Red Man Corporation borrowed
$25 million in revolving loans under its revolving credit
facility and distributed the proceeds of the loans to McJunkin
Red Man Holding Corporation. On the same date, McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation borrowed $450 million in term loans
under its term loan facility and distributed the proceeds of the
term loans, together with the proceeds of the revolving loans,
to its stockholders, including PVF Holdings LLC. PVF Holdings
LLC used the proceeds from the dividend to fund distributions to
members of PVF Holdings LLC in May 2008. The Goldman Sachs Funds
received $311,722,411.39 in such distribution.
Credit
Facilities
Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., an affiliate of Goldman,
Sachs & Co., or Goldman Sachs, is one of the lenders
under our Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan Facility and
Junior Term Loan Facility. Goldman Sachs Credit Partners is also
a co-lead arranger and joint bookrunner under each of these
facilities and is also the syndication agent under the Term Loan
Facility and the Junior Term Loan Facility. Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners was also a lender, co-lead arranger, joint bookrunner
and syndication agent under the revolving credit facility that
we entered into in January 2007. The January 2007 revolving
credit facility was entered into in connection with the
financing of the GS Acquisition and, at that time, we paid this
Goldman Sachs affiliate an $8.5 million financing fee. The
January 2007 revolving credit facility was terminated in October
2007 in connection with our entering into the Revolving Credit
Facility and the Red Man Transaction. In conjunction with
entering into the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan
Facility in October 2007, we paid a $4.9 million financing
fee to Goldman Sachs Credit Partners. We also paid a
$4.4 million fee to Goldman Sachs Capital Partners in May
2008 in connection with the Junior Term Loan Facility and a fee
of $0.5 million to Goldman Sachs Credit Partners in June
2008 in connection with the $50 million upsizing of our
Revolving Credit Facility. See Description of Our
Indebtedness.
Transactions with
Prideco
In November/December 2007, and continuing in 2008, Red Man, a
subsidiary of McJunkin Red Man Corporation, has leased and
continues to lease certain equipment and buildings from Prideco,
LLC, an entity owned by Craig Ketchum (our president and chief
executive officer and a member of our board of directors) and
certain of his immediate family members. Craig Ketchum owns a
25%
130
interest in Prideco, LLC. Red Man paid Prideco, LLC an aggregate
rental amount of $538,185 in November/December 2007.
Transactions with
Hansford Associates Limited Partnership
McJunkin Red Man Corporation leases certain land and buildings
from Hansford Associates Limited Partnership, a limited
partnership in which H. B. Wehrle, III (a member of our
board of directors) and E. Gaines Wehrle (a former member of our
board of directors) and Stephen D. Wehrle (one of our executive
officers) and certain of their immediate family members are
limited partners. Together, these three persons and their
immediate family members have a 50% ownership interest in the
limited partnership. McJunkin Red Man Corporation (and its
predecessor) paid Hansford Associates Limited Partnership an
aggregate rental amount of $2,583,184 in 2007, $2,403,240 in
2006, and $2,343,240 in 2005.
Transactions with
Appalachian Leasing Company
McJunkin Red Man Corporation leases certain land and buildings
from Appalachian Leasing Company, an entity in which David
Fox, III, one of our executive officers, and certain of
Mr. Foxs immediate family members have an ownership
interest. Mr. Fox and his immediate family members have a
67.5% ownership interest in Appalachian Leasing Company.
McJunkin Red Man Corporation (and its predecessor) paid
Appalachian Leasing Company an aggregate rental amount of
$146,064 in 2007, $153,144 in 2006, and $154,344 in 2005.
Transactions with
Executive Officers and Directors
Investments in
PVF Holdings LLC
Certain of our current and former executive officers and
directors are members of PVF Holdings LLC, our majority
stockholder. These executive officers and directors do not have
or share the right to vote or dispose of the shares of our
common stock held by PVF Holdings LLC and thus do not have
beneficial ownership of such shares. See Principal and
Selling Stockholders.
On January 31, 2007, in connection with the GS Acquisition,
certain of our current and former executive officers and
directors contributed shares of McJunkin Red Man Corporation and
McJunkin Appalachian to PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for common
units in PVF Holdings LLC. The number of shares of McJunkin Red
Man Corporation and McJunkin Appalachian contributed by each
such executive officer and director, the value of such
contribution, and the number of common units of PVF Holdings LLC
received in consideration for such contribution are indicated in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
Common Units of
|
|
|
McJunkin
|
|
McJunkin
|
|
Value of
|
|
PVF Holdings LLC
|
|
|
Corporation
|
|
Appalachian
|
|
Shares
|
|
Received
|
Name
|
|
Contributed
|
|
Contributed
|
|
Contributed
|
|
in Exchange
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
|
310.0000
|
|
|
|
31.89
|
|
|
$
|
17,173,005.47
|
|
|
|
4,365.4898
|
|
David Fox, III(1)
|
|
|
0.0000
|
|
|
|
459.18
|
|
|
$
|
2,548,646.04
|
|
|
|
647.8824
|
|
E. Gaines Wehrle
|
|
|
218.9688
|
|
|
|
31.89
|
|
|
$
|
12,180,895.82
|
|
|
|
3,096.4630
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
|
215.8000
|
|
|
|
31.89
|
|
|
$
|
12,008,413.81
|
|
|
|
3,052.6170
|
|
Michael H. Wehrle
|
|
|
212.5521
|
|
|
|
31.89
|
|
|
$
|
11,829,133.40
|
|
|
|
3,007.0427
|
|
Martha G. Wehrle
|
|
|
26.4688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,019.99
|
|
|
|
368.8587
|
|
Russell L. Isaacs
|
|
|
2.4063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,910.91
|
|
|
|
33.5326
|
|
Other Wehrle Family Members(2)
|
|
|
850.4147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,619,540.83
|
|
|
|
11,850.9908
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Foxs common units in PVF Holdings LLC were
transferred to a trust established by Mr. Fox. |
131
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As used in this table, Other Wehrle Family Members
include the immediate family members of H.B. Wehrle, III,
E. Gaines Wehrle, Stephen D. Wehrle and Michael H. Wehrle. |
On January 31, 2007, Mr. Fox was awarded 640.6004
restricted common units in PVF Holdings LLC. At the time these
units were awarded, they had a value of $2.52 million. Also
on January 31, 2007, certain of our executive officers and
directors received profits units in PVF Holdings LLC in
connection with the GS Acquisition. Each of Rory Isaac, Gary
Ittner and James F. Underhill received profits units as follows:
381.3098 profits units for Mr. Isaac, 381.3098 profits
units for Mr. Ittner, and 597.3853 profits units for
Mr. Underhill. Each of Messrs. Isaac, Ittner, and
Underhill also contributed $857.14 in cash to PVF Holdings LLC
in exchange for 0.2179 common units. H.B. Wehrle, III
received 381.3098 profits units and Stephen D. Wehrle received
190.6549 profits units on January 31, 2007.
On April 13, 2007, Harry K. Hornish, Jr., a member of
our board of directors, made an investment of $1.5 million
in PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for 381.3098 common units. The
investment consisted of $500,000 in cash and a $1 million
promissory note issued to PVF Holdings LLC. The $500,000 in cash
and $1 million promissory note were subsequently
contributed to McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation by PVF
Holdings LLC. In connection with the May 2008 dividend, the
amount of the note was reduced to $498,467.01. Mr. Hornish
repaid the note in full on August 7, 2008.
On October 31, 2007, in connection with the Red Man
Transaction, E. Gaines Wehrle, Martha G. Wehrle, Michael H.
Wehrle and Russell Isaacs, each a McJunkin Rollover Equity
Holder, exercised their option to purchase additional common
units in PVF Holdings LLC. See Transactions
with the Goldman Sachs Funds Red Man
Transaction above. Mr. Gaines Wehrle purchased
1,669.9676 additional common units for a price of $6,569,334.58.
On April 30, 2008, Mr. Wehrle transferred all of his
common units to a trust that he established. The trust received
4,766.4306 common units. Ms. Martha G. Wehrle purchased an
additional 198.9309 common units for a price of $782,556.17.
Mr. Michael H. Wehrle purchased 1,621.7420 additional
common units for a price of $6,379,623.97. Mr. Russell
Isaacs purchased 56.0408 additional common units for a price of
$220,453.93. In connection with the Red Man Transaction, the
immediate family members of H.B. Wehrle, III, E. Gaines
Wehrle, Stephen D. Wehrle and Michael H. Wehrle exercised their
option to purchase 10,555.4465 additional common units for a
price of $41,523,116.19.
Additionally, in October 2007, PVF Holdings LLC provided an
opportunity for select employees of PVF Holdings LLC and its
subsidiaries to purchase common units (McJunkin Management
Coinvest). Certain executive officers and directors
purchased common units in the McJunkin Management Coinvest on
October 31, 2007. The number of common units purchased and
the amount paid for such units is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Contributed
|
|
Number of Common Units
|
Name
|
|
to PVF Holdings LLC
|
|
of PVF Holdings LLC
Received
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
$
|
3,000,000.00
|
|
|
|
762.6195
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
$
|
5,000,000.00
|
|
|
|
1,271.0376
|
|
Rory Isaac
|
|
$
|
500,000.00
|
|
|
|
127.1033
|
|
Gary Ittner
|
|
$
|
100,000.00
|
|
|
|
25.4207
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
$
|
200,000.00
|
|
|
|
50.8413
|
|
As part of the Red Man Transaction, on October 31, 2007,
Craig Ketchum contributed 9,634 shares of Red Man to PVF
Holdings LLC. The value of the shares of Red Man contributed by
Mr. Ketchum was $44,135,969.59. As part of the
consideration payable to Mr. Ketchum in connection with the
Red Man Transaction, on October 31, 2007, April 10,
2008 and May 16, 2008, 10,510.7577, 674.2538 and 34.6394
common units of PVF Holdings LLC respectively were issued.
Mr. Ketchum holds the 11,219.6509 common units of PVF
Holdings LLC received in connection with the Red Man Transaction
through a limited liability company which he controls.
132
As part of the Red Man Transaction, on October 31, 2007,
Kent Ketchum contributed 3,745 shares of Red Man to PVF
Holdings LLC. As part of the consideration payable to Kent
Ketchum in connection with the Red Man Transaction, on
October 31, 2007, April 10, 2008 and May 16,
2008, 4,203.6296, 269.6583 and 13.8536 common units of PVF
Holdings LLC respectively were issued. Mr. Ketchum holds
the 4,487.1415 common units of PVF Holdings LLC received in
connection with the Red Man Transaction through a limited
liability company which he controls. In connection with the Red
Man Transaction, Craig Ketchum, Kent Ketchum, and their
immediate family members received 28,257.6087 common units of
PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for consideration with a value of
$111,160,050.30.
In November 2007, PVF Holdings LLC provided an opportunity for
select employees of PVF Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries to
purchase common units (Red Man Management Coinvest).
Certain executive officers and directors purchased common units
in the Red Man Management Coinvest. The number of common units
purchased, the date such units were issued and the amount paid
for such units is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Contributed
|
|
Common Units of PVF
|
|
Date Units
|
Name
|
|
to PVF Holdings LLC
|
|
Holdings LLC Received
|
|
Were Issued
|
|
Randy Adams
|
|
$
|
15,735.24
|
|
|
|
4.0000
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
Ken Hayes
|
|
$
|
212,425.74
|
|
|
|
54.0000
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
Stephen W. Lake
|
|
$
|
200,000.00
|
|
|
|
50.8413
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2008
|
|
Jeffrey Lang
|
|
$
|
100,000.00
|
|
|
|
25.4207
|
|
|
|
December 14, 2007
|
|
Dee Paige
|
|
$
|
200,000.00
|
|
|
|
50.8413
|
|
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
On November 30, 2007, Rhys J. Best made an investment of
$500,000 in PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for 127.1033 common
units and on December 17, 2007, Peter C. Boylan, III
made an investment of $1 million in PVF Holdings LLC in
exchange for 254.2065 common units. Both of these directors made
their investments in PVF Holdings LLC through limited liability
companies which they control.
On December 21, 2007, the board of directors of PVF
Holdings LLC granted profits units to the following executive
officers in the amounts indicated: Craig Ketchum (381.3098
profits units), Kent Ketchum (190.6549 profits units), Randy
Adams (381.3098 profits units), Dee Paige (571.9647 profits
units), Ken Hayes (127.1033 profits units), and Jeffrey Lang
(381.3098 profits units). In connection with the issuance of
profits units to Craig Ketchum and Kent Ketchum, on May 14,
2008 each of these directors contributed $857.14 to PVF Holdings
LLC in exchange for 0.2179 common units each.
On January 7, 2008, 127.1033 profits units were issued to
Stephen W. Lake. In connection with this issuance, on
January 7, 2008 Mr. Lake contributed $857.14 to PVF
Holdings LLC in exchange for 0.2179 common units. On
January 9, 2008, 254.2065 profits units were issued to
Dennis Niver. In connection with this issuance, on
January 9, 2008 Mr. Niver contributed $857.14 to PVF
Holdings LLC in exchange for 0.2179 common units.
On July 7, 2008, Sam B. Rovit made an investment of
$300,000 in PVF Holdings LLC in exchange for 69.6675 common
units.
McJunkin
Acquisition
Under the terms of the merger agreement for the GS Acquisition,
McJunkin Red Man Corporation was required to use its
commercially reasonable efforts promptly following the closing
of the merger to sell certain of its assets (the Non-Core
Assets) for cash and to distribute 95% of the net proceeds
of such sales, less 40% of taxable gains, to McJunkin Red Man
Corporations shareholders of record immediately prior to
the merger. The Non-Core Assets included (i) approximately
20% of the outstanding common stock of PrimeEnergy Corporation,
(ii) approximately 32% of the ownership interests of Vision
Exploration & Production Co., LLC, (iii) certain
real property located in Charleston,
133
West Virginia, including a building, (iv) an apartment
located in New York, New York, (v) a farm located in Union,
West Virginia, and (vi) a vacant lot located in Charleston,
West Virginia. At December 31, 2006, these assets had a net
book value of approximately $27.1 million. Of the Non-Core
Assets, the ownership interest of Vision Exploration &
Production Co., LLC, the apartment located in New York, New
York, and the farm located in Union, West Virginia have each
been sold, and in 2007 aggregate proceeds of $2.552 million
were distributed to those individuals and entities who were
shareholders of record of McJunkin Red Man Corporation
immediately prior to the merger. In connection with such sale of
Non-Core Assets, H.B. Wehrle, III (one of our directors)
received $180,751, E. Gaines Wehrle (a former director of our
company) received $198,972, Stephen D. Wehrle (one of our
executive officers) received $157,282, Michael H. Wehrle (a
former director of our company) received $193,141, Martha G.
Wehrle (a former director of our company) received $24,052 and
their immediate family members received $933,781 due to their
status as shareholders of record of McJunkin Red Man Corporation
immediately prior to the merger. McJunkin Red Man Corporation is
currently in the process of selling the remaining Non-Core
Assets.
In connection with the GS Acquisition, on December 4, 2006
we entered into an indemnity agreement with certain former
shareholders of McJunkin Red Man Corporation, including H.B.
Wehrle, III and Stephen D. Wehrle. Under the indemnity
agreement, certain former shareholders of McJunkin Red Man
Corporation agreed to jointly and severally indemnify
(i) McJunkin Red Man Corporation, (ii) McJunkin Red
Man Holding Corporation and (iii) the wholly owned
subsidiary of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation which merged
with and into McJunkin Red Man Corporation in connection with
the GS Acquisition, and their respective shareholders, members,
partners, officers, directors, employees, attorneys,
accountants, affiliates, agents, other advisors and successors,
from and against all costs incurred by such indemnified parties
relating to the holding and disposition of the Non-Core Assets,
and the distribution of net proceeds with respect to such
disposition, to the extent the costs for each non-core asset
exceeds the net proceeds received in the sale of such non-core
asset.
Additionally, the indemnity agreement provided that from and
after the effective time of the merger that was consummated in
connection with the GS Acquisition, the indemnifying
shareholders would jointly and severally indemnify the
indemnified parties for (i) any amounts paid or payable by
McJunkin Red Man Corporation or any of its subsidiaries to any
of its officers, directors or employees in excess of $965,000 in
the nature of any stay-pay bonuses as a result of
the merger, other than payments to certain specific employees,
and (ii) any failure to properly withhold any amounts
required to be withheld by McJunkin Red Man Corporation or any
of its subsidiaries relating to stay-pay bonuses or any similar
such payments (which indemnity only applied to withholding
obligations that arose before the effective time of the merger
on January 31, 2007).
May 2008
Dividend
Certain members of our management team and certain current and
former members of our board of directors are members of PVF
Holdings LLC and therefore participated in PVF Holdings
LLCs cash distributions to its members in May 2008. See
Transactions with the Goldman Sachs
Funds May 2008 Dividend above. The table below
sets forth the proceeds of the distributions
134
received on account of the profits units and common units held
by our current and former executive officers and directors who
are members of PVF Holdings LLC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Distributions
|
|
Proceeds from Distributions
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Received on Common
Units
|
|
Received on Profits
Units
|
|
Total
|
|
Randy K. Adams
|
|
$
|
6,131.28
|
|
|
$
|
48,420.00
|
|
|
$
|
54,551.28
|
|
Rhys J. Best(1)
|
|
$
|
194,826.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,826.51
|
|
Peter C. Boylan, III(2)
|
|
$
|
389,653.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
389,653.01
|
|
David Fox, III(3)
|
|
$
|
1,975,013.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,975,013.20
|
|
Ken Hayes
|
|
$
|
82,772.33
|
|
|
$
|
16,140.00
|
|
|
$
|
98,912.33
|
|
Harry K. Hornish, Jr.
|
|
$
|
584,479.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
584,479.57
|
|
Rory M. Isaac
|
|
$
|
195,160.51
|
|
|
$
|
48,420.00
|
|
|
$
|
243,580.51
|
|
Russell L. Isaacs
|
|
$
|
137,300.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,300.00
|
|
Gary A. Ittner
|
|
$
|
39,299.30
|
|
|
$
|
48,420.00
|
|
|
$
|
87,719.30
|
|
Craig Ketchum(4)
|
|
$
|
17,198,047.58
|
|
|
$
|
48,420.00
|
|
|
$
|
17,246,467.58
|
|
Kent Ketchum(5)
|
|
$
|
6,878,317.54
|
|
|
$
|
24,210.00
|
|
|
$
|
6,902,527.54
|
|
Stephen W. Lake
|
|
$
|
78,264.59
|
|
|
$
|
16,140.00
|
|
|
$
|
94,404.59
|
|
Jeffrey Lang
|
|
$
|
38,965.30
|
|
|
$
|
48,420.00
|
|
|
$
|
87,385.30
|
|
Dennis Niver
|
|
$
|
333.99
|
|
|
$
|
32,280.00
|
|
|
$
|
32,613.99
|
|
Dee Paige
|
|
$
|
77,930.60
|
|
|
$
|
72,630.00
|
|
|
$
|
150,560.60
|
|
James F. Underhill
|
|
$
|
78,264.60
|
|
|
$
|
75,858.00
|
|
|
$
|
154,122.60
|
|
E. Gaines Wehrle(6)
|
|
$
|
7,306,083.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,306,083.68
|
|
H.B. Wehrle, III
|
|
$
|
7,860,472.35
|
|
|
$
|
48,420.00
|
|
|
$
|
7,908,892.35
|
|
Stephen D. Wehrle
|
|
$
|
6,627,379.72
|
|
|
$
|
24,210.00
|
|
|
$
|
6,651,589.72
|
|
Michael H. Wehrle
|
|
$
|
7,095,097.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,095,097.13
|
|
Martha G. Wehrle
|
|
$
|
870,319.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
870,319.63
|
|
Other Wehrle Family Members(7)
|
|
$
|
34,345,051.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,345,051.67
|
|
Other Ketchum Family Members(8)
|
|
$
|
19,238,151.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,238,151.48
|
|
All executive officers, directors and their immediate family
members
|
|
$
|
111,297,315.58
|
|
|
$
|
551,988.00
|
|
|
$
|
111,849,303.58
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Best holds common units in
PVF Holdings LLC through a limited liability company which he
controls.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Boylan holds common units
in PVF Holdings LLC through a limited liability company which he
owns and controls.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The $1,975,013.20 that is indicated
as being distributed on account of Mr. Foxs common
units (including common units) was distributed to a trust
established by Mr. Fox. Of this sum, $993,087.61 was
distributed with respect to common units and $81,345.60 was paid
as a tax distribution with respect to restricted common units.
The balance of this sum ($900,579.99) relates to proceeds of the
dividend distributed with respect to restricted common units
which are being held by PVF Holdings LLC subject to vesting of
the restricted common units.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Craig Ketchum received
$17,197,713.60 in proceeds with respect to common units held by
a limited liability company which he controls. Craig Ketchum
received $333.99 in proceeds with respect to common units that
he holds directly.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Kent Ketchum received $6,877,983.55
in proceeds with respect to common units held by a limited
liability company which he controls. Kent Ketchum received
$333.99 in proceeds with respect to common units that he holds
directly.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The $7,306,083.68 that is indicated
as being distributed with respect to Mr. Wehrles
common units was distributed to a trust established by
Mr. Wehrle.
|
|
(7)
|
|
As used in this table, Other
Wehrle Family Members include the immediate family members
of H.B. Wehrle, III, E. Gaines Wehrle, Stephen D. Wehrle
and Michael H. Wehrle.
|
|
(8)
|
|
As used in this table, Other
Ketchum Family Members include the immediate family
members of Craig Ketchum and Kent Ketchum.
|
135
Phantom Shares
Surrender Agreements
In connection with the Red Man Transaction, on October 30,
2007, PVF Holdings LLC and Red Man entered into phantom shares
surrender agreements with each of Jeffrey Lang and Dee Paige,
who were then employees of Red Man. Pursuant to these
agreements, Mr. Lang and Mr. Paige surrendered all
phantom shares awarded to them under Red Mans phantom
stock plan, which was terminated in connection with the Red Man
Transaction.
As consideration for Mr. Langs surrender of his
phantom shares, we are required to pay him $175,000 on each of
January 1, 2008, October 31, 2008, and January 1,
2009, in each case (i) provided that Mr. Lang is still
employed with us on the relevant payment date, (ii) plus
interest for the period from November 1, 2007 to the
payment date at a rate equal to 4.88%, and (iii) less any
withholding that we may be required to make. All of such
payments are immediately due and payable in certain
circumstances, including if Mr. Lang is terminated without
cause. As consideration for Mr. Paiges surrender of
his phantom shares, we are required to pay him $433,333.33 on
each of January 1, 2008, October 31, 2008, and
October 31, 2009, in each case (i) provided that
Mr. Paige is still employed with us on the relevant payment
date, (ii) plus interest for the period from
November 1, 2007 to the payment date at a rate equal to
4.88%, and (iii) less any withholding that we may be
required to make. All of such payments are immediately due in
certain circumstances, including if Mr. Paige is terminated
without cause.
Employment of
Family Members
Stephen G. Fox, brother of David Fox, III (one of our
executive officers), is employed by our company pursuant to an
employment agreement and received aggregate compensation of
$764,807 in 2005, $935,322 in 2006 and $3,006,556 in 2007. Betty
Ketchum, mother of Craig Ketchum, is employed by our company and
the pro rated portion of her compensation in November/December
2007 (following the Red Man Transaction) was $451,934. Betty
Ketchum will cease to be an employee of our company effective
September 30, 2008. Brian Ketchum, brother of Craig
Ketchum, is employed by our company and the pro rated portion of
his compensation in November/December 2007 (following the Red
Man Transaction) was $345,704. Kevin Ketchum, brother of Craig
Ketchum, is employed by our company and the pro rated portion of
his compensation in November/December 2007 (following the Red
Man Transaction) was $348,286. Kent Ketchum, brother of Craig
Ketchum and a former member of our board of directors, was
formerly employed by Red Man and the pro rated portion of his
compensation in November/December 2007 (following the Red Man
Transaction) was $481,532. Since January 2008, Kent Ketchum
has been employed by Red Man Distributors LLC. David
Fox, Jr., father of David Fox, III, was previously
employed by our company and received aggregate compensation of
$246,523 in 2005 and $289,918 in 2006.
Anthony Zande,
brother-in-law
of H.B. Wehrle, III (one of our directors), was employed by
our company until June 2008 and received aggregate compensation
of $160,409 in 2006 and $161,613 in 2007. Helen Lynne Wehrle
Zande, H.B. Wehrle, IIIs sister, was employed by our
company until December 2007 and received aggregate compensation
of $1,243,350 in 2005, $1,549,378 in 2006, and $258,535 in 2007.
Transactions with
Bain & Company
Sam Rovit, a member of our board of directors, is a partner at
Bain Corporate Renewal Group, a unit of Bain &
Company. Mr. Rovit joined Bain Corporate Renewal Group in
January 2008 and was a partner at Bain & Company
from 1989 to June 2005. In 2006, Bain & Company
provided consulting
136
services to the entity now known as McJunkin Red Man Corporation
and McJunkin Red Man Corporation paid Bain & Company
$2,976,432 for such services.
Registration
Rights Agreement
Prior to this offering, we intend to enter into a new
registration rights agreement with PVF Holdings LLC pursuant to
which we may be required to register the sale of our shares held
by PVF Holdings LLC. Under the registration rights agreement,
PVF Holdings LLC will have the right, including in connection
with this offering, to request that we use our reasonable best
efforts to register the sale of shares held by PVF Holdings LLC
on its behalf on up to six occasions including requiring us to
file shelf registration statements permitting sales of shares
into the market from time to time over an extended period. PVF
Holdings LLCs right to demand registration will be subject
to certain limitations contained in the registration rights
agreement, including our right to decline to cause a
registration statement for a demand registration to be declared
effective within 180 days after the effective date of any
of our other registration statements.
In addition, PVF Holdings LLC will have the ability to exercise
certain piggyback registration rights with respect to its own
securities if we elect to register any of our equity securities.
The registration rights agreement will also include provisions
dealing with allocation of securities included in registration
statements, registration procedures, indemnification,
contribution and allocation of expenses. The registration rights
agreement will also provide that if PVF Holdings LLC is
dissolved, an amended and restated registration rights agreement
will become automatically effective and the existing agreement
will terminate. Pursuant to the terms of such amended and
restated registration rights agreement, the existing members of
PVF Holdings LLC would thereafter be entitled to certain
registration rights with respect to our shares which are
distributed to them in connection with any such dissolution of
PVF Holdings LLC.
Management
Stockholders Agreement
Each holder of a stock option
and/or
restricted stock award from the company, including the members
of our board of directors who have received stock option awards,
is a party to a management stockholders agreement. The
management stockholders agreement provides that upon the
termination of a restricted stock or stock option holders
employment with us (including, in the case of a non-employee
member of our board of directors, the termination of his or her
service on our board), we may exercise our right to purchase all
or a portion of the restricted stock
and/or stock
received upon the exercise of stock options held by such
employee or director (or his or her permitted transferee). In
the event of a termination by us with cause, the call option
price would be the lesser of (i) the fair market value on
the date of repurchase (determined in accordance with the
management stockholders agreement) or (ii) the price paid
for the stock by such employee or director. Under all other
circumstances, the call option price would be the fair market
value of the stock subject to the call option on the date of
repurchase (determined in accordance with the management
stockholders agreement).
The management stockholders agreement prohibits the transfer of
any shares of our stock (including restricted stock) by a
restricted stock or stock option holder, other than
(i) following the death of such holder pursuant to the
terms of any trust or will of the deceased or by the laws of
intestate succession or (ii) in connection with our
exercise of our call option.
Purchase of
Midfield Minority Interest
In June 2005, a subsidiary of Red Man, which is now known as
McJunkin Red Man Canada Ltd. (CanHCo) acquired an
equity interest in Midfield Supply ULC (Midfield).
This transaction is referred to as the Midfield
Investment. Midfield is an unlimited liability corporation
incorporated under the laws of Alberta and is one of the three
largest distributors of PVF products to the energy sector in the
four Western Canadian provinces. The headquarters of Midfield is
in Calgary, Alberta. Pursuant to the
137
Midfield Investment, CanHCo acquired an approximate 51% voting
interest (constituting an approximately 49% equity interest) in
Midfield. The remainder of the voting and equity interest was
held by Midfield Holdings (Alberta) Ltd.
(MinorityHCo), an Alberta corporation. The Midfield
Investment was an acquisition transaction whereby the existing
shareholders of the predecessor entity to Midfield partially
liquidated their ownership interests. There were in excess of
200 shareholders of the predecessor entity, who were
largely employees or former employees of that entity. Prior to
the Midfield Transaction described below, employees of Midfield
were shareholders of MinorityHCo. These shareholders were
largely employees or former employees of Midfield or its
predecessor. Certain employees of Midfield own common units in
PVF Holdings LLC.
In connection with the Midfield Investment, a shareholders
agreement was entered into among CanHCo, MinorityHCo and
Midfield. One of the features of the shareholders agreement was
the Call Right, which was held by CanHCo, and was a
right to acquire the securities of Midfield held by MinorityHCo.
This allowed CanHCo to acquire the remainder of the ownership in
Midfield that it did not acquire in June 2005 at the time of the
Midfield Investment. The Call Right was exercisable during a six
month period which commenced on June 15, 2008. Pursuant to
the Call Right, CanHCo had the option to provide a purchase
notice to MinorityHCo, and was entitled to acquire the shares of
Midfield held by MinorityHCo at a price provided by formula. We
were required to concurrently acquire all related shareholder
loans owing by Midfield to Holdings. CanHCo had intended to
exercise the Call Right in the manner described above, however,
the Call Right transaction was ultimately structured as a
purchase by CanHCo of all of the outstanding securities of
MinorityHCo from its shareholders (the Midfield
Transaction). On July 31, 2008, CanHCo paid
approximately CDN$86.5 million to the shareholders of and
lenders to MinorityHCo, of which $2 million is being held
in escrow for one year to satisfy any potential indemnification
claims against such shareholders and lenders. On August 1,
2008, pursuant to the stock purchase agreement entered into in
connection with the Red Man Transaction, a subsidiary of
McJunkin Red Man Corporation paid approximately
$47.7 million to former shareholders of Red Man, including
Craig Ketchum, Kent Ketchum (brother of Craig Ketchum), and an
immediate family member of Craig Ketchum, who received
approximately $4.5 million, $6.2 million, and $165,250
respectively.
Red Man
Distributors LLC
Red Man Distributors LLC (RMD) is an Oklahoma
limited liability company formed on November 1, 2007 for
the purposes of distributing oil country tubular goods in North
America as a certified minority supplier. McJunkin Red Man
Corporation is a member of RMD and owns 49% of the outstanding
equity interests of RMD. The other members of RMD, consisting of
Craig Ketchum, Kent Ketchum, Kevin Ketchum and Brian Ketchum,
own in the aggregate the remaining 51% of the outstanding equity
interests of RMD. RMD is managed by its members. McJunkin Red
Man Corporation is retained by RMD as an independent contractor
to provide general corporate and administrative services to RMD.
McJunkin Red Man Corporation is paid an annual services fee of
$725,000 by RMD to provide such services. In addition, McJunkin
Red Man Corporation is paid an annual license fee for the right
and license to use the name Red Man. McJunkin Red
Man Corporation pays RMD a specified percentage of RMDs
gross monthly revenue for the relevant month from sales of
products by RMD that are sourced from McJunkin Red Man
Corporation.
Related Party
Transaction Policy
Prior to the completion of this offering, our board of directors
will adopt a Related Party Transaction Policy, which is designed
to monitor and ensure the proper review, approval, ratification
and disclosure of related party transactions involving us. This
policy applies to any transaction, arrangement or relationship
(or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or
relationships) in which we were, are or will be a participant
and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any
related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect
material interest. The audit committee of our board of directors
must review, approve and ratify a related party transaction if
such transaction is
138
consistent with the Related Party Transaction Policy and is on
terms, taken as a whole, which the audit committee believes are
no less favorable to us than could be obtained in an arms-length
transaction with an unrelated third party, unless the audit
committee otherwise determines that the transaction is not in
our best interests. Any related party transaction or
modification of such transaction which our board of directors
has approved or ratified by the affirmative vote of a majority
of directors, who do not have a direct or indirect material
interest in such transaction, does not need to be approved or
ratified by our audit committee. In addition, related party
transactions involving compensation will be approved by our
compensation committee in lieu of our audit committee.
139
DESCRIPTION OF
OUR INDEBTEDNESS
The following summaries of the material terms of our revolving
credit facility, two term loan credit facilities and the debt of
our subsidiary Midfield Supply ULC are only general descriptions
and are not complete and, as such, are subject to and are
qualified in their entirety by reference to the provisions of
the revolving credit facility, the two term loan credit
facilities, and the agreements governing Midfield Supply
ULCs debt, as applicable.
Revolving Credit
Facility and Term Loan Facility
Our subsidiary McJunkin Red Man Corporation is the borrower
under a $700 million revolving credit facility (the
Revolving Credit Facility) and a $575 million
term loan facility (the Term Loan Facility and,
together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the Senior
Secured Facilities). $204.4 million of borrowings
were outstanding and $490.9 million were available under
the Revolving Credit Facility as of June 26, 2008. Goldman
Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. are co-lead
arrangers and joint bookrunners for each of these facilities.
McJunkin Red Man Corporation entered into the Term Loan
Facility, as well as a $300 million asset-backed revolving
credit facility with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. and the
other financial institutions party thereto, in January 2007 for
purposes of financing the acquisition of McJunkin Corporation by
affiliates of Goldman Sachs. The Term Loan Facility was amended,
and the Revolving Credit Facility was entered into, for purposes
of financing the Red Man Transaction in October 2007 and
refinancing the $300 million asset-backed revolving credit
facility. The Revolving Credit Facility was upsized on
June 10, 2008 from $650 million to $700 million.
Letter of Credit and Swingline
Sublimits. The Revolving Credit Facility
provides for the extension of both revolving loans and swingline
loans and the issuance of letters of credit. The aggregate
principal amount of revolving loans outstanding at any time
under the Revolving Credit Facility may not exceed
$700 million, subject to adjustments based on changes in
the borrowing base and less the sum of aggregate letters of
credit outstanding and the aggregate principal amount of
swingline loans outstanding, provided that the borrower may
elect to increase the limit on the revolving loans or term loans
outstanding as described in Incremental
Facilities below. There is a $60 million sub-limit on
swingline loans and the total letters of credit outstanding at
any time may not exceed $60 million.
Maturity. The revolving loans have a
maturity date of October 31, 2013 and the swingline loans
have a maturity date of October 24, 2013. Any letters of
credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility will
expire on October 24, 2013. The maturity date of the term
loans under the Term Loan Facility is January 31, 2014.
Interest Rate and Fees. The term loans
bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at the
borrowers option, either (i) the greater of the prime
rate and the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%, plus in
either case 2.25%; or (ii) LIBOR plus 3.25%. On
June 26, 2008, $567.8 million was outstanding under
the Term Loan Facility and the interest rate on these loans was
6.13%.
The revolving loans bear interest at a rate per annum equal to,
at the borrowers option, either (i) the greater of
the prime rate and the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50%,
plus in either case (a) 0.50% if the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio is
greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00, (b) 0.25% if such
ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 but less than
2.75 to 1.00, or (c) 0.00% if such ratio is less than 2.00
to 1.00; or (ii) LIBOR plus (a) 1.50% if the
borrowers consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted
EBITDA ratio is greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00,
(b) 1.25% if such ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to
1.00 but less than 2.75 to 1.00, or (c) 1.00% if such ratio
is less than 2.00 to 1.00. Interest on swingline loans is
calculated on the basis of the rate described in clause (i)
of the preceding sentence. The weighted average interest rate on
the revolving loans as of June 26, 2008 was 4.14% and the
interest rate on the swingline loans was 5.25%.
140
Additionally, the borrower is required to pay a commitment fee
with respect to unutilized revolving credit commitments at a
rate per annum equal to (i) 0.375% if the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio is
greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00 and (ii) 0.25% if
such ratio is less than 2.75 to 1.00. The borrower is also
required to pay fees on the stated amounts of outstanding
letters of credit for the account of all revolving lenders at a
per annum rate equal to (i) 1.375% if the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio is
greater than or equal to 2.75 to 1.00, (ii) 1.125% if such
ratio is greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.00 but less than
2.75 to 1.00, or (iii) 0.875% if such ratio is less than
2.00 to 1.00. The borrower is required to pay a fronting fee for
the account of the letter of credit issuer in respect of each
letter of credit issued by it at a rate for each day equal to
0.125% per annum on the average daily stated amount of such
letter of credit. The borrower is also obligated to pay directly
to the letter of credit issuer upon each issuance of, drawing
under,
and/or
amendment of, a letter of credit issued by it such amount as the
borrower and the letter of credit issuer agree upon for
issuances of, drawings under or amendments of, letters of credit
issued by the letter of credit issuer.
Prepayments. The borrower may
voluntarily prepay revolving loans, swingline loans and term
loans in whole or in part at the borrowers option, in each
case without premium or penalty. If the borrower refinances the
term loans on certain terms prior to October 31, 2008, the
borrower will be subject to a prepayment penalty of 1.00% of the
aggregate principal amount of such prepayment. The borrower is
required to prepay outstanding term loans with 100% of the net
cash proceeds of:
|
|
|
|
|
a disposition of any business units, assets or other property of
the borrower or any of the borrowers restricted
subsidiaries not in the ordinary course of business, subject to
certain exceptions for permitted asset sales;
|
|
|
|
a casualty event with respect to collateral for which the
borrower or any of its restricted subsidiaries receives
insurance proceeds, or proceeds of a condemnation award or other
compensation;
|
|
|
|
the issuance or incurrence by the borrower or any of its
restricted subsidiaries of indebtedness, subject to certain
exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
any sale-leaseback transaction permitted under the Term Loan
Facility.
|
Not later than the date that is 90 days after the last day
of any fiscal year, the borrower under the Term Loan Facility
will be required to prepay the outstanding term loans under the
Term Loan Facility with an amount equal to (i) 50% of
excess cash flow for such fiscal year, provided that
(a) the percentage will be reduced to 25% if the
borrowers ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated
EBITDA for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters is
no greater than 2.50 to 1.00 but greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and
(b) no prepayment of term loans with excess cash flow is
required if the borrowers ratio of consolidated total debt
to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent four consecutive
fiscal quarters is no greater than 2.00 to 1.00, minus
(ii) the principal amount of term loans under the Term Loan
Facility voluntarily prepaid during such fiscal year.
In addition, if at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding
loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn
letters of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility
exceeds the total revolving credit commitments or the
borrowing base, the borrower will be required to repay
outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an
aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the
commitment amount. If the amount available under the Revolving
Credit Facility is less than 7% of total revolving credit
commitments for any period of five consecutive business days, or
an event of default pursuant to certain provisions of the
Revolving Credit Facility has occurred, the borrower would be
required to transfer funds from certain blocked accounts daily
into a collection account under the exclusive control of the
agent under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Amortization. The term loans are
repayable in quarterly installments in an amount equal to the
principal amount of the term loans outstanding on the quarterly
installment date multiplied by
141
0.25%, with the balance of the principal amount due on the term
loan maturity date of January 31, 2014.
Incremental Facilities. Subject to
certain terms and conditions, the borrower may request an
increase in revolving loan commitments and term loan
commitments. The increase in revolving loan commitments may not
exceed the sum of (i) $150 million, plus
(ii) only after the entire amount in the preceding
clause (i) is drawn, an amount such that on a pro forma
basis after giving effect to the new revolving credit
commitments and certain other specified transactions, the
secured leverage ratio will be no greater than 4.75 to 1.00. The
borrowers ability to borrow under such incremental
facilities, however, would still be limited by the borrowing
base. The incremental term loan commitments may not exceed the
difference between (i) up to $100 million, and
(ii) the sum of all incremental revolving commitments and
incremental term loan commitments taken together. Any lender
that is offered to provide all or part of the new revolving loan
commitments or new term loan commitments may elect or decline,
in its sole discretion, to provide such new commitments.
Collateral and Guarantors. The
obligations under the Senior Secured Facilities are guaranteed
by the borrowers wholly owned domestic subsidiaries. The
obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured,
subject to exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of the
borrower and the subsidiary guarantors, including (i) a
first-priority security interest in personal property consisting
of and arising from inventory and accounts receivable;
(ii) a second-priority pledge of certain of the capital
stock held by the borrower or any subsidiary guarantor; and
(iii) a second-priority security interest in, and mortgages
on, substantially all other tangible and intangible assets of
the borrower and each subsidiary guarantor. The obligations
under the Term Loan Facility are secured, subject to certain
significant exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of
the borrower and the subsidiary guarantors, including (i) a
second-priority security interest in personal property
consisting of and arising from inventory and accounts
receivable; (ii) a first-priority pledge of certain of the
capital stock held by the borrower or any subsidiary guarantor;
and (iii) a first-priority security interest in, and
mortgages on, substantially all other tangible and intangible
assets of the borrower and each subsidiary guarantor.
Covenants. The Senior Secured
Facilities contain customary covenants. These agreements, among
other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the
ability of the borrower and its subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, create liens on assets, engage in mergers,
consolidations or sales of assets, dispose of subsidiary
interests, make investments, loans or advances, pay dividends,
make payments with respect to subordinated indebtedness, enter
into sale and leaseback transactions, change the business
conducted by the borrower and its subsidiaries taken as a whole,
and enter into agreements that restrict subsidiary dividends or
limit the ability of the borrower or any subsidiary guarantor to
create or keep liens for the benefit of the lenders with respect
to the obligations under the Senior Secured Facilities. The
Senior Secured Facilities require the borrower to enter into
interest rate swap, cap and hedge agreements for purposes of
ensuring that no less than 50% of the aggregate principal amount
of the total indebtedness of the borrower and its subsidiaries
then outstanding is either subject to such interest rate
agreements or bears interest at a fixed rate.
The Term Loan Facility requires the borrower to maintain a
maximum ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated
adjusted EBITDA and a minimum ratio of consolidated adjusted
EBITDA to consolidated interest expense. Each of these ratios is
calculated for the period that is four consecutive
142
fiscal quarters prior to the date of calculation. These
financial covenants are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total Debt to
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA to
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Four Consecutive Fiscal
Quarters Ending on:
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
4.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.50:1.00
|
|
If the borrower fails to comply with the consolidated total debt
to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio, then within ten days
after the date on which financial statements for the applicable
period are due under the Term Loan Facility, the Goldman Sachs
Funds and other investors in the borrower (or any direct or
indirect parent of the borrower) have a cure right which allows
any of them to make a direct or indirect equity investment in
the borrower or any restricted subsidiary of the borrower in
cash. If such cure right is exercised, the consolidated total
debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio of the borrower will
be recalculated to give pro forma effect to the net cash
proceeds received from the exercise of the cure right. The cure
right is subject to certain limitations. For the four prior
consecutive fiscal quarters, there must be at least one fiscal
quarter in which the cure right is not exercised. Additionally,
the equity investment contributed under the cure right may not
exceed the amount necessary to bring the borrower back into
compliance with the restrictions regarding the borrowers
consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio.
Although the Revolving Credit Facility does not require the
borrower to comply with any financial ratio maintenance
covenants, if less than 7% of the then-outstanding credit
commitments are available to be borrowed under the Revolving
Credit Facility at any time, the borrower will not be permitted
to borrow additional amounts unless its pro forma ratio of
consolidated adjusted EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges is at
least 1.00 to 1.00.
The Term Loan Facility provides that the borrower and its
restricted subsidiaries may not make, or commit to make, capital
expenditures in excess of $25 million in any year. If the
actual amount of capital expenditures made in any fiscal year is
less than the amount permitted to be made in such fiscal year,
the amount of such difference may be carried forward and used to
make capital expenditures in the succeeding fiscal year, though
the carried forward amount may not be used beyond the
immediately succeeding fiscal year.
143
Events of Default. The Senior Secured
Facilities contain customary events of default. The events of
default include the failure to pay interest and principal when
due, failure to pay fees and any other amounts owed under the
Senior Secured Facilities when due, a breach of certain
covenants in the Senior Secured Facilities, a breach of any
representation or warranty contained in the Senior Secured
Facilities in any material breach, defaults in payments with
respect to any other indebtedness in excess of $15 million
(under the Term Loan Facility) or in excess of $30 million
(under the Revolving Credit Facility), defaults with respect to
other indebtedness in excess of $15 million (under the Term
Loan Facility) or in excess of $30 million (under the
Revolving Credit Facility) that has the effect of accelerating
such indebtedness, bankruptcy, certain events relating to
employee benefits plans, failure of a material subsidiarys
guarantee to remain in full force and effect, failure of the
security agreement, pledge agreements pursuant to which the
stock of any material subsidiary is pledged, or any mortgage for
the benefit of the lenders under the Term Loan Facility to
remain in full force and effect, entry of one or more judgments
or decrees against the borrower or its restricted subsidiaries
involving a liability of $15 million or more in the
aggregate (under the Term Loan Facility) or $30 million or
more in the aggregate (under the Revolving Credit Facility), and
the invalidation of subordination provisions of any document
evidencing permitted additional debt having a principal amount
in excess of $15 million.
The Senior Secured Facilities also contain an event of default
upon the occurrence of a change of control. Under the Senior
Secured Facilities, a change of control shall have
occurred if (i) the Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of
their affiliates shall cease to beneficially own at least 35% of
the voting power of the outstanding voting stock of the borrower
(other than as a result of one or more widely distributed
offerings of the common stock of the borrower or any direct or
indirect parent of the borrower); or (ii) any person,
entity or group (within the meaning of
Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended) shall have acquired beneficial ownership of a
percentage of the voting power of the outstanding voting stock
of the borrower that exceeds the percentage of the voting power
of such voting stock then beneficially owned, in the aggregate,
by the Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of their affiliates,
unless, in the case of either clause (i) or
(ii) above, the Goldman Sachs Funds have, at such time, the
right or the ability by voting power, contract or otherwise to
elect or designate for election at least a majority of the board
of directors of the borrower; or (iii) a majority of the
board of directors of the borrower ceases to consist of
continuing directors, defined as individuals who
(a) were members of the board of directors of the borrower
on October 31, 2007 (or January 31, 2007 for purposes
of determining whether an event of default has occurred under
the Term Loan Facility), (b) who have been a member of the
board of directors for at least 12 months preceding
October 31, 2007 or January 31, 2007, as the case may
be, (c) who have been nominated to be a member of the board
of directors, directly or indirectly, by the Goldman Sachs Funds
and certain of their affiliates or persons nominated by the
Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of their affiliates or
(d) who have been nominated to be a member of the board of
directors by a majority of the other continuing directors then
in office.
Junior Term Loan
Facility
On May 22, 2008, McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation, as
the borrower, entered into a $450 Million Term Loan Credit
Agreement (the Junior Term Loan Facility). Goldman
Sachs Credit Partners L.P. and Lehman Brothers Inc. were the
co-lead arrangers and joint bookrunners under this facility. The
proceeds from the Junior Term Loan Facility, along with
$25 million in proceeds from revolving loans drawn under
the Revolving Credit Facility, were used to fund a dividend to
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporations stockholders,
including PVF Holdings LLC. PVF Holdings LLC distributed the
proceeds it received from the dividend to its members, including
the Goldman Sachs Funds and certain of our directors and members
of our management. See Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Transactions with the Goldman
Sachs Funds May 2008 Dividend. The term loans
under the Junior Term Loan Facility are not subject to
amortization and the principal of such loans must be repaid on
January 31, 2014.
144
Interest Rate and Fees. The term loans
under the Junior Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate per
annum equal to, at the borrowers option, either
(i) the greater of the prime rate and the federal funds
effective rate plus 0.50%, plus in either case 2.25%, or
(ii) LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate plus
3.25%.
Prepayments. We may voluntarily prepay
term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility in whole or in
part at our option, without premium or penalty. After the
payment in full of the term loans under the Term Loan Facility,
we will be required to prepay outstanding term loans under the
Junior Term Loan Facility with 100% of the net cash proceeds of:
|
|
|
|
|
a disposition of any of our or our restricted subsidiaries
business units, assets or other property not in the ordinary
course of business, subject to certain exceptions for permitted
asset sales;
|
|
|
|
a casualty event with respect to collateral for which we or any
of our restricted subsidiaries receives insurance proceeds, or
proceeds of a condemnation award or other compensation;
|
|
|
|
the issuance or incurrence by us or any of our restricted
subsidiaries of indebtedness, subject to certain
exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
any sale-leaseback transaction permitted under the Junior Term
Loan Facility.
|
Also, after the payment in full of the term loans under the Term
Loan Facility, not later than the date that is 90 days
after the last day of any fiscal year, we will be required to
prepay the outstanding term loans under the Junior Term Loan
Facility with an amount equal to (i) 50% of excess
cash flow for such fiscal year, provided that (a) the
percentage will be reduced to 25% if the borrowers ratio
of consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA for
the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters is no greater
than 2.50 to 1.00 but greater than 2.00 to 1.00, and (b) no
prepayment of term loans with excess cash flow is required if
the borrowers ratio of consolidated total debt to
consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the most recent four
consecutive fiscal quarters is no greater than 2.00 to 1.00,
minus (ii) the principal amount of term loans under the
Junior Term Loan Facility voluntarily prepaid during such fiscal
year.
We must also prepay the principal amount of the term loans under
the Junior Term Loan Facility with 50% of the cash proceeds
received by us from a Qualified IPO, net of
underwriting discounts and commissions and other related
reasonable costs and expenses. A Qualified IPO is
defined as a bona fide underwritten sale to the public of our
common stock or the common stock of any of our direct or
indirect subsidiaries or our direct or indirect parent companies
pursuant to a registration statement that is declared effective
by the SEC or the equivalent offering on a private exchange or
platform. Prepayment is only required if we or one of our
subsidiaries receives cash proceeds from the Qualified IPO.
Collateral. The term loans under the
Junior Term Loan Facility are secured by perfected security
interests in and liens on substantially all of the personal
property and certain real property of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation, including the common stock we hold of McJunkin Red
Man Corporation. The term loans are not guaranteed by any of our
subsidiaries or by PVF Holdings LLC.
Certain Covenants and Events of
Default. The Junior Term Loan Facility
contains customary covenants for a holding company facility.
These agreements, among other things, restrict, subject to
certain exceptions, the ability of the borrower to incur
additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, and engage in
activities or own assets other than certain specified activities
and assets. Also, the Junior Term Loan Facility requires the
borrower to maintain a maximum ratio of consolidated total debt
to consolidated adjusted EBITDA and a minimum ratio of
consolidated adjusted EBITDA to
145
consolidated interest expense. Each of these ratios is
calculated for the period that is four consecutive fiscal
quarters prior to the date of calculation. These financial
covenants are set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total Debt to
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA to
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
Interest Expense
|
Four Consecutive Fiscal
Quarters Ending on:
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
4.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
4.75:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.50:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
3.25:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
2.75:1.00
|
|
March 31, 2012 and thereafter
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
|
|
3.00:1.00
|
|
Consolidated adjusted EBITDA is calculated under the Junior Term
Loan Facility in a similar manner as under the Senior Secured
Facilities. See Revolving Credit Facility and
Term Loan Facility Covenants.
The Junior Term Loan Facility provides that the borrower and its
restricted subsidiaries may not make, or commit to make, capital
expenditures in excess of $30 million in any year. If the
actual amount of capital expenditures made in any fiscal year is
less than the amount permitted to be made in such fiscal year,
the amount of such difference may be carried forward and used to
make capital expenditures in the succeeding fiscal year, though
the carried forward amount may not be used beyond the
immediately succeeding fiscal year.
If the borrower fails to comply with the consolidated total debt
to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio, then the Goldman Sachs
Funds and other investors in the borrower have a cure right that
is similar to the cure right provided with respect to the Term
Loan Facility. See Revolving Credit Facility
and Term Loan Facility Covenants.
The Junior Term Loan Facility also contains customary events of
default that are similar to the events of default under the
Senior Secured Credit Facilities, including an event of default
upon a change of control. See Revolving Credit
Facility and Term Loan Facility Events of
Default.
Purchases of Outstanding Loans. Subject
to certain terms and conditions, the Goldman Sachs Funds and
their affiliates may from time to time seek to purchase term
loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility from the lenders under
the facility pursuant to open market purchases in an aggregate
amount not to exceed 30% of the aggregate principal amount of
the loans outstanding under the Junior Term Loan Facility. The
Goldman Sachs Funds and their affiliates may contribute such
purchased loans to PVF Holdings LLC as an equity contribution in
return for equity interests in PVF Holdings LLC and PVF Holdings
LLC will then contribute such loans to the borrower under the
Junior Term Loan Facility as an equity contribution in return
for additional stock of the borrower. In the
146
case of such purchases of term loans by the Goldman Sachs Funds
and their affiliates followed by contributions of the purchased
loans to PVF Holdings LLC and then to the borrower, the loans
subject to such purchases and contributions shall be cancelled.
In addition, the borrower under the Junior Term Loan Facility
may from time to time seek to purchase, subject to certain terms
and conditions, term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility
from the lenders under the facility pursuant to open market
purchases. In the case of such purchases by the borrower, the
loans subject to such purchases shall be cancelled.
Midfield CDN$150
Million Revolving Credit Facility
One of our subsidiaries, Midfield Supply ULC, is the borrower
under a CDN$150 million revolving credit facility (the
Midfield Revolving Credit Facility) with Bank of
America, N.A. and certain other lenders from time to time
parties thereto. Proceeds from this facility may be used by
Midfield for working capital and other general corporate
purposes. As of June 26, 2008, US$51.7 million of
borrowings were outstanding and $51.6 million were
available under the Midfield Revolving Credit Facility. The
facility provides for the extension of up to
CDN$150 million in revolving loans, subject to adjustments
based on the borrowing base and less the aggregate letters of
credit outstanding under the facility. Letters of credit may be
issued under the facility subject to certain conditions,
including a CDN$10 million sub-limit. The revolving loans
have a maturity date of November 2, 2010. All letters of
credit issued under the facility must expire at least 20
business days prior to November 2, 2010.
Interest Rate and Fees. The revolving
loans bear interest at a rate equal to either (i) the
Canadian prime rate, plus (a) 0.25% if the average
daily availability (as defined in the loan and security
agreement for the facility) for the previous fiscal quarter was
less than CDN$30 million or (b) 0.00% if the average
daily availability for the previous fiscal quarter was greater
than or equal to CDN$30 million, or, at the borrowers
option, (ii) the rate of interest per annum equal to the
rates applicable to Canadian Dollar Bankers Acceptances
having a comparable term as the proposed loan displayed on the
CDOR Page of Reuter Monitor Money Rates Service,
plus (a) 1.75% if the average daily availability for the
previous fiscal quarter was less than CDN$30 million,
(b) 1.50% if the average daily availability for the
previous fiscal quarter was greater than or equal to
CDN$30 million but less than CDN$60 million, or
(c) 1.25% if the if the average daily availability for the
previous fiscal quarter was greater than or equal to
CDN$60 million.
The borrower must pay a monthly unused line fee with respect to
unutilized revolving loan commitments equal to (i) 0.25% if
the outstanding amount of borrowings under the facility for the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter are greater than 50% of the
revolving loan commitments, or (ii) 0.375% if otherwise.
The borrower must pay a monthly fronting fee equal to 0.125% per
annum of the stated amount of letters of credit issued and must
also pay a monthly fee to the agent on the average daily stated
amount of letters of credit issued equal to (i) 1.75% if
the average daily availability for the previous fiscal quarter
was less than CDN$30 million, (ii) 1.50% if the
average daily availability for the previous fiscal quarter was
greater than or equal to CDN$30 million but less than
CDN$60 million, or (iii) 1.25% if the average daily
availability for the previous fiscal quarter was greater than or
equal to CDN$60 million.
Prepayments. The borrower may prepay
the revolving loans from time to time without premium or penalty.
Collateral and Guarantors. The Midfield
Revolving Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the
personal property of Midfield Supply ULC and its subsidiary
guarantors, Mega Production Testing Inc. and Hagan Oilfield
Supply Ltd.
Certain Covenants and Events of
Default. The Midfield Revolving Credit
Facility contains customary covenants. These agreements, among
other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the
ability of the borrower and its subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness, create liens on assets, make distributions, make
investments, sell, lease or transfer assets, make loans or
advances, pay
147
certain debt, amalgamate, merge, combine or consolidate with
another entity, enter into certain types of restrictive
agreements, engage in any business other than the business
conducted by the borrower and its subsidiaries on the closing
date of the Midfield Revolving Credit Facility, enter into
transactions with affiliates, become a party to certain employee
benefit plans, enter into certain amendments with respect to
subordinated debt, make acquisitions, enter into transactions
which would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect or cause a default, enter into sale and leaseback
transactions, and terminate certain agreements.
Additionally, the Midfield Revolving Credit Facility requires
the borrower to maintain a leverage ratio of no greater than
3.50 to 1.00 (measured on a monthly basis) and to maintain a
fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.15 to 1.00 (measured
on a monthly basis). The facility also prohibits the borrower
and its subsidiaries from making capital expenditures in excess
of $5 million in the aggregate during any fiscal year,
subject to exceptions for certain expenditures and provided that
if the actual amount of capital expenditures made in any fiscal
year is less than the amount permitted to be made in such fiscal
year, up to $250,000 of such excess may be carried forward and
used to make capital expenditures in the succeeding fiscal year.
The Midfield Revolving Credit Facility contains customary events
of default. The events of default include, among others, the
failure to pay interest, principal and other obligations under
the facilitys loan documents when due, a breach of any
representation or warranty contained in the loan documents,
breaches of certain covenants, the failure of any loan document
to remain in full force and effect, a default with respect to
other indebtedness in excess of $250,000 if the other
indebtedness may be accelerated due to such default, judgments
against the borrower and its subsidiaries in excess of $250,000
in the aggregate, the occurrence of any loss or damage with
respect to the collateral if the amount not covered by insurance
exceeds $100,000, cessation or governmental restraint of a
material part of the borrowers or a subsidiarys
business, insolvency, certain events related to benefits plans,
the criminal indictment of a senior officer of the borrower or a
guarantor or the conviction of a senior officer of the borrower
or a guarantor of certain crimes, an amendment to the
shareholders agreement among Midfield Supply ULC, the entity now
known as McJunkin Red Man Canada Ltd. and Midfield Holdings
(Alberta) Ltd. without the prior written consent of Bank of
America, N.A., and any event or condition that has a material
adverse effect on the borrower or a guarantor.
A change of control is also an event of default. A
change of control occurs if (i) McJunkin Red
Man Canada Ltd. ceases to own and control, directly or
indirectly, 51% or more of the voting equity interests of
Midfield Supply ULC, (ii) a change in the majority of
directors of Midfield Supply ULC occurs, unless approved by the
then-majority of directors, or (iii) all or substantially
all of Midfield Supply ULCs assets are sold or transferred.
Midfield CDN$15
Million Facility
One of our subsidiaries, Midfield Supply ULC, is also the
borrower under a CDN$15 million credit facility with
Alberta Treasury Branches. The facility is secured by
substantially all of the real property and equipment of Midfield
Supply ULC and its subsidiary guarantors. The facility contains
customary covenants and events of default. The borrowers
leverage ratio must not exceed 3.50 to 1, its fixed charge
coverage ratio must be at least 1.15 to 1, and its ratio of
tangible asset value to borrowings outstanding must be at least
2.00 to 1.
The Midfield CDN$15 million facility and the Midfield
CDN$150 million facility are subject to an intercreditor
agreement which relates to, among other things, priority of
liens and proceeds of sale of collateral.
148
DESCRIPTION OF
OUR CAPITAL STOCK
Immediately following the completion of this offering, our
authorized capital stock will consist
of shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
and shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, the rights and
preferences of which may be established from time to time by our
board of directors. Upon the completion of this offering, there
will
be
outstanding shares of common stock and no outstanding shares of
preferred stock. The following description of our capital stock
does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified
by our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws, which are included as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part, and by the
provisions of applicable Delaware law.
Common
Stock
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share on all matters voted upon by our stockholders, including
the election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting
rights. Subject to the rights of holders of any then outstanding
shares of our preferred stock, our common stockholders are
entitled to any dividends that may be declared by our board of
directors. Holders of our common stock are entitled to share
ratably in our net assets upon our dissolution or liquidation
after payment or provision for all liabilities and any
preferential liquidation rights of our preferred stock then
outstanding. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive
rights to purchase shares of our stock. The shares of our common
stock are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not
convertible into any other shares of our capital stock. All
outstanding shares of our common stock are fully paid and
nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders
of our common stock will be subject to those of the holders of
any shares of our preferred stock we may issue in the future.
Our common stock will be represented by certificates, unless our
board of directors adopts a resolution providing that some or
all of our common stock shall be uncertificated. Any such
resolution will not apply to any shares of common stock that are
already certificated until such shares are surrendered to us.
Preferred
Stock
Our board of directors may, from time to time, authorize the
issuance of one or more series of preferred stock without
stockholder approval. Subject to the provisions of our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation and limitations
prescribed by law, our board of directors is authorized to adopt
resolutions to issue shares, designate the series, establish the
number of shares, change the number of shares constituting any
series, and provide or change the voting powers, preferences and
relative participating, optional and other special rights, and
any qualifications, limitations or restrictions on shares of our
preferred stock, including dividend rights, terms of redemption,
conversion rights and liquidation preferences, in each case
without any action or vote by our stockholders. We have no
current intention to issue any shares of preferred stock.
One of the effects of undesignated preferred stock may be to
enable our board of directors to discourage an attempt to obtain
control of our company by means of a tender offer, proxy
contest, merger or otherwise. The issuance of preferred stock
may adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders by,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
restricting dividends on the common stock;
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the common stock;
|
|
|
|
impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; or
|
|
|
|
delaying or preventing a change in control without further
action by the stockholders.
|
149
Limitation on
Liability and Indemnification of Officers and
Directors
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation limits the
liability of directors to the fullest extent permitted by
Delaware law. The effect of these provisions is to eliminate the
rights of our company and our stockholders, through
stockholders derivative suits on behalf of our company, to
recover monetary damages against a director for breach of
fiduciary duty as a director, including breaches resulting from
grossly negligent behavior. However, our directors will be
personally liable to us and our stockholders for any breach of
the directors duty of loyalty, for acts or omissions not
in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law, under Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law or for any transaction from which the
director derived an improper personal benefit. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. We may enter into
indemnification agreements with our current directors and
executive officers prior to the completion of this offering. We
also maintain directors and officers insurance.
Corporate
Opportunities
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that the Goldman Sachs Funds have no obligation to offer us any
opportunity to participate in business opportunities presented
to the Goldman Sachs Funds or their affiliates even if the
opportunity is one that we might reasonably have pursued, and
that neither the Goldman Sachs Funds nor their affiliates will
be liable to us or our stockholders for breach of any duty by
reason of any such activities unless, in the case of any person
who is a director or officer of our company, such business
opportunity is expressly offered to such director or officer in
writing solely in his or her capacity as an officer or director
of our company. Stockholders will be deemed to have notice of
and consented to this provision of our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation.
Delaware
Anti-Takeover Law
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that we are not subject to Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which regulates corporate acquisitions.
This law provides that specified persons who, together with
affiliates and associates, own, or within three years did own,
15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a corporation may
not engage in business combinations with the corporation for a
period of three years after the date on which the person became
an interested stockholder. The law defines the term
business combination to include mergers, asset sales
and other transactions in which the interested stockholder
receives or could receive a financial benefit on other than a
pro rata basis with other stockholders.
Removal of
Directors; Vacancies
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
provide that any director or the entire board of directors may
be removed with or without cause by the affirmative vote of the
majority of all shares then entitled to vote at an election of
directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
and bylaws also provide that any vacancies on our board of
directors will be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority
of the board of directors then in office, even if less than a
quorum, or by a sole remaining director.
Voting
The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of our common
stock present, in person or by proxy will decide the election of
any directors, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the
shares of our common stock present, in person or by proxy will
decide all other matters voted on by stockholders, unless the
question is one upon which, by express provision of law, under
our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, or under
our bylaws, a different vote is required, in which case such
provision will control.
150
Amending Our
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that our certificate of incorporation may be amended by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors and by
the affirmative vote of the majority of all shares of our common
stock then entitled to vote at any annual or special meeting of
stockholders. In addition, our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation and bylaws provide that our bylaws may be
amended, repealed or new bylaws may be adopted by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the board of directors or by
the affirmative vote of the majority of all shares of our common
stock then entitled to vote at any annual or special meeting of
stockholders.
Advance Notice
Provisions for Stockholders
In order to nominate directors to our board of directors or
bring other business before an annual meeting of our
stockholders, a stockholders notice must be received by
the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices
of the Company not less than 120 calendar days before the date
that our proxy statement is released to stockholders in
connection with the previous years annual meeting of
stockholders, subject to certain exceptions contained in our
bylaws. If no annual meeting was held in the previous year, or
if the date of the applicable annual meeting has been changed by
more than 30 days from the date of the previous years
annual meeting, then a stockholders notice, in order to be
considered timely, must be received by the Secretary of the
Company no later than the later of the 90th day prior to
such annual meeting or the tenth day following the day on which
notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public
disclosure of such date was made.
Listing
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol MRC.
Transfer Agent
and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock
is .
151
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have
outstanding shares
of common stock.
The shares
sold in this offering plus any additional shares sold by the
selling stockholder upon exercise of the underwriters
option will be freely tradable without restriction under the
Securities Act, unless purchased by our affiliates
as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities
Act. In general, affiliates include executive officers,
directors and our largest stockholders. Shares of common stock
purchased by affiliates will be subject to the resale
limitations of Rule 144.
The
remaining shares
outstanding following this offering are restricted securities
within the meaning of Rule 144. Restricted securities may
be sold in the public market only if registered or if they
qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144
promulgated under the Securities Act, which is summarized below.
Our executive officers and directors and our principal
stockholder, PVF Holdings LLC, will enter into
lock-up
agreements in connection with this offering, generally providing
that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, or grant any
option to purchase or otherwise dispose of our common stock or
any securities exercisable for or convertible into our common
stock owned by them for a period of 180 days after the date
of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Goldman,
Sachs & Co.
Despite possible earlier eligibility for sale under the
provisions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act, any shares
subject to the
lock-up
agreement will not be salable until the
lock-up
agreement expires or is waived by Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Taking into account the
lock-up
agreement, and assuming that PVF Holdings LLC is not released
from its
lock-up
agreement, the shares held by
our affiliates will be eligible for future sale in accordance
with the requirements of Rule 144 upon the expiration of
the lock-up
agreement.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, after
the expiration of
lock-up
agreements, a person who has beneficially owned restricted
securities for at least six months would be entitled to sell
within any three month period a number of shares that does not
exceed the greater of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
one percent of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding, which will equal
approximately shares
immediately after this offering; or
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by affiliates are also subject to
manner-of-sale requirements, notice requirements and the
availability of current public information about us.
PVF Holdings LLC, which will
hold shares
of our common stock upon the completion of this offering if the
underwriters option to purchase additional shares from PVF
Holdings LLC is not exercised
( shares
of our common stock upon completion of this offering if the
underwriters option is exercised in full), will enter into
a new registration rights agreement with us prior to the
consummation of this offering. Pursuant to this registration
rights agreement, PVF Holdings LLC can request that we use our
reasonable best efforts to register its shares with the SEC,
including in connection with this offering, on up to six
occasions, including pursuant to shelf registration statements.
In addition, under the registration rights agreement PVF
Holdings LLC will have the ability to exercise certain piggyback
registration rights with respect to its own securities if we
elect to register any of our equity securities. Immediately
after this offering, all of our shares held by PVF Holdings LLC
will be entitled to these registration rights.
The registration rights agreement will also provide that if PVF
Holdings LLC is dissolved, an amended and restated registration
rights agreement will become automatically effective and the
existing agreement will terminate. Pursuant to the terms of such
amended and restated registration rights agreement, the existing
members of PVF Holdings LLC would thereunder be entitled to
certain registration rights with respect to our shares which are
distributed to them in connection with any such dissolution of
PVF Holdings LLC.
152
CERTAIN U.S.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR
NON-U.S.
HOLDERS
The following is a general discussion of the material
U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of our common stock by a
non-U.S. holder.
This discussion is for general information only and is not tax
advice. For purposes of this discussion, the term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States
or a former citizen or resident of the United States subject to
taxation as an expatriate;
|
|
|
|
a corporation (or other entity classified as a corporation for
these purposes) created or organized in, or under the laws of,
the United States or any political subdivision of the United
States;
|
|
|
|
a partnership (including any entity or arrangement classified as
a partnership for these purposes);
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is includible in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its
source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust, if (1) a United States court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more United States persons (within the meaning of
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the
Code) has the authority to control all of the trusts
substantial decisions, or (2) the trust has a valid
election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations to be treated as a United States person.
|
An individual may be treated as a resident of the United States
in any calendar year for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
instead of as a nonresident, by, among other ways, being present
in the United States on at least 31 days in that calendar
year and for an aggregate of at least 183 days during a
three-year period ending in the current calendar year. For
purposes of this calculation, an individual would count all of
the days present in the current year, one-third of the days
present in the immediately preceding year and one-sixth of the
days present in the second preceding year. Residents are taxed
for U.S. federal income purposes as if they were
U.S. citizens.
If a partnership (or other entity taxable as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) owns our common stock,
the tax treatment of a partner of the partnership may depend
upon the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership and upon certain determinations made at the partner
level. Partners in partnerships that own our common stock should
consult their own tax advisors as to the particular
U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences applicable
to them.
This discussion does not address all of the aspects of
U.S. federal income and estate taxation that may be
relevant to a
non-U.S. holder
in light of the
non-U.S. holders
particular investment or other circumstances. In particular,
this discussion only addresses a
non-U.S. holder
that holds our common stock as a capital asset (generally,
investment property) and does not address:
|
|
|
|
|
special U.S. federal income tax rules that may apply to
particular
non-U.S. holders,
such as financial institutions, insurance companies, tax-exempt
organizations, and dealers and traders in stocks, securities or
currencies;
|
|
|
|
non-U.S. holders
holding our common stock as part of a conversion, constructive
sale, wash sale or other integrated transaction or a hedge,
straddle or synthetic security;
|
|
|
|
any U.S. state and local or
non-U.S. or
other tax consequences; or
|
|
|
|
the U.S. federal income or estate tax consequences for the
beneficial owners of a
non-U.S. holder.
|
This discussion is based on provisions of the Code, applicable
U.S. Treasury regulations and administrative and judicial
interpretations, all as in effect or in existence on the date of
this prospectus.
153
Subsequent developments in U.S. federal income or estate
tax law, including changes in law or differing interpretations,
which may be applied retroactively, could have a material effect
on the U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of
owning and disposing of our common stock as set forth in this
discussion.
If you are considering purchasing our common stock, you
should consult your tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal,
state, local and
non-U.S. income,
estate and other tax consequences to you of owning and disposing
of our common stock.
Dividends
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. See Dividend
Policy. In the event, however, that we pay dividends on
our common stock that are not effectively connected with a
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States, a
U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of 30%, or a lower
rate under an applicable income tax treaty, will be withheld
from the gross amount of the dividends paid to such
non-U.S. holder.
In order to claim the benefit of an applicable income tax
treaty, a
non-U.S. holder
will be required to provide a properly completed and executed
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
(or other applicable form) in accordance with the applicable
certification and disclosure requirements. Special rules apply
to partnerships and other pass-through entities and these
certification and disclosure requirements also may apply to
beneficial owners of partnerships and other pass-through
entities that hold our common stock. A
non-U.S. holder
that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal
withholding tax under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund
or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an
appropriate claim for a refund with the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding their
entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty and
the manner of claiming the benefits.
Dividends that are effectively connected with a
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States and, if
required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to
a permanent establishment maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States, generally will be taxed on a net income
basis at the regular graduated rates and in the manner
applicable to United States persons. In that case, the
U.S. federal withholding tax discussed above will not apply
if the
non-U.S. holder
provides a properly completed and executed U.S. Internal
Revenue Service
Form W-8ECI
(or other applicable form) in accordance with the applicable
certification and disclosure requirements. In addition, a
branch profits tax may be imposed at a 30% rate, or
a lower rate under an applicable income tax treaty, on dividends
received by a foreign corporation that are effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.
Gain on
disposition of our common stock
A non-U.S.
holder generally will not be taxed on any gain realized on a
disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States and, if
required by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to
a permanent establishment maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States; in these cases, the gain generally will be
taxed on a net income basis at the regular graduated rates and
in the manner applicable to United States persons (unless an
applicable income tax treaty provides otherwise) and, if the
non-U.S. holder
is a foreign corporation, the branch profits tax
described above may also apply;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who holds our common stock as a capital asset,
is present in the United States for at least 183 days in
the taxable year of the disposition and meets other requirements
(in which case, except as otherwise provided by an applicable
income tax treaty, the gain, which may be offset by
U.S. source capital losses, generally will be subject to a
flat
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
30% U.S. federal income tax, even though the
non-U.S. holder
is not considered a resident alien under the Code); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
we are or have been a U.S. real property holding
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes at
any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on
the date of disposition or the period that the
non-U.S. holder
held our common stock.
|
Generally, a corporation is a U.S. real property
holding corporation if the fair market value of its
U.S. real property interests equals or exceeds
50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real
property interests plus its other assets used or held for use in
a trade or business. The tax relating to stock in a
U.S. real property holding corporation generally will not
apply to a
non-U.S. holder
whose holdings, direct and indirect, at all times during the
applicable period, constituted 5% or less of our common stock,
provided that our common stock was regularly traded on an
established securities market. We believe that we are not
currently, and we do not anticipate becoming in the future, a
U.S. real property holding corporation.
Federal estate
tax
Our common stock that is owned or treated as owned by an
individual who is not a U.S. citizen or resident of the
United States (as specially defined for U.S. federal estate
tax purposes) at the time of death will be included in the
individuals gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax
purposes, unless an applicable estate tax or other treaty
provides otherwise and, therefore, may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax.
Information
reporting and backup withholding tax
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
may be subject to U.S. information reporting and backup
withholding. A
non-U.S. holder
will be exempt from backup withholding if the
non-U.S. holder
provides a properly completed and executed U.S. Internal
Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
or otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for
establishing its status as a
non-U.S. holder
or otherwise establishes an exemption.
The gross proceeds from the disposition of our common stock may
be subject to U.S. information reporting and backup
withholding. If a
non-U.S. holder
sells our common stock outside the United States through a
non-U.S. office
of a
non-U.S. broker
and the sales proceeds are paid to the
non-U.S. holder
outside the United States, then the U.S. backup withholding
and information reporting requirements generally will not apply
to that payment. However, U.S. information reporting, but
not U.S. backup withholding, will apply to a payment of
sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United
States, if a
non-U.S. holder
sells our common stock through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker that:
|
|
|
|
|
is a United States person;
|
|
|
|
derives 50% or more of its gross income in specific periods from
the conduct of a trade or business in the United States;
|
|
|
|
is a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes; or
|
|
|
|
is a foreign partnership, if at any time during its tax year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
one or more of its partners are United States persons who in the
aggregate hold more than 50% of the income or capital interests
in the partnership; or
|
|
|
|
the foreign partnership is engaged in a United States trade or
business,
|
unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the
non-U.S. holder
is not a United States person and certain other conditions are
met or the
non-U.S. holder
otherwise establishes an exemption.
155
If a
non-U.S. holder
receives payments of the proceeds of a sale of our common stock
from or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment is
subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information
reporting unless the
non-U.S. holder
provides a properly completed and executed U.S. Internal
Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
certifying that the
non-U.S. Holder
is not a United States person or the
non-U.S. holder
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. A
non-U.S. holder
generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the
backup withholding rules that exceed the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, by filing a
refund claim with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME AND ESTATE TAX DISCUSSION SET
FORTH ABOVE IS INCLUDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY.
YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR TO DETERMINE THE
U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND
NON-U.S. TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO YOU OF OWNING AND DISPOSING OF OUR COMMON
STOCK.
156
UNDERWRITING
The Company, the selling stockholder and the underwriters will
enter into an underwriting agreement with respect to the shares
being offered. Subject to certain conditions, each underwriter
has severally agreed to purchase the number of shares indicated
in the following table. Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
Lehman Brothers Inc. are the representatives of the underwriters
and the joint book-running managers for this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Stephens Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are committed to take and pay for all of the
shares being offered, if any are taken, other than the shares
covered by the option described below unless and until this
option is exercised. We expect that the underwriting agreement
will provide that the obligations of the underwriters to take
and pay for the shares are subject to a number of conditions,
including, among others, the accuracy of the Companys and
the selling stockholders representations and warranties in
the underwriting agreement, listing of the shares, receipt of
specified letters from counsel and the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm, and receipt of
specified officers certificates.
If the underwriters sell more shares than the total number set
forth in the table above, the underwriters have an option to buy
up to an
additional shares
from the selling stockholder. They may exercise that option for
30 days. If any shares are purchased pursuant to this
option, the underwriters will severally purchase shares in
approximately the same proportion as set forth in the table
above.
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting
discounts and commissions to be paid to the underwriters by the
selling stockholder. These amounts are shown assuming both no
exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase
additional shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be
offered at the initial public offering price set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus. Any shares sold by the
underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of
up to $ per share from the initial
public offering price. If all the shares are not sold at the
initial public offering price, the representatives may change
the offering price and the other selling terms. The offering of
the shares by the underwriters is subject to receipt and
acceptance and subject to the underwriters right to reject
any order in whole or in part.
The Company, its executive officers and directors and the
selling stockholder have agreed with the underwriters, subject
to certain exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of their
common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for
shares of common stock during the period from the date of this
prospectus continuing through the date 180 days after the
date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent
of the representatives. This agreement does not apply to any
existing employee benefit plans. See Shares Eligible for
Future Sale for a description of certain transfer
restrictions.
157
The 180-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
automatically extended if: (1) during the last 17 days
of the
180-day
restricted period the Company issues an earnings release or
announces material news or a material event; or (2) prior
to the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, the Company announces that it will release
earnings results during the
15-day
period following the last day of the
180-day
period, in which case the restrictions described in the
preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration
of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
announcement of the material news or material event.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
common stock. The initial public offering price will be
negotiated among the Company, the selling stockholder and the
representatives. The factors to be considered in determining the
initial public offering price of the shares include:
|
|
|
|
|
the history and prospects for our industry;
|
|
|
|
our historical performance, including our net sales, net income,
margins and certain other financial information;
|
|
|
|
estimates of our business potential and earnings prospects;
|
|
|
|
an assessment of our management;
|
|
|
|
investor demand for our shares of common stock;
|
|
|
|
market valuations of companies that we and the representatives
believe to be comparable; and
|
|
|
|
prevailing securities markets at the time of this offering.
|
We intend to apply to list our common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol MRC. In order to
meet the requirements for listing the common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange, the underwriters have undertaken to sell
lots of 100 or more shares to a minimum of 2,000 beneficial
holders.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may purchase
and sell shares of the common stock in the open market. These
transactions may include short sales, stabilizing transactions
and purchases to cover positions created by short sales. Short
sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number
of shares than they are required to purchase in this offering.
Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not
greater than the underwriters option to purchase
additional shares from the selling stockholder in this offering.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by
either exercising their option to purchase additional shares or
purchasing shares in the open market. In determining the source
of shares to close out the covered short position, the
underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of
shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to
the price at which they may purchase additional shares pursuant
to the option granted to them. Naked short sales are
any sales in excess of that option. The underwriters must close
out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward
pressure on the price of the shares of common stock in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in this offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of
various bids for or purchases of shares of common stock made by
the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of
this offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the
account of that underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
Purchases to cover a short position and stabilizing transactions
may have the effect of preventing or retarding a decline in the
market price of the shares of common stock and, together with
the imposition of the penalty bid, may stabilize, maintain or
otherwise affect the market price of the shares of common stock.
As a result, the price of the shares of common stock may be
higher than the price
158
that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these
activities are commenced, they may be discontinued at any time.
These transactions may be effected on the New York Stock
Exchange, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Each underwriter has represented and agreed that:
(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the FSMA) received by
it in connection with the sale of the shares in circumstances in
which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply to the
Company; and
(b) it has complied and will comply with all applicable
provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in
relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the
United Kingdom.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a Relevant
Member State), each underwriter has represented and agreed that
with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus
Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State (the
Relevant Implementation Date) it has not made and will not make
an offer of shares to the public in that Relevant Member State
prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to the
shares which has been approved by the competent authority in
that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in
another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent
authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with
the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from
and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of
shares to the public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
(a) to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43 million and (3) an annual net turnover of
more than 50 million, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts;
(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than
qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive)
subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives
for any such offer; or
(d) in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by the Company of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of shares to the public in relation to any
shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms
of the offer and the shares to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares, as the
same may be varied in that Relevant Member State by any measure
implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Relevant Member
State and the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive
2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing measure in
each Relevant Member State.
The shares may not be offered or sold by means of any document
other than (i) in circumstances which do not constitute an
offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap. 32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (ii) to
professional investors within the meaning of the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong)
and any rules made thereunder, or (iii) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus within the meaning of the Companies
Ordinance (Cap. 32, Laws of Hong Kong), and no advertisement,
invitation or document relating to the shares may be issued or
may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue
(in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere), which is
directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed
or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to
159
do so under the laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to
shares which are or are intended to be disposed of only to
persons outside Hong Kong or only to professional
investors within the meaning of the Securities and Futures
Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made
thereunder.
This prospectus has not been registered as a prospectus with the
Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus
and any other document or material in connection with the offer
or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of the
shares may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares
be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for
subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to
persons in Singapore other than (1) to an institutional
investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures
Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore, or the SFA, (2) to a
relevant person, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A),
and in accordance with the conditions, specified in
Section 275 of the SFA or (3) otherwise pursuant to,
and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable
provision of the SFA.
Where the shares are subscribed or purchased under
Section 275 by a relevant person which is: (a) a
corporation (which is not an accredited investor) the sole
business of which is to hold investments and the entire share
capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of
whom is an accredited investor; or (b) a trust (where the
trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to
hold investments and each beneficiary is an accredited investor,
shares, debentures and units of shares and debentures of that
corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest in
that trust shall not be transferable for 6 months after
that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under
Section 275 except: (1) to an institutional investor
under Section 274 of the SFA or to a relevant person, or
any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance
with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA;
(2) where no consideration is given for the transfer; or
(3) by operation of law.
The securities have not been and will not be registered under
the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan (the Securities
and Exchange Law) and each underwriter has agreed that it
will not offer or sell any securities, directly or indirectly,
in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan
(which term as used herein means any person resident in Japan,
including any corporation or other entity organized under the
laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly
or indirectly, in Japan or to a resident of Japan, except
pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of,
and otherwise in compliance with, the Securities and Exchange
Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial
guidelines of Japan.
The shares may not be offered, sold and delivered directly or
indirectly, or offered or sold to any person for reoffering or
resale, directly or indirectly, in Korea or to any resident of
Korea except pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations of
Korea, including the Korea Securities and Exchange Act and the
Foreign Exchange Transaction Law and the decrees and regulations
thereunder. The shares have not been registered with the
Financial Services Commission of Korea for public offering in
Korea. Furthermore, the shares may not be resold to Korean
residents unless the purchaser of the shares complies with all
applicable regulatory requirements (including but not limited to
government approval requirements under the Foreign Exchange
Transaction Law and its subordinate decrees and regulations) in
connection with the purchase of the shares.
This prospectus has not been and will not be registered as a
prospectus with the Registrar of Companies in India or with the
Securities and Exchange Board of India. This prospectus or any
other material relating to these securities is for information
purposes only and may not be circulated or distributed, directly
or indirectly, to the public or any members of the public in
India and in any event to not more than 50 persons in
India. Further, persons into whose possession this prospectus
comes are required to inform themselves about and to observe any
such restrictions. Each prospective investor is advised to
consult its advisors about the particular consequences to it of
an investment in these securities. Each prospective investor is
also advised that any investment in these securities by it is
160
subject to the regulations prescribed by the Reserve Bank of
India and the Foreign Exchange Management Act and any
regulations framed thereunder.
No prospectus or other disclosure document (as defined in the
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) of Australia (Corporations
Act)) in relation to the shares has been or will be lodged
with the Australian Securities & Investments
Commission (ASIC). This document has not been lodged
with ASIC and is only directed to certain categories of exempt
persons. Accordingly, if you receive this document in Australia:
(a) you confirm and warrant that you are either:
(i) a sophisticated investor under
section 708(8)(a) or (b) of the Corporations Act;
(ii) a sophisticated investor under
section 708(8)(c) or (d) of the Corporations Act and
that you have provided an accountants certificate to us
which complies with the requirements of section 708(8)(c)(i) or
(ii) of the Corporations Act and related regulations before
the offer has been made;
(ii) a person associated with the company under
section 708(12) of the Corporations Act; or
(iv) a professional investor within the meaning
of section 708(11)(a) or (b) of the Corporations Act,
and to the extent that you are unable to confirm or warrant that
you are an exempt sophisticated investor, associated person or
professional investor under the Corporations Act any offer made
to you under this document is void and incapable of acceptance;
and
(b) you warrant and agree that you will not offer any of
the shares for resale in Australia within 12 months of
those shares being issued unless any such resale offer is exempt
from the requirement to issue a disclosure document under
section 708 of the Corporations Act.
The underwriters do not expect sales to discretionary accounts
to exceed five percent of the total number of shares offered.
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend to
confirm sales to discretionary accounts without the prior
specific written approval of the customer.
The Company and the selling stockholder estimate that their
share of the total expenses of this offering will be
approximately
$ .
The Company and the selling stockholder have agreed to indemnify
the several underwriters against specified liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. own more than 10%
of the Companys outstanding common stock. As a result,
Goldman, Sachs & Co. is deemed to be an affiliate of
the Company under Rule 2720(b)(1) of the NASD Conduct Rules
and is deemed to have a conflict of interest under
Rule 2720 of such Rules. PVF Holdings LLC, the selling
stockholder in this offering, will receive the net proceeds of
this offering. Affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. own
a majority interest in PVF Holdings LLC, which owns a majority
of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly, such affiliates
will receive approximately % of the
proceeds from this offering. This offering will be made in
compliance with the applicable provisions of Rule 2720 of
the NASD Conduct Rules as required by such Rules. Rule 2720
requires that the initial public offering price be no higher
than that recommended by a qualified independent
underwriter, as defined by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Lehman Brothers Inc.
is serving as a qualified independent underwriter and will
assume the customary responsibilities of acting as a qualified
independent underwriter in pricing the offering and conducting
due diligence. We have agreed to indemnify Lehman Brothers Inc
against any liabilities arising in connection with its role as a
qualified independent underwriter, including liabilities under
the Securities Act.
161
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates
have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future
perform, various financial advisory, investment banking,
commercial banking and other services for the company, for which
they received or will receive customary fees and expenses.
Furthermore, certain of the underwriters and their respective
affiliates may, from time to time, enter into arms-length
transactions with us in the ordinary course of their business.
Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. is a co-lead arranger and
joint bookrunner under our Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan
Facility and Junior Term Loan Facility. Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P. is also the syndication agent under the Term Loan
Facility and the Junior Term Loan Facility. For a description of
other transactions between us and Goldman Sachs & Co.
and its affiliates, including payments of dividends and payments
under our credit facilities by us to such affiliates, see
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.
Lehman Brothers Inc. is a co-lead arranger and joint bookrunner
under our Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan Facility, and
Junior Term Loan Facility. Lehman Brothers Inc. is also the
syndication agent under the Term Loan Facility. Lehman
Commercial Paper Inc., an affiliate of Lehman Brothers Inc., is
an administrative agent and collateral agent under the Term Loan
Facility and the Junior Term Loan Facility.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., an affiliate of J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., is a lender under the Revolving Credit Facility
and is also a co-documentation agent and reference lender under
that facility. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is also a reference
lender under the Term Loan Facility and the Junior Term Loan
Facility, and is a lender under the Midfield Revolving Credit
Facility.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters
and/or
selling group members participating in this offering, or by
their affiliates. In those cases, prospective investors may view
offering terms online and, depending upon the particular
underwriter or selling group member, prospective investors may
be allowed to place orders online. The underwriters may agree
with us to allocate a specific number of shares for sale to
online brokerage account holders. Any such allocation for online
distributions will be made by the representatives on the same
basis as other allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriters or selling group members web
site and any information contained in any other web site
maintained by an underwriter or selling group member is not part
of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, has not been approved
and/or
endorsed by us or any underwriter or selling group member in its
capacity as underwriter or selling group member and should not
be relied upon by investors.
If you purchase shares of common stock offered in this
prospectus, you may be required to pay stamp taxes and other
charges under the laws and practices of the country of purchase,
in addition to the offering price listed on the cover page of
this prospectus.
162
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for our company by Fried, Frank,
Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York, New York.
Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, New York is acting as
counsel to the underwriters.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2007, and for the period from inception (January 31, 2007)
to December 31, 2007, and those of McJunkin Corporation and
subsidiaries predecessor to McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation
for the period from January 1, 2007 to January 30,
2007, appearing in this Prospectus and Registration Statement
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report
thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance
upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts
in accounting and auditing.
Schneider Downs & Co., Inc., independent registered
public accounting firm, has audited the financial statements of
McJunkin Corporation at December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2006 and for the years ended December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2006, as set forth in their report.
We have included these financial statements in the prospectus
and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on the
report of Schneider Downs & Co., Inc., given on their
authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Red Man Pipe and Supply
Company at October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006 and
for each of the three years in the period ended October 31,
2007, included in this Prospectus have been so included in
reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
On June 1, 2007, the Company engaged Ernst &
Young, LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The auditor of
our predecessor, McJunkin Corporation, was Schneider
Downs & Co., Inc. through December 31, 2006. The
reports of Schneider Downs & Co., Inc. on our
predecessors financial statements for the past two fiscal
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 did not contain an
adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or
accounting principles. In connection with the audits of our
predecessors financial statements for each of the two
fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and in the subsequent
interim period through the date of appointment of
Ernst & Young, LLP, there were no disagreements with
Schneider Downs & Co., Inc. on any matters of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope and procedures which, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of Schneider Downs & Co.,
Inc. would have caused Schneider Downs & Co., to make
reference to the matter in their report. The Company has
requested Schneider Downs & Co., to furnish it a
letter addressed to the Commission stating whether it agrees
with the above statements. A copy of that letter, dated
August 18, 2008, is filed as Exhibit 16 to this
Form S-1.
WHERE YOU CAN
FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock. This
prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the
registration statement. For further information with respect to
us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration
statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as a part of the
registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus
concerning the contents of any contract or any other document
are not necessarily
163
complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit
to the registration statement, we refer you to the copy of the
contract or document that has been filed as an exhibit and
reference thereto is qualified in all respects by the terms of
the filed exhibit.
The registration statement, including exhibits and schedules,
may be inspected without charge at the Public Reference Room of
the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549, and copies of all or any part of it may be obtained from
that office after payment of fees prescribed by the SEC.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be
obtained by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding
registrants that file electronically with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
164
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of McJunkin Corporation and
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
F-65
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of Red Man Pipe &
Supply Co. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
|
|
|
|
|
F-70
|
|
|
|
|
F-71
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
|
|
|
|
|
F-74
|
|
F-1
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of McJunkin Red Man Corporation and subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity,
and cash flows for the period from inception (January 31,
2007) to December 31, 2007. We have also audited the
accompanying consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity and cash flows of McJunkin Corporation
and subsidiaries (McJunkin) predecessor to the Company for the
period from January 1, 2007 to January 30, 2007. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The
financial statements of McJunkin as of December 31, 2006,
and for each of the two years in the period then ended were
audited by other auditors whose report dated January 13,
2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2007, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for the period
from inception (January 31, 2007) to December 31,
2007, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows
of McJunkin Corporation and Subsidiaries, predecessor to the
Company for the period from January 1, 2007 to
January 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
Charleston, West Virginia
August 15, 2008
F-2
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
Receivables, less allowances of $6,352 and $2,015
|
|
|
481,463
|
|
|
|
|
168,877
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
666,188
|
|
|
|
|
225,304
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,159,663
|
|
|
|
|
401,051
|
|
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
|
40,985
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
23,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable and other assets
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,946
|
|
|
|
|
43,980
|
|
FIXED ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
80,120
|
|
|
|
|
27,208
|
|
PROPERTY HELD UNDER CAPITAL LEASES
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,092,379
|
|
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
523,998
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,616,377
|
|
|
|
|
6,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,925,031
|
|
|
|
$
|
480,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
306,509
|
|
|
|
$
|
130,864
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
70,778
|
|
|
|
|
46,471
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
11,996
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
6,552
|
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
80,364
|
|
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
Term loans due on demand
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
496,169
|
|
|
|
|
188,715
|
|
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
848,616
|
|
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
Payable to shareholders
|
|
|
49,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
215,487
|
|
|
|
|
15,627
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
|
|
|
3,635
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118,128
|
|
|
|
|
34,096
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST AND AMOUNTS DUE TO FORMER RED MAN SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
100,700
|
|
|
|
|
15,601
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 authorized 1,000,000;
issued and outstanding 299,891.4604 in 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, Class A voting, par value $700
authorized 37,860; issued and outstanding 16,940 in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
Common stock, Class B nonvoting, par value $700
authorized 5,000; issued and outstanding 570 in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,154,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
56,926
|
|
|
|
|
206,044
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of deferred income taxes
of $162 and $14,759
|
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,210,034
|
|
|
|
|
242,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,925,031
|
|
|
|
$
|
480,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
SALES
|
|
$
|
2,124,919
|
|
|
|
$
|
142,549
|
|
|
$
|
1,713,679
|
|
|
$
|
1,445,770
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,734,558
|
|
|
|
|
114,562
|
|
|
|
1,394,294
|
|
|
|
1,177,091
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
201,948
|
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
|
|
173,948
|
|
|
|
155,717
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
10,489
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
13,167
|
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
|
|
13,144
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
1,968,552
|
|
|
|
|
130,852
|
|
|
|
1,587,519
|
|
|
|
1,350,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
156,367
|
|
|
|
|
11,697
|
|
|
|
126,160
|
|
|
|
95,738
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(61,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(2,845
|
)
|
|
|
(2,707
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
|
(2,774
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(1,259
|
)
|
|
|
(1,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,882
|
)
|
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
(8,246
|
)
|
|
|
(6,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
93,485
|
|
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
117,914
|
|
|
|
89,124
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
36,559
|
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
48,340
|
|
|
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
56,926
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
|
$
|
69,574
|
|
|
$
|
52,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
410.64
|
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
|
$
|
3,973.39
|
|
|
$
|
3,000.63
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
409.84
|
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
|
$
|
3,973.39
|
|
|
$
|
3,000.63
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREDECESSOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
11,858
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,592
|
|
|
$
|
8,469
|
|
|
$
|
132,318
|
|
Net income for the year 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,541
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale net
of deferred taxes of $7,153 and reclassification adjustments for
gains included in net income of $585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,421
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Class A, $1,490 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,242
|
)
|
On Class B, $2,980 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,192
|
|
|
|
19,349
|
|
|
|
168,798
|
|
Net income for the year 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,574
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale net
of deferred taxes of $3,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,511
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Class A, $40 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
On Class B, $80 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,044
|
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
242,587
|
|
Net income for month ended January 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,596
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale net
of deferred taxes of $2,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,958
|
)
|
|
|
(3,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
11,858
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
212,640
|
|
|
$
|
20,328
|
|
|
$
|
245,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUCCESSOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for eleven months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
56,926
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,926
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
|
|
(791
|
)
|
Derivative valuation adjustment (net of $162 of deferred taxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,886
|
|
Equity contribution to acquire controlling interest and
recognize new basis of accounting arising from change of
controlling interest of predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,125
|
|
Carryover basis adjustment for continuing shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,605
|
)
|
Equity contribution associated with acquisition of Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,136
|
|
Equity contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674,537
|
|
Issuance of stock subscription receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,154,148
|
|
|
$
|
56,926
|
|
|
$
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,210,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
56,926
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
|
$
|
69,574
|
|
|
$
|
52,541
|
|
Noncash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
(4,905
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
10,489
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Increase in fair market value of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
Provision for losses on receivables
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Reduction of inventory loss provision
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Non-operating gains and other items not providing cash
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Operations Before Working Capital Changes
|
|
|
83,801
|
|
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
|
|
81,314
|
|
|
|
52,847
|
|
Working Capital Changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
46,974
|
|
|
|
|
(1,363
|
)
|
|
|
(5,516
|
)
|
|
|
(53,444
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
27,821
|
|
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
|
(35,835
|
)
|
|
|
(36,386
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
|
|
(6,016
|
)
|
|
|
6,823
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(35,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7,665
|
)
|
|
|
(14,432
|
)
|
|
|
47,694
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(19,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
12,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,425
|
|
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
(62,962
|
)
|
|
|
(22,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS
|
|
|
110,226
|
|
|
|
|
6,617
|
|
|
|
18,352
|
|
|
|
30,385
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(5,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(5,314
|
)
|
|
|
(8,680
|
)
|
Proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
Acquisition of controlling interest in McJunkin by GSCP
|
|
|
(849,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of
Midway-Tristate
Corporation
|
|
|
(83,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co., net of cash
acquired of $13,866
|
|
|
(852,422
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment and notes receivable transactions
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(1,788,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(6,701
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term obligations
|
|
|
897,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term obligations
|
|
|
(78,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,319
|
)
|
Cash equity contribution in conjunction with acquisition of
controlling interest in McJunkin by GSCP
|
|
|
225,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equity contributions
|
|
|
673,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs paid
|
|
|
(30,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,938
|
)
|
|
|
(9,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
1,687,188
|
|
|
|
|
(8,254
|
)
|
|
|
(17,207
|
)
|
|
|
(21,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
8,494
|
|
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
(2,117
|
)
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash beginning of period
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
|
3,748
|
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
|
$
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
|
|
NOTE 1
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Business Operations: McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation (the Company) is a holding company
co-headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia and Tulsa,
Oklahoma. Holding is a substantially owned subsidiary of PVF
Holdings LLC. The Companys wholly owned subsidiary,
McJunkin Red Man Corporation and its subsidiaries (MRM) are
national distributors of pipe, valves, and fittings, with
locations in principal industrial, hydrocarbon producing and
refining areas throughout the United States and Canada. Major
customers represent the natural gas producing, petroleum
refining, chemical and other segments of the raw materials
processing and construction industries. Products are obtained
from a broad range of suppliers.
The Company operates as a single reportable segment, which
represents the Companys business of providing industrial
pipe valves and fittings to various customers through our
distribution operations located throughout North America. The
Company has operations in eight geographic regions, which have
similar economic characteristics, and similar products and
services, types or classes of customers, distribution methods
and similar regulatory environments in each location. The total
consolidated net sales outside of the United States were 4.49%
for the eleven months ended December 31, 2007, 0.8% for the
one month ended January 30, 2007 and 0.8% and 1.0% for the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
percentage of total consolidated assets outside of the United
States as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was 11.0% and 0.7%,
respectively.
Basis of Presentation: PVF Holdings
LLC, (formerly known as McJ Holding LLC) was formed on
November 20, 2006 by affiliates of the Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. (the Goldman Sachs Funds) and a control group of certain
shareholders of McJunkin Corporation (McJunkin) for the purpose
of acquiring McJunkin on January 31, 2007. In connection
with the acquisition by the Goldman Sachs Funds of a controlling
interest in McJunkin, a new basis of accounting and reporting
was established that reflected the Goldman Sachs Funds
cost of the acquisition. This new accounting basis has been
pushed down to the Companys accounts and is reflected in
the Companys consolidated balance sheet (successor basis)
at December 31, 2007.
Because PVF Holdings LLC and the Company had no operations,
assets, or business prior to their acquisition of McJunkin,
McJunkin is the predecessor of MRM, the Company, and PVF
Holdings LLC. While these statements have been prepared to
present the financial position and results of operations for the
Company, such financial position and results would not be
significantly different if reported at either the PVF Holdings
LLC or the MRM levels of consolidation.
All references to the Predecessor relate to McJunkin
for periods prior to January 31, 2007. All references to
the Successor relate to the Company for periods
subsequent to January 31, 2007. As a result, the
consolidated income statements and statements of cash flows for
the eleven-month period ended December 31, 2007 consist of
the earnings and cash flows of the Company. The consolidated
income statements and statements of cash flows of the Company
for the month ended January 30, 2007 and for the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, are presented as
Predecessor financial statements for comparison purposes.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and its wholly
owned and majority owned subsidiaries. The residual ownership in
the equity and income of Midfield Supply ULC (Midfield), a 51%
owned, Canada-based
F-7
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
subsidiary, is reflected as minority interest. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Cash Equivalents: The Company considers
all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or
less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Financial Instruments: In the normal
course of business, the Company invests in various financial
assets and incurs various financial liabilities. Financial
instruments that potentially could subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade
accounts and notes receivable and an interest rate swap
agreement. The Companys financial assets and liabilities
are generally recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at
historical cost, which approximates fair value. Specific
treatment of certain financial instruments is discussed below.
Investments: Investments are carried at
fair market value based on quoted market prices. Prior to the
acquisition by the Goldman Sachs Funds on January 31, 2007,
these available for sale investments were recorded at fair value
and reflected as investments on the balance sheets. Changes to
the fair value of the assets were recorded in other
comprehensive income, net of related deferred taxes. On
January 31, 2007, these investments were reclassified as
assets held for sale as more fully described in Assets Held for
Sale below.
Short-Term and Long-Term
Borrowings: Borrowings under the credit
facilities have variable rates that reflect currently available
terms and conditions for similar debt. The carrying amount of
this debt is a reasonable estimate of its fair value.
Leases: Management estimated the fair
value of the Companys lease obligations using discounted
cash flow analysis based on the Companys current lease
rates for similar leases, and determined that the fair value is
not materially different from carrying values.
Derivatives: The Company utilizes
interest rate swaps to reduce its exposure to potential interest
rate increases. Changes in fair values of derivative instruments
were based upon independent market quotes.
Assets Held for Sale: Certain of the
Companys assets, consisting principally of certain
available for sale securities and certain real estate holdings,
were designated as non-core assets under the terms of the
acquisition by the Goldman Sachs Funds . The Company has
classified these as assets held for sale in the balance sheet. A
corresponding liability to predecessor shareholders has been
recognized to reflect the obligation to the shareholders of
record at the date of the acquisition. Upon the sale of these
assets, the proceeds net of associated taxes will be distributed
to the predecessor shareholders. No gain or loss will be
recognized as the result of the sale of these assets.
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts: Managements evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for losses on receivables is based
upon periodic evaluation of accounts that may have a higher
credit risk using information available about the customer and
other relevant data. This formal analysis is inherently
subjective and requires management to make significant estimates
of factors affecting doubtful accounts, including customer
specific information, current economic conditions, volume,
growth and composition of the account, and other factors such as
financial statements, news reports and published credit ratings.
The amount of the allowance for the remainder of the trade
balance is not evaluated individually but is based upon
historical loss experience. Because this process is subjective
and based on estimates, ultimate losses may differ from those
estimates. Receivable balances are written off when we determine
that the balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if
any, are credited to the allowance when received. Activity in
the allowance for doubtful accounts is set forth in the table
below.
F-8
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
2,059.6
|
|
|
$
|
4,450.2
|
|
|
$
|
157.6
|
|
|
$
|
6,352.2
|
|
One month ended January 30, 2007
|
|
|
2,015.0
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
2,059.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,743.3
|
|
|
|
414.0
|
|
|
|
142.3
|
|
|
|
2,015.0
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,722.0
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
68.7
|
|
|
|
1,743.3
|
|
Concentration of Credit Risk: Most of
the Companys business activity is with customers in the
chemical, petroleum, refining and other segments of the raw
materials processing industry. In the normal course of business
the Company grants credit to these customers in the form of
trade accounts receivable. These receivables could potentially
subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk; however,
the Company minimizes such risk by closely monitoring extensions
of trade credit. The Company generally does not require
collateral on its trade receivables.
The Company has a broad customer base doing business in all
regions of the United States as well as parts of Canada. During
2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not have sales to any
customers in excess of 10% of gross sales and at those
respective year-ends, no individual customer balances exceeded
10% of gross accounts receivable. Accordingly, no significant
concentration of credit risk is considered to exist.
Debt Issuance Costs: The Company defers
costs directly related to obtaining financing and amortizes them
over the term of the loan on a straight-line basis which is not
materially different than the effective interest method. Such
amounts are reflected in the consolidated income statement as a
component of interest expense.
Derivatives and Hedging: The Company
records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. If a
derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the Company
measures the effectiveness of the hedge, or the degree that the
gain (loss) for the hedging instrument offsets the loss (gain)
on the hedged item, at each reporting period. The effective
portion of the gain (loss) on the derivative instrument is
recognized in other comprehensive income as a component of
equity and, subsequently, reclassified into earnings when the
forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion
of a derivatives change in fair value is recognized in
earnings immediately. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge
treatment are recorded at fair value with gains (losses)
recognized in earnings in the period of change.
Fixed Assets: Land, buildings and
equipment are stated on the basis of cost. For financial
statement purposes, depreciation is computed over the estimated
useful lives of the assets principally by the straight-line
method; accelerated depreciation and cost recovery methods are
used for income tax purposes. When assets are retired or
otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss
is reflected in income for the period.
F-9
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Ranges of estimated useful lives for financial reporting
purposes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
40 years
|
|
Machinery, shop equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
3-10 years
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
3-10 years
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation and
Transactions: Gains and losses from balance
sheet translation of operations outside of the United States
where the applicable foreign currency is the functional currency
are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income within stockholders equity. Gains and losses
resulting from foreign currency transactions are recognized
currently in the consolidated income statements.
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets: Goodwill represents the excess of
cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Recorded
goodwill balances are not amortized but, instead, are evaluated
for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances
indicate that an impairment may exist.
Intangible assets are initially recorded at fair value at the
date of acquisition. Amortization is provided using the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The
carrying value of intangible assets is subject to an impairment
test on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate a possible impairment. The measure of
impairment is based on the estimated fair values.
Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the tax
rate expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be
paid or refunds received.
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, which clarifies the accounting and disclosure
for uncertain tax positions, as defined. FIN 48 requires
that a tax position meet a probable recognition
threshold for the benefit of the uncertain tax position to
be recognized in the financial statements. The impact of
adoption was not material.
Insurance: The Company is self-insured
for portions of employee healthcare and maintains a deductible
program as it relates to workers compensation, automobile
liability, asbestos claims and general liability claims
including, but not limited to, product liability claims, which
are secured by various letters of credit totaling
$3.1 million. Commercially comprehensive catastrophic
coverage is maintained. The Companys liability and related
expenses for claims are based upon estimates provided by
insurance carriers, third-party administrators and past
experience. The reserves are deemed by the Company to be
sufficient to cover outstanding claims, including those incurred
but not reported as of the estimation date.
Inventories: The Companys
inventories are generally valued at the lower of cost
(principally
last-in,
first-out method) or market. The Company believes the LIFO
method more fairly presents the results of operations by more
closely matching current costs with current revenues. The
Company records an adjustment each month, if necessary, for the
expected annual effect of inflation, and these estimates are
adjusted to actual results determined at year-end. This practice
excludes certain inventories held in Canada totaling
$78.6 million, at December 31, 2007, that are valued
at the lower of weighted average cost or market.
F-10
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Long-Lived Assets: The carrying value
of long-lived assets is evaluated whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may
be impaired. Upon the occurrence of such an event or change in
circumstance, an impairment loss is recognized when estimated
undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the
asset, including disposition, is less than the carrying value of
the asset. Impairment is measured by the amount by which the
carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
Reclassifications: Certain immaterial
amounts in the prior years financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
Revenue Recognition: The Company
recognizes revenue as products are shipped, title has
transferred to the customer, and the customer assumes the risk
and rewards of ownership. Out-bound shipping and handling costs
are reflected in cost of goods sold, and freight charges billed
to customers are reflected in revenues.
Equity-Based Compensation: The
Companys equity-based compensation consists of restricted
common units, profit units, restricted stock and non-qualified
stock options. The cost of employee services received in
exchange for an award of an equity instrument is measured based
on the grant-date fair value of the award. The Companys
policy is to expense stock-based compensation using the
fair-value of awards granted, modified or settled. Restricted
common units, profit units, and restricted stock are credited to
equity as they are expensed over their vesting periods based on
the current market value of the shares to be granted.
The fair value of non-qualified stock options is measured on the
grant date of the related equity instrument using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized as
compensation expense over the applicable vesting period.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per
share are computed based upon the weighted average number of
common units outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the
dilutive effect of restricted stock and stock options.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R
(SFAS No. 141R), Business Combinations
Revised. SFAS No. 141R requires an acquirer to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition
date, measured at the fair values as of that date, with limited
exceptions specified in the statement. That replaces Statement
141s cost-allocation process, which required the cost of
an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values.
The statement applies to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The Company has not yet completed the analysis necessary
to determine the impact adoption of this standard may ultimately
have on future financial reporting.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement on Financial
Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157),
Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
provisions of SFAS No. 157 are effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does
not expect adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material
effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement on Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS No. 159),
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS No. 159
F-11
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
provides companies with an option to report selected financial
assets and liabilities at fair value. It also established
presentation and disclosure requirements to facilitate
comparisons between companies using different measurement
attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. This
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect adoption of
SFAS No. 159 to have a material effect on its results
of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement on Financial
Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS No. 160),
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents
ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated.
SFAS No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements
that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of
the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. This
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The Company has not yet completed the
analysis necessary to determine the impact adoption of this
standard may ultimately have on future financial reporting.
Acquisition
of Controlling Interest in McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs
Funds
In connection with the acquisition of controlling interest in
McJunkin by GSCP, the purchase price paid to effect the
acquisition was allocated to the fair value of acquired assets
and liabilities at January 31, 2007.
Certain members of the Companys executive management team
held equity interests in McJunkin, the Predecessor, prior to
this transaction and continue to hold equity interests in the
Successor. In accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues
Task Force
No. 88-16,
Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions, the basis of
executive managements interests in MRM, the Successor,
after the acquisition was carried over at the basis of their
interests in the Predecessor prior to the acquisition.
The purchase price was approximately $1,008.5 million. The
sources and uses of funds in connection with the acquisition are
summarized below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
75.0
|
|
Term Loan Facility
|
|
|
575.0
|
|
Equity contribution cash
|
|
|
225.6
|
|
Equity contribution non-cash
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources
|
|
$
|
1,035.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid to stockholders (including non-cash
|
|
|
|
|
rollover by McJunkin and McApple stockholders of
$159.5 million)
|
|
$
|
983.4
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
General corporate purposes
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Repayment of existing debt
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total uses
|
|
$
|
1,035.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
In connection with the purchase price allocation, the fair
values of long-lived and intangible assets were determined based
upon assumptions related to future cash flows, discount rates
and asset lives utilizing currently available information. As of
January 31, 2007, the Company recorded adjustments to
reflect property and equipment, inventory, intangible assets for
its tradename, customer-related intangibles, and backlog at
their estimated fair values. The Company also acquired the
minority interest in McJunkin Appalachian Oilfield Supply
Company (McJunkin Appalachian), which became wholly owned
concurrent with the acquisition by the Goldman Sachs Funds.
The purchase price has been allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
823.9
|
|
Transaction costs paid at closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Transaction costs paid outside of closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
849.0
|
|
Noncash consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008.5
|
|
Net assets acquired at historical cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
Adjustments to state acquired assets at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) Increase carrying value of property and equipment to fair
value
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) Increase carrying value of inventory to fair value
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Write-off historical goodwill and tradename
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
4) Record intangible assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
|
356.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales order backlog
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
155.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) Eliminate McApple minority interest
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
6) Record liability to shareholders related to non-core assets
|
|
|
(26.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
7) Record fair value adjustments to various other assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
8) Tax impact of valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(213.8
|
)
|
|
|
368.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614.0
|
|
Carryover basis adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price recorded as goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
382.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tradename has an indefinite life and is not subject to
amortization. Tradename and goodwill will be reviewed at least
annually for impairment.
Transaction costs paid at closing included $10.6 million
paid to an affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds as reimbursement
of their costs associated with due diligence and advisory
services.
Acquisition
of Midway-Tristate Corporation
On April 30, 2007, MRM, through its wholly owned subsidiary
McJunkin Appalachian, acquired a 100% interest in
Midway-Tristate
Corporation (Midway). Midway is engaged primarily in the
distribution of pipe, equipment and supplies to the oil and gas
and utility industries in Michigan, West Virginia,
F-13
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Wyoming, and Colorado. The acquisition
of Midway significantly increased McJunkin Appalachians
presence particularly in the strategic Rocky Mountain region.
The purchase price was approximately $83.3 million and has
preliminarily been allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.7
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill associated with this transaction is not deductible for
tax purposes, nor is any amortization associated with
customer-related intangibles which have a useful life of
20 years.
Acquisition
of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co.
On October 31, 2007, MRM, through its wholly owned
subsidiary West Oklahoma PVF Company, acquired a 100% interest
in Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man). Red Man is a
distributor of tubular goods and an operator of service and
supply centers which distribute maintenance, repair and
operating products utilized primarily in the energy industry as
well as industrial products consisting primarily of line pipe,
valves, fittings and flanges. Red Man distributes products and
tubular goods through service and supply centers and sales
locations strategically located close to major hydrocarbon
producing and refining areas of the United States and Canada.
F-14
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
The purchase price was approximately $970.4 million
(including common units issued for Red Man shares of
$104.1 million at closing) and has preliminarily been
allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
342.3
|
|
Notes and other receivables
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
378.5
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
681.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,461.6
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
209.5
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
42.9
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
71.6
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
100.6
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
970.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending
receipt of appraisals and valuations for certain of Red
Mans assets, including intangible assets. Goodwill
associated with this transaction is not deductible for tax
purposes, nor is any amortization associated with amortizable
intangibles that are still being valued.
Transaction costs capitalized in connection with the acquisition
of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. totaled
$17.3 million and included $12.0 million paid to an
affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds as reimbursement of their
costs associated with due diligence and advisory services.
Subsequent to the date of the balance sheet, certain provisions
of the purchase agreement, including a net working capital
adjustment, were finalized resulting in an increase of the
purchase price referenced above of $18.1 million, including
additional shares issued of $7.0 million.
As part of the Red Man transaction, MRM indirectly acquired a
call option to buy out the 49% minority interest of Midfield for
approximately $100.0 million. The call option may be
exercised between June 15, 2008 and December 15, 2008.
The Company has concluded that it is probable the option will be
exercised and has provided for the financing of such exercise in
the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. Accordingly, the
Company has allocated $100.0 million of the purchase price
to minority interest. In the event the call option is not
exercised during that time period, certain additional amounts
would be due to the former shareholders of Red Man on
January 15, 2009.
Pro Forma
Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma results of operations assume
that each of the transactions described above occurred on
January 1, 2006. This unaudited pro forma information
should not be relied upon as necessarily being indicative of the
historical results that would have been obtained if the
transactions had actually occurred on that date nor the results
that may be obtained in the future.
F-15
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
4,000.0
|
|
|
$
|
3,703.1
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
149.9
|
|
|
|
88.6
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
|
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The significant components of goodwill and intangible assets are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Order
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
Non Compete
|
|
|
(With
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 Year)
|
|
|
(38 Years)
|
|
|
(5 Years)
|
|
|
Life)
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Recorded in connection with the McJunkin acquisition
|
|
$
|
1,601
|
|
|
$
|
356,036
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
$
|
155,762
|
|
|
$
|
382,908
|
|
Recorded in connection with the Midway acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,802
|
|
Recorded in connection with the Red Man acquisition
(preliminary, see note below)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681,906
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(1,467
|
)
|
|
|
(8,844
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
367,310
|
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
155,762
|
|
|
$
|
1,092,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
Amortization in future periods could change significantly based
on the finalization of the purchase price allocation for the Red
Man transaction. The potential impact on amortization expense
for the two-month period from the date of the acquisition to
December 31, 2007 is not material. The weighted average
amortization period for each type of intangible is noted in the
table above. The weighted average amortization period for all
amortizable intangibles is 38 years. Total amortization of
all acquisition-related intangible assets for each of the years
ending December 31, 2008 to 2012, is currently estimated as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2010
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2011
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2012
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
If inventories were reported at values approximating current
costs, as would have resulted from using the
first-in,
first-out method, they would have been $10.3 million and
$74.4 million higher at
F-16
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition,
after giving pro forma effect to profit sharing and income
taxes, net income would have been higher by $6.7 million
for the eleven months ended December 31, 2007, $0 for the
one-month ended January 30, 2007, and $7.9 million and
$13.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. For the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007, the Company experienced a liquidation of
certain LIFO inventories resulting in income of
$1.5 million.
The significant components of our long-term debt are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Asset-based revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
234,146
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
569,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit/term loan agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
Short-term debt expected to be refinanced on a long-term basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
Three-year asset securitization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Midfield revolving credit facility
|
|
|
50,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield term loan facility
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield notes payable
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
868,397
|
|
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
19,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
848,616
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility: On January 31, 2007, in
connection with the acquisition of McJunkin by GSCP, MRM entered
into a credit agreement and related security and other
agreements for a secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. as administrative agent
and collateral agent. The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
provided financing of up to $300.0 million, subject to a
borrowing base equal to at any time the lesser of 85% of
eligible accounts receivable and 85% of net orderly liquidation
value of the eligible inventory, less certain reserves. The
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility included borrowing
capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on
same-day
notice. At the closing of the acquisition, MRM utilized
$75.0 million of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
for loans and approximately $3.1 million for letters of
credit.
On October 31, 2007, and concurrent with the close of the
Red Man acquisition, MRM refinanced the initial Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility with a new $650.0 million
facility with terms substantially the same as those described
above. At that date, MRM utilized $322.5 million of the new
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility to fund a portion of the
Red Man acquisition in addition to refinancing amounts
previously outstanding.
As of December 31, 2007, MRM had $326.5 million of
unused borrowing availability under the Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility based on a borrowing base of $563.8 million
and after giving effect to $3.1 million used for letters of
credit.
The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides that MRM has
the right at any time to request incremental facilities
commitments, but the lenders are under no obligation to provide
any
F-17
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
such additional commitments. The Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility permits incremental facilities (together with any new
commitments under the Term Loan Facility discussed below) up to
(1) $200.0 million specifically available to fund the
CanHCo Call Right (which pertains to the Midfield Supply
minority interest) and refinance certain indebtedness of
Midfield Supply, (2) $150.0 million generally
available, (3) and additional amounts available so long as
the secured leverage ratio as specified in the Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility is satisfied. If MRM were to request
any such additional commitments and the existing lenders or new
lenders were to agree to provide such commitments, the
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility size could be increased as
described above, but MRMs ability to borrow would still be
limited by the amount of the borrowing base.
Borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate per annum equal to, at MRMs option,
either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the
greater of (1) the prime rate as quoted in The Wall
Street Journal and (2) the federal funds effective rate
plus
1/2
of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments,
in each case plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin in
the initial asset revolving credit facility was 0.75% with
respect to base rate borrowings and 1.75% with respect to LIBOR
borrowings. As part of the refinancing, these were revised to
0.50% and 1.50%, respectively. The applicable margin is subject
to adjustment downward based on the MRMs leverage ratio.
In addition, MRM is required to pay a commitment fee of 0.375%
per annum in respect of the unutilized commitments. This rate is
also subject to adjustment downward based upon the MRMs
leverage. MRM must also pay customary letter of credit fees and
agency fees.
If at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding loans,
unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of
credit under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds
the lesser of (i) the total revolving credit commitments
and (ii) the borrowing base, MRM will be required to repay
outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an
aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the
commitment amount. If the amount available under the Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility is less than 7% of total revolving
credit commitments, or an event of default pursuant to certain
provisions of the credit agreement has occurred, MRM would then
be required to deposit daily in a collection account managed by
the agent under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. MRM
may voluntarily reduce the unutilized portion of the commitment
amount and repay outstanding loans at any time without premium
or penalty other than customary breakage costs with
respect to LIBOR loans. There is no scheduled amortization under
the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility; the principal amount
of the loans outstanding is due and payable in full on
October 31, 2013.
All obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
are guaranteed by MRMs existing and future wholly owned
domestic subsidiaries. All obligations under MRMs
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, and the guarantees of
those obligations, are secured, subject to certain significant
exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of MRM and the
subsidiaries that have guaranteed the Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility, including:
|
|
|
|
|
A first-priority security interest in personal property
consisting of inventory and accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
A second-priority pledge of certain of the capital stock held by
MRM or any subsidiary guarantor; and
|
|
|
|
A second-priority security interest in, and mortgages on,
substantially all other tangible and intangible assets of MRM
and each subsidiary guarantor.
|
F-18
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of
covenants that, among other things and subject to certain
significant exceptions, restrict its ability and the ability of
its subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
Incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Pay dividends on MRMs capital stock or the capital stock
of MRMs direct or indirect parent;
|
|
|
|
Make investments, loans, advances or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Sell assets, including capital stock of MRMs subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
Consolidate or merge with another entity;
|
|
|
|
Create liens;
|
|
|
|
Pay, redeem, or amend the terms of subordinated indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Enter into certain sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
Fundamentally or substantively alter the character of the
business conducted by MRM and its subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Enter into agreements that limit (1) the ability of
non-guarantors to pay dividends to MRM or any guarantor or
(2) the ability of MRM or any guarantor to pledge its
assets to secure its obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility.
|
In addition to other customary exceptions, the covenants
limiting dividends and other restricted payments and prepayments
or redemptions of subordinated indebtedness generally permit the
restricted actions in additional limited amounts, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, principally that MRM must
have at least $50.0 million of pro forma excess
availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.
Although the credit agreement governing the Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility does not require MRM to comply with
any financial ratio maintenance covenants, if less than 7% of
the then outstanding credit commitments were available to be
borrowed under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility at any
time, MRM would not be permitted to borrow any additional
amounts unless its pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to
consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in the
credit agreement) were at least 1.0 to 1.0. The credit agreement
also contains customary affirmative covenants and events of
default.
Term Loan Facility: On January 31,
2007, in connection with the acquisition of McJunkin by the
Goldman Sachs Funds, MRM entered into a credit agreement and
related security and other agreements for a $575.0 million
Term Loan Facility with Lehman Commercial Paper as
administrative agent and collateral agent. The full amount of
the Term Loan Facility was borrowed on January 31, 2007.
On October 31, 2007, and concurrent with the close of the
Red Man acquisition, the Term Loan Facility was amended to
permit for the refinancing of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility, as described above, in addition to revising certain
provisions of the agreement as discussed in more detail below.
At December 31, 2007, borrowings under the Term Loan
Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at
MRMs option, either (a) a base rate determined by
reference to the greater of (1) the prime rate as quoted in
The Wall Street Journal and (2) the federal funds
effective rate plus
1/2
F-19
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments,
in each case plus an applicable margin. At December 31,
2007, the applicable margin with respect to base rate borrowings
was 2.25% and the applicable margin with respect to LIBOR
borrowings was 3.25%. The interest rate on the outstanding
borrowings pursuant to the Term Loan Facility was 8.08% at
December 31, 2007.
The Term Loan Facility requires MRM to prepay outstanding term
loans with 50% (which percentage will be reduced to 25% if
MRMs total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio
and will be reduced to 0% if MRMs total leverage ratio is
less than a specified ratio) of its annual excess cash flow (as
defined in the credit agreement). For 2007, MRM was not required
to prepay any outstanding term loans pursuant to the annual
excess cash flow requirements.
MRM may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the Term Loan
Facility at any time without premium or penalty other than
customary breakage costs with respect to LIBOR
loans. The Term Loan Facility amortizes at a rate of 1.00% per
year with the balance due at January 31, 2014.
All obligations under the Term Loan Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by the MRM and each wholly owned domestic subsidiary
of MRM. All obligations under the Term Loan Facility, and the
guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain
significant exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of
MRM and the subsidiaries that have guaranteed the Term Loan
Facility, including:
|
|
|
|
|
A second-priority security interest in personal property
consisting of inventory and accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
A first-priority pledge of certain of the capital stock held by
MRM or any subsidiary guarantor; and
|
|
|
|
A first-priority security interest in, and mortgages on,
substantially all other tangible and intangible assets of the
MRM and each subsidiary guarantor.
|
The Term Loan Facility contains a number of negative covenants
that are substantially similar to those governing the
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. The credit agreement also
contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default.
Midfield Revolving Credit
Facility: Midfield, the Companys
Canadian subsidiary, has a Canadian dollar revolving credit
facility administered by Bank of America. This facility has a
maximum limit of CAD $150 million bearing interest at
Canadian prime rate plus a margin of up to 0.25%. The revolver
is secured by substantially all of Midfields personal
property assets including accounts receivable, chattel paper,
bank accounts, general intangibles, inventory, investment
property, cash and insurance proceeds. The balance of the
revolver is due at its maturity date, November 2, 2010.
Midfield Term Loan Facility: Midfield
has a term loan facility that is due on demand. This facility
bears interest at Canadian prime rate plus a margin of up to
0.5%. The term loan facility is secured by substantially all of
Midfields real property and equipment.
Midfield Notes Payable: Midfield has
two notes payable due April 1, 2008 pursuant to holdback
provisions from recent acquisitions. These amounts, totaling
$3.8 million at December 31, 2007, are owed to
individuals who became and continue to be shareholders of
Midfield supply as a result of these transactions.
F-20
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Maturities of Long-Term Debt: At
December 31, 2007, annual maturities of long-term debt
during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
19.8
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
2010
|
|
|
56.8
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
774.6
|
|
The above table does not reflect future excess cash flow
prepayments, if any, that may be required under the Term Loan
Facility.
Interest Rate Swaps: The Company uses
derivative financial instruments to help manage its interest
rate risk. On December 3, 2007, MRM entered into a floating
to fixed interest rate swap agreement, effective
December 31, 2007, for a notional amount of
$700.0 million to limit its exposure to interest rate
increases related to a portion of its floating rate
indebtedness. The interest rate swap agreement terminates after
three years. At December 31, 2007, the fair value of
MRMs interest rate swap agreement was a loss of
approximately $0.4 million, which amount is included in
accrued liabilities.
As of the effective date, MRM designated the interest rate swap
as a cash flow hedge. As a result, changes in the fair value of
MRMs swap is recorded as a component of other
comprehensive income. At December 31, 2007,
$0.2 million of unrecognized losses, net of tax, on the
interest rate swap agreement is included in other comprehensive
income.
As a result of the swap agreement, MRMs effective fixed
interest rates as to the $700.0 million in floating rate
indebtedness will be 5.368% for associated indebtedness on the
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and 7.118% for associated
indebtedness on the Term Loan Facility, per quarter through 2010
and result in an average fixed rate of 6.771%.
Interest Paid: The Company paid
interest of $52.9 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007, $0.1 million for the one month
ended January 30, 2007, and $2.8 million and
$2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
10,911
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,392
|
|
Buildings and building improvements
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
|
21,416
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
42,295
|
|
|
|
|
43,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,830
|
|
|
|
|
68,951
|
|
Allowances for depreciation
|
|
|
(4,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
(41,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,120
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
The Company leases land and buildings at various locations from
Hansford Associates, Appalachian Leasing, and one stockholder.
The Company leases land, buildings and vehicles from Prideco.
Certain officers and directors of the Company participate in
ownership of Hansford Associates, Appalachian Leasing and
Prideco. Most of these leases are renewable for various periods
through 2026 and contain clauses for escalation of lease
payments, payment of real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance
and certain other operating expenses of the properties. Leases
with unrelated parties contain similar provisions.
Amortization of capital leases was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Amortization of capital leases
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property held under capital leases in the balance sheets
consists of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
$
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,881
|
|
Allowances for amortization
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases aggregate
$10.1 million of which $3.2 million represents
interest and $3.4 million represents escalation and
executory costs. The present value of net minimum lease payments
is $3.6 million, all applicable to Hansford Associates.
Annual payments under capital leases are $0.9 million for
years 2008 through 2012.
F-22
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Rent expense under operating leases is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Leases with Hansford Associates
|
|
$
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
1,534
|
|
|
$
|
1,474
|
|
Leases with Appalachian Leasing
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Leases with Prideco
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases with Midfield shareholders
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating leases
|
|
|
8,748
|
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
7,149
|
|
|
|
6,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense under operating leases
|
|
$
|
11,069
|
|
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
8,836
|
|
|
$
|
8,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum rental payments required under operating leases
that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in
excess of one year aggregate to $45.5 million and include
leases applicable to Hansford Associates ($4.2 million),
Appalachian Leasing ($0.5 million), Prideco
($0.3 million), and the stockholder ($0.1 million).
Annual operating lease payments are $18.3 million,
$12.7 million, $6.2 million, $4.7 million, and
$3.7 million for years 2008 through 2012, respectively.
Income taxes included in the consolidated statements of income
consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
31,190
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,024
|
|
|
$
|
36,514
|
|
|
$
|
34,075
|
|
State
|
|
|
5,895
|
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
8,024
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,309
|
|
|
|
|
4,838
|
|
|
|
44,538
|
|
|
|
41,488
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
(4,037
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
(4,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
36,559
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,599
|
|
|
$
|
48,340
|
|
|
$
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
The Companys effective tax rate varied from the statutory
federal income tax rate for the following reasons (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Federal tax expense at statutory rates
|
|
$
|
32,721
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,918
|
|
|
$
|
41,270
|
|
|
$
|
31,193
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
3,971
|
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
4,254
|
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
36,559
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,599
|
|
|
$
|
48,340
|
|
|
$
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective rate
|
|
|
39.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
40.78
|
%
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid $38.2 million for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2007, $0 for the one month ended
January 30, 2007, and $50.6 million and
$34.7 million in 2006 and 2005 for federal and state taxes.
Significant components of the Companys current deferred
tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable valuation
|
|
$
|
964
|
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Real estate and investments
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
Other
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
(75,882
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6,464
|
)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(6,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2,969
|
)
|
Interest in Red Man Canada
|
|
|
(4,138
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(11,930
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(197,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(300,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(295,851
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(19,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax returns are filed in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, various states, Puerto Rico and Canada. The
Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax
examination for years through 2004.
F-24
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Effective January 1, 2007, the Predecessor adopted
FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
This interpretation established new standards for the financial
statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain
tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax
returns.
The effect of adopting FIN 48 was immaterial. Upon
adoption, the liability for income taxes under FIN 48 was
$0.4 million and interest and penalties were
$0.2 million. Interest related to income tax liabilities is
classified as interest expense and penalties are recognized as a
component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2007,
there were no material changes in the reserve or the amount of
unrecognized tax benefits, interest or penalties. It is not
anticipated that settlement of the uncertain tax positions will
have a material affect on the statutory rate. The decrease in
tax liability shown below was due to expiring statute of
limitations and settlement of taxes.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Restricted Stock and Stock Option
Plans: Effective March 27, 2007, the
Companys Board of Directors approved the formation of the
2007 Restricted Stock Plan and the 2007 Stock Option Plan. The
purpose of these plans is to aid MRM in recruiting and retaining
key employees, directors and consultants of outstanding ability
and to motivate such key employees, directors and consultants to
exert their best efforts on behalf of the Company by providing
incentives in the form of restricted stock and stock options.
The Company expects that it will benefit from the added interest
which such key employees, directors and consultants will have in
the welfare of the Company as a result of their proprietary
interest in the Companys success.
Under the terms of the stock option plan, options may not be
granted at prices less than their fair market value on the date
of the grant, nor for a term exceeding 10 years. Vesting
occurs in one-third increments on the third, fourth, and fifth
anniversaries of the date specified in the employees
respective option agreements. The Company expenses the fair
value of the stock option grants on a straight-line basis over
the vesting period. A Black-Scholes option pricing model was
used to estimate the fair value of the stock options granted in
2007. For purposes of measuring compensation, the Company relies
on a calculated value that requires certain assumptions
including volatility based on
F-25
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
the appropriate industry sector. Following are the weighted
average assumptions used to estimate the fair values of options
granted during the eleven months ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.10%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
22.07%
|
Expected lives
|
|
6.2 years
|
A summary of the status of stock option grants under the stock
option plan as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the
eleven months ended on that date is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,533.46
|
|
|
|
3,933.81
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,533.46
|
|
|
$
|
3,933.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options vested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the restricted stock plan, restricted stock
may be granted at the direction of the Board of Directors and
vesting occurs in one-fourth increments on the second, third,
fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the date specified in the
employees respective restricted stock agreements. The
Company expenses the fair value of the restricted stock grants
on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity under
the restricted stock plan as of December 31, 2007, and
changes during the eleven months ended on that date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
635.52
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
635.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense recognized under the stock option and
restricted stock plans totaled $0.3 million and
$0.1 million for the eleven months ended December 31,
2007. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had
$4.3 million and $1.4 million of unrecognized
compensation expense related to outstanding stock options and
restricted stock. These amounts will be recognized over a
weighted average vesting period of five years.
Restricted Common Units: In conjunction
with the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds,
certain key MRM employees received restricted common units of
PVF Holdings LLC that vest over a five-year requisite service
period. Compensation expense associated with these restricted
common units totaled $1.0 million for the eleven months
ended December 31, 2007 based upon their fair market value
at the date they were issued which is being recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had $4.6 million of
F-26
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding
restricted common units which will be amortized over a weighted
average vesting period of four years.
Profits Units: In conjunction with the
acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds and the Red
Man acquisition, certain key MRM employees received profits
units in PVF Holdings LLC that vest over a five-year requisite
service period. These units entitle their holders to a share of
any distributions made by PVF Holdings LLC once common unit
holders have received a return of all capital contributed to PVF
Holdings LLC in the period of resolution.
Compensation expense associated with these profits units totaled
$1.6 million for the eleven months ended December 31,
2007 based upon their fair market value at the date they were
issued which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over
the vesting period. As of December 31, 2007, the Company
had $15.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense
related to outstanding profits units which will be amortized
over a weighted average vesting period of five years.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
|
In 2007, the Company offered a noncontributory profit sharing
plan to employees with at least six months of service. This plan
provides for annual employer contributions generally based upon
a formula related primarily to earnings, limited to 15% of the
eligible compensation paid to all eligible employees. Employees
may also participate in the McJunkin Red Man Savings Plan,
whereunder any employee who has completed as least six months of
service to the Company may elect to defer a percentage of their
base earnings, and that deferral is partially matched by the
Company, pursuant to section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Employees of Red Man located in the United States who have
attained the age of 21 are eligible to participate in the Red
Man Pipe & Supply Co. Retirement Savings Plan which
also exists pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Companys provisions for the profit sharing plan and
matching portion under the 401(k) plans approximated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Profit sharing expenses
|
|
$
|
12,294
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
$
|
15,064
|
|
|
$
|
13,144
|
|
401(k) savings plan expenses
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
Other
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
|
|
NOTE 11
|
RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
In connection with Red Mans 2005 acquisition of 51% of the
shares of Midfield, a Shareholders Agreement between Red
Man Pipe & Supply Canada, LTD., the 51% majority
shareholder of Midfield Supply ULC, and Midfield Holdings
(Alberta) LTD., the 49% minority interest shareholder of
Midfield Supply ULC was created. This agreement, among other
things, stipulates how profits of Midfield Supply ULC are
shared. Midfield Holdings (Alberta) LTDs portion of the
profits are accrued and subsequently paid to shareholders of
Midfield Holdings (Alberta) LTD, who are also employees of
Midfield Supply ULC, via a formal Employee Profit Sharing Plan
(EPSP). In connection with the EPSP, $8.9 million was
accrued as of December 31, 2007. Expense associated with
this plan is included in selling, general and administrative
expenses. Red Man Pipe & Supply Canada, LTDs
portion of the profits was accrued and subsequently paid through
an after-tax dividend, which has been eliminated in
consolidation.
In connection with the EPSP payments, from time to time the
minority shareholders make loans to the Company. These notes
payable are unsecured, bear interest at 8% and have no fixed
terms of repayment. Amounts payable to minority interest
shareholders were $25.0 million at December 31, 2007.
|
|
NOTE 12
|
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Net income (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
56,926
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
|
$
|
69,574
|
|
|
$
|
52,541
|
|
Average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
138,627
|
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average dilutive shares outstanding
|
|
|
138,899
|
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
410.64
|
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
|
$
|
3,973.39
|
|
|
$
|
3,000.63
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
409.84
|
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
|
$
|
3,973.39
|
|
|
$
|
3,000.63
|
|
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims,
both as a plaintiff and a defendant, which arise in the ordinary
course of business. Included in these legal proceedings are
cases where the Company has been named as a defendant in
lawsuits brought against a large number of entities by
individuals seeking damages for injuries allegedly caused by
certain products containing asbestos. Although the Company has
estimated its liabilities in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and currently has insurance covering a
portion of its asbestos liabilities, there is a possibility that
resolution of the matters could result in additional losses in
excess of presently estimated liabilities. Also, there is a
possibility that resolution of certain of the Companys
legal contingencies for which there are no liabilities recorded
could result in a loss.
F-28
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2007
Management is not able to estimate the amount of such loss, if
any. However, in the opinion of the Company, after consultation
with counsel, the ultimate resolution of all pending matters is
not expected to have a material effect on its financial
position, although it is possible that such resolutions could
have a material adverse impact on results of operations in the
period of resolution.
In addition to the foregoing, from time to time the Company is
involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings
that are incidental to its business, including claims relating
to product liability, general negligence, environmental issues,
employment, and other matters. It is not expected that the
ultimate resolution of any of these matters will have a material
adverse impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Midfield has issued a financial guarantee in the form of an
irrevocable standby letter of credit for an associated entity in
the amount of $5.1 million which is recorded in the
accompanying balance sheet at its fair value. This letter
expires January 31, 2009 subject to certain renewal
provisions.
F-29
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Note1)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
8,761
|
|
|
$
|
10,075
|
|
Receivables, less allowances of $5,426 and $6,352
|
|
|
617,693
|
|
|
|
481,463
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
724,208
|
|
|
|
666,188
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,355,099
|
|
|
|
1,159,663
|
|
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
36,022
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
30,341
|
|
|
|
23,390
|
|
Notes receivable and other assets
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,639
|
|
|
|
66,946
|
|
FIXED ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
91,396
|
|
|
|
80,120
|
|
PROPERTY HELD UNDER CAPITAL LEASES
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
814,704
|
|
|
|
1,092,379
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
959,603
|
|
|
|
523,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,774,307
|
|
|
|
1,616,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,294,276
|
|
|
$
|
2,925,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
$
|
453,184
|
|
|
$
|
306,509
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
103,724
|
|
|
|
70,778
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
10,182
|
|
|
|
11,996
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,589
|
|
|
|
6,552
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
76,538
|
|
|
|
80,364
|
|
Term loans due on demand
|
|
|
9,845
|
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
Current portion of long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
6,717
|
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
669,038
|
|
|
|
496,169
|
|
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,268,184
|
|
|
|
848,616
|
|
Payable to shareholders
|
|
|
52,294
|
|
|
|
49,164
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
380,512
|
|
|
|
215,487
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
3,339
|
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705,715
|
|
|
|
1,118,128
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST AND AMOUNTS DUE TO FORMER RED MAN SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
95,164
|
|
|
|
100,700
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share;
1,000,000 shares authorized issued and outstanding June
2008 311,364.7277, issued and outstanding December
2007 299,891.4604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,169,589
|
|
|
|
1,154,148
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(341,763
|
)
|
|
|
56,926
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss), net of deferred income taxes of
$1,200 and $162
|
|
|
(3,467
|
)
|
|
|
(1,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
824,359
|
|
|
|
1,210,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,294,276
|
|
|
$
|
2,925,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-30
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
|
June 28, 2007
|
|
|
January 30, 2007
|
|
|
SALES
|
|
$
|
2,196,033
|
|
|
$
|
784,964
|
|
|
$
|
142,549
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,803,792
|
|
|
|
635,934
|
|
|
|
114,562
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
200,116
|
|
|
|
80,714
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
15,623
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
13,509
|
|
|
|
5,635
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
2,041,551
|
|
|
|
729,863
|
|
|
|
130,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
154,482
|
|
|
|
55,101
|
|
|
|
11,697
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(34,973
|
)
|
|
|
(24,332
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,345
|
)
|
|
|
(25,154
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
119,137
|
|
|
|
29,947
|
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
|
|
12,333
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
75,934
|
|
|
$
|
17,614
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate
|
|
|
36.26
|
%
|
|
|
41.18
|
%
|
|
|
41.08
|
%
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
245.41
|
|
|
$
|
171.69
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
244.92
|
|
|
$
|
171.36
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-31
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING CORPORATION
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
|
June 28, 2007
|
|
|
January 30, 2007
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,934
|
|
|
$
|
17,614
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
Noncash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,192
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,319
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(2,482
|
)
|
|
|
(2,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
15,623
|
|
|
|
4,624
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivatives
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for losses on receivables
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Inventory loss provision
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Non-operating gains (losses) and other items not providing cash
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Operations Before Working Capital Changes
|
|
|
101,499
|
|
|
|
25,022
|
|
|
|
7,207
|
|
Working Capital Changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(138,949
|
)
|
|
|
(28,597
|
)
|
|
|
(1,363
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(57,634
|
)
|
|
|
(2,843
|
)
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(1,763
|
)
|
|
|
(2,248
|
)
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(2,509
|
)
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
146,589
|
|
|
|
6,104
|
|
|
|
(7,665
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
23,264
|
|
|
|
3,931
|
|
|
|
(2,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,002
|
)
|
|
|
(23,127
|
)
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS
|
|
|
70,497
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
6,617
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(7,550
|
)
|
|
|
(2,235
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
Proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of controlling interest in McJunkin by GSCP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(849,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Midway Tristate Corporation
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(83,338
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Red Man Pipe & Supply
|
|
|
(11,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment and notes receivable transactions
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(16,437
|
)
|
|
|
(933,256
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term obligations
|
|
|
454,474
|
|
|
|
747,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term obligations
|
|
|
(31,384
|
)
|
|
|
(4,896
|
)
|
|
|
(8,254
|
)
|
Cash equity contribution in conjunction with acquisition of
controlling interest in McJunkin by GSCP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equity contributions
|
|
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs paid
|
|
|
(9,257
|
)
|
|
|
(22,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(474,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(55,233
|
)
|
|
|
945,860
|
|
|
|
(8,254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash
|
|
|
(1,173
|
)
|
|
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash beginning of period
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
3,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
8,761
|
|
|
$
|
16,452
|
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-32
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Business Operations: McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporation (the Company) is a holding company
co-headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia and Tulsa,
Oklahoma. The Company is a substantially owned subsidiary of PVF
Holdings, LLC. Our wholly owned subsidiary, McJunkin Red Man
Corporation and its subsidiaries (MRM) are national distributors
of pipe, valves, and fittings, with locations in principal
industrial, hydrocarbon producing and refining areas throughout
the United States and Canada. Major customers represent the
natural gas producing, petroleum refining, chemical and other
segments of the raw materials processing and construction
industries. Products are obtained from a broad range of
suppliers.
The Company operates as a single reportable segment, which
represents the Companys business of providing industrial
pipe valves and fittings to various customers through our
distribution operations located throughout North America. The
Company has operations in eight geographic regions, which have
similar economic characteristics, and similar products and
services, types or classes of customers, distribution methods
and similar regulatory environments in each location. The total
consolidated net sales outside of the United States was 11.7%
for the six months ended June 26, 2008, 0.5% for the five
months ended June 28, 2007 and 0.8% for the one month ended
January 30, 2007. The percentage of total consolidated
assets outside of the United States as of June 26, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 was 10.5% and 0.2%, respectively. The
Company has a broad customer base and did not have sales to any
customer in excess of 10% of gross sales for any of the periods
presented.
Basis of Presentation: PVF Holdings
LLC, (formerly known as McJ Holding LLC) was formed on
November 20, 2006 by affiliates of the Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. (the Goldman Sachs Funds) and a control group of certain
shareholders of McJunkin Corporation (McJunkin) for the purpose
of acquiring McJunkin on January 31, 2007. In connection
with the acquisition by the Goldman Sachs Funds of a controlling
interest in McJunkin, a new basis of accounting and reporting
was established that reflected the Goldman Sachs Funds
cost of the acquisition. This new accounting basis has been
pushed down to the Companys accounts and is reflected in
the Companys consolidated balance sheet (successor basis)
at January 30, 2007.
In connection with the acquisition, GSCP and existing MRM
shareholders made an aggregate cash equity contribution of
$225.6 million and a noncash equity contribution of
$159.5 million to PVF in exchange for 100% ownership
interests in both the Company and MRM.
Because PVF Holdings LLC and the Company had no operations,
assets or business prior to their acquisition of McJunkin and
through December 31, 2007, MRM is the predecessor of the
Company and PVF Holdings LLC as of this date. On May 22,
2008, MRM borrowed $25 million in revolving loans under its
revolving credit facility and distributed the proceeds of the
loans to the Company. On the same date, the Company borrowed
$450 million in term loans under its term loan facility and
distributed the proceeds of the term loans, together with the
proceeds of the revolving loans, to its stockholders, including
PVF Holdings LLC. PVF Holdings LLC used the proceeds from the
dividend to fund distributions to members of PVF Holdings LLC in
May 2008.
All references to the Predecessor relate to McJunkin
for periods prior to January 31, 2007. All references to
the Successor relate to the Company for periods
subsequent to January 31, 2007. As a result, the
consolidated income statements and statements of cash flows for
the five-month period ended June 28, 2007 consist of the
earnings and cash flows of the Company. The consolidated income
statements and statements of cash flows of the Company for the
month ended January 30, are presented as Predecessor
financial statements for comparison purposes.
F-33
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
Variable Interest Entities (VIE) are those entities in which the
Company, through contractual arrangements, bears the risks of,
and enjoys the rewards normally associated with ownership of the
entities, and therefore, the Company is the primary beneficiary
of these entities. MRM owns 49% of the outstanding equity
interests of Red Man Distributors LLC (RMD), an
Oklahoma limited liability company, formed on November 1,
2007 for the purposes of distributing oil country tubular goods
in North America as a certified minority supplier. MRM is
retained by RMD as an independent contractor to provide general
corporate and administrative services to RMD. MRM is paid an
annual services fee by RMD to provide such services. In
addition, MRM is paid a license fee for the right and license to
use the name Red Man. MRM pays RMD a specified
percentage of RMDs gross monthly revenue for the relevant
month from sales of products by RMD that are sourced from
McJunkin Red Man Corporation. For the six months ended
June 26, 2008, the amounts paid approximated
$0.4 million (service fee), $0.6 million (license fee)
and $3.7 million (sales payment). There were no such
amounts paid in the year ended December 31, 2007. RMD is a
VIE and MRM has determined that it is the primary beneficiary,
therefore the Company has consolidated this entity.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial
statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
Rule 10-01
of
Regulation S-X
for interim financial statements and do not include all
information and footnotes required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete annual financial statements.
However, the information furnished herein reflects all normal
recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim
periods. The results of operations for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that will be realized for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2008. The consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007 has been derived from audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2007. These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and its wholly owned and
majority owned subsidiaries. The residual ownership in the
equity and income of Midfield Supply ULC (Midfield), a 51%
owned, Canada-based subsidiary, is reflected as minority
interest. All significant intercompany transactions have been
eliminated.
There have been no significant changes in our significant
accounting polices during the six months ended June 26,
2008 as compared to the significant accounting policies
described in our audited financial statements for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2007.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It requires
qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for
using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in
derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal
F-34
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is
still assessing the impact of this pronouncement.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets,
(FSP
FAS 142-3).
FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
The intent of the position is to improve the consistency between
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows
used to measure the fair value of the intangible asset. FSP
FAS 142-3
is effective for the fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The Company is assessing the potential
impact that the adoption of FSP
FAS 142-3
may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,
(SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies
the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial
statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. This
statement shall be effective 60 days following the
Securities and Exchange Commissions approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU
Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does
not believe that implementation of this standard will have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 08-3,
Accounting for Lessees for Maintenance Deposits Under Lease
Arrangements,
(EITF 08-3).
EITF 08-3
provides guidance for accounting for nonrefundable maintenance
deposits.
EITF 08-3
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The Company does not currently expect the adoption of
EITF 08-3
to have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
TRANSACTIONS
AND SUBSEQUENT EVENT
|
Acquisition
of Controlling Interest in McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs
Funds
In connection with the acquisition of controlling interest in
McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds, the purchase price paid to
effect the acquisition was allocated to the fair value of
acquired assets and liabilities at January 31, 2007.
Certain members of the Companys executive management team
held equity interests in McJunkin, the Predecessor, prior to
this transaction and continue to hold equity interests in the
Successor. In accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues
Task Force
No. 88-16,
Basis in Leveraged Buyout Transactions, the basis of
executive managements interests in the Company, the
Successor, after the acquisition was carried over at the basis
of their interests in the Predecessor prior to the acquisition.
F-35
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
The purchase price was approximately $1,008.5 million. The
sources and uses of funds in connection with the acquisition are
summarized below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
$
|
75.0
|
|
Term Loan Facility
|
|
|
575.0
|
|
Equity contribution cash
|
|
|
225.6
|
|
Equity contribution non-cash
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources
|
|
$
|
1,035.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uses
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid to stockholders (including non-cash rollover
by McJunkin and McApple stockholders of $159.5 million)
|
|
$
|
983.4
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
General corporate purposes
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Repayment of existing debt
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total uses
|
|
$
|
1,035.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the purchase price allocation, the fair
values of long-lived and intangible assets were determined based
upon assumptions related to future cash flows, discount rates
and asset lives utilizing currently available information. As of
January 31, 2007, the Company recorded adjustments to
reflect property and equipment, inventory, intangible assets for
its tradename, customer-related intangibles, and backlog at
their estimated fair values. The Company also acquired the
minority interest in McJunkin Appalachian Oilfield Supply
Company (McJunkin Appalachian), which became wholly owned
concurrent with the acquisition by the Goldman Sachs Funds.
F-36
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
The purchase price has been allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
823.9
|
|
Transaction costs paid at closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
Transaction costs paid outside of closing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
849.0
|
|
Noncash consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008.5
|
|
Net assets acquired at historical cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
Adjustments to state acquired assets at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) Increase carrying value of property and equipment to fair
value
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) Increase carrying value of inventory to fair value
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Write-off historical goodwill and tradename
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
4) Record intangible assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
|
356.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales order backlog
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
155.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) Eliminate McApple minority interest
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
6) Record liability to shareholders related to non-core assets
|
|
|
(26.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
7) Record fair value adjustments to various other assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
8) Tax impact of valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(213.8
|
)
|
|
|
368.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
614.0
|
|
Carryover basis adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price recorded as goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
382.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tradename has an indefinite life and is not subject to
amortization. Tradename and goodwill are reviewed at least
annually for impairment.
Transaction costs paid at closing included $10.6 million
paid to an affiliate of the Goldman Sachs Funds as reimbursement
of their costs associated with due diligence and advisory
services.
Acquisition
of Midway-Tristate Corporation
On April 30, 2007, MRM, through its wholly owned subsidiary
McJunkin Appalachian , acquired a 100% interest in
Midway-Tristate
Corporation (Midway). Midway is engaged primarily in the
distribution of pipe, equipment and supplies to the oil and gas
and utility industries in Michigan, West Virginia, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Utah, Wyoming, and Colorado. The acquisition of
Midway significantly increased McApples presence
particularly in the strategic Rocky Mountain region.
F-37
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
The purchase price was approximately $83.3 million and has
been allocated as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104.5
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
83.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill associated with this transaction is not deductible for
tax purposes, nor is any amortization associated with
customer-related intangibles which have a useful life of
20 years.
Acquisition
of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co.
On October 31, 2007, MRM, through its wholly owned
subsidiary West Oklahoma PVF Company, acquired a 100% interest
in Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. (Red Man). Red Man is a
distributor of tubular goods and an operator of service and
supply centers which distribute maintenance, repair and
operating products utilized primarily in the energy industry as
well as industrial products consisting primarily of line pipe,
valves, fittings and flanges. Red Man distributes products and
tubular goods through service and supply centers and sales
locations strategically located close to major hydrocarbon
producing and refining areas in the United States and Canada.
F-38
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
The purchase price was approximately $991.0 million
(including common units issued for Red Man shares of
$111.1 million) and has preliminarily been allocated as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
335.2
|
|
Notes and other receivables
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
386.3
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
|
260.2
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
188.9
|
|
Sales order backlog
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
407.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650.5
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
209.5
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
225.9
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
71.6
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
100.6
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
991.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs capitalized in connection with the acquisition
of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. totaled
$17.3 million and included $12.0 million paid to an
affiliate of GSCP as reimbursement of their costs associated
with due diligence and advisory services.
As part of the Red Man transaction, MRM indirectly acquired a
call option to buy out the 49% minority interest of Midfield for
approximately $100.0 million. The call option may be
exercised between June 15, 2008 and December 15, 2008.
On July 31, 2008 MRM exercised this call right.
Approximately $68 million of the purchase price was paid in
cash with proceeds from MRMs Asset Based Revolving Credit
Facility while the remainder was paid through the issuance of
PVF stock. In addition to the $100.0 million purchase
price, the company repaid $29 million of loans to the
selling shareholders of Midfield Supply.
Pro Forma
Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma results of operations assume
that each of the transactions described above occurred on
January 1, 2007. This unaudited pro forma information
should not be relied upon as necessarily being indicative of the
historical results that would have been obtained if the
transactions had actually occurred on that date nor the results
that may be obtained in the future.
F-39
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Pro forma sales
|
|
$
|
1,909.2
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
NOTE 3
|
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The following tables present the Companys goodwill and
other intangible assets at June 26, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Order
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
Non Compete
|
|
|
(With
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 Year)
|
|
|
(30.5 Years)
|
|
|
(5 Years)
|
|
|
Life)
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Recorded in connection with the McJunkin acquisition
|
|
$
|
1,601
|
|
|
$
|
356,036
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
$
|
155,762
|
|
|
$
|
382,908
|
|
Recorded in connection with the Midway acquisition (preliminary)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,802
|
|
Recorded in connection with the Red Man acquisition (preliminary)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681,906
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(1,467
|
)
|
|
|
(8,844
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
367,310
|
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
155,762
|
|
|
$
|
1,092,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to purchase price allocation in connection with the
Red Man acquisition
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
260,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,864
|
|
|
|
(273,978
|
)
|
Adjustments to purchase price allocation in connection with the
Midway acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
|
(14,204
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 26, 2008
|
|
$
|
861
|
|
|
$
|
613,422
|
|
|
$
|
694
|
|
|
$
|
344,626
|
|
|
$
|
814,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
Amortization
of Intangible Assets
The weighted average amortization period for each type of
intangible is noted in the table above. The weighted average
amortization period for all amortizable intangibles is
30.3 years. The sales order backlog is amortized over one
year, the non-compete agreements are amortized over the life of
the agreements (five years) and the customer base is amortized
based upon estimated attrition rates. Total amortization of all
acquisition-related intangible assets for each of the years
ending December 31, 2008 to 2012, is currently estimated as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
27.9
|
|
2009
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
2010
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
2011
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
2012
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
If inventories were reported at values approximating current
costs, as would have resulted from using the
first-in,
first-out method, they would have been $65.9 million and
$10.3 million higher at June 26, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. In addition, after giving
pro forma effect to profit sharing and income taxes, net income
would have been higher by $34.9 million for the six months
ended June 26, 2008 and $1.8 million for the five
months ended June 28, 2007, respectively. No such amounts
were recorded for the one month ended January 30, 2007. For
the six months ended June 26, 2008, the Company experienced
a liquidation of certain LIFO inventories resulting in income of
$15.1 million. For the five months ended June 28,
2007, the Company experienced a liquidation of certain LIFO
inventories resulting in income of $1.6 million. The
liquidation for the one month ended January 30, 2007 was
immaterial.
The significant components of our long-term debt are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Asset-based revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
204,394
|
|
|
|
$
|
234,146
|
|
Term loan facility
|
|
|
567,813
|
|
|
|
|
569,250
|
|
Junior Term loan facility
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfield revolving credit facility
|
|
|
51,727
|
|
|
|
|
50,970
|
|
Midfield term loan facility
|
|
|
9,845
|
|
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
Midfield notes payable
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
3,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,284,746
|
|
|
|
|
868,397
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
16,562
|
|
|
|
|
19,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,268,184
|
|
|
|
$
|
848,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility: On January 31, 2007, in
connection with the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs
Funds, MRM entered into a credit agreement and related security
and other agreements for a secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility with The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. as
administrative agent and collateral agent. The Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility provided financing of up to
$300.0 million, subject to a borrowing base equal to at any
time the lesser of 85% of eligible accounts receivable and 85%
of net orderly liquidation value of the
F-41
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
eligible inventory, less certain reserves. The Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility included borrowing capacity available
for letters of credit and for borrowings on
same-day
notice. At the closing of the acquisition, MRM utilized
$75.0 million of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
for loans and approximately $3.1 million for letters of
credit.
On October 31, 2007, and concurrent with the close of the
Red Man acquisition, MRM refinanced the initial Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility with a new $650.0 million
facility with terms substantially the same as those described
above. At that date, MRM utilized $322.5 million of the new
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility to fund a portion of the
Red Man acquisition in addition to refinancing amounts
previously outstanding. In June 2008, the facility limit
increased to $700.0 million.
As of June 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
$204.4 million and $234.1 million, respectively, in
borrowings were outstanding under the Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility. As of June 26, 2008, MRM had
$490.8 million of unused borrowing availability based on a
borrowing base of $700 million and after giving effect to
$4.8 million used for letters of credit.
The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides that MRM has
the right at any time to request incremental facilities
commitments, but the lenders are under no obligation to provide
any such additional commitments. The Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility permits incremental facilities (together with
any new commitments under the Term Loan Facility discussed
below) up to (1) $150.0 million generally available,
(2) and additional amounts available so long as the secured
leverage ratio as specified in the Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility is satisfied. If MRM were to request any such
additional commitments and the existing lenders or new lenders
were to agree to provide such commitments, the Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility size could be increased as described
above, but MRMs ability to borrow would still be limited
by the amount of the borrowing base.
Borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility bear
interest at a rate per annum equal to, at MRMs option,
either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the
greater of (1) the prime rate as quoted in The Wall
Street Journal and (2) the federal funds effective rate
plus 1/2 of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain
adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin. The
applicable margin in the initial asset revolving credit facility
was 0.75% with respect to base rate borrowings and 1.75% with
respect to LIBOR borrowings. As part of the refinancing, these
were revised to 0.50% and 1.50%, respectively. The applicable
margin is subject to adjustment downward based on the MRMs
leverage ratio. In addition, MRM is required to pay a commitment
fee of 0.375% per annum in respect of the unutilized
commitments. This rate is also subject to adjustment downward
based upon the MRMs leverage. MRM must also pay customary
letter of credit fees and agency fees. The weighted average
interest rate on the revolving loans was 4.14% and 6.53% at
June 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
If at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding loans,
unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of
credit under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds
the lesser of (i) the total revolving credit commitments
and (ii) the borrowing base, MRM will be required to repay
outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an
aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the
commitment amount. If the amount available under the Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility is less than 7% of total revolving
credit commitments, or an event of default pursuant to certain
provisions of the credit agreement has occurred, MRM would then
be required to deposit daily in a collection account managed by
the agent under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. MRM
may voluntarily reduce the unutilized portion of the commitment
amount and repay outstanding loans at any time without premium
or penalty other than customary breakage costs with
F-42
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
respect to LIBOR loans. There is no scheduled amortization under
the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility; the principal amount
of the loans outstanding is due and payable in full on
October 31, 2013.
All obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility
are guaranteed by MRMs existing and future wholly owned
domestic subsidiaries. All obligations under MRMs
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, and the guarantees of
those obligations, are secured, subject to certain significant
exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of MRM and the
subsidiaries that have guaranteed the Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility, including:
|
|
|
|
|
A first-priority security interest in personal property
consisting of inventory and accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
A second-priority pledge of certain of the capital stock held by
MRM or any subsidiary guarantor; and
|
|
|
|
A second-priority security interest in, and mortgages on,
substantially all other tangible and intangible assets of MRM
and each subsidiary guarantor.
|
The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of
covenants that, among other things and subject to certain
significant exceptions, restrict MRMs ability and the
ability of its subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
|
|
Incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Pay dividends on MRMs capital stock or the capital stock
of MRMs direct or indirect parent;
|
|
|
|
Make investments, loans, advances or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Sell assets, including capital stock of MRMs subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
Consolidate or merge with another entity;
|
|
|
|
Create liens;
|
|
|
|
Pay, redeem, or amend the terms of subordinated indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
Enter into certain sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
Fundamentally or substantively alter the character of the
business conducted by MRM and its subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Enter into agreements that limit (1) the ability of
non-guarantors to pay dividends to MRM or any guarantor or
(2) the ability of MRM or any guarantor to pledge its
assets to secure its obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving
Credit Facility.
|
In addition to other customary exceptions, the covenants
limiting dividends and other restricted payments and prepayments
or redemptions of subordinated indebtedness generally permit the
restricted actions in additional limited amounts, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, principally that MRM must
have at least $50.0 million of pro forma excess
availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.
Although the credit agreement governing the Asset-Based
Revolving Credit Facility does not require MRM to comply with
any financial ratio maintenance covenants, if less than 7% of
the then outstanding credit commitments were available to be
borrowed under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility at any
time, MRM would not be permitted to borrow any additional
amounts unless its pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to
consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in
F-43
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
the credit agreement) were at least 1.0 to 1.0. The credit
agreement also contains customary affirmative covenants and
events of default.
Term Loan Facility: On January 31,
2007, in connection with the acquisition of McJunkin by GSCP,
MRM entered into a credit agreement and related security and
other agreements for a $575.0 million Term Loan Facility
with Lehman Commercial Paper as administrative agent and
collateral agent. The full amount of the Term Loan Facility was
borrowed on January 31, 2007.
On October 31, 2007, and concurrent with the close of the
Red Man acquisition, the Term Loan Facility was amended to
permit for the refinancing of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Facility, as described above, in addition to revising certain
provisions of the agreement as discussed in more detail below.
These borrowings bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at
MRMs option, either (a) the greater of the prime rate
and the federal funds rate effective rate plus 0.50%, plus in
either case 2.25%; or (b) LIBOR plus 3.25%. On
June 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
$567.8 million and $569.3 million, respectively, were
outstanding under the Term Loan. The weighted average interest
rate on the term loan was 6.13% and 8.08% at June 26, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The Term Loan Facility requires MRM to prepay outstanding term
loans with 50% (which percentage will be reduced to 25% if
MRMs total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio
and will be reduced to 0% if MRMs total leverage ratio is
less than a specified ratio) of its annual excess cash flow (as
defined in the credit agreement). For 2008 and 2007, MRM was not
required to prepay any outstanding term loans pursuant to the
annual excess cash flow requirements.
MRM may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the Term Loan
Facility at any time without premium or penalty other than
customary breakage costs with respect to LIBOR
loans. The Term Loan Facility amortizes at a rate of 1.00% per
year with the balance due at January 31, 2014.
All obligations under the Term Loan Facility are unconditionally
guaranteed by MRM and each wholly owned domestic subsidiary of
MRM. All obligations under the Term Loan Facility, and the
guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain
significant exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of
MRM and the subsidiaries that have guaranteed the Term Loan
Facility, including:
|
|
|
|
|
A second-priority security interest in personal property
consisting of inventory and accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
A first-priority pledge of certain of the capital stock held by
MRM or any subsidiary guarantor; and
|
|
|
|
A first-priority security interest in, and mortgages on,
substantially all other tangible and intangible assets of the
Company and each subsidiary guarantor.
|
The Term Loan Facility contains a number of negative covenants
that are substantially similar to those governing the
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. The credit agreement also
contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default.
Junior Term Loan Facility: On
May 22, 2008, McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation, as the
borrower, entered into a $450 Million Term Loan Credit Agreement
(the Junior Term Loan Facility). The proceeds from
the Junior Term Loan Facility, along with $25 million in
proceeds from revolving loans drawn under the Revolving Credit
Facility, were used to fund a dividend to McJunkin Red Man
Holding Corporations stockholders, including PVF Holdings
LLC. PVF Holdings LLC distributed the proceeds it received from
the dividend to its members, including the Goldman Sachs Funds
and certain of the Companys directors and members of its
management. The term loans under the Junior
F-44
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
Term Loan Facility are not subject to amortization and the
principal of such loans must be repaid on January 31, 2014.
The term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility bear interest
at a rate per annum equal to, at the borrowers option,
either (i) the greater of the prime rate and the federal
funds effective rate plus 0.50%, plus in either case 2.25%, or
(ii) LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate plus
3.25%. On June 26, 2008, $450.0 million was
outstanding under the Junior Term Loan Facility and the interest
rate on these loans was 5.73%.
We may voluntarily prepay term loans under the Junior Term Loan
Facility in whole or in part at our option, without premium or
penalty. After the payment in full of the term loans under the
Term Loan Facility, we will be required to prepay outstanding
term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility with 100% of the
net cash proceeds of:
|
|
|
|
|
a disposition of any of our or our restricted subsidiaries
business units, assets or other property not in the ordinary
course of business, subject to certain exceptions for permitted
asset sales;
|
|
|
|
a casualty event with respect to collateral for which we or any
of our restricted subsidiaries receives insurance proceeds, or
proceeds of a condemnation award or other compensation;
|
|
|
|
the issuance or incurrence by us or any of our restricted
subsidiaries of indebtedness, subject to certain
exceptions; and
|
|
|
|
any sale-leaseback transaction permitted under the Junior Term
Loan Facility.
|
Also, after the payment in full of the term loans under the Term
Loan Facility, we will be required to prepay the outstanding
term loans under the Junior Term Loan Facility. We must also
prepay the principal amount of the term loans under the Junior
Term Loan Facility with 50% of the cash proceeds received by us
from a Qualified IPO, net of underwriting discounts
and commissions and other related reasonable costs and expenses.
A Qualified IPO is defined as a bona fide
underwritten sale to the public of our common stock or the
common stock of any of our direct or indirect subsidiaries or
our direct or indirect parent companies pursuant to a
registration statement that is declared effective by the SEC or
the equivalent offering on a private exchange or platform.
The Junior Term Loan Facility contains a number of negative
covenants that are substantially similar to those governing the
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. The credit agreement also
contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default.
Midfield Revolving Credit
Facility: Midfield, the Companys
Canadian subsidiary, has a Canadian dollar revolving credit
facility administered by Bank of America. This facility has a
maximum limit of CAD $150 million bearing interest at
Canadian prime rate plus a margin of up to 0.25%. The revolver
is secured by substantially all of Midfields personal
property assets including accounts receivable, chattel paper,
bank accounts, general intangibles, inventory, investment
property, cash and insurance proceeds. The balance of the
revolver is due at its maturity date, November 2, 2010.
Midfield Term Loan Facility: Midfield
has a term loan facility that is due on demand. This facility
bears interest at Canadian prime rate plus a margin of up to
0.5%. The term loan facility is secured by substantially all of
Midfields real property and equipment.
Midfield Notes Payable: Midfield has
two notes payable pursuant to holdback provisions from recent
acquisitions. These amounts, totaling $1.0 million and
$3.8 million at June 26, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively, are owed to individuals who became and
continue to be shareholders of Midfield supply as a result of
these transactions. These notes were paid in August 2008.
F-45
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
Maturities of Long-Term Debt: At
December 31, 2007, annual maturities of long-term debt
during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
2009
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
2010
|
|
|
56.8
|
|
2011
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,194.0
|
|
The above table does not reflect future excess cash flow
prepayments, if any, that may be required under the Term Loan
Facility.
Interest Rate Swaps: The Company uses
derivative financial instruments to help manage its interest
rate risk exposure. On December 3, 2007, MRM entered into a
floating to fixed interest rate swap agreement, effective
December 31, 2007, for a notional amount of
$700.0 million to limit its exposure to interest rate
increases related to a portion of its floating rate
indebtedness. The interest rate swap agreement terminates after
three years. At June 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
the fair value of MRMs interest rate swap agreement was a
loss of approximately $3.2 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, which amount is included in accrued liabilities.
As of the effective date, MRM designated the interest rate swap
as a cash flow hedge.
For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss
on the derivative hedging instrument is reported in other
comprehensive income, while the ineffective portion is recorded
in current earnings as other income or other expense. At
June 26, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $1.6 million
and $0.2 million, respectively, of unrecognized losses, net
of tax, on the interest rate swap agreement is included in other
comprehensive income. During the six months ended June 26,
2008, the Company recognized a hedge ineffectiveness loss of
$0.4 million on the consolidated statements of income.
There was no hedge ineffectiveness at December 31, 2007.
As a result of the swap agreement, MRMs effective fixed
interest rates as to the $700.0 million in floating rate
indebtedness will be 4.868% for associated indebtedness on the
Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and 7.118% for associated
indebtedness on the Term Loan Facility, per quarter through 2010
and result in an average fixed rate of 6.672%.
Management evaluates the estimated annual effective income tax
rate for interim periods based on current and forecasted
business levels and activities, including enacted tax laws.
Items unrelated to current year ordinary income are recognized
entirely in the period identified as a discrete item of tax. The
interim period income tax provisions are comprised of tax on
ordinary income at the most recent estimated annual effective
tax rate, adjusted for the effect of discrete items.
The effective tax rates were 36.26% for the six months ended
June 26, 2008, 41.18% for the five months ended
June 28, 2007 and 41.08% for the one month ended
January 30, 2007. These rates differ from the federal
statutory rate of 35% principally as a result of state and
foreign income taxes. The rate for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 is lower than the rates for the five months
ended June 28, 2007 and the one month ended
January 30, 2007 primarily due to lower state taxes.
During the interim period, there were no material changes to the
amount of previously disclosed unrecognized tax benefits.
F-46
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims,
both as a plaintiff and a defendant, which arise in the ordinary
course of business. Included in these legal proceedings are
cases where the Company has been named as a defendant in
lawsuits brought against a large number of entities by
individuals seeking damages for injuries allegedly caused by
certain products containing asbestos. Although the Company has
estimated its liabilities in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and currently has insurance covering a
portion of its asbestos liabilities, there is a possibility that
resolution of the matters could result in additional losses in
excess of presently estimated liabilities. Also, there is a
possibility that resolution of certain of the Companys
legal contingencies for which there are no liabilities recorded
could result in a loss. Management is not able to estimate the
amount of such loss, if any. However, in the opinion of the
Company, after consultation with counsel, the ultimate
resolution of all pending matters is not expected to have a
material effect on its financial position, although it is
possible that such resolutions could have a material adverse
impact on the Companys results of operations.
In addition to the foregoing, from time to time the Company is
involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings
that are incidental to its business, including claims relating
to product liability, general negligence, environmental issues,
employment, and other matters. It is not expected that the
ultimate resolution of any of these matters will have a material
adverse impact on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Midfield has issued a financial guarantee in the form of an
irrevocable standby letter of credit for an associated entity in
the amount of $4.9 million which is recorded in the
accompanying balance sheet at its fair value. This letter
expires January 31, 2009 subject to certain renewal
provisions.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which clarifies the
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, and enhances disclosures about fair value
measurements. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board Staff Position
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the
Company will delay application of SFAS No. 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until
January 1, 2009.
SFAS No. 157 clarified the definition of fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation
inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy
established by SFAS No. 157 is as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the
measurement date.
Level 2: Significant observable
inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data.
F-47
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
Level 3: Significant unobservable
inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs should
reflect a companys own assumptions about the assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability (including all assumptions about risk).
The Company used the following methods and significant
assumptions to estimate fair value for assets and liabilities
recorded at fair value.
Assets Held for Sale. Included in
assets held for sale are certain investments held for sale that
are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. The
fair value of these investments held for sale is determined by
obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities
exchanges.
Derivatives. Derivatives are reported
at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The Company obtains
dealer quotations to value its interest rate swaps.
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 26, 2008
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Held for Sale (Investments)
|
|
$
|
33,595
|
|
|
$
|
33,595
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (Interest Rate Swaps)
|
|
$
|
3,248
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,248
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value at specified election dates.
The Company has not elected to account for any of its assets or
liabilities at fair value and therefore adoption of
SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 did not effect
its financial statements.
|
|
NOTE 9
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Five Months Ended
|
|
|
One Month Ended
|
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
75,934
|
|
|
$
|
17,614
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,958
|
)
|
Derivative valuation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,386
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
73,507
|
|
|
$
|
17,614
|
|
|
$
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Restricted Stock and Stock Option
Plans: Effective March 27, 2007, the
Companys Board of Directors approved the formation of the
2007 Restricted Stock Plan and the 2007 Stock Option Plan. The
purpose of these plans is to aid MRM in recruiting and retaining
key employees, directors and consultants of outstanding ability
and to motivate such key employees, directors and consultants
F-48
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
to exert their best efforts on behalf of the Company by
providing incentives in the form of restricted stock and stock
options. The Company expects that it will benefit from the added
interest which such key employees, directors and consultants
will have in the welfare of the Company as a result of their
proprietary interest in the Companys success.
Under the terms of the stock option plan, options may not be
granted at prices less than their fair market value on the date
of the grant, nor for a term exceeding 10 years. Vesting
occurs in one-third increments on the third, fourth, and fifth
anniversaries of the date specified in the employees
respective option agreements. The Company expenses the fair
value of the stock option grants on a straight-line basis over
the vesting period. A Black-Scholes option pricing model was
used to estimate the fair value of the stock options granted in
2007 and 2008. For purposes of measuring compensation, the
Company relies on a calculated value that requires certain
assumptions including volatility based on the appropriate
industry sector. Following are the weighted average assumptions
used to estimate the fair values of options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.19%
|
|
|
|
4.10%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
|
|
0.00%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
22.07%
|
|
|
|
22.07%
|
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
6.2 years
|
|
|
|
6.2 years
|
|
A summary of the status of stock option grants under the stock
option plan as of June 26, 2008, and changes during the six
months ended on that date is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
3,533.46
|
|
|
$
|
2,411.17
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
394.61
|
|
|
|
4,348.19
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(128.37
|
)
|
|
|
(2,411.17
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 26, 2008
|
|
|
3,799.70
|
|
|
$
|
2,612.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Options vested at June 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the restricted stock plan, restricted stock
may be granted at the direction of the Board of Directors and
vesting occurs in one-fourth increments on the second, third,
fourth, and fifth anniversaries of the date specified in the
employees respective restricted stock agreements. The
Company expenses the fair value of the restricted stock grants
on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
F-49
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity under
the restricted stock plan as of June 26, 2008, and changes
during the eleven months ended on that date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
635.52
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(41.95
|
)
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 26, 2008
|
|
|
593.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized compensation expense under the stock option and
restricted stock plans is set forth in the table below. There
were no such expenses for the one month ended January 30,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Compensation expense Stock options
|
|
$
|
501,000
|
|
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
139,000
|
|
|
|
39,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
$
|
640,000
|
|
|
$
|
119,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 26, 2008, the Company had $7.3 million and
$1.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related
to outstanding stock options and restricted stock, respectively.
Restricted Common Units: In conjunction
with the acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds,
certain key MRM employees received restricted common units of
PVF Holdings LLC that vest over a five-year requisite service
period. Compensation expense associated with these restricted
common units totaled $0.6 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 and $0.1 million for the five months
ended June 28, 2007 based upon their fair market value at
the date they were issued which is being recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. There was no such
expense for the one month ended January 30, 2007. As of
June 26, 2008, the Company had $4.1 million of
unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding
restricted common units which will be amortized over a weighted
average vesting period of four years.
Profits Units: In conjunction with the
acquisition of McJunkin by the Goldman Sachs Funds and the Red
Man acquisition, certain key MRM employees received profits
units in PVF Holdings LLC that vest over a five-year requisite
service period. These units entitle their holders to a share of
any distributions made by PVF Holdings LLC once common unit
holders have received a return of all capital contributed to PVF
Holdings LLC. Compensation expense associated with these profits
units totaled $1.6 million for the six months ended
June 26, 2008 and $0.7 million for the five months
ended June 28, 2007 based upon their fair market value at
the date they were issued which is being amortized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period. There was no such
expense for the one month ended January 30, 2007. As of
June 26, 2008, the Company had $13.8 million and of
unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding profits
units which will be amortized over a weighted average vesting
period of five years.
|
|
NOTE 11
|
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
|
Basic earnings per share are computed based on the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, excluding
any dilutive effects of stock options and restricted stock.
Diluted
F-50
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN RED MAN
HOLDING CORPORATION
June 26,
2008
earnings per share are computed based on the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding including any dilutive
effect of stock options and restricted stock. The dilutive
effect of stock options and restricted stock are calculated
under the treasury stock method. Earnings per share are
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Successor)
|
|
|
(Predecessor)
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Five Months
|
|
|
One Month
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 26,
|
|
|
June 28,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net income (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
75,934
|
|
|
$
|
17,614
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
309,421
|
|
|
|
102,594
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average dilutive shares outstanding
|
|
|
310,034
|
|
|
|
102,792
|
|
|
|
17,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
245.41
|
|
|
$
|
171.69
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
244.92
|
|
|
$
|
171.36
|
|
|
$
|
376.70
|
|
F-51
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
McJunkin Corporation
Charleston, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
McJunkin Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years
then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of McJunkin Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.
/s/ Schneider Downs
& Co., Inc
Columbus, Ohio
January 13, 2007
F-52
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
McJUNKIN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
|
$
|
5,865
|
|
Receivables, less allowances of $2,015 and $1,743
|
|
|
168,877
|
|
|
|
163,775
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
225,304
|
|
|
|
189,209
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
|
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
401,051
|
|
|
|
361,391
|
|
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PrimeEnergy and other oil and gas
|
|
|
40,396
|
|
|
|
32,226
|
|
Real estate and other
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
40,985
|
|
|
|
32,675
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
Cash value of life insurance
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
2,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,980
|
|
|
|
37,132
|
|
FIXED ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
|
4,392
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
Buildings and building improvements
|
|
|
21,416
|
|
|
|
21,325
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
43,143
|
|
|
|
42,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,951
|
|
|
|
68,138
|
|
Allowances for depreciation
|
|
|
(41,743
|
)
|
|
|
(41,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,208
|
|
|
|
26,229
|
|
PROPERTY HELD UNDER CAPITAL LEASES
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
6,274
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$2,702 and $2,425
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,656
|
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
480,999
|
|
|
$
|
433,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable trade
|
|
$
|
130,864
|
|
|
$
|
145,296
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
46,471
|
|
|
|
45,220
|
|
Customer prepayments
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
|
|
6,536
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,216
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
8,516
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Current portion of long-term obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
188,715
|
|
|
|
232,345
|
|
LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
3,635
|
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,469
|
|
|
|
8,977
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
15,627
|
|
|
|
12,389
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST IN McJUNKIN APPALACHIAN OILFIELD SUPPLY
COMPANY
|
|
|
15,601
|
|
|
|
11,459
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock, par value $700:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common voting authorized 37,860; issued
and outstanding 16,940
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
Class B common nonvoting authorized 5,000;
issued and outstanding 570
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
206,044
|
|
|
|
137,192
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of deferred income taxes of
$14,759 and $11,529
|
|
|
24,286
|
|
|
|
19,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,587
|
|
|
|
168,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
480,999
|
|
|
$
|
433,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-53
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
McJUNKIN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,713,679
|
|
|
$
|
1,445,770
|
|
Increase in fair market values of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL REVENUES
|
|
|
1,716,294
|
|
|
|
1,448,630
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,394,294
|
|
|
|
1,177,091
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
173,948
|
|
|
|
155,717
|
|
Profit sharing
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
|
|
13,144
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2,845
|
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
Minority interest in McJunkin Appalachian
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
3,874
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
1,598,380
|
|
|
|
1,359,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
117,914
|
|
|
|
89,124
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
48,340
|
|
|
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
69,574
|
|
|
$
|
52,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-54
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
11,858
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
111,592
|
|
|
$
|
8,469
|
|
|
$
|
132,318
|
|
Net income for the year 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,541
|
|
Unrealized and realized gain in
PrimeEnergy-net
of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,541
|
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
63,421
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Class A, $1,490 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,242
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,242
|
)
|
On Class B, $2,980 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
137,192
|
|
|
|
19,349
|
|
|
|
168,798
|
|
Net income for the year 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,574
|
|
Unrealized and realized gain in
PrimeEnergy-net
of deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,574
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
74,511
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Class A, $40 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
On Class B, $80 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
11,858
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
206,044
|
|
|
$
|
24,286
|
|
|
$
|
242,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-55
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
McJUNKIN
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
69,574
|
|
|
$
|
52,541
|
|
Noncash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,802
|
|
|
|
(4,905
|
)
|
Minority interest in McJunkin Appalachian
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Increase in fair market values of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
Provision for losses on receivables
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Reduction of inventory loss provision
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Non-operating gains and other items not providing cash
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by Operations Before Working Capital Changes
|
|
|
81,314
|
|
|
|
52,847
|
|
Working Capital Changes
|
|
|
(62,962
|
)
|
|
|
(22,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS
|
|
|
18,352
|
|
|
|
30,385
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset purchases net of proceeds from disposals
|
|
|
(4,960
|
)
|
|
|
(7,725
|
)
|
Other investment and notes receivable transactions
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
(6,701
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (Payments on) long-term obligations
|
|
|
9,731
|
|
|
|
(11,319
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(26,938
|
)
|
|
|
(9,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(17,207
|
)
|
|
|
(21,084
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in cash
|
|
|
(2,117
|
)
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Cash beginning of year
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
3,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
|
$
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
|
|
NOTE A
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Business Operations: McJunkin
Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) are national
distributors of pipe, valves, and fittings (PVF), with locations
in principal industrial centers. Major customers represent the
chemical, petroleum refining and other segments of the raw
materials processing industry and the construction industry. PVF
product lines and their share of total sales for 2006 and 2005
include carbon steel pipe (approximately 33% and 34%) and
stainless steel and carbon steel valves (approximately 20% and
21%). Products are obtained from a broad range of suppliers.
Basis of Presentation: The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to
make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
McJunkin Corporation and its wholly-owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries. The residual ownership in the equity and income of
McJunkin Appalachian Oilfield Supply Company (approximately 14%)
is reflected as minority interest. All significant intercompany
transactions have been eliminated. Certain 2005 amounts have
been reclassified to conform to 2006 presentation. Such
reclassifications did not impact net income or
shareholders equity.
Financial Instruments: Financial
instruments that potentially could subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade
accounts and notes receivable. The Company minimizes such risk
by closely monitoring extensions of trade credit. Sales to
industries in 2006 and 2005 in which the Company has significant
receivables were gas utility (15% and 17%), petroleum refining
(14% in both years), chemical processing (12% in both years),
and contractors (12% in both years). The Company estimates
losses for uncollectible accounts based on the aging of the
accounts receivable and the evaluation of the likelihood of
collection. Credit losses relating to customers in these
industries historically have been insignificant.
The Company sells to a large,
U.S.-owned,
multi-national, energy company in Nigeria through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, McJunkin-Nigeria Limited. The
collection of the receivables generated by these sales could be
negatively impacted by such factors as changes in Nigerian or
worldwide economic or political conditions. Credit losses
relating to sales in Nigeria have been insignificant. Total net
assets invested in Nigeria at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
approximated $2,956,000 and $5,205,000.
The Company believes that the carrying values of all significant
assets and liabilities, which meet the definition of financial
instruments, approximate their fair values.
Income Taxes: Deferred income taxes are
provided under the liability method. The liability method
requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be determined
based on differences between the financial reporting and tax
bases of assets and liabilities using the tax rate expected to
be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds
received.
Insurance: The Company is self-insured
for portions of employee healthcare and maintains a deductible
program as it relates to workers compensation, automobile
liability, and general liability claims including, but not
limited to, product liability claims, which are secured by
various letters of credit totaling $3,195,000. Commercially
comprehensive catastrophic coverage is maintained. The
Companys liability and related expenses for claims are
based upon estimates provided by insurance carriers, third-party
administrators and past experience. The reserves are deemed by
the Company to be sufficient to cover outstanding claims,
including those incurred but not reported as of the estimation
date.
F-57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
Inventories: Inventories are valued at
the lower of cost (principally
last-in,
first-out method) or market.
Investments: The Company has equity
investments in certain oil and gas interests that are either
thinly traded in the over-the-counter market or are not publicly
traded. Such investments, considered available for sale, are
carried at estimated fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are recognized in comprehensive
income to the extent they are material. Total accumulated gains,
net of deferred taxes, in comprehensive income are $24,286,000
at December 31, 2006.
The thinly traded nature of PrimeEnergy stock results in
significant fluctuations in the stock price. Accordingly, the
proceeds from any sale of the stock could be significantly less
than the December 31, 2006 carrying value, $40,217,000. An
officer of the Company serves as a director of PrimeEnergy.
Real estate investments, primarily limited partnerships, are
generally carried at the lower of cost or estimated realizable
value.
Fixed Assets: Land, buildings and
equipment are stated on the basis of cost. For financial
statement purposes, depreciation is computed over the estimated
useful lives of the assets by the straight-line method;
accelerated depreciation and cost recovery methods are used for
income tax purposes.
Certain long-term lease transactions relating to the financing
of land and buildings are accounted for as installment
purchases. These properties are capitalized as leased facilities
and amortized on a straight-line basis over their lease terms.
The corresponding lease rental obligations represent the present
value of future lease payments.
Derivative Instruments: The Company had
an interest rate swap, which expired in December 2005, and
collar, which expired in September 2006, that were carried at
fair value as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet.
Changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments were
recognized in current earnings in the year of change.
Retirement Plans: Employees with at
least six months of service participate in the Companys
profit sharing plan. Contributions to the plan are based on the
earnings of the Company, as defined in the plan document.
Employees may also participate in the McJunkin Savings Plan,
whereby a portion of the individuals base earnings may be
deferred and partially matched by the Company, pursuant to
section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The
Companys matching portion under the 401(k) plan
approximated $837,000 and $830,000 in 2006 and 2005.
Revenue Recognition: The Company
records sales revenue upon shipment of goods or performance of
services. Shipping costs are included in cost of goods sold in
the consolidated statements of income.
Intangibles: The Company tests its
goodwill and intangible assets for impairment annually. The
impairment tests are performed at the distribution operations
reporting level of the Company, which holds 100% of the
consolidated intangible assets. At December 31, 2006 and
2005, the Company had no impairment in the carrying value of its
intangible assets.
Goodwill carried by the Company is not amortized for financial
reporting purposes, but is eligible for deduction for income tax
purposes. The Company amortizes intangible assets with finite
lives, such as non-compete agreements, trade names, and customer
lists and relationships over the legal or estimated lives of the
individual assets, principally from one to six years.
F-58
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
Stock Split: All prior period capital
stock and applicable share amounts have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect a
5-for-1
split of the Companys capital stock effective
October 4, 2005.
If inventories were reported at values approximating current
costs, as would have resulted from using the
first-in,
first-out method, they would have been $74,414,000 and
$62,188,000 higher at December 31, 2006 and 2005. In
addition, after giving pro forma effect to profit sharing and
income taxes, net income would have been higher by $7,947,000 in
2006 and $13,114,000 in 2005.
The Company maintains lines of credit that include an unsecured
multi-bank revolving lending agreement totaling
$60 million. In addition, McJunkin Appalachian, which is
financed on a stand-alone basis with no guarantees provided by
McJunkin Corporation, maintains its own long-term revolving
credit/term loan agreement totaling $7.5 million. These
long-term loan agreements contain covenants that require
maintenance of minimum tangible net worth and other financial
ratios. Such covenants could restrict investments outside the
Companys primary line of business, capital expenditures,
and dividend payments.
The Company has a $50 million trade receivables
securitization facility with a group of financial institutions
and uses a special-purpose, wholly-owned, consolidated
subsidiary, McJunkin Receivables Corporation (MRC), for the sole
purpose of buying substantially all of the trade accounts
receivable of the Company, other than McJunkin Appalachian,
McJunkin-Nigeria and McJunkin-Puerto Rico. Under these
facilities, the Company transfers all eligible accounts
receivable to MRC, which in turn sells an undivided ownership
interest in the receivables into commercial paper conduits
administered by the banks. This agreement is accounted for as a
secured borrowing; thus, all receivables outstanding under the
program and corresponding debt are recognized in the
consolidated balance sheet. The assets of MRC are available to
satisfy the claims of the financial institutions to the extent
of the securitized debt. The Company services the receivables
and retains an interest in the receivables subordinate to the
amount borrowed under the agreement. MRC retains the risk of
credit loss on the receivables and, accordingly, the full amount
of the allowance for doubtful accounts has been reflected on the
consolidated balance sheets. The credit losses and delinquencies
relating to these receivables were not material in 2006 and 2005.
The conduits obtain the funds to purchase interests in
receivables by selling commercial paper to third-party
investors. The facility provides that as accounts receivable are
collected, MRC can elect to have the commercial paper conduits
reinvest the proceeds in new accounts receivable. Fundings under
the facility are limited to the lesser of a funding base of
eligible receivables, as defined in the agreement, or
$50 million. Amounts outstanding under the agreement as of
December 31, 2006, were $2 million. There were no
amounts outstanding at the end of 2005. Due to the current
nature of the Companys retained interest in the
receivables, the book value of the receivables represents the
best estimate of the fair market value. This three-year
agreement bears interest at a margin over A1P1 commercial paper
rates.
The facility requires the Company to comply with various
affirmative or negative covenants including, among other things,
accounts receivable delinquency, dilution, and days sales
outstanding ratios and maintenance of a minimum $5 million
net worth in MRC. The securitization agreement contains certain
restrictive covenants, including further sale or placement of
liens on accounts receivable, adherence to collection policies,
restrictions concerning mergers, and commingling of funds
between MRC and the Company. The financial institutions may
terminate the facility upon the
F-59
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
occurrence of, and failure to cure, termination events including
violations of representations, warranties and covenants. The
commercial paper conduits, in addition to their rights to
collect payments from that portion of the interest in the
accounts receivable owned by them, also have rights to collect
payments from that portion of the ownership interest in the
accounts receivable that is owned by MRC.
The total trade receivables pledged as collateral under this
agreement at December 31, 2006 and 2005, were $121,641,000
and $119,692,000.
Maturities of long-term debt are $2,000,000 in 2009 and
$11,035,000 in 2010, including certain amounts that are due on
demand but excluded from current liabilities because the Company
intends to replace such borrowings with funds available under
existing, unused long-term lines of credit. At December 31,
2006, the Company, exclusive of McJunkin Appalachian, had unused
short-term and long-term lines of credit of $10,765,000 and
$99,700,000; McJunkin Appalachian had unused short-term and
long-term lines of credit of $5 million and
$7.5 million.
The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in 2000
and interest rate collar agreement in 2001 to reduce its
exposure to potential interest rate increases. The swap
agreement, which expired in 2005, enabled the Company to make
fixed rate (6.39%) payments and receive floating rate (one-month
LIBOR) payments on a notional amount of $10 million. The
collar agreement, which expired in 2006, enabled the Company to
make fixed rate (ceiling rate of 5.50% and a floor rate of
4.08%) payments and receive floating rate (one-month LIBOR)
payments on a notional amount of $10 million. Only interest
payments, not the notional amounts, were exchanged. The
differences between the amounts exchanged in 2006 and 2005 were
not significant. The Companys interest cost exposure was
limited to the difference between the 5.24% (weighted average)
and a lower floating interest rate, if any, applied to the
notional amounts then outstanding. Management believes it
mitigated counter party credit risk by entering into these
agreements only with major financial institutions. There were no
accumulated derivative liabilities at December 31, 2006 and
2005.
The Company paid interest of $2,831,000 and $2,630,000 in 2006
and 2005.
The Companys long-term debt consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In $000s)
|
|
|
Revolving credit/term loan agreement at a variable rate between
LIBOR and prime, due in 2010
|
|
$
|
8,300
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
Short-term debt expected to be refinanced on a long-term basis
at a variable rate between LIBOR and prime, due in 2010
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Three-year asset securitization at a variable rate based on
commercial paper due in 2009
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,035
|
|
|
$
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
The Company leases land and buildings at various locations from
Hansford Associates and Appalachian Leasing. Certain officers
and directors of the Company participate in the ownership of
Hansford Associates and Appalachian Leasing. Most of these
leases are renewable for various periods through 2026 and
contain clauses for escalation of lease payments, payment of
real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance, and certain other
operating expenses of the properties. Leases with unrelated
parties contain similar provisions. Lease amortization was
$179,000 in 2006 and 2005.
Property held under capital leases in the balance sheets
consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In $000s)
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
$
|
4,881
|
|
|
$
|
4,881
|
|
Allowances for amortization
|
|
|
(2,777
|
)
|
|
|
(2,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
|
$
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases aggregate to
$11,088,000, of which $3,608,000 represents interest and
$3,678,000 represents escalation and executory costs. The
present value of net minimum lease payments is $3,802,000, all
applicable to Hansford Associates. Annual payments under capital
leases are $949,000 for years 2007 through 2011.
Rental expense under operating leases amounted to $8,836,000 in
2006 and $8,070,000 in 2005, including $1,534,000 in 2006 and
$1,474,000 in 2005 applicable to leases with Hansford Associates
and $153,000 in 2006 and $154,000 in 2005 applicable to leases
with Appalachian Leasing. Future minimum rental payments
required under operating leases that have initial or remaining
noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year aggregate to
$19,061,000 and include leases applicable to Hansford Associates
($3,902,000) and leases applicable to Appalachian Leasing
($180,000). Annual operating lease payments are $7,848,000,
$6,616,000, $2,237,000, $956,000, and $626,000 for years 2007
through 2011.
|
|
NOTE E
|
FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
In the normal course of business, the Company invests in various
financial assets and incurs various financial liabilities. The
Companys financial assets and liabilities are recorded in
the consolidated balance sheets at historical cost, which
approximates fair value.
Investments: Investments are carried at
fair market value based on quoted market prices.
Short-Term and Long-Term
Borrowings: Borrowings under the credit
facilities have variable rates that reflect currently available
terms and conditions for similar debt. The carrying amount of
this debt is a reasonable estimate of its fair value.
Leases: Management estimated the fair
value of the Companys lease obligations using discounted
cash flow analysis based on the Companys current lease
rates for similar leases, and determined that the fair value is
not materially different from their carrying values.
Derivatives: The Company utilized
interest rate swaps and collars to reduce its exposure to
potential interest rate increases. Changes in fair values of
derivative instruments were based upon independent market quotes.
F-61
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
|
|
NOTE F
|
CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in $000s)
|
|
|
CASH PROVIDED BY (USED FOR) WORKING CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
(5,516
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,444
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(35,835
|
)
|
|
|
(36,386
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(6,016
|
)
|
|
|
6,823
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(14,432
|
)
|
|
|
47,694
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
12,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL CHANGES
|
|
$
|
(62,962
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes included in the consolidated statements of income
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in $000s)
|
|
|
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
36,514
|
|
|
$
|
34,075
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
(4,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,643
|
|
|
|
30,038
|
|
State and local:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
8,024
|
|
|
|
7,413
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,697
|
|
|
|
6,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
$
|
48,340
|
|
|
$
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective tax rate varied from the statutory
federal income tax rate for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in $000s)
|
|
|
Federal tax expense at statutory rates
|
|
$
|
41,270
|
|
|
$
|
31,193
|
|
State taxes
|
|
|
5,653
|
|
|
|
4,254
|
|
Non-deductible sales expenses
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
$
|
48,340
|
|
|
$
|
36,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective rate
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-62
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
The Company paid $50,553,000 and $34,665,000 in 2006 and 2005
for federal and state taxes.
Significant components of the Companys current deferred
tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(in $000s)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable valuation
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
$
|
689
|
|
Real estate and investment bases differences
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Expenses deductible as paid
|
|
|
3,684
|
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,567
|
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
(6,464
|
)
|
|
|
(2,612
|
)
|
Accelerated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,969
|
)
|
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
Investment basis difference
|
|
|
(14,759
|
)
|
|
|
(11,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(24,192
|
)
|
|
|
(17,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(19,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims,
both as a plaintiff and a defendant, which arise in the ordinary
course of business. Included in these legal proceedings are
cases where the Company has been named as a defendant in
lawsuits brought against a large number of entities by
individuals seeking damages for injuries allegedly caused by
certain products containing asbestos. Although the Company has
estimated its liabilities in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and currently has insurance covering a
portion of its asbestos liabilities, there is a possibility that
resolution of these matters could result in additional losses in
excess of presently estimated liabilities. Also, there is a
possibility that resolution of certain of the Companys
legal contingencies for which there are no liabilities recorded
could result in a loss. Management is not able to estimate the
amount of such loss, if any.] However, in the opinion of the
Company, after consultation with counsel, the ultimate
resolution of all pending matters is not expected to have a
material effect on its financial position, although it is
possible that such resolutions could have a material adverse
impact on net income and cash flows.
|
|
NOTE I
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
|
On December 4, 2006, McJunkin entered into a definitive
agreement (the Merger Agreement) to be acquired by McJ Holding
Corporation (ParentCo), a wholly owned subsidiary of McJ Holding
LLC (HoldCo). Both ParentCo and HoldCo were formed by Goldman
Sachs Capital Partners (GSCP) for purposes of facilitating this
acquisition. On January 12, 2007, McJunkins
shareholders voted to approve the Merger Agreement. Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement, McJunkins shareholders will
exchange their shares in McJunkin for cash and ownership units
of HoldCo in a transaction valued at approximately
$1.065 billion, including associated fees and refinanced
debt. At the conclusion of the transaction, McJunkin
shareholders will own an approximate 40% interest in HoldCo with
GSCP
F-63
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
McJUNKIN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, 2006
and their affiliates holding the remaining interest. The
transaction is expected to close on or about January 30,
2007.
It is anticipated that the acquisition will be financed with a
term loan of $575 million, asset-based revolver borrowings
of $75 million, existing capital leases of
$3.6 million and an equity investment of approximately
$411 million, which includes equity rolled over from
existing McJunkin shareholders of approximately
$169 million.
Under the provisions of the Merger Agreement, certain of the
Companys assets will be liquidated subsequent to closing
and distributed to McJunkins current shareholders. These
include the investment in PrimeEnergy as well as certain real
estate holdings. At December 31, 2006, these assets had a
net book value of approximately $27.1 million.
F-64
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
McJunkin Corporation
Charleston, West Virginia
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of
McJunkin Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, and for the years then ended, and have issued our
report thereon dated January 13, 2007. Our audits also
included the consolidated financial statement schedule of the
Company listed in the accompanying schedule. This consolidated
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statement schedule as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
/s/ Schneider
Downs & Co., Inc.
Columbus, Ohio
January 13, 2007
F-65
Schedule II
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Worksheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(B) Balance
|
|
|
(C) Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
(E) Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at Beginning
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
at end
|
|
|
|
|
(A) Description (1)
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
(D) Deductions (1)
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
1,722,000
|
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
68,654
|
|
|
$
|
1,743,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
1,743,346
|
|
|
$
|
414,000
|
|
|
$
|
142,346
|
|
|
$
|
2,015,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes write off of uncollectible accounts receivable, net of
recoveries. |
F-66
Report of
Independent Auditors
To the Board of
Directors and Stockholders
Red Man Pipe & Supply Co.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income, preferred stock and stockholders equity, and cash
flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Red Man Pipe and Supply Co. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) at October 31, 2006 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended October 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
February 15, 2008
F-67
RED MAN
PIPE & SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
October 31,
2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
13,866
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2,204 and $1,755 in 2006 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
303,629
|
|
|
|
329,073
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
336,714
|
|
|
|
329,272
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
647,202
|
|
|
|
672,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
29,931
|
|
|
|
39,583
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
76,198
|
|
|
|
91,077
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,047 and
$8,913 in 2006 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
28,422
|
|
|
|
30,034
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
6,689
|
|
|
|
5,057
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
791,000
|
|
|
$
|
838,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lines of credit
|
|
$
|
27,028
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
|
|
187,162
|
|
|
|
209,513
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
63,043
|
|
|
|
41,988
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
3,427
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loans due on demand
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
10,519
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
22,721
|
|
|
|
28,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
315,813
|
|
|
|
298,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
207,418
|
|
|
|
31,434
|
|
Payable to minority interest shareholders
|
|
|
28,009
|
|
|
|
25,718
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
7,826
|
|
Other long-term liability (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
557,163
|
|
|
|
488,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7 and 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
49,423
|
|
|
|
76,064
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $2,500 par value, 2,000 shares
authorized, none issued and outstanding as of October 31,
2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value,
50,000,000 shares authorized, 144,831 and 143,976 issued
and outstanding as of October 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value,
50,000,000 shares authorized, 34,344 issued and outstanding
as of October 31, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
8,159
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
176,091
|
|
|
|
258,274
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
6,343
|
|
|
|
7,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,916
|
|
|
|
273,839
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
184,414
|
|
|
|
273,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
791,000
|
|
|
$
|
838,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-68
RED MAN
PIPE & SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended
October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
1,224,174
|
|
|
$
|
1,815,345
|
|
|
$
|
1,981,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
1,023,030
|
|
|
|
1,551,118
|
|
|
|
1,632,320
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
100,211
|
|
|
|
172,192
|
|
|
|
186,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,123,241
|
|
|
|
1,723,310
|
|
|
|
1,818,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
100,933
|
|
|
|
92,035
|
|
|
|
163,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,431
|
)
|
|
|
(15,024
|
)
|
|
|
(20,641
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
3,317
|
|
|
|
(2,658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,458
|
)
|
|
|
(11,707
|
)
|
|
|
(23,299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
93,475
|
|
|
|
80,328
|
|
|
|
139,820
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
34,208
|
|
|
|
26,498
|
|
|
|
57,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,267
|
|
|
|
53,830
|
|
|
|
82,248
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations
|
|
|
59,267
|
|
|
|
53,654
|
|
|
|
82,183
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of EPSP and
income tax (Note 4)
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
|
(2,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of EPSP and income
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
59,795
|
|
|
$
|
59,647
|
|
|
$
|
82,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-69
RED MAN
PIPE & SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended
October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
59,795
|
|
|
$
|
59,647
|
|
|
$
|
82,183
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in value of cash flow derivative instruments used as cash
flow hedges
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification derivative settlements
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
6,095
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
60,526
|
|
|
$
|
65,742
|
|
|
$
|
83,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-70
RED MAN
PIPE & SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended
October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class C
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Balances at October 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,628
|
|
|
$
|
56,649
|
|
|
$
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
58,709
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,795
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on derivative instruments designated and qualifying as cash
flow hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at October 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
116,444
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,647
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at October 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,480
|
|
|
|
176,091
|
|
|
|
6,343
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
184,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,183
|
|
Retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder contributions (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at October 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,159
|
|
|
$
|
258,274
|
|
|
$
|
7,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
273,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-71
RED MAN
PIPE & SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years Ended
October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
59,795
|
|
|
$
|
59,647
|
|
|
$
|
82,183
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,916
|
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
|
|
9,680
|
|
Write-off of obsolete inventories
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
|
3,383
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(2,336
|
)
|
Impairment loss on goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
(705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
15,364
|
|
|
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|
|
7,214
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,328
|
|
|
|
52,505
|
|
|
|
107,282
|
|
Decrease (increase) in assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(59,120
|
)
|
|
|
(63,380
|
)
|
|
|
(8,626
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,008
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(65,164
|
)
|
|
|
(98,085
|
)
|
|
|
18,724
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,799
|
)
|
|
|
(1,563
|
)
|
|
|
3,162
|
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
30,528
|
|
|
|
53,027
|
|
|
|
(22,937
|
)
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(11,419
|
)
|
|
|
(56,459
|
)
|
|
|
102,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(5,801
|
)
|
|
|
(14,468
|
)
|
|
|
(12,193
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions
|
|
|
(45,874
|
)
|
|
|
(12,784
|
)
|
|
|
(3,747
|
)
|
Advance to related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,877
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of advances to unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(50,411
|
)
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
(12,510
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-72
RED MAN
PIPE & SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances on long-term debt
|
|
|
1,143,106
|
|
|
|
1,403,024
|
|
|
|
1,353,302
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,093,917
|
)
|
|
|
(1,338,977
|
)
|
|
|
(1,398,620
|
)
|
Extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,027
|
)
|
Advances on operating lines of credit
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on operating lines of credit
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(2,665
|
)
|
|
|
(27,606
|
)
|
Advances on notes payable
|
|
|
20,450
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,027
|
|
Advances to affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
Repayments of term loans
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
(1,619
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,369
|
)
|
|
|
(7,087
|
)
|
Advances (payments) to minority interest shareholders
|
|
|
(7,974
|
)
|
|
|
13,087
|
|
|
|
(6,238
|
)
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments to shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(918
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
Financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
60,904
|
|
|
|
52,663
|
|
|
|
(78,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
13,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
7,228
|
|
|
$
|
18,133
|
|
|
$
|
21,961
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
18,144
|
|
|
|
30,436
|
|
|
|
45,118
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-73
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
1.
|
Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Nature of
Operations
|
Nature of
Operations
Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. (the Company) is
a distributor of tubular goods, including oil country tubular
goods and line pipe, and operates service and supply centers
which distribute maintenance, repair and operating products
utilized primarily in the energy industry as well as industrial
products consisting primarily of line pipe, valves, fittings and
flanges. The Company distributes products and tubular goods
through service and supply centers and sales locations
strategically located close to the major hydrocarbon producing
and refining areas of the United States and Canada.
Additionally, the Company distributes its products and tubular
goods to customers in various locations outside of North America.
Principles of
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. and its
majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investments that are not wholly owned, but where we exercise
control, are fully consolidated with the equity held by minority
owners reflected as minority interest in the accompanying
financial statements. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates,
over which we exercise significant influence, but not control,
are accounted for by the equity method. Investments in which we
exercise no control or significant influence are accounted for
under the cost method.
Cash
Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be
cash equivalents.
Derivatives
and Hedging
The Company follows Financial Accounting Standard No. 133
(including subsequent amendments) Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. These statements require
all derivatives to be recognized on the balance sheet and
measured at fair value. If a derivative is designated as a cash
flow hedge, the Company is required to measure the effectiveness
of the hedge, or the degree that the gain (loss) for the hedging
instrument offsets the loss (gain) on the hedged item, at each
reporting period. The effective portion of the gain (loss) on
the derivative instrument is recognized in other comprehensive
income as a component of equity and, subsequently, reclassified
into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
The ineffective portion of a derivatives change in fair
value is required to be recognized in earnings immediately.
Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment under FAS
133 must be recorded at fair value with gains (losses)
recognized in earnings in the period of change. There were no
derivatives outstanding at October 31, 2006 and 2007.
Inventories
The Company accounts for inventories using the
Last-In,
First-Out (LIFO) method. The majority of the
Companys inventories are valued at the lower of LIFO cost
or market. If the LIFO method of valuing inventories were not
used, total inventories would have been $70.0 and
$62.0 million higher at October 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively. However, certain of the Companys
Canadian-based inventories, totaling $73.6 million and
$79.1 million at October 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively, are valued utilizing the lower of cost or market
method.
F-74
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
During 2007, inventory quantities were reduced. This reduction
resulted in a liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried
at lower costs prevailing in prior years as compared with the
current cost of purchases, the effect of which decreased costs
of products sold by approximately $28.3 million in 2007.
There were no LIFO liquidations in 2005 and 2006.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and include
expenditures for facilities as well as significant improvements
to existing facilities. When assets are retired or otherwise
disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in
income for the period. Maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred.
Depreciation and amortization are computed utilizing both
straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful
lives of the property. The ranges of estimated useful lives for
financial reporting are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
5 -- 40
|
|
Machinery, shop equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
5 -- 12
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
3 -- 7
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5 -- 15
|
|
Depreciation expense from continuing operations for the years
ended October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 was $2,828,000,
$4,770,000 and $5,971,000, respectively.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue as products are shipped or
accepted by the customer.
The results of discontinued operations
(Note 4) include manufacturing revenue generated on
long-term fixed price contracts. Revenue on these contracts is
recognized on the percentage of completion basis. The Company
progress bills the customers based upon the contract terms. When
the amount that is billed is greater than the revenue that is
recognized based upon the percentage of completion, deferred
revenue is recognized. Anticipated losses are provided for in
the period incurred.
Rental, service and other revenues are recorded when such
services are performed and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Income
Taxes
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (SFAS No. 109). SFAS No.
109 requires the measurement of deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the future tax consequences attributable to
the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts
of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases.
As the result of a recent FASB deferral, FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48) is effective for the Company for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. FIN 48
prescribes a two-step model for how companies should recognize
and measure uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 also requires
several new disclosures. The Company is assessing the impact
FIN 48 will have on our financial statements.
F-75
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
Treasury
Stock
The Company utilizes the cost method to account for its treasury
stock acquisitions and dispositions.
Freight
The Company follows
EITF 00-10
Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs.
Accordingly, all out-bound shipping and handling costs are
reflected in cost of goods sold and all freight reimbursements
billed to customers are reflected in revenues.
Comprehensive
Income
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income
(SFAS No. 130). SFAS 130
established rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive
income and its components. Comprehensive income includes gains
and losses on hedging activities.
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
Gains and losses from balance sheet translation of operations
outside of the United States where the applicable foreign
currency is the functional currency is included as a component
of accumulated other comprehensive income within
stockholders equity. Gains and losses resulting from
foreign currency transactions are recognized currently in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of
net assets acquired. Recorded goodwill balances are not
amortized but, instead, evaluated for impairment annually or
more frequently if circumstances indicate that an impairment may
exist. The goodwill valuation, which is prepared each fiscal
year, is largely influenced by projected future cash flows and,
therefore, is significantly impacted by estimates and judgments.
Intangible assets are initially recorded at cost. Amortization
is provided using the straight-line method over 3 to
10 years which is intended to amortize the cost of assets
over their estimated useful lives. The carrying value of
intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount
may not be recoverable.
As a result of the Companys annual impairment analysis,
impairment losses of $3,954,000 related to goodwill and
$1,195,000 related to intangibles were recognized in 2007 (2006:
$0). The impairment charge was recorded in Other, net in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-76
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
Fair Value
Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value
measurements. The Company does not believe this pronouncement
will have a material impact on our financial statement. The
provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007.
On July 6, 2007 Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. and its
Shareholders, collectively entered into a definitive agreement
to be acquired by a subsidiary of McJunkin Corporation
(McJunkin). The Companys Shareholders approved
the Merger Agreement and the transaction closed on
October 31, 2007. In exchange for all of the outstanding
stock of the Company, Shareholders received cash and other
considerations. In conjunction with this Merger Agreement
certain Shareholders exchanged some of their shares for common
units in McJ Holding LLC, the ultimate parent corporation of
McJunkin Corporation. McJ Holding LLC is majority-owned by
Goldman Sachs Capital Partners and their affiliates. In
connection with this merger, the combined company has been
renamed McJunkin Red Man Corporation. The cash consideration to
be ultimately paid to the shareholders of the company
approximates $1.1 billion, less debt and certain
transaction expenses, and is subject to a working capital
adjustment and any additional consideration related to
McJunkins right to purchase the remaining equity of the
Companys majority-owned Canadian subsidiary, Midfield
Supply ULC (Midfield). As part of the agreement
McJunkin loaned the Company $120,027,000 in order to pay off the
Companys existing Revolving credit facility. McJunkin also
agreed to accept the obligation arising from certain transaction
expenses and from the termination of the Phantom Stock plan.
This amounted to $6,181,000 of capital contributions.
On June 2, 2006, the Company purchased certain assets from
Bear Tubular, Inc., for $4,613,000 in cash. The summary of the
purchase price allocation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
2,553
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
260
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2006, through a series of transactions, Red Man
Pipe & Supply Canada Ltd. (Red Man Canada)
acquired 100% interest in four separate companies. The
consideration paid consisted of $8,171,000 of cash and $246,000
of share capital in one of the Companys majority-owned
subsidiaries. The summary of the total purchase allocation is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
12,170
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(11,053
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-77
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
On June 14, 2005, the Company formed Red Man Canada.
Through a series of transactions Red Man Canada acquired
21,975 shares (51%) of Midfield. The shares were acquired
for $45,874,000. The summary of the purchase price allocation is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
54,585
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
37,285
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
23,154
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
27,106
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
67,469
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(56,989
|
)
|
Debt and notes payable
|
|
|
(31,710
|
)
|
Payable to shareholders
|
|
|
(22,125
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(45,609
|
)
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
(7,757
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
45,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 1, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of Northern Boreal in exchange for cash and
shares. Northern Boreal operates an oilfield supply store.
Consolidated earnings of Northern Boreal since acquisition date
have been included in these financial statements.
On April 3, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the
outstanding shares of Hagan Oilfield Supply Ltd., and affiliated
companies (1236564 and 1048025) in
exchange for cash and shares. Consolidated earnings of Hagan
since acquisition date have been included in these financial
statements. The Company subsequently amalgamated the operations
of the three companies on November 1, 2007, into Hagan
Oilfield Supply Ltd (Hagan), which operates three
oilfield supply stores.
F-78
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
The consideration paid and the fair values of the net assets
acquired are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hagan
|
|
|
Boreal
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Consideration paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,882
|
|
|
$
|
2,773
|
|
|
$
|
4,655
|
|
Shares issued in Midfield Supply ULC
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,088
|
|
|
$
|
7,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
3,812
|
|
|
$
|
3,910
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
4,683
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(2,773
|
)
|
|
|
(2,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,800
|
|
|
$
|
5,088
|
|
|
$
|
7,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On June 30, 2006, a subsidiary of the Company, Nusco Pipe
and Supply ULC, disposed of its manufacturing business located
in Nisku, Alberta, Canada, as well as its 80% interest in Nusco
Northern Manufacturing Ltd. and its wholly owned subsidiary
Moes. The Company received proceeds of $41,106,000
consisting of cash of $35,220,000, warrants with an estimated
fair value of $308,000 and an assumption of long-term debt of
$5,578,000.
The carrying amounts of the disposed assets relating to this
sale are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands
|
|
|
|
of dollars)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
5,790
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
14,760
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
7,943
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
297
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(2,416
|
)
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(1,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-79
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
The results of operations for the discontinued operations were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2005
|
|
|
November 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
to
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
15,170
|
|
|
$
|
28,031
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(10,819
|
)
|
|
|
(21,880
|
)
|
Expenses
|
|
|
(2,494
|
)
|
|
|
(4,608
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
Bonuses
|
|
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
|
(3,326
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
(1,876
|
)
|
Provision for current income taxes
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
(2,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative figures have been restated as a result of these
discontinued operations.
On November 1, 2006, the Companys 100% owned
subsidiary, Midfield Supply USA Ltd. disposed of all of its
working capital assets with proceeds equal to book value ($888)
and plant and equipment with proceeds equal to net book value
($5) to the Companys majority shareholder. Midfield Supply
USA Ltd. ceased operating at this time.
|
|
5.
|
Property, Plant
and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following as of
October 31, 2006 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands
|
|
|
|
of dollars)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
|
$
|
4,300
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
11,140
|
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
Machinery, shop equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
11,840
|
|
|
|
24,178
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
|
24,455
|
|
|
|
21,254
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
68,900
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
23,069
|
|
|
|
29,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,931
|
|
|
$
|
39,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Operating Lines
of Credit (in thousands of dollars)
|
The Company has one Canadian dollar line of credit with Bank of
America, which is further described in Note 7.
In 2006 bank indebtedness consisted of three Canadian dollar and
one U.S. dollar revolving lines of credit. The Canadian
dollar lines of credit had a maximum limit of $30,000 bearing
interest to Canadian prime rate plus 0.625%, a maximum limit of
$25,000 bearing interest at prime plus 0.5% and a maximum limit
of $1,500 bearing interest at prime plus 0.5%. The
U.S. dollar line of credit had
F-80
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
a maximum of $250 US, bearing interest at 5.875%. All of these
lines of credit were fully repaid in the current year.
|
|
7.
|
Long-Term Debt,
Notes Payable and Term Loans
|
Long-term debt, notes payable and term loans as of
October 31, 2006 and 2007 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(A)
|
|
$
|
207,418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes payable(B)
|
|
|
6,939
|
|
|
|
3,910
|
|
Term loans due on demand(C)
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
41,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,332
|
|
|
|
45,863
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
10,914
|
|
|
|
14,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
207,418
|
|
|
$
|
31,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
At October 31, 2006, the Credit Facility, as amended and
restated, permitted the Company to borrow amounts up to the
lesser of (i) $260 million or (ii) an amount
equal to the borrowing base plus the outstanding balance on the
term loan portion. On the revolving credit portion of the Credit
Facility, the Company is permitted to borrow amounts up to the
lesser of (i) $260 million or (ii) an amount
equal to the borrowing base amount. The borrowing base amount is
determined through a computation of eligible accounts receivable
and inventories as defined in the Credit Facility. The amount of
unused borrowings available under the Credit Facility at
October 31, 2006 was $52.6 million. The borrowings
under the revolving credit portion of the Credit Facility bear
an interest rate equal to the lesser of the Eurodollar rate, as
defined in the Credit Facility plus a margin based upon the
average daily availability and a fixed charge coverage ratio, as
defined in the Credit Facility or the maximum legal rate
permitted by applicable state or federal law, as defined in the
Credit Facility. The term loan portion of the Credit Facility
bears interest at (i) the lesser of the banks
Eurodollar margin plus the Eurodollar base rate, as defined in
the Credit Facility, or the maximum legal rate permitted by
applicable state or federal law, as defined in the Credit
Facility or (ii) the lesser of the banks base rate
margin, plus the base rate, as defined by the Credit Facility,
or the maximum legal rate permitted by applicable state or
federal law, as defined by the Credit Facility. The term loan
was paid off in 2006. The Company pays a fee on the unused
portion of the Credit Facility equal to 0.25% per year.
Additionally, the Company will pay a fee equal to 2.5% per annum
of the face amount of the letters of credit outstanding during
the month, for which letter of credit guarantees have been
issued. As discussed in Note 2, the Credit Facility was
paid off on October 31, 2007, using funds loaned from
McJunkin Corporation.
|
The amended and restated credit agreement contained customary
restrictions and limitations on the Companys ability to
incur liens, incur additional debt, make investments or engage
in transactions with affiliates, make capital expenditures, and
pay dividends or make other distributions. The Company was also
subject to financial covenants which included a total leverage
and a fixed charge ratio.
F-81
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
(B) Notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
$
|
5,154
|
|
|
$
|
3,910
|
|
Unsecured note payable
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,939
|
|
|
$
|
3,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts due to related parties are unsecured, bear interest
at varying rates from 0% to 8% per annum, and are due on demand,
with no fixed terms of repayment. The parties are related due to
some common directors, or they are shareholders of the Company.
(C) Revolver and term loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Borrowings under line of credit with interest at prime plus
margin of 0.25%, due in October 2010(D)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,434
|
|
Revolving term loan facility with interest at prime plus margin
of up to 0.5% (6.75% at October 31, 2007), due on
February 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,420
|
|
Term loan payable in monthly installments of $57,107 including
interest at Canadian bank prime plus 1.25%
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,975
|
|
|
$
|
41,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D) |
On November 2, 2006, Midfield entered into a loan and
security agreement for a CAD150 million revolving credit
facility. As of October 31, 2007, $31.4 million of
borrowings were outstanding under the facility and the unused
borrowing capacity was approximately $125.8 million.
Midfield must pay a monthly fee with respect to unutilized
revolving loan commitments equal to amounts ranging from 0.25%
to 0.375%, depending upon average borrowing levels for the
previous quarter. The facility provides for borrowings up to
CAD150 million, subject to adjustments based on the
borrowing base and less the aggregate letters of credit
outstanding under the facility. Letters of credit may be issued
under the facility subject to certain conditions, including a
CAD10 million sub-limit. The revolving loan has a maturity
date of November 2, 2010. All letters of credit issued
under the facility must expire at least 20 business days prior
to November 2, 2010.
|
The revolving credit facility bears interest with various
variable interest rate options. Midfield can elect a variable
rate based upon either the Canadian prime rate or Canadian
Dollar Bankers Acceptance rate (Canadian BA).
If the Canadian prime rate is elected, the rate ranges from
prime rate to prime rate plus 0.25%, depending upon average
borrowing levels for the previous quarter. If the Company elects
the Canadian BA rate, the rate ranges from Canadian BA rate plus
1.25% to 1.75%, depending upon borrowing levels for the previous
quarter.
The revolving credit facility is secured by substantially all of
the personal property of Midfield, with a carrying value of
$317.3 million at October 31, 2007. Provisions
contained in the revolving credit
F-82
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
facility require Midfield to maintain certain financial ratios
and limit capital expenditures. At October 31, 2007, the
Company was in compliance with all such debt covenants.
The CAD150 million facility is subject to an inter-creditor
agreement which relates to, among other things, priority of
liens and proceeds of sale of collateral.
Aggregate future principal maturities of long-term debt as of
October 31, 2007, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands
|
|
|
|
of dollars)
|
|
|
Year ending October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10,519
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
31,434
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During February 2003, the Company entered into a swap agreement
and swapped $50 million at a variable rate
(LIBOR) for a fixed rate of 3.88%. This derivative
instrument was settled monthly on the first day of the
month and terminated in October 2005. This derivative
qualified as a cash flow hedge under FAS 133. The fair
value of this derivative instrument at October 31, 2005 was
approximately $0. This instrument expired effective
October 31, 2005.
Common
Stock
The Company has two classes of common stock. One class consists
of 50,000,000 authorized shares of $.01 par value voting
Class A Common stock. As of October 31, 2006 and 2007,
there were 144,831 and 143,976 shares, issued and
outstanding, respectively. The other class consists of
50,000,000 authorized shares of $.01 par value nonvoting
Class B Common Stock. As of October 31, 2006 and 2007,
there were 34,344 shares issued and outstanding.
Preferred
Stock
The Company also has 2,000 authorized shares of $2,500 par
value redeemable Class C Preferred Stock. As of
October 31, 2002, there were 2,000 preferred shares issued
and outstanding, and there were no preferred shares issued or
outstanding as of October 31, 2006 and 2007. The
Class C Preferred Stock is nonvoting and subordinate to
indebtedness of the Company, but bears full preference to the
Common Stock as to dividends and to redemption in the event of
liquidation of the Company. On November 30, 1999, certain
rights and privileges relating to the Class C Preferred
Stock were amended. Effective April 1, 2000, the Preferred
Stock bears an annual dividend of 8%, payable quarterly,
beginning on June 30, 2000. Effective April 1, 2002,
the preferred stock annual dividend rate was increased to 9% per
annum, payable quarterly, beginning on July 1, 2002.
Dividends paid on Class C Preferred Stock were $0, $0 and
$0 during 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
In September 2003, the Company redeemed the 2,000 shares of
Class C Preferred Stock for $5,000,000.
F-83
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
Incentive
Stock Plan
In December 1997, the Company established the Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. Incentive Stock Plan (the
Incentive Plan) in which officers, employees and
directors are eligible to participate. The Incentive Plan
authorizes the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified
stock options and awards of restricted stock. Incentive stock
options may only be awarded to employees and the exercise price
may not be less than the fair market value of the Class A
common stock on the date of grant (or 110% of such fair market
value if granted to employees who own more than 10% of the
combined voting power of all classes of the stock of the
Company). The exercise price of non-qualified stock options
shall be determined by the Board of Directors or its committee
and shall not be less than the fair market value of the
Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. The vesting
period for all options will be determined by the Board of
Directors or its committees at the time of the grant. The
incentive stock option may not be exercised after the expiration
of 10 years from the date of grant (or 5 years if
granted to employees who own more than 10% of the combined
voting power of all classes of stock of the Company). No options
have been granted under the Incentive Plan. In connection with
the Merger Agreement (Note 2), the Incentive Stock Plan was
terminated on October 31, 2007.
A restricted stock award will consist of shares of Class A
Common Stock that are nontransferable or subject to risk of
forfeiture until specific conditions are met. The restrictions
will lapse in accordance with the schedule or other conditions
as determined by the Board of Directors or its committee. During
the restriction period, the recipient of restricted stock will
have certain rights as a shareholder, including the right to
vote the stock and receive dividends. No awards have been
granted under the Incentive Plan. In connection with the Merger
Agreement (Note 2), the Incentive Stock Plan was terminated
on October 31, 2007.
Phantom Stock
Plan
In April 2003, the Company established the Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. Phantom Stock Plan (the
Phantom Plan) in which officers and key employees
are eligible to participate. The Plan authorizes the grant of up
to 5,000 shares of phantom stock. The shares are credited
to the participants accounts and are eligible for
redemption payment after vesting at a price per share based upon
the annual stock valuation. As of October 31, 2005,
1,957 shares had been granted under the Phantom Plan and
have a redemption value of approximately $750,000, upon vesting
in years 2012 through 2027. Selling, general and administrative
expenses include compensation expense related to the Phantom
Plan of $84,000, $426,000 and $2,482,000 for the periods ended
October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. In
connection with the Merger Agreement (Note 2), the Phantom
Plan was terminated on October 31, 2007, in exchange for an
agreement to pay Phantom Plan participants a total of $3,075,000.
The Company occupies facilities and operates motor vehicles
under long-term operating leases that expire during the fiscal
years ending 2005 through 2014. Certain of these leases are
subject to renewal or purchase options and escalation clauses.
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease
payments required under the operating leases that have initial
or remaining noncancelable lease terms as of October 31,
2007;
F-84
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
October 31
|
|
(In thousands of
dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
10,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
31,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense on all operating leases amounted to approximately
$5,700,000, $8,043,000 and $10,457,000 in 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
The components of income (loss) from continuing operations and
before income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
91,209
|
|
|
$
|
74,918
|
|
|
$
|
141,881
|
|
Non-United
States
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
|
|
(2,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
93,475
|
|
|
$
|
80,328
|
|
|
$
|
139,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of income tax expense, from continuing
operations, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax expense
|
|
$
|
16,312
|
|
|
$
|
21,791
|
|
|
$
|
42,632
|
|
State tax expense
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
|
|
6,198
|
|
Non-United
States
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
|
|
15,364
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,208
|
|
|
$
|
26,498
|
|
|
$
|
57,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
$
|
(18,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,627
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,461
|
)
|
|
|
(4,103
|
)
|
Vacation accrual
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
318
|
|
Red Man Canada interest
|
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
|
(3,987
|
)
|
Phantom stock
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(22,721
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
(1,847
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,136
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(4,048
|
)
|
|
|
(4,690
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(5,924
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,826
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the effective tax rate and the
U.S. federal statutory rate was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income tax
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Foreign sales corporation
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Non-United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Employee Benefit
Plans
|
The Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. Retirement Savings Plan
(the Plan) incorporates the provisions of
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan
covers all employees in the United States who have attained the
age of twenty-one (21). Participants are allowed to contribute a
portion of their salary with employer matching contributions
based on the contributions of the participants. The employer
matching contributions were approximately $927,000, $1,081,000
and $1,215,000 for the years ended October 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007, respectively.
|
|
12.
|
Related Party
Transactions
|
The Company leases certain equipment from Prideco, a partnership
related by common ownership and control. The Company also leases
certain buildings from Prideco. Amounts paid to Prideco for
building and equipment rental were $2,205,000, $2,695,000 and
$3,086,000 for the years ended October 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007, respectively.
F-86
RED MAN PIPE
& SUPPLY CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
October 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007
A stockholder leases a supply and service center to the Company
for use in its operations. The stated term of the lease will
expire in January 2008. The aggregate lease payments made to the
stockholder were $13,200 in each of fiscal years ended
October 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.
In connection with the Companys acquisition of 51% of the
shares of Midfield Supply ULC, a Shareholders Agreement
between Red Man Pipe & Supply Canada, LTD., the 51%
majority shareholder of Midfield Supply ULC, and Midfield
Holdings (Alberta) LTD., the 49% minority interest shareholder
of Midfield Supply ULC was created. This agreement, among other
things, stipulates how profits of Midfield Supply ULC are
shared. Midfield Holdings (Alberta) LTDs portion of the
profits are accrued and subsequently paid to shareholders of
Midfield Holdings (Alberta) LTD, who are also employees of
Midfield Supply ULC, via a formal Employee Profit Sharing Plan
(EPSP). In connection with the EPSP, $22,186,000 and
$8,212,000 is accrued as of October 31, 2006 and 2007,
respectively, and is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Red Man Pipe & Supply Canada,
LTDs portion of the profits were accrued and subsequently
paid via an after-tax dividend, which has been eliminated in
consolidation.
In connection with the EPSP payments, from time to time the
minority shareholder makes loans to the Company. These
subordinated notes payable are unsecured, bear interest at 8%
and have no fixed terms of repayment. Amounts payable to
minority interest shareholders were $28,009,000 and $25,718,000
as of October 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively, for amounts
loaned to the Company.
The Company has unsecured advances to a related entity, Europump
Systems Inc. (Europump), with no fixed terms of
repayment bearing interest at 8% per annum in 2006 and 0% in
2007. The outstanding balance on the advances was $4,940,000 and
$2,921,000 at October 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The
Company has also issued a financial guarantee in the form of an
irrevocable standby letter of credit for Europump for an amount
up to CAD5,000,000 (2006: CAD0), to support a line of credit
that Europump has established with its bank. The expiry date of
the letter of credit is January 31, 2008, subject to an
automatic renewal of one year unless such bank elects not to
renew this letter of credit.
|
|
13.
|
Concentration of
Credit Risk and Sources of Supply
|
Most of the Companys business activity is with customers
in the oil and gas industry. In the normal course of business
the Company grants credit to these customers. Trade accounts
receivable are primarily from these customers. The Company
generally does not require collateral on its trade receivables.
During 2005, 2006 and 2007, the Company did not have sales to
any customers in excess of 10% of gross sales.
A substantial portion of the Companys tubular goods is
purchased from two manufacturers. The Company has no long-term
supply contracts with these manufacturers which would assure the
Company of a continued supply of tubular products in the future.
Although the Company believes there are numerous manufacturers
having the capacity to supply its tubular products, the loss of
one of these major suppliers could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business, financial condition or
results of operations.
F-87
Shares
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING
CORPORATION
Common Stock
Goldman, Sachs &
Co.
Lehman Brothers
JPMorgan
Deutsche Bank
Securities
Robert W. Baird &
Co.
Credit Suisse
Stephens Inc.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT
REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other Expenses
of Issuance and Distribution.
|
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses to be paid
by the Registrant in connection with the sale of the shares of
common stock being registered hereby. All amounts are estimates
except for the SEC registration fee, the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (FINRA) filing fee and the New
York Stock Exchange listing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$
|
29,475
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
75,500
|
|
The New York Stock Exchange listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Blue Sky qualification fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filled in by amendment. |
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
|
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
authorizes a court to award, or a corporations board of
directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers in terms
sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain
circumstances for liabilities (including reimbursement for
expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act).
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the
Registrants Certificate of Incorporation includes a
provision that eliminates the personal liability of its
directors for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a
director, except for liability:
|
|
|
|
|
for any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to the
Registrant or its stockholders;
|
|
|
|
for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
under section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
regarding unlawful dividends and stock purchases; or
|
|
|
|
for any transaction for which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
As permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, the
Registrants Bylaws provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
the Registrant is required to indemnify its directors and
officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law, subject to very limited exceptions;
|
|
|
|
the Registrant may indemnify its other employees and agents to
the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law, subject to very limited exceptions;
|
|
|
|
the Registrant is required to advance expenses, as incurred, to
its directors and officers in connection with a legal proceeding
to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law, subject to very limited exceptions;
|
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
the Registrant may advance expenses, as incurred, to its
employees and agents in connection with a legal
proceeding; and
|
|
|
|
the rights conferred in the Bylaws are not exclusive.
|
The Registrant may enter into Indemnity Agreements with each of
its current directors and officers to give these directors and
officers additional contractual assurances regarding the scope
of the indemnification set forth in the Registrants
Certificate of Incorporation and to provide additional
procedural protections. At present, there is no pending
litigation or proceeding involving a director, officer or
employee of the Registrant regarding which indemnification is
sought, nor is the Registrant aware of any threatened litigation
that may result in claims for indemnification.
The indemnification provisions in the Registrants
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and any Indemnity
Agreements entered into between the Registrant and each of its
directors and officers may be sufficiently broad to permit
indemnification of the Registrants directors and officers
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act.
The Registrant and its subsidiaries are covered by liability
insurance policies which indemnify their directors and officers
against loss arising from claims by reason of their legal
liability for acts as such directors, officers or trustees,
subject to limitations and conditions as set forth in the
policies.
The underwriting agreement to be entered into among the Company,
the selling stockholder and the underwriters will contain
indemnification and contribution provisions.
Stephen W. Lake, senior corporate vice president, general
counsel and corporate secretary of our company, holds an
employed lawyers professional liability policy with Ace
American Insurance Company, insuring him against liability which
he may incur in his capacity as an officer of our company. The
policy provides for $2 million of coverage with a $10,000
deductible.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent Sales
of Unregistered Securities.
|
As of July 31, 2008, we had issued 311,428.6614 shares
of common stock to PVF Holdings LLC. All issuances of common
stock to PVF Holdings LLC were exempt from registration in
accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
We issued shares of common stock to PVF Holdings LLC over the
period from November 29, 2006 to July 7, 2008. During
this period, PVF Holdings LLC contributed cash and shares of the
entities now known as McJunkin Red Man Corporation, McJunkin
Appalachian Oilfield Supply Company, and Red Man
Pipe & Supply Co. with an aggregate value of
$1,225,101,035.12 in consideration for shares of our common
stock. Except as set forth in the following paragraph, all
issuances of shares of our common stock were made in exchange
for contributions of cash from PVF Holdings LLC.
On January 31, 2007, in connection with our acquisition of
the entity now known as McJunkin Red Man Corporation, certain
shareholders of McJunkin Red Man Corporation and McJunkin
Appalachian Oilfield Supply Company contributed shares of these
entities to PVF Holdings LLC, which then contributed such shares
to us in consideration for our issuance of
40,538.9382 shares of common stock to PVF Holdings LLC.
Additionally, on October 31, 2007, in connection with our
business combination with Red Man Pipe & Supply Co.,
certain shareholders of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co.
contributed shares of this entity to PVF Holdings LLC, which
then contributed such shares to us in consideration for our
issuance of 26,472.2031 shares of common stock to PVF
Holdings LLC. For a detailed description of these transactions,
see Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions.
As of August 13, 2008, we had outstanding stock options for
certain of our employees and directors to purchase
3,759.8887 shares of our common stock and
584.6744 shares of restricted stock outstanding in
connection with awards made to certain of our employees and
directors. These numbers take into account forfeitures as a
result of the termination of certain grantees employment.
All of these awards of restricted stock and stock options were
exempt from registration in accordance
II-2
with Rule 701 or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of
1933. The dates of grant and recipients of such awards are more
fully described below.
In February and March of 2007 we granted options to acquire
1,169.3502 shares of our common stock, and
317.7575 shares of restricted stock, to certain employees
of McJunkin Corporation. In December 2007 and January 2008, we
granted options to acquire 800.7505 shares of our common
stock to certain employees of our subsidiary Midfield Supply
ULC. In December 2007 we also granted options to acquire
1,436.2666 shares of our common stock, and
317.7581 shares of restricted stock, to certain employees
of Red Man Pipe & Supply Co. In addition to grants
made to employees, in December 2007 we granted options to
acquire 76.2620 shares of our common stock to each of Rhys
J. Best and Peter C. Boylan, III, in connection with their
service on our board of directors. All of the options to acquire
shares of our common stock described in this paragraph had an
exercise price of $3,933.81, which was subsequently reduced to
$2,411.17 in connection with our recapitalization in May 2008.
In February and June 2008, we granted options to purchase
300.1922 shares of our common stock to certain of our
employees. In addition, we granted options to acquire
68.9942 shares of our common stock to Sam B. Rovit in
connection with his appointment to our board of directors in
June 2008. The options to acquire shares of our common stock
granted in February and June 2008 have exercise prices of
$3,933.81 (which was also reduced to $2,411.17 in connection
with the recapitalization) and $4,348.19, respectively. On
August 13, 2008 we granted options to purchase
27.1208 shares of our common stock with an exercise price
of $5,530.81 per share to each of two of our employees.
The amounts of our common stock, restricted stock and stock
options described in this Item 15 do not take into account
the
for split of our common stock
which will occur prior to the pricing of this offering.
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
2
|
.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 4, 2006,
by and among McJunkin Corporation, McJ Holding Corporation and
Hg Acquisition Corp.
|
|
2
|
.2*
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2007, by and
between McJunkin Development Corporation, Midway-Tristate
Corporation and the other parties thereto.
|
|
2
|
.2.1*
|
|
Assignment Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2007, by and
among McJunkin Development Corporation, McJunkin Appalachian
Oilfield Supply Company, Midway-Tristate Corporation, and John
A. Selzer, as Representative of the Shareholders.
|
|
2
|
.3*
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2007, by and
among West Oklahoma PVF Company, Red Man Pipe & Supply
Co., the Shareholders listed on Schedule 1 thereto, PVF
Holdings LLC, and Craig Ketchum, as Representative of the
Shareholders.
|
|
2
|
.3.1*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of
October 24, 2007, by and among West Oklahoma PVF Company,
Red Man Pipe & Supply Co., and Craig Ketchum, as
Representative of the Shareholders.
|
|
2
|
.3.2*
|
|
Joinder Agreement and Amendment No. 2 to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2007, by and among West
Oklahoma PVF Company, Red Man Pipe & Supply Co., PVF
Holdings LLC, Craig Ketchum, as Representative of the
Shareholders, and the other parties thereto.
|
|
3
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation.
|
|
3
|
.2*
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation.
|
|
4
|
.1*
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Form of opinion of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &
Jacobson LLP.
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Revolving Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31,
2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation and the other
parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.1.1*
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2008, by and among
The Huntington National Bank, McJunkin Red Man Corporation and
The CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.1.2*
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2008, by and among
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., McJunkin Red Man Corporation and The
CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.1.3*
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2008, by and among
TD Bank, N.A., McJunkin Red Man Corporation and The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.1.4*
|
|
Joinder Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2008, by and among
United Bank Inc., McJunkin Red Man Corporation and The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc.
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Revolving Loan Security Agreement, dated as of October 31,
2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation and the other
parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2007,
by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation and the other parties
thereto.
|
|
10
|
.3.1*
|
|
First Amendment to Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of
October 31, 2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation
and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Term Loan Pledge Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2007,
by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation, Lehman Commercial
Paper Inc., and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.4.1*
|
|
Supplement No. 1 to Term Loan Pledge Agreement, dated as of
April 30, 2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation,
Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.4.2*
|
|
Supplement No. 2 to Term Loan Pledge Agreement, dated as of
April 30, 2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation,
Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.4.3*
|
|
Supplement No. 3 to Term Loan Pledge Agreement, dated as of
October 31, 2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man
Corporation, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and the other parties
thereto.
|
|
10
|
.5*
|
|
Term Loan Security Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2007,
by and among McJunkin Red Man Corporation, Lehman Commercial
Paper Inc., and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.5.1*
|
|
Supplement No. 1 to Term Loan Security Agreement, dated as
of April 30, 2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man
Corporation, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and the other parties
thereto.
|
|
10
|
.5.2*
|
|
Supplement No. 2 to Term Loan Security Agreement, dated as
of October 31, 2007, by and among McJunkin Red Man
Corporation, Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., and the other parties
thereto.
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
Term Loan Credit Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2008, by
and among McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and the other
parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
Term Loan Pledge Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2008, by
and between McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and Lehman
Commercial Paper Inc.
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
Term Loan Security Agreement, dated as of May 22, 2008, by
and between McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation and Lehman
Commercial Paper Inc.
|
|
10
|
.9*
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2006,
by and among Midfield Supply ULC and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.9.1*
|
|
Consent and First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement,
dated as of April 26, 2007, by and among Midfield Supply
ULC and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.9.2*
|
|
Second Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of
May 17, 2007, by and among Midfield Supply ULC and the
other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.9.3*
|
|
Third Amendment, Consent and Waiver to the Loan and Security
Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2007, by and among
Midfield Supply ULC and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 17, 2007, by and between
Alberta Treasury Branches and Midfield Supply ULC.
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Title
|
|
|
10
|
.10.1*
|
|
Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated as of October 10,
2007, by and between Alberta Treasury Branches and Midfield
Supply ULC.
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Employment Agreement of H.B. Wehrle, III.
|
|
10
|
.12*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Craig Ketchum.
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Employment Agreement of James F. Underhill.
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
Employment Agreement of David Fox, III.
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Dee Paige.
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Stephen D. Wehrle.
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
McJ Holding Corporation 2007 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.17.1*
|
|
Form of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
McJ Holding Corporation 2007 Restricted Stock Plan.
|
|
10
|
.18.1*
|
|
Form of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation Restricted Stock
Award Agreement.
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation 2007 Stock Option Plan
(Canada).
|
|
10
|
.19.1*
|
|
Form of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement (Canada) (for plan participants who are parties
to non-competition agreements).
|
|
10
|
.19.2*
|
|
Form of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement (Canada) (for plan participants who are not
parties to non-competition agreements).
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
McJunkin Red Man Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Indemnity Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2006, by and
among McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation, Hg Acquisition
Corp., McJunkin Red Man Corporation, and certain shareholders of
McJunkin Red Man Corporation named therein.
|
|
10
|
.22*
|
|
Management Stockholders Agreement, dated as of March 27,
2007, by and among PVF Holdings LLC, McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation, and the other parties thereto.
|
|
10
|
.22.1*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Management Stockholders Agreement,
dated as of December 21, 2007, executed by PVF Holdings LLC.
|
|
10
|
.22.2*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Management Stockholders Agreement,
dated as of December 26, 2007, executed by PVF Holdings LLC.
|
|
10
|
.23*
|
|
Phantom Shares Surrender Agreement, Release and Waiver, dated as
of October 30, 2007, by and among Red Man Pipe &
Supply Co., PVF Holdings LLC, and Jeffrey Lang.
|
|
10
|
.24*
|
|
Phantom Shares Surrender Agreement, Release and Waiver, dated as
of October 30, 2007, by and among Red Man Pipe &
Supply Co., PVF Holdings LLC, and Dee Paige.
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of PVF
Holdings LLC, dated as of October 31, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.25.1*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Limited
Liability Company Agreement of PVF Holdings LLC, dated as of
December 18, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among McJunkin Red
Man Holding Corporation and PVF Holdings LLC.
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Operating Agreement of Red Man Distributors LLC, dated as of
November 1, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Services Agreement by and between McJunkin Red Man Corporation
and Red Man Distributors LLC.
|
|
16
|
|
|
Letter from Schneider Downs & Co., Inc.
|
|
21
|
.1*
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Schneider Downs & Co., Inc.
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
|
|
23
|
.4*
|
|
Consent of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson
LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to the
Registration Statement).
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
(b) None.
II-5
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the provisions
described in Item 14 above, or otherwise, the Registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this Registration Statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as
of the time it was declared effective; and
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at the time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized in the City of Tulsa, State of Oklahoma, on August
19, 2008.
McJUNKIN RED MAN HOLDING CORPORATION
Craig Ketchum
President and Chief Executive Officer
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Craig Ketchum, James F.
Underhill and Stephen W. Lake, and each of them, his or her true
and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full powers of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or
her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
any or all amendments to this Registration Statement, including
post-effective amendments and registration statements filed
pursuant to Rule 462(b) and otherwise, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as
he or she might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and
confirms all his or her said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or
any of them, or his or her substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Craig
Ketchum
Craig
Ketchum
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
F. Underhill
James
F. Underhill
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Rhys
J. Best
Rhys
J. Best
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Henry
Cornell
Henry
Cornell
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher
A.S. Crampton
Christopher
A.S. Crampton
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
F. Daly
John
F. Daly
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Harry
K. Hornish, Jr.
Harry
K. Hornish, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
II-7
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ Sam
B. Rovit
Sam
B. Rovit
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ H.B.
Wehrle, III
H.B.
Wehrle, III
|
|
Director
|
|
August 19, 2008
|
II-8
EX-16
Exhibit 16
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Ladies and Gentlemen,
We agree with the statements of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation in its registration statement
on Form S-l on page 165 in response to Item 304 of Regulation S-K.
/s/
SCHNEIDER DOWNS & CO., INC.
Columbus, Ohio
August 18, 2008
EX-23.1
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
Experts and to the use of our report dated
August 15, 2008, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-1)
and related Prospectus of McJunkin Red Man Holding Corporation
for the registration of $750,000,000 of its shares of common stock.
Charleston, West Virginia
August 15, 2008
EX-23.2
Exhibit 23.2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-l of our reports dated
January 13, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial
statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of McJunkin Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years then
ended appearing in the Preliminary Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.
We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Experts in such Preliminary Prospectus.
/s/ Schneider Downs & Co., Inc.
Columbus, Ohio
August 15, 2008
EX-23.3
Exhibit 23.3
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of McJunkin Red Man Holding
Corporation of our report dated February 15, 2008 relating to the financial statements of Red Man
Pipe and Supply Company, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading Experts in such Registration Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Tulsa, OK
August 18, 2008